Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

dot-star updates following discussion #2657

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

hexylena
Copy link
Member

@hexylena hexylena commented Jun 23, 2024

cc @frederikcoppens

Other open tasks/issues

  • Regions dropdown in the masthead should be removed (@nekrut)
  • Synchronise /use/ with /usegalaxy/ 0d88ce0
  • galaxyproject.org "Use galaxy now" isn't synchronised
  • add a google form
  • Add metrics update the usegalaxy.* requirements #2658
  • specify the CVMFS.
  • Google form (+ statement of how you'll contribute to the community)
  • Instances should contribute the 'application's tab
  • Minimum storage, 250GB

Related tasks: galaxyproject/galaxy#13339

hexylena and others added 2 commits June 23, 2024 14:43
Like we talked about in the Direction Summit.
@hexylena
Copy link
Member Author

hexylena commented Jun 26, 2024

Storage discussion

  • @shiltemann proposed collecting a number based on the top N tutorials (SH: basically enough space so that people can reasonably participate in the smorgasbord for a week on the server)
  • What about providing temporary scratch space.
UseGalaxy.* Policy
BE provides 50 GB
FR anon/10GB, reg/100GB, french/250GB. No erasing so far. scratch: interested
CZ reg/50GB, would use scratch. Removing data from users inactive longer than a year.
IT not in production yet.
ES not in production yet.
NO larger storage accessible, project storage, smaller user stroage. transfer back and forth. archive storage.

@abretaud suggests adding a formal data policy.

@bgruening requests a ToS linked.

@nekrut requests harmonising the main page. @frederikcoppens pushes back on this, it is not acceptable.

@sveinugu had some concerns over the "membership" and that they have the domain. We update the text in order to reduce the stress.

@bgruening suggests required SIG membership for a 'regional galaxy', that they join the GCB meetings. @nomadscientist points out that many members are there already, as part of a different SIG.

@lecorguille points out the utility of the meetings for admins. @sveinugu seconds. @frederikcoppens is against more meetings (reasonable.)

@hexylena wants admins to communicate in the existing admins channel (or the private one, but she prefers the public since the knowledge benefits everyone.)

TODO:

  • Checklist for actions after membership

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants