[Snyk] Security upgrade tornado from 6.2 to 6.3.3

[jsnel]

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Snyk has created this PR to fix one or more vulnerable packages in the `pip` dependencies of this project.

Changes included in this PR

• Changes to the following files to upgrade the vulnerable dependencies to a fixed version:
  • docs/requirements.txt

⚠️ Warning

sphinx-rtd-theme 1.2.2 has requirement docutils<0.19, but you have docutils 0.19.
notebook 6.5.5 has requirement pyzmq<25,>=17, but you have pyzmq 25.1.1.

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed

By pinning:

Severity	Priority Score (*)	Issue	Upgrade	Breaking Change	Exploit Maturity
	566/1000 Why? Recently disclosed, Has a fix available, CVSS 5.6	HTTP Request Smuggling SNYK-PYTHON-TORNADO-5840803	tornado: 6.2 -> 6.3.3	No	No Known Exploit

(*) Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.

Some vulnerabilities couldn't be fully fixed and so Snyk will still find them when the project is tested again. This may be because the vulnerability existed within more than one direct dependency, but not all of the affected dependencies could be upgraded.

Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.

---

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust project settings

📚 Read more about Snyk's upgrade and patch logic

---

Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Learn about vulnerability in an interactive lesson of Snyk Learn.

[github-actions]

👈 Launch a binder notebook on branch glotaran/pyglotaran/snyk-fix-40658653c7b100efc593d464d0fb8722

[github-actions]

Benchmark is done. Checkout the benchmark result page.
Benchmark differences below 5% might be due to CI noise.

Benchmark diff v0.7.1 vs. main

Parametrized benchmark signatures:

BenchmarkOptimize.time_optimize(index_dependent, grouped, weight)

All benchmarks:

       before           after         ratio
     [535acaaa]       [1e260f4e]
     <v0.7.1>                   
           failed           failed      n/a  BenchmarkOptimize.time_optimize(False, False, False)
           failed           failed      n/a  BenchmarkOptimize.time_optimize(False, False, True)
           failed           failed      n/a  BenchmarkOptimize.time_optimize(False, True, False)
           failed           failed      n/a  BenchmarkOptimize.time_optimize(False, True, True)
           failed           failed      n/a  BenchmarkOptimize.time_optimize(True, False, False)
           failed           failed      n/a  BenchmarkOptimize.time_optimize(True, False, True)
           failed           failed      n/a  BenchmarkOptimize.time_optimize(True, True, False)
           failed           failed      n/a  BenchmarkOptimize.time_optimize(True, True, True)
             216M             215M     0.99  IntegrationTwoDatasets.peakmem_optimize
       1.34±0.05s       1.30±0.02s     0.97  IntegrationTwoDatasets.time_optimize

Benchmark diff main vs. PR

Parametrized benchmark signatures:

BenchmarkOptimize.time_optimize(index_dependent, grouped, weight)

All benchmarks:

       before           after         ratio
     [1e260f4e]       [e79c709d]
           failed           failed      n/a  BenchmarkOptimize.time_optimize(False, False, False)
           failed           failed      n/a  BenchmarkOptimize.time_optimize(False, False, True)
           failed           failed      n/a  BenchmarkOptimize.time_optimize(False, True, False)
           failed           failed      n/a  BenchmarkOptimize.time_optimize(False, True, True)
           failed           failed      n/a  BenchmarkOptimize.time_optimize(True, False, False)
           failed           failed      n/a  BenchmarkOptimize.time_optimize(True, False, True)
           failed           failed      n/a  BenchmarkOptimize.time_optimize(True, True, False)
           failed           failed      n/a  BenchmarkOptimize.time_optimize(True, True, True)
             215M             217M     1.01  IntegrationTwoDatasets.peakmem_optimize
       1.30±0.02s       1.33±0.04s     1.02  IntegrationTwoDatasets.time_optimize

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch and project coverage have no change.

Comparison is base (1e260f4) 88.5% compared to head (e79c709) 88.5%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##            main   #1340   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage   88.5%   88.5%           
=====================================
  Files        107     107           
  Lines       5128    5128           
  Branches     962     962           
=====================================
  Hits        4542    4542           
  Misses       471     471           
  Partials     115     115           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[sonarcloud]

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!   

0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities
0 Security Hotspots
0 Code Smells

No Coverage information
No Duplication information