Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow renaming of nodes in editor #60

Merged
merged 27 commits into from
Sep 12, 2021
Merged

Allow renaming of nodes in editor #60

merged 27 commits into from
Sep 12, 2021

Conversation

RcubDev
Copy link
Contributor

@RcubDev RcubDev commented Sep 11, 2021

I have refactored quite a bit in this pull request. If you would like me to keep it separate and in my fork that is fine! This PR allows a user to rename their nodes how they would like similar to #51 but doing what they did didn't seem to play well with the editor. Also added undo and redo functionality with the BTree editor and renaming nodes. Refactored most of the editor nodes to inherit from a base class so it is easier to do changes to all of them (a lot of code was duplicated between each ui node). It persists through relaunches and shows in the debugger as well. If you have any questions let me know!

zZbiQjIl2T

I had done a PR for this previously but closed it since it wasn't completely finished. I've been using these changes in my main project and have had no issues so far. Thanks!

Only the title of the node should be changed or graph gets messed up
unsure what this node does at the moment
♻ cleaned up files, removed methods from children that were just overriding their parents
Noted differences between fork and main branch and planned features
@RcubDev
Copy link
Contributor Author

RcubDev commented Sep 11, 2021

We can probably close #51 with this PR as well 😊

@fian46 fian46 merged commit aabf165 into fian46:master Sep 12, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants