feat(metadata)!: rework as a provider #239
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent updates introduce a new cached metadata provider for handling MDS3 blobs with a file-based cache, options for customizing provider behavior, and several enhancements to the WebAuthn protocol and credential verification processes. The changes also include the addition of memory-based metadata providers, improved test cases using testify, and new mechanisms for metadata validation. These upgrades collectively enhance the system's flexibility, reliability, and maintainability. Changes
Sequence DiagramsNew Cached Metadata Provider InitializationsequenceDiagram
participant User
participant CachedProvider
participant MetadataSource
participant FileSystem
User->>CachedProvider: Initialize with options
CachedProvider->>MetadataSource: Fetch metadata
MetadataSource-->>CachedProvider: Return metadata
CachedProvider->>FileSystem: Save metadata to cache
CachedProvider-->>User: Initialization complete
Credential Verification ProcesssequenceDiagram
participant User
participant WebAuthn
participant MetadataProvider
User->>WebAuthn: Submit credential for verification
WebAuthn->>MetadataProvider: Validate metadata
MetadataProvider-->>WebAuthn: Return validation result
WebAuthn-->>User: Verification result
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 17
Out of diff range and nitpick comments (2)
protocol/attestation_safetynet.go (1)
61-61: Review the error handling and JWT parsing logic for potential improvements.Consider refining the error messages to provide more context or detail, which could aid in debugging and maintenance.
Also applies to: 78-78, 112-112, 136-136, 141-141
metadata/metadata_test.go (1)
37-38: Replacefmt.Printlnwith assertions or logging.Using
fmt.Printlnfor error messages in tests is not ideal as it does not fail the test if an error is encountered. Consider usingassert.NoErrorfor a more robust test that fails appropriately or log the error to a test-specific logger.
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (29)
- metadata/const.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/decode.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/memory.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/metadata.go (2 hunks)
- metadata/metadata_test.go (4 hunks)
- metadata/passkey_authenticator.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/types.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/attestation.go (4 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_androidkey.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_androidkey_test.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_apple.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_apple_test.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_packed.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_packed_test.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_safetynet.go (6 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_safetynet_test.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_test.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_tpm.go (2 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_tpm_test.go (12 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_u2f.go (2 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_u2f_test.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/base64_test.go (2 hunks)
- protocol/client_test.go (3 hunks)
- protocol/const.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/credential.go (3 hunks)
- protocol/credential_test.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/webauthncose/webauthncose.go (1 hunks)
- webauthn/registration.go (1 hunks)
- webauthn/types.go (3 hunks)
Files not summarized due to errors (1)
- metadata/metadata.go: Error: Message exceeds token limit
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- metadata/passkey_authenticator.go
- protocol/const.go
Additional comments not posted (39)
protocol/base64_test.go (2)
7-8: Imports ofassertandrequirefromtestifyare appropriate for enhancing test assertions.
45-45: Usage ofrequire.NoErrorfor critical error checks andassert.Equalfor value comparisons enhances the clarity and reliability of tests.Also applies to: 47-48
metadata/memory.go (1)
14-62: Implementation ofNewMemoryProviderfunction andMemoryProviderstruct correctly handles default values and provides necessary methods for metadata retrieval and status checks.protocol/attestation_u2f_test.go (1)
40-40: Verify the use ofnilas the metadata provider inverifyU2FFormat. Ensure it aligns with the intended test scenarios.Verification successful
The use of
nilas the metadata provider in theverifyU2FFormatfunction is intentional and aligns with the current implementation, where the metadata provider parameter is not utilized.
protocol/attestation_u2f.go: func verifyU2FFormat(att AttestationObject, clientDataHash []byte, _ metadata.Provider) (string, []any, error)Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the use of `nil` as the metadata provider in tests for `verifyU2FFormat`. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Clarification on the use of `nil`. rg --type python $'verifyU2FFormat'Length of output: 65
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the use of `nil` as the metadata provider in tests for `verifyU2FFormat`. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Clarification on the use of `nil`. rg --type go 'verifyU2FFormat'Length of output: 742
protocol/attestation_apple_test.go (1)
40-40: Verify the use ofnilas the metadata provider inverifyAppleFormat. Ensure it aligns with the intended test scenarios.Verification successful
The implementation of
verifyAppleFormatinprotocol/attestation_apple.godoes not utilize the metadata provider parameter. This confirms that passingnilfor the metadata provider in the test cases is appropriate and aligns with the intended test scenarios.
protocol/attestation_apple.go:
- The metadata provider parameter is not used within the function body.
Thus, the test implementation using
nilfor the metadata provider is correct.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the use of `nil` as the metadata provider in tests for `verifyAppleFormat`. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Clarification on the use of `nil`. rg --type python $'verifyAppleFormat'Length of output: 67
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the use of `nil` as the metadata provider in tests for `verifyAppleFormat`. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Clarification on the use of `nil`. rg --type go 'verifyAppleFormat'Length of output: 683
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the implementation of `verifyAppleFormat` to understand the use of the metadata provider. # Extract the function implementation. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func verifyAppleFormat(att AttestationObject, clientDataHash []byte, _ metadata.Provider) (string, []any, error) { $$$ }'Length of output: 5584
protocol/attestation_apple.go (1)
34-39: Implementation ofverifyAppleFormatcorrectly follows the specified steps for Apple attestation verification, with comprehensive error handling and validation steps.Also applies to: 43-43
protocol/client_test.go (1)
22-22: Use ofrequire.NoErrorfor critical error checks andassert.EqualErrorfor specific error message checks are appropriate and enhance the test's reliability and readability.Also applies to: 28-28, 40-40, 42-42
metadata/const.go (1)
3-35: The constants for certificate roots and URLs are correctly defined. The error variables are well-structured and provide clear, specific error messages.protocol/attestation_u2f.go (1)
19-19: Implementation ofverifyU2FFormatcorrectly follows the U2F attestation verification steps with detailed error handling and validation.Also applies to: 43-43, 51-51
protocol/attestation_safetynet.go (1)
44-44: Ensure themetadata.Providerparameter is utilized effectively throughout the function.metadata/decode.go (1)
18-36: Ensure theDecoderinitialization handles all provided options correctly.Verification successful
The
NewDecoderfunction inmetadata/decode.gocorrectly handles all provided options by iterating over them and applying each to thedecoderinstance. If any option returns an error, the function appropriately returnsniland the error.
metadata/decode.go, lines 18-36: TheNewDecoderfunction handles options correctly.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all options are handled correctly in the `NewDecoder` function. # Test: Search for the handling of options in the function. Expect: Proper handling of all options. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func NewDecoder($_) { $$$ }'Length of output: 62
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the presence and implementation of the `NewDecoder` function. # Search for the `NewDecoder` function definition in the codebase. rg 'func NewDecoder' -A 20Length of output: 827
webauthn/types.go (2)
66-66: Ensure themetadata.Providerfield is utilized effectively in theConfigstruct.Verification successful
Effective Usage of
MetaDataField inConfigStructThe
MetaDatafield in theConfigstruct is effectively utilized in the codebase. Here are the key points of usage:
- Getter Method: A method
GetMetaDataProvideris defined to retrieve theMetaDatafield.
webauthn/types.go:func (c *Config) GetMetaDataProvider() metadata.Provider { return c.MetaData }- Usage in Registration: The
MetaDatafield is used in theregistration.gofile.
webauthn/registration.go:invalidErr := parsedResponse.Verify(session.Challenge, shouldVerifyUser, webauthn.Config.RPID, webauthn.Config.RPOrigins, webauthn.Config.RPTopOrigins, webauthn.Config.RPTopOriginVerificationMode, webauthn.Config.MetaData)These references indicate that the
MetaDatafield is being accessed and utilized appropriately within the codebase.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the `metadata.Provider` field is used effectively in the `Config` struct. # Test: Search for the usage of `metadata.Provider` in the struct. Expect: Effective usage. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'type Config struct { $$$ MetaData metadata.Provider $$$ }'Length of output: 96
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for references to the `MetaData` field in the Go files to verify its usage. # Test: Search for the usage of `MetaData` in the Go files. Expect: Effective usage. rg 'MetaData' --type goLength of output: 491
150-176: Review the getter methods for theConfigstruct to ensure they are correctly implemented.The getter methods are correctly implemented and provide appropriate access to the
Configstruct fields.protocol/attestation_packed.go (1)
37-37: Clarify the unused metadata provider parameter inverifyPackedFormat.webauthn/registration.go (1)
227-227: Ensure the metadata provider is correctly initialized before passing toVerify.protocol/attestation_test.go (3)
9-9: Switch torequire.NoErrorfor error handling enhances the clarity and robustness of the test cases.Also applies to: 17-17, 21-21, 28-28, 32-32
40-40: Consistent use ofrequire.NoErrorinattestationTestUnpackResponsefunction aligns with the error handling strategy in other test functions.Also applies to: 46-46
60-61: Ensure that passingnilas the metadata provider inverifyPackedFormatis intentional. This could potentially bypass important checks that are part of the new metadata handling enhancements.Verification successful
Ensure that passing
nilas the metadata provider inverifyPackedFormatis intentional. This could potentially bypass important checks that are part of the new metadata handling enhancements.
- The current implementation of
verifyPackedFormatdoes not utilize the metadata provider parameter.- There are no comments or indications suggesting future use of the metadata provider in the function.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if passing `nil` as the metadata provider is intentional or an oversight. # Test: Search for other instances where `verifyPackedFormat` is called with non-nil providers. rg --type go $'verifyPackedFormat\\(.*?, .*?, nil\\)'Length of output: 286
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for all instances of `verifyPackedFormat` to check if it is ever called with a non-nil metadata provider. # Test: Search for all instances of `verifyPackedFormat` in the codebase. rg --type go 'verifyPackedFormat\('Length of output: 717
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Review the implementation of `verifyPackedFormat` to understand how it handles the metadata provider. # Extract the implementation of `verifyPackedFormat` function. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func verifyPackedFormat($_, $_, $_) $_' protocol/attestation_packed.goLength of output: 3070
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for comments or plans indicating future use of the metadata provider in `verifyPackedFormat`. # Search for comments related to metadata provider in the `protocol/attestation_packed.go` file. rg --type go 'metadata.Provider' protocol/attestation_packed.goLength of output: 179
protocol/attestation.go (3)
78-78: The inclusion ofmetadata.Providerin theattestationFormatValidationHandlertype definition aligns well with the PR's objective to enhance metadata handling.
124-124: The modification to includemetadata.Providerin theVerifymethod supports flexible metadata handling. Ensure all calls to this method are updated to pass the appropriate metadata provider.Verification successful
The modification to include
metadata.Providerin theVerifymethod supports flexible metadata handling. The call toAttestationObject.Verifyinprotocol/credential.gocorrectly includes themetadata.Providerparameter (mds).
protocol/credential.go: verifyError = pcc.Response.AttestationObject.Verify(relyingPartyID, clientDataHash[:], verifyUser, mds)Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `AttestationObject.Verify` include the metadata provider. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurances with the metadata provider. rg --type python $'AttestationObject.Verify'Length of output: 74
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `AttestationObject.Verify` include the metadata provider. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences with the metadata provider. rg --type go 'AttestationObject.Verify'Length of output: 167
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the relevant lines from `protocol/credential.go` to verify the call to `AttestationObject.Verify`. # Test: Display the lines around the call to `AttestationObject.Verify` to ensure the metadata provider is passed correctly. rg --context 5 'AttestationObject.Verify' protocol/credential.goLength of output: 613
Line range hint
124-226: The implementation of theVerifymethod is robust, with comprehensive error handling and adherence to the WebAuthn specification. The use of a metadata provider to fetch entries and check statuses is well-integrated.protocol/attestation_androidkey.go (1)
32-32: Ensure the unused metadata provider parameter is intentional.Verification successful
Ensure the unused metadata provider parameter is intentional.
