Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

support escaped property name #70

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

codgician
Copy link

Attempt to address #69

Added optional [@]? pattern in getPropertyRegex() of RegExHelper and added some tests. Not sure if I did this right, please review.

@pull-dog
Copy link

pull-dog bot commented Sep 22, 2020

*Ruff* 🐶 I wasn't able to find any Docker Compose files in your repository at any of the given paths in the pull-dog.json configuration file, or the default docker-compose.yml file 😩 Make sure the given paths are correct.

Files checked:

  • docker-compose.yml
What is this?

Pull Dog is a GitHub app that makes test environments for your pull requests using Docker, from a docker-compose.yml file you specify. It takes 19 seconds to set up (we counted!) and there's a free plan available.

Visit our website to learn more.

Commands
  • @pull-dog up to reprovision or provision the server.
  • @pull-dog down to delete the provisioned server.
Troubleshooting

Need help? Don't hesitate to file an issue in our repository

Configuration

{"isLazy":false,"dockerComposeYmlFilePaths":["docker-compose.yml"],"expiry":"00:00:00","conversationMode":"singleComment"}

Trace ID
cfbf9080-fc76-11ea-99e1-30306186294f

@@ -189,6 +189,7 @@
result += this.getAttributesRegex(captureAttributes);
result += this.getModifiersRegex(captureModifiers);
result += this.getGenericTypeNameRegex(captureReturnType, false, false, false, false);
result += "[@]?";
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it should be added as part of the getGenericTypeNameRegex method. Also, I don't think the square brackets are needed? 🤔😊

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it should be added as part of the getGenericTypeNameRegex method. Also, I don't think the square brackets are needed? 🤔😊

Does that mean '@' should be considered as a part of typename instead of property name?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants