This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 28, 2024. It is now read-only.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Updated the profiles to reflect categories and labeled missingness #70
Updated the profiles to reflect categories and labeled missingness #70
Changes from all commits
c09d880
6982157
ea725e0
2683e92
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just to be sure. Defining the properties (
value
,label
) doesn't restrict publishers to add more properties (e.g.description
), correct?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, all the object are open for custom props unless it has
additionalProperties: false
(in-general that was the idea of an "open" to custom props specs)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@khusmann do I understand correctly that for an integer field, defining
value
incategories
as something other than an integer, it would have to generate a validation error?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My understanding is this is the point of the type-based version (moving it to the logical level). Am I correct?