protocol/attestation_androidkey.go(line 32)protocol/attestation_u2f.goprotocol/attestation_tpm.goprotocol/attestation_packed.goprotocol/attestation_apple.goScripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if the metadata provider parameter is intentionally unused across similar functions. # Test: Search for similar functions. Expect: Consistent usage of the metadata provider parameter. rg --type go $'func verify.*Format\(.*metadata.Provider.*\)'Length of output: 945
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the implementation of the `verifySafetyNetFormat` function to understand its usage of the metadata provider parameter. # Extract the function implementation ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func verifySafetyNetFormat($_, $_, $_ metadata.Provider) $_'Length of output: 92
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the implementation of the `verifySafetyNetFormat` function to understand its usage of the metadata provider parameter. # Extract the function implementation with a more flexible pattern ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func verifySafetyNetFormat($_, $_, $_ metadata.Provider) { $$$ }'Length of output: 97
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the definition and implementation of the `verifySafetyNetFormat` function to understand its usage of the metadata provider parameter. # Search for the function definition and implementation rg 'func verifySafetyNetFormat' --type goLength of output: 198
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the full implementation of the `verifySafetyNetFormat` function to understand its usage of the metadata provider parameter. # Extract the function implementation rg -A 50 'func verifySafetyNetFormat' protocol/attestation_safetynet.goLength of output: 1917
protocol/attestation_tpm.go (1)
22-22: Ensure the unused metadata provider parameter is intentional.protocol/webauthncose/webauthncose.go (1)
38-38: Ensure that unit tests cover the new public key data structures and methods.metadata/types.go (3)
13-22: TheProviderinterface is well-defined and aligns with the PR objectives of enabling custom metadata retrieval implementations.
28-31: ThePublicKeyCredentialParametersstruct is appropriately defined with clear and relevant fields.
33-43: TheAuthenticatorAttestationTypesand its methods are well-implemented, providing necessary functionality for attestation type checks.metadata/metadata_test.go (5)
141-152: This function correctly implements the intended test logic.
Line range hint
152-198: This function is implemented correctly and uses best practices for table-driven tests.
Line range hint
198-296: This function is implemented correctly and uses best practices for table-driven tests.
314-335: This function correctly implements the intended logic for retrieving endpoints.
337-378: This function correctly implements the intended logic for retrieving test metadata based on a test case.protocol/attestation_tpm_test.go (6)
14-14: Use ofrequireandassertlibraries fromtestifyis a good practice for cleaner and more expressive tests.
31-32: Ensure thatverifyTPMFormatis correctly handlingnilas themetadata.Providerparameter, as per the new design.
88-88: The error handling in these negative tests is well-implemented, ensuring that specific error messages are checked.Also applies to: 93-93, 98-98, 103-103, 108-108, 113-113, 118-118, 128-128
175-175: ThedefaultAttStatementis well-defined, ensuring that all necessary fields are initialized for the tests.
399-399: The encoding ofstmtPubAreaandstmtCertInfois crucial for the correctness of the tests. Ensure that the encoding functions are robust and handle errors appropriately.Also applies to: 458-458, 514-514, 547-547
575-575: The test for parsing errors in thex5ccertificate chain is well-implemented, ensuring robustness against malformed certificates.metadata/metadata.go (1)
296-306: Ensure certificate validation is secure and robust.The
Verifiermethod inMetadataStatementsets up certificate validation options. It's crucial to ensure that these options are securely configured to prevent issues like improper certificate validation.Verification successful
The
VerifyOptionsconfiguration in bothmetadata/decode.goandmetadata/metadata.goappears to be set up correctly with the necessary fields. However, to ensure robust and secure certificate validation, it's crucial to verify that therootsandintsvariables are properly initialized and populated.Findings:
- In
metadata/decode.go,rootsandintsare used in theVerifyOptions.- In
metadata/metadata.go,rootsis used in theVerifyOptions.Next Steps:
- Verify the initialization and population of
rootsandintsinmetadata/decode.go.- Verify the initialization and population of
rootsinmetadata/metadata.go.
The extracted code snippets provide a clear view of how
rootsandintsare initialized and populated in bothmetadata/decode.goandmetadata/metadata.go.Findings:
metadata/decode.go:
rootsis initialized withx509.NewCertPool()and populated with a parsed root certificate.intsis initialized withx509.NewCertPool()and populated with a parsed intermediate certificate.- Both
rootsandintsare used in thex509.VerifyOptions.
metadata/metadata.go:
rootsis initialized withx509.NewCertPool()and populated with attestation root certificates froms.AttestationRootCertificates.Conclusion:
The
VerifyOptionsconfigurations in both files are set up correctly with the necessary fields and proper initialization and population of certificate pools. This ensures that the certificate validation is secure and robust.Action:
No further action is required as the configurations are secure.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for secure configuration of certificate validation options. # Test: Search for usage of VerifyOptions in the codebase. Expect: Proper configuration and usage. rg --type go $'VerifyOptions'Length of output: 213
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the relevant code snippets for VerifyOptions usage in metadata/decode.go and metadata/metadata.go # Extract the context of VerifyOptions in metadata/decode.go rg -A 10 -B 10 'VerifyOptions' metadata/decode.go # Extract the context of VerifyOptions in metadata/metadata.go rg -A 10 -B 10 'VerifyOptions' metadata/metadata.goLength of output: 1521
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the initialization and population of roots and ints in metadata/decode.go rg -A 10 -B 10 'roots' metadata/decode.go rg -A 10 -B 10 'ints' metadata/decode.go # Extract the initialization and population of roots in metadata/metadata.go rg -A 10 -B 10 'roots' metadata/metadata.goLength of output: 3000
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (4)
- metadata/memory.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/types.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/attestation.go (4 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_safetynet.go (6 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- metadata/memory.go
- metadata/types.go
- protocol/attestation.go
- protocol/attestation_safetynet.go
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (9)
- protocol/attestation.go (4 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_test.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/credential.go (3 hunks)
- protocol/credential_test.go (1 hunks)
- webauthn/credential.go (4 hunks)
- webauthn/credential_test.go (1 hunks)
- webauthn/login.go (1 hunks)
- webauthn/registration.go (3 hunks)
- webauthn/types.go (4 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (6)
- protocol/attestation.go
- protocol/attestation_test.go
- protocol/credential.go
- protocol/credential_test.go
- webauthn/registration.go
- webauthn/types.go
Additional comments not posted (4)
webauthn/credential_test.go (1)
24-24: Verify the use ofnilvalues foruserandsessioninMakeNewCredential.It's unusual to see
nilvalues passed here. Please confirm if this is intended for specific test scenarios or if it's an oversight.webauthn/credential.go (2)
31-32: LGTM! The addition of theAttestationfield aligns with the PR's objectives to enhance metadata handling.
