Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: formatting for test failed results #47

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 5, 2023

Conversation

bchelkowski
Copy link
Member

What did you implement:

Non-breaking change for failed test results formatting.
For example, previously there was no information when the objects were nested nodes or associative arrays with function or node fields.

How can we verify it:

Currently, any compared nodes that do not match should be printed with all fields and children entities formatted in the same way.
Any function that is an associative array field also will be transformed into a string and printed.

Todos:

  • Write documentation (if required)
  • Fix linting errors
  • Enable "Allow edits from maintainers" for this PR
  • Update the messages below

Is this ready for review?: YES
Is it a breaking change?: NO

@bchelkowski bchelkowski requested a review from a team as a code owner December 1, 2023 12:26
@bchelkowski bchelkowski requested review from tbazelczuk and adamczopek and removed request for a team December 1, 2023 12:26
@bchelkowski bchelkowski merged commit 01bc9fa into master Dec 5, 2023
1 check passed
@bchelkowski bchelkowski deleted the fix--formatting-for-test-failed-results branch December 5, 2023 09:01
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2023
## [2.4.1](v2.4.0...v2.4.1) (2023-12-05)

### Bug Fixes

* formatting for test failed results ([#47](#47)) ([01bc9fa](01bc9fa))
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 5, 2023

🎉 This PR is included in version 2.4.1 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants