new(kernel_crawler): rename distro keys to match os-release names. #188
Conversation
|
I'm all for this, been wondering why they weren't synced up haha. I am not in office today though - I have a sick kiddo I'm taking care of 🙁 I'll approve this tomorrow when I get in so that I can make the necessary changes downstream to handle it. Thanks! |
Welcome to new school's year i guess? 🤣
Great! |
|
Also @EXONER4TED please note that, as stated here: falcosecurity/test-infra#1118 (comment) i force pushed main branch of kernel-crawler removing any fat json from the history (since at the start of the repo life, kernels lists were pushed to the main branch, not the |
This is what we expect in driverkit, dbg-go and test-infra. Signed-off-by: Federico Di Pierro <[email protected]>
FedeDP
force-pushed
the
new/rename_keys_to_osrelease
branch
from
b609c13
to
b13529a
Compare
|
/lgtm |
|
/cc @EXONER4TED |
It is needed to refresh kernels lists allowing `dbg-go` CI to pass with the new distro keys. Signed-off-by: Federico Di Pierro <[email protected]>
| @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ | |||
| name: Update Kernels | |||
|
|
|||
| on: | |||
| workflow_dispatch: | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is needed to trigger a refresh of kernels lists, allowing falcosecurity/dbg-go#36 CI to be green.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Anyway, we can leave it there, it makes no harm after all.
|
/unhold |
This is what we expect in driverkit, dbg-go and test-infra.
This is a BREAKING CHANGE
/cc @maxgio92 @EXONER4TED
/hold for discussion.
See previous #185