Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Avoiding conflict with reserved keyword type in Rust #2441

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

futreall
Copy link
Contributor

@futreall futreall commented Dec 15, 2024

Renaming the field from field_type to type in this context causes a conflict with the reserved keyword type in Rust. Using field_type instead of type is the correct solution as it prevents a compilation error and adheres to the language rules.


PR-Codex overview

This PR focuses on renaming a field in the LinkBody struct from field_type to type, which likely aligns with a more appropriate naming convention.

Detailed summary

  • Changed the field name from field_type to type in the LinkBody struct.

✨ Ask PR-Codex anything about this PR by commenting with /codex {your question}

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Dec 15, 2024

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 805ea09

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

Copy link

vercel bot commented Dec 15, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
hub-monorepo ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Dec 15, 2024 0:19am

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant