feat: Adds breadcrumb.origin field

[antonis]

📜 Description

Adds a new SentryBreadcrumb optional private string property origin

💡 Motivation and Context

Fixes #4043
The discussion in getsentry/sentry-capacitor#629 (comment) adds some context on the need of a new field.

💚 How did you test it?

Unit tests

📝 Checklist

You have to check all boxes before merging:

• I reviewed the submitted code.
• I added tests to verify the changes.
• No new PII added or SDK only sends newly added PII if sendDefaultPII is enabled.
• I updated the docs if needed.
• Review from the native team if needed.
• No breaking change or entry added to the changelog.
• No breaking change for hybrid SDKs or communicated to hybrid SDKs.

🔮 Next steps

[github-actions]

	Messages
📖	Do not forget to update Sentry-docs with your feature once the pull request gets approved.

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against 5da364f

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 91.465%. Comparing base (e2a3ac7) to head (5da364f).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##              main     #4358       +/-   ##
=============================================
+ Coverage   91.426%   91.465%   +0.038%     
=============================================
  Files          630       631        +1     
  Lines        50668     50780      +112     
  Branches     18296     18406      +110     
=============================================
+ Hits         46324     46446      +122     
+ Misses        4252      4242       -10     
  Partials        92        92               

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
Sources/Sentry/SentryBreadcrumb.m	97.701% <100.000%> (+0.170%)	⬆️
Sources/Sentry/SentryCrashReportConverter.m	95.737% <100.000%> (+0.014%)	⬆️
...s/SentryTests/Protocol/SentryBreadcrumbTests.swift	100.000% <100.000%> (ø)
Tests/SentryTests/SentryInterfacesTests.m	100.000% <100.000%> (ø)
Tests/SentryTests/SentryTests.m	100.000% <100.000%> (ø)

... and 21 files with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update e2a3ac7...5da364f. Read the comment docs.

[github-actions]

Performance metrics 🚀

	Plain	With Sentry	Diff
Startup time	1225.57 ms	1253.65 ms	28.08 ms
Size	21.58 KiB	714.38 KiB	692.80 KiB

Baseline results on branch: main

Startup times

Revision	Plain	With Sentry	Diff
f4e0299	1230.33 ms	1249.68 ms	19.35 ms
2a894d5	1202.07 ms	1227.66 ms	25.59 ms
9f0d9e0	1206.55 ms	1219.41 ms	12.86 ms
8cf5bca	1212.35 ms	1223.90 ms	11.54 ms
3a31fc9	1237.35 ms	1249.02 ms	11.67 ms
984eb2d	1220.62 ms	1235.24 ms	14.62 ms
c471221	1224.16 ms	1241.59 ms	17.43 ms
156e771	1228.06 ms	1242.64 ms	14.58 ms
de033da	1216.91 ms	1222.84 ms	5.92 ms
f1c36e0	1215.18 ms	1223.62 ms	8.43 ms

App size

Revision	Plain	With Sentry	Diff
f4e0299	20.76 KiB	427.54 KiB	406.78 KiB
2a894d5	21.58 KiB	414.57 KiB	392.99 KiB
9f0d9e0	21.58 KiB	424.28 KiB	402.70 KiB
8cf5bca	21.58 KiB	671.30 KiB	649.72 KiB
3a31fc9	20.76 KiB	414.45 KiB	393.69 KiB
984eb2d	20.76 KiB	425.77 KiB	405.01 KiB
c471221	22.85 KiB	413.89 KiB	391.04 KiB
156e771	20.76 KiB	419.70 KiB	398.94 KiB
de033da	21.58 KiB	418.15 KiB	396.57 KiB
f1c36e0	21.58 KiB	670.40 KiB	648.81 KiB

Previous results on branch: antonis-add-breadrumb-origin

Startup times

Revision	Plain	With Sentry	Diff
7e1ee3a	1235.37 ms	1252.23 ms	16.86 ms

App size

Revision	Plain	With Sentry	Diff
7e1ee3a	21.58 KiB	714.37 KiB	692.79 KiB

[brustolin]

First pass, it looks good.

Just a few comments.

[antonis]

Thank you for reviewing @brustolin and the feedback 🙇
I applied your suggestions and it is ready for another pass.

Note that the Test / Unit iOS - Xcode 15.4 - OS 17.2 and Benchmarking / Collect app metrics CI checks are failing for me. I think they are flaky and I'll try to rerun. Let me know if you have more context since I'm new to the repo 🙏

[brustolin]

Thanks for this. Looks good!

[antonis]

Thank you for the review and the feedback 🙇
Given that the Benchmarking / Collect app metrics is also failing on main at this point I'll proceed with merging.

[krystofwoldrich]

Thank you for adding the field. @antonis