-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Pin FSharp.Core dependency #75
Conversation
Build failure looks like it’s related to the StructuredLogger version in |
Looks like bumping it to |
Also note I’ve considered bumping FSharp.Core to 6.0.7 as it looks like it will make life easier with tasks - I’ve been working on streams support using a Task based API. Not sure of the tradeoffs here though - open to suggestions. |
I think 6.0.7 is a good call - there's probably the odd gap closed in Arrray, Seq and stuff too |
(Giving up for now; have time-sensitive stuff this side...) |
Thanks @bartelink - I’m off grid the next few days but will have a look on the weekend.
On 10 Apr 2024, at 2:09 PM, Ruben Bartelink ***@***.***> wrote:
(Giving up for now; have time-sensitive stuff this side...)
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#75 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AACLRRCUXH33AJILVHHZGKDY4TJQ3AVCNFSM6AAAAABF6E5DBOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDANBWGYYDGMRTGI>.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
Thanks; it's not time sensitive from my perspective. |
@samritchie Thanks to hard work from Stephen, we can up the Unquote dependency to v 7.0.1 (if we are willing to up FSharp.Core dep to 6.0.0). I feel it would be good to get this in now though, in advance of that, so the minimum Alternately, we could let the Unquote dependency float (and trust there not to be breaking changes in its interface) by changing to specify: I have no particular preference; my main desire is that the transitive dependencies forced by this package to be something that has been a conscious choice (and in general be minimal) |
@bartelink I’ll merge this & push a release so we can then move on bumping Core. I may need input on the observability work - I’ve seen mention of |
Triggered by SwensenSoftware/unquote#169
Dotnet.ReproducibleBuilds
into the package deps