-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix auth errors when username/password are too long (#1482) #1625
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent changes focus on enhancing project documentation and modifying buffer management within the code. Jakub Adamus has been added to the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- AUTHORS (1 hunks)
- packets.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- AUTHORS
Additional comments not posted (1)
packets.go (1)
Line range hint
397-401
: Change totakeBuffer
is appropriate.The switch from
takeSmallBuffer
totakeBuffer
allows the buffer to accommodate longer inputs, aligning with the PR objectives to fix authentication errors due to long usernames or passwords.However, verify the
takeBuffer
implementation to ensure it handles dynamic buffer growth as expected.Verification successful
Change to
takeBuffer
is verified.The
takeBuffer
function inbuffer.go
handles buffer allocation with necessary checks, supporting the change inpackets.go
for better handling of larger inputs. This aligns with the PR objectives.
buffer.go
:takeBuffer
method implementationScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of `takeBuffer`. # Test: Search for the `takeBuffer` function definition. Expect: A function that handles dynamic buffer growth. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func takeBuffer($_) $_ { $$$ }'Length of output: 63
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for buffer-related functions to identify `takeBuffer` or similar implementations. # Test: Search for any function with "buffer" in its name to locate the `takeBuffer` or similar functions. rg 'func.*buffer' -A 5Length of output: 1834
Description
Targets issue in #1482. When username/password (JWT token usually) are too long, there are unable to fit into buffer, which has only 4k at connection startup. Using takeBuffer (which autogrows) instead of takeSmallBuffer should work in this case.
I did not find any "better" solution to this problem as checking length of packet before choosing buffer would be practicaly the same logic and conditions, what takeBuffer does. If there is need to use takeSmallBuffer for perfomrance reasons, there can be takeSmallBuffer kept and takeBuffer called only after failure, which seems to be ugliest solution.
Checklist
Summary by CodeRabbit
Documentation
AUTHORS
file to acknowledge contributions.Improvements