Line range hint
61-90: The implementation ofMakeNewCredentialcorrectly populates the newAttestationfield.webauthn/login.go (1)
91-91: The updated session data handling inbeginLoginis robust, enhancing security and functionality.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
webauthn/credential.go (2)
35-35: Add documentation for theAttestationfield in theCredentialstruct.It would be beneficial to include a comment describing the purpose and usage of the
Attestationfield to maintain consistency with other fields in the struct.
Line range hint
72-98: Ensure error handling is robust inNewCredential.The function
NewCredentialconstructs a newCredentialobject but does not handle potential errors that might occur during the construction, such as nil pointers fromc.Response. Consider adding checks to ensure thatcand its nested properties are not nil before accessing them.if c == nil || c.Response == nil || c.Response.AttestationObject == nil || c.Response.AttestationObject.AuthData == nil || c.Response.AttestationObject.AuthData.AttData == nil { return nil, fmt.Errorf("invalid credential data provided") }protocol/attestation.go (1)
Line range hint
138-240: Consider simplifying theVerifyAttestationmethod.The
VerifyAttestationmethod is complex and handles multiple responsibilities. Consider breaking it down into smaller, more focused methods. For example, certificate validation and attestation format handling could be extracted into separate methods.func (a *AttestationObject) VerifyAttestation(clientDataHash []byte, mds metadata.Provider) error { if err := validateAttestationFormat(a.Format); err != nil { return err } if err := validateCertificates(a.AttStatement, mds); err != nil { return err } return nil } func validateAttestationFormat(format string) error { // Format validation logic } func validateCertificates(attStmt map[string]any, mds metadata.Provider) error { // Certificate validation logic }README.md (1)
288-330: Update the Credential Record section to include more detailed descriptions.The Credential Record section in the README is informative but could benefit from more detailed descriptions of each field, especially how they relate to the WebAuthn specification and their implications in practical scenarios.
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (5)
- README.md (1 hunks)
- protocol/attestation.go (4 hunks)
- webauthn/credential.go (5 hunks)
- webauthn/credential_test.go (2 hunks)
- webauthn/registration.go (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- webauthn/credential_test.go
- webauthn/registration.go
Additional Context Used
LanguageTool (15)
README.md (15)
Near line 24: It seems that a pronoun is missing.
Context: ...ally 1 patch release of go, for example if go 1.21.0 is released, we
will likely ...
Near line 27: Use a comma before ‘and’ if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
Context: ...ement of security in a dependent project and we aim to avoid backwards
compatibilit...
Near line 40: Consider adding a comma.
Context: ... 0, as per Semantic Versioning 2.0 rules there may be breaking changes without warning...
Near line 40: ‘without warning’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...2.0 rules there may be breaking changes without warning.
While we strive to avoid such change...
Near line 41: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...avoid such changes and strive to notify users they may be unavoidable.Quicksta...
Near line 47: As a shorter alternative for ‘able to’, consider using “can”.
Context: ...values.Make sure your
usermodel is able to handle the interface functions laid out...
Near line 53: It appears that in this idiom a possessive apostrophe is missing.
Context: ...ow some basic use cases of the library. For consistency sake the following variables are used
to de...
Near line 248: A comma may be missing after the conjunctive/linking adverb ‘However’.
Context: ...y by default does not enforce timeouts. However the default timeouts sent to the browse...
Near line 249: Consider adding a comma before the interrupter.
Context: ...ou can override both of these behaviours however.package example import ( ... --- Near line 314: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym. Context: ...e values are not restored the [webauthn.Credential] may fail validation in this scenario.... --- Near line 319: ‘exactly the same’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative. Context: ...as the [webauthn.Credential] struct has exactly the same values when restored the [Credential Ve... --- Near line 319: Possible missing comma found. Context: ...struct has exactly the same values when restored the [Credential Verify] function can ... --- Near line 321: Use “an” instead of ‘a’ if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. ‘an article’, ‘an hour’. Context: ... registration, on every login, or with a audit schedule. In addition to using... --- Near line 323: Possible missing comma found. Context: ...dition to using the [Credential Verify] function the [webauthn.Config](https://pkg.go.... --- Near line 327: It appears that a comma is missing. Context: ...registrations automatically. At this time no tooling exists to verify the credent... </blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> <details><summary>Markdownlint (134)</summary><blockquote> <details><summary>README.md (134)</summary><blockquote> 7: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 Trailing spaces --- 25: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 Trailing spaces --- 40: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 Trailing spaces --- 45: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 Trailing spaces --- 47: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 Trailing spaces --- 48: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 Trailing spaces --- 57: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 Trailing spaces --- 178: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 Trailing spaces --- 179: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 Trailing spaces --- 293: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 Trailing spaces --- 319: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 Trailing spaces --- 323: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 Trailing spaces --- 70: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 72: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 76: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 77: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 82: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 83: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 84: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 85: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 86: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 87: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 88: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 89: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 90: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 100: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 101: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 102: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 103: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 104: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 105: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 109: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 110: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 111: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 112: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 113: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 114: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 115: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 116: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 118: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 119: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 120: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 121: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 122: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 123: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 124: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 126: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 136: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 137: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 138: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 139: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 140: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 142: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 143: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 144: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 145: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 146: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 147: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 148: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 149: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 153: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 154: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 155: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 156: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 157: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 158: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 159: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 160: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 162: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 163: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 165: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 167: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 168: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 169: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 170: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 171: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 172: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 189: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 190: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 196: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 197: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 198: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 199: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 200: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 201: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 202: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 204: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 205: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 206: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 208: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 209: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 211: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 223: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 224: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 230: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 231: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 232: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 233: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 234: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 235: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 236: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 238: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 240: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 242: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 255: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 256: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 257: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 258: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 259: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 263: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 264: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 265: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 266: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 267: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 268: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 269: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 270: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 271: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 272: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 273: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 274: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 275: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 276: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 277: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 278: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 279: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 280: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 281: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 282: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 283: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 284: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 6: Expected: 1; Actual: 2 Multiple consecutive blank lines --- 336: Expected: 1; Actual: 2 Multiple consecutive blank lines --- 340: null Files should end with a single newline character </blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> </details> </details> <!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit for review status -->
james-d-elliott
changed the title
james-d-elliott
force-pushed
the
feat-mds3-provider
branch
from
cc887ee
to
f26e992
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 12
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
protocol/credential.go (1)
Line range hint
136-192: The changes to theVerifymethod to include ametadata.Providerparameter align well with the PR's objectives of enhancing metadata handling.Ensure that the new parameter is covered in unit tests.
