specify Reuss, consistently use isentropic rather than adiabatic #579
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Naming conventions for scalar bulk moduli and compressibilities in BurnMan were always vague, and the ambiguity has become relevant with the introduction of anisotropic models.
To fix this, the primary functions for scalar bulk moduli have been appended with the word "_reuss" (i.e. these are isostress, or Reuss properties).
Because this is a breaking change, I have also taken the opportunity to rename adiabatic properties to be isentropic. This is a more valid name.
Aliases (K_T, K_S, beta_T, beta_S) remain the same as before, but are overridden in the AnisotropicMineral class.