-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 159
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adjoint variational solver #3723
Open
Ig-dolci
wants to merge
48
commits into
master
Choose a base branch
from
dolci/adjoint_solver
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Ig-dolci
commented
Aug 5, 2024
Ig-dolci
commented
Aug 6, 2024
Ig-dolci
commented
Aug 6, 2024
Ig-dolci
commented
Aug 6, 2024
Ig-dolci
commented
Aug 6, 2024
Ig-dolci
commented
Sep 4, 2024
Ig-dolci
commented
Sep 10, 2024
for block_variable in self.get_dependencies(): | ||
# The self.adj_F coefficients hold the forward output | ||
# references. | ||
if block_variable.output in self.adj_F.coefficients(): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This condition is required. We are looping over self._dependencies that are not necessarily a self.adj_F coefficient.
|
|
This PR is linked with pyadjoint PR #172. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This PR updates the adjoint solver by introducing a Linear Variational Solver to handle adjoint equations. It also addresses an issue arising when the Jacobian is constant and the tape recomputation is required after updating an equation parameter (a common scenario in optimisation solvers).
I have executed tests to compare computation time and memory usage between the master branch and this current branch. The tests consider three time-dependent cases:
Forward solver: Burger equation
Forward solver: Navier-Stokes equations
Forward solver: Second-order wave equation
The test scripts are available here, and the plots comparing this branch with the master branch are shown below.
Feel free to add your review to anyone interested in this PR.