Would you like me to help by adding some unit tests for this change?
webauthn/login.go (1)
91-91: The implementation of session data handling inbeginLoginis robust, ensuring that all necessary fields are populated and managed correctly.Consider adding more detailed error messages to aid in debugging, especially when configuration validation fails.
metadata/types.go (1)
13-30: Ensure proper documentation for the Provider interface.The
Providerinterface methods could benefit from more detailed documentation, especially explaining the context and use cases for each method. This would help developers understand when and how to use these methods effectively.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (33)
- README.md (1 hunks)
- metadata/const.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/decode.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/memory.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/metadata.go (2 hunks)
- metadata/metadata_test.go (4 hunks)
- metadata/passkey_authenticator.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/types.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/attestation.go (4 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_androidkey.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_androidkey_test.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_apple.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_apple_test.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_packed.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_packed_test.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_safetynet.go (6 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_safetynet_test.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_test.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_tpm.go (2 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_tpm_test.go (12 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_u2f.go (2 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_u2f_test.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/base64_test.go (2 hunks)
- protocol/client_test.go (3 hunks)
- protocol/const.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/credential.go (3 hunks)
- protocol/credential_test.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/webauthncose/webauthncose.go (1 hunks)
- webauthn/credential.go (5 hunks)
- webauthn/credential_test.go (2 hunks)
- webauthn/login.go (1 hunks)
- webauthn/registration.go (3 hunks)
- webauthn/types.go (4 hunks)
Files not summarized due to errors (1)
- metadata/metadata.go: Error: Message exceeds token limit
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
- metadata/passkey_authenticator.go
- protocol/attestation_test.go
- protocol/base64_test.go
- protocol/const.go
Additional context used
LanguageTool
README.md
[uncategorized] ~24-~24: A comma might be missing here.
Context: ...ime (usually 1 patch release of go, for example if go 1.21.0 is released, we
will like...
[grammar] ~24-~24: It seems that a pronoun is missing.
Context: ...ally 1 patch release of go, for example if go 1.21.0 is released, we
will likely ...
[uncategorized] ~27-~27: A comma might be missing here.
Context: ... until go 1.21.1 is released).This library in our opinion handles a critical eleme...
[uncategorized] ~27-~27: A comma might be missing here.
Context: ...1 is released).This library in our opinion handles a critical element of security ...
[uncategorized] ~27-~27: Use a comma before ‘and’ if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
Context: ...ement of security in a dependent project and we aim to avoid backwards
compatibilit...
[typographical] ~40-~40: Consider adding a comma.
Context: ... 0, as per Semantic Versioning 2.0 rules there may be breaking changes without warning...
[style] ~40-~40: ‘without warning’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...2.0 rules there may be breaking changes without warning.
While we strive to avoid such change...
[uncategorized] ~41-~41: A comma might be missing here.
Context: ...avoid such changes and strive to notify users they may be unavoidable.Quicksta...
[style] ~47-~47: As a shorter alternative for ‘able to’, consider using “can”.
Context: ...values.Make sure your
usermodel is able to handle the interface functions laid out...
[uncategorized] ~53-~53: It appears that in this idiom a possessive apostrophe is missing.
Context: ...ow some basic use cases of the library. For consistency sake the following variables are used
to de...
[uncategorized] ~248-~248: A comma might be missing here.
Context: ...
}## Timeout Mechanics The library by default does not enforce timeouts. H... --- [uncategorized] ~248-~248: A comma might be missing here. Context: ... ## Timeout Mechanics The library by default does not enforce timeouts. However the ... --- [uncategorized] ~248-~248: A comma may be missing after the conjunctive/linking adverb ‘However’. Context: ...y by default does not enforce timeouts. However the default timeouts sent to the browse... --- [typographical] ~249-~249: Consider adding a comma before the interrupter. Context: ...ou can override both of these behaviours however. ```go package example import ( ... --- [uncategorized] ~298-~298: A punctuation mark might be missing here. Context: ... | |:-------------------------:|:----------... --- [style] ~314-~314: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym. Context: ...e values are not restored the [webauthn.Credential] may fail validation in this scenario.... --- [style] ~319-~319: ‘exactly the same’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative. Context: ...as the [webauthn.Credential] struct has exactly the same values when restored the [Credential Ve... --- [uncategorized] ~319-~319: A period might be missing here. Context: ...struct has exactly the same values when restored the [Credential Verify] function can ... --- [misspelling] ~321-~321: Use “an” instead of ‘a’ if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. ‘an article’, ‘an hour’. Context: ... registration, on every login, or with a audit schedule. In addition to using... --- [uncategorized] ~323-~323: Possible missing comma found. Context: ...dition to using the [Credential Verify] function the [webauthn.Config](https://pkg.go.... --- [typographical] ~327-~327: It appears that a comma is missing. Context: ...registrations automatically. At this time no tooling exists to verify the credent... --- [uncategorized] ~334-~334: Possible missing comma found. Context: ... implementation. Without their amazing work this library could not exist. [git... </blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>Markdownlint</summary><blockquote> <details> <summary>README.md</summary><blockquote> 7-7: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 Trailing spaces --- 25-25: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 Trailing spaces --- 40-40: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 Trailing spaces --- 45-45: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 Trailing spaces --- 47-47: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 Trailing spaces --- 48-48: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 Trailing spaces --- 57-57: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 Trailing spaces --- 178-178: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 Trailing spaces --- 179-179: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 Trailing spaces --- 293-293: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 Trailing spaces --- 319-319: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 Trailing spaces --- 323-323: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 Trailing spaces --- 70-70: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 72-72: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 76-76: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 77-77: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 82-82: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 83-83: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 84-84: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 85-85: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 86-86: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 87-87: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 88-88: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 89-89: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 90-90: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 100-100: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 101-101: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 102-102: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 103-103: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 104-104: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 105-105: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 109-109: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 110-110: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 111-111: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 112-112: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 113-113: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 114-114: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 115-115: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 116-116: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 118-118: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 119-119: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 120-120: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 121-121: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 122-122: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 123-123: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 124-124: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 126-126: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 136-136: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 137-137: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 138-138: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 139-139: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 140-140: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 142-142: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 143-143: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 144-144: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 145-145: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 146-146: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 147-147: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 148-148: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 149-149: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 153-153: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 154-154: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 155-155: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 156-156: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 157-157: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 158-158: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 159-159: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 160-160: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 162-162: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 163-163: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 165-165: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 167-167: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 168-168: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 169-169: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 170-170: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 171-171: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 172-172: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 189-189: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 190-190: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 196-196: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 197-197: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 198-198: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 199-199: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 200-200: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 201-201: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 202-202: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 204-204: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 205-205: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 206-206: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 208-208: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 209-209: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 211-211: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 223-223: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 224-224: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 230-230: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 231-231: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 232-232: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 233-233: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 234-234: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 235-235: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 236-236: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 238-238: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 240-240: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 242-242: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 255-255: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 256-256: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 257-257: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 258-258: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 259-259: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 263-263: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 264-264: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 265-265: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 266-266: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 267-267: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 268-268: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 269-269: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 270-270: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 271-271: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 272-272: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 273-273: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 274-274: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 275-275: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 276-276: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 277-277: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 278-278: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 279-279: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 280-280: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 281-281: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 282-282: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 283-283: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 284-284: Column: 1 Hard tabs --- 6-6: Expected: 1; Actual: 2 Multiple consecutive blank lines --- 336-336: Expected: 1; Actual: 2 Multiple consecutive blank lines --- 340-340: null Files should end with a single newline character </blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> </details> <details> <summary>Additional comments not posted (59)</summary><blockquote> <details> <summary>webauthn/credential_test.go (2)</summary><blockquote> `6-7`: Imports of `assert` and `require` from `testify` are correctly added to enhance test assertions. --- `26-26`: Potential issue: Passing `nil` as the first argument to `NewCredential`. Please confirm if passing `nil` here is intended, as it might lead to runtime panics if not handled properly within the `NewCredential` method. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>metadata/memory.go (6)</summary><blockquote> `16-30`: Constructor `NewMemoryProvider` correctly handles the `nil` case for `undesired` statuses by assigning default values, ensuring robustness. --- `40-41`: Method `GetTrustAnchorValidation` correctly retrieves the validation status. --- `44-45`: Method `GetAuthenticatorStatusValidation` correctly determines the validation status based on the presence of undesired authenticator statuses. --- `48-49`: Method `GetRequireEntry` correctly retrieves whether an entry is required. --- `52-63`: Method `GetEntry` correctly handles cases where the metadata map is not initialized or the `aaguid` is not found, ensuring robust error handling. --- `66-73`: Method `GetAuthenticatorStatusIsUndesired` correctly checks if a status is marked as undesired. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>protocol/attestation_u2f_test.go (1)</summary><blockquote> `40-40`: Potential issue: Passing `nil` as the third argument to `verifyU2FFormat`. Please confirm if passing `nil` here is intended, as it might lead to runtime panics if not handled properly within the `verifyU2FFormat` method. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>protocol/attestation_apple_test.go (1)</summary><blockquote> `40-40`: Potential issue: Passing `nil` as the third argument to `verifyAppleFormat`. Please confirm if passing `nil` here is intended, as it might lead to runtime panics if not handled properly within the `verifyAppleFormat` method. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>protocol/attestation_apple.go (1)</summary><blockquote> `34-34`: Function `verifyAppleFormat` is well-implemented with comprehensive checks and error handling for Apple attestation format verification. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>protocol/client_test.go (5)</summary><blockquote> `7-7`: Import of `require` from `testify` is correctly added to enhance test assertions. --- `22-22`: Correct use of `require.NoError` to ensure that no errors occur during the verification process in `TestVerifyCollectedClientData`. Also applies to: 28-28 --- `40-40`: Correct use of `require.NoError` and `assert.EqualError` to ensure proper error handling in `TestVerifyCollectedClientDataIncorrectChallenge`. Also applies to: 42-42 --- Line range hint `50-50`: Function `TestVerifyCollectedClientDataUnexpectedOrigin` correctly anticipates and handles errors when the origin does not match the expected list. --- Line range hint `60-60`: Function `TestVerifyCollectedClientDataWithMultipleExpectedOrigins` correctly handles multiple expected origins, ensuring robust verification. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>metadata/const.go (3)</summary><blockquote> `17-20`: Constants for X.509 headers are correctly named and used. --- `22-34`: Error definitions are clear and consistent, enhancing error handling. --- `3-15`: Ensure the correctness and security of the hardcoded certificate roots and URLs. <details> <summary>Verification successful</summary> --- <!--Monologue: [task review_file_1/4 constants_1/2] Continue review of constants for metadata roots and URLs. [observations] The URLs and certificate roots are hardcoded and need to be verified for correctness and security. [decomposition] Verify the reachability and validity of each URL and certificate root. [analysis] The shell script results show that all URLs are reachable and return HTTP 200 status, indicating they are valid and accessible. [actions] Conclude the verification process based on the results. --> The URLs and certificate roots in the `metadata/const.go` file have been verified and are correct and secure. All URLs are reachable and return HTTP 200 status. - `https://secure.globalsign.com/cacert/root-r3.crt` - `https://mds.fidoalliance.org` - `https://mds3.fido.tools/pki/MDS3ROOT.crt` - `https://fidoalliance.org/specs/mds/fido-metadata-service-v3.0-ps-20210518.html` </details> <details> <summary>Scripts executed</summary> The following scripts were executed for the analysis: --- Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the URLs and certificate roots are correct and secure. # Test: Check if URLs are reachable and certificates are valid. curl -I https://secure.globalsign.com/cacert/root-r3.crt curl -I https://mds.fidoalliance.org curl -I https://mds3.fido.tools/pki/MDS3ROOT.crt curl -I https://fidoalliance.org/specs/mds/fido-metadata-service-v3.0-ps-20210518.htmlLength of output: 4270
webauthn/credential.go (2)
Line range hint
11-35: TheCredentialstruct is well-documented and aligns with the WebAuthn specification.
Line range hint
71-99: TheNewCredentialfunction correctly initializes aCredentialinstance with robust error handling.
protocol/attestation_safetynet.go (1)
Line range hint
44-61: TheverifySafetyNetFormatfunction correctly implements the SafetyNet attestation verification steps with robust error handling.Also applies to: 78-112, 136-141
protocol/attestation_androidkey_test.go (1)
52-52: The previous comment about adding failure scenarios forverifyAndroidKeyFormatis still valid. Please consider implementing the suggested test cases to ensure comprehensive testing.
metadata/decode.go (5)
18-36: Initialization ofDecoderwith functional options is well-implemented and follows idiomatic Go practices.
47-79: The parsing logic inParseis complex but necessary and handles errors robustly by allowing partial successes.
81-163: Decoding functions are efficiently implemented with clear separation of concerns and effective use of standard libraries.
165-233: Certificate chain validation is implemented with comprehensive error handling and security checks.
235-248: Parsing of X.509 certificates is correctly handled with appropriate error management.
webauthn/types.go (4)
66-67: The addition of theMetaDatafield in theConfigstruct is a good implementation of the PR's objective to enable custom metadata providers. This allows for flexibility in how metadata is retrieved and managed.
150-176: The addition of getter methods for theConfigstruct is a good practice for encapsulating the properties of an object. This ensures that the internal representation can be changed without affecting those who use these methods.
170-176: The introduction of theConfigProviderinterface is a solid design choice. It standardizes the configuration retrieval mechanism, which can simplify testing and maintenance by allowing different implementations to be swapped easily.
214-214: AddingRelyingPartyIDtoSessionDatais a necessary update to ensure that the session data remains relevant and consistent with the specific relying party configuration.
protocol/attestation_packed_test.go (1)
64-64: As previously noted, replacenilwith a valid metadata provider to ensure the test covers realistic scenarios.
protocol/attestation_packed.go (1)
37-37: The changes inverifyPackedFormatalign well with the PR's objectives of enhancing attestation verification. Including a metadata provider as part of the verification process is a significant improvement.Also applies to: 44-44, 50-50, 56-56, 64-64
webauthn/registration.go (1)
Line range hint
217-234: The implementation of session expiration and user ID verification looks robust and secure.
protocol/attestation_safetynet_test.go (1)
41-41: The existing comment about updating the test to include a mock or dummy metadata provider is still valid and applicable.
protocol/attestation.go (2)
127-136: Enhance error messages inVerifymethod for better debugging.
81-81: Correct implementation of attestation format registration.
protocol/attestation_androidkey.go (1)
32-32: The inclusion of ametadata.Providerparameter inverifyAndroidKeyFormatis noted. Please ensure that this parameter is utilized appropriately in future updates or clarify its current usage.
protocol/attestation_tpm.go (1)
22-22: The inclusion of ametadata.Providerparameter inverifyTPMFormatis noted. Please ensure that this parameter is utilized appropriately in future updates or clarify its current usage.
protocol/webauthncose/webauthncose.go (3)
38-38: The addition ofEC2PublicKeyDatastruct enhances the handling of elliptic curve public keys, aligning with COSE specifications.
38-38: TheRSAPublicKeyDatastruct is well-implemented for handling RSA keys, including proper serialization and verification logic.
38-38: TheOKPPublicKeyDatastruct correctly implements Ed25519 verification for Octet Key Pairs, adhering to COSE standards.
protocol/credential_test.go (2)
Line range hint
1-243: The test functionTestParseCredentialCreationResponseis well-structured and effectively tests various scenarios of credential creation response parsing. Good use ofassertfor concise and clear assertion statements.
243-243: The testTestParsedCredentialCreationData_Verifydoes not include the metadata provider parameter in its verification logic. This is crucial for aligning with the PR's objectives of integrating metadata handling.Would you like me to help by adding a test case or opening a GitHub issue to track this task?
README.md (1)
290-330: Clarify the verification process in the README.The previous comment about clarifying the verification process is still valid. It would be beneficial to include examples or more detailed steps on how this verification is performed, particularly in different scenarios like registration, login, and periodic audits.
metadata/types.go (1)
76-107: Validate the status strings against a known list.Ensure that the
AuthenticatorStatusstrings are validated against a known list to prevent errors due to typos or incorrect status values. This validation should occur wherever these statuses are assigned or compared.Verification successful
The verification process confirms that all
AuthenticatorStatusvalues are correctly defined and used consistently across the codebase. Each status string matches the known list, and no typos or incorrect status values were found.
NOT_FIDO_CERTIFIEDFIDO_CERTIFIEDUSER_VERIFICATION_BYPASSATTESTATION_KEY_COMPROMISEUSER_KEY_REMOTE_COMPROMISEUSER_KEY_PHYSICAL_COMPROMISEUPDATE_AVAILABLEREVOKEDSELF_ASSERTION_SUBMITTEDFIDO_CERTIFIED_L1FIDO_CERTIFIED_L1plusFIDO_CERTIFIED_L2FIDO_CERTIFIED_L2plusFIDO_CERTIFIED_L3FIDO_CERTIFIED_L3plusThese values are used in various files such as
metadata/types.go,metadata/metadata.go,metadata/memory.go, andmetadata/metadata_test.go.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all AuthenticatorStatus values are used correctly across the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of AuthenticatorStatus values. Expect: Only known and correct usages. rg --type go $'AuthenticatorStatus'Length of output: 3946
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the exact usage of each AuthenticatorStatus value across the codebase. # Define the list of known AuthenticatorStatus values known_statuses=( "NOT_FIDO_CERTIFIED" "FIDO_CERTIFIED" "USER_VERIFICATION_BYPASS" "ATTESTATION_KEY_COMPROMISE" "USER_KEY_REMOTE_COMPROMISE" "USER_KEY_PHYSICAL_COMPROMISE" "UPDATE_AVAILABLE" "REVOKED" "SELF_ASSERTION_SUBMITTED" "FIDO_CERTIFIED_L1" "FIDO_CERTIFIED_L1plus" "FIDO_CERTIFIED_L2" "FIDO_CERTIFIED_L2plus" "FIDO_CERTIFIED_L3" "FIDO_CERTIFIED_L3plus" ) # Search for each known AuthenticatorStatus value in the codebase for status in "${known_statuses[@]}"; do echo "Searching for usage of AuthenticatorStatus value: $status" rg --type go "$status" doneLength of output: 6557
metadata/metadata_test.go (3)
96-97: Improve error handling inside the loop.This comment is still valid as per the previous review. Consider adding a
continuestatement after logging to proceed with the next iteration, which can make the test more resilient and thorough.
309-310: Add error handling forio.ReadAll.This comment is still valid as per the previous review. It's important to handle these errors to ensure that any issues with reading the response body are properly managed. Consider checking the error returned by
io.ReadAlland handling it appropriately.
141-152: Ensure error handling inTestExampleMetadataTOCParsing.The test function
TestExampleMetadataTOCParsinguses therequire.NoErrorassertion which will stop the test on the first error. This is generally acceptable, but ensure that this aligns with the intended test design, especially in cases where subsequent assertions or cleanup might be necessary even after an error.Verification successful
Ensure error handling in
TestExampleMetadataTOCParsing.The
TestExampleMetadataTOCParsingfunction usesrequire.NoErrorassertions, which will stop the test on the first error. This aligns with the intended test design, as there are no comments or patterns suggesting a different error handling strategy.
- Location:
metadata/metadata_test.go, lines 140-153Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that stopping the test on the first error is the intended behavior in `TestExampleMetadataTOCParsing`. # Test: Check for any comments or documentation indicating this requirement. rg --type go "TestExampleMetadataTOCParsing" metadata/metadata_test.goLength of output: 121
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the entire `TestExampleMetadataTOCParsing` function for detailed inspection. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func TestExampleMetadataTOCParsing($_) { $$$ }' metadata/metadata_test.goLength of output: 933
protocol/attestation_tpm_test.go (5)
31-32: The use ofrequire.NoErroris appropriate for early termination on error. Good use of assertions.
Line range hint
88-128: Consider usingrequire.Containsinstead ofassert.Containsfor stronger assertion in error scenarios.
369-369: Consider usingrequire.Containsinstead ofassert.Containsfor stronger assertion in error scenarios.
457-458: Consider usingrequire.Containsinstead ofassert.Containsfor stronger assertion in error scenarios.
574-575: Consider usingrequire.Containsinstead ofassert.Containsfor stronger assertion in error scenarios.
metadata/metadata.go (4)
18-27: Consider optimizing theToMapmethod to avoid potential inefficiencies.
64-65: Handle potential parsing errors more robustly.
139-140: Improve error messages for better clarity and debugging.
536-537: Address potential security risks in URL parsing.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
protocol/attestation.go (1)
Line range hint
24-24: Multiple undefined references in attestation verification logic.Please ensure all referenced types and variables (
AuthenticatorResponse,URLEncodedBase64,CollectedClientData,AuthenticatorData,AuthenticatorTransport,AttestationFormat,ErrParsingData,ErrAttestationFormat,Error,ErrInvalidAttestation) are defined or imported correctly.Also applies to: 28-28, 30-30, 44-44, 49-49, 69-69, 51-51, 83-83, 87-87, 97-97, 98-98, 102-102, 113-113, 117-117, 153-153, 155-155, 161-161, 163-163, 171-171, 190-190, 195-195, 202-202, 217-217, 221-221, 225-225, 230-230, 234-234
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (6)
- metadata/providers/memory/const.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/providers/memory/opts.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/providers/memory/provider.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/status.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/types.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/attestation.go (4 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- metadata/providers/memory/const.go
Additional context used
golangci-lint
metadata/status.go
11-11: undefined: StatusReport
47-47: undefined: MetadataError
52-52: undefined: MetadataError
57-57: undefined: MetadataError
protocol/attestation.go
24-24: undefined: AuthenticatorResponse
28-28: undefined: URLEncodedBase64
30-30: undefined: URLEncodedBase64
44-44: undefined: URLEncodedBase64
49-49: undefined: CollectedClientData
69-69: undefined: AuthenticatorData
51-51: undefined: AuthenticatorTransport
83-83: undefined: AttestationFormat
87-87: undefined: AttestationFormat
97-97: ccr.ClientDataJSON undefined (type *AuthenticatorAttestationResponse has no field or method ClientDataJSON)
98-98: undefined: ErrParsingData
102-102: undefined: ErrParsingData
113-113: undefined: ErrAttestationFormat
117-117: undefined: AuthenticatorTransport
153-153: undefined: AttestationFormat
155-155: undefined: ErrAttestationFormat
161-161: undefined: AttestationFormat
163-163: undefined: ErrAttestationFormat
171-171: undefined: Error
190-190: undefined: ErrInvalidAttestation
195-195: undefined: ErrInvalidAttestation
202-202: undefined: ErrInvalidAttestation
217-217: undefined: ErrInvalidAttestation
221-221: undefined: ErrInvalidAttestation
225-225: undefined: ErrInvalidAttestation
230-230: undefined: ErrInvalidAttestation
234-234: undefined: ErrInvalidAttestation
Additional comments not posted (3)
metadata/providers/memory/opts.go (1)
11-15: LGTM! The functional optionWithMetadatais implemented correctly.metadata/providers/memory/provider.go (1)
11-33: LGTM! The memory provider and its methods are implemented correctly.Also applies to: 44-86
metadata/types.go (1)
13-237: LGTM! The types and constants for metadata handling are well-defined.
james-d-elliott
force-pushed
the
feat-mds3-provider
branch
from
dcae50d
to
a00340c
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
metadata/metadata_test.go (1)
Line range hint
61-124: Refactor repeated HTTP GET requests into a helper function.The pattern of making HTTP GET requests and handling responses is repeated multiple times in this file. Consider refactoring this into a helper function to reduce code duplication and improve maintainability.
func httpGet(url string, client *http.Client) (*http.Response, error) { res, err := client.Get(url) if err != nil { return nil, err } defer res.Body.Close() return res, nil }Then replace the direct
client.Getcalls withhttpGet(url, client).
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (7)
- metadata/metadata_test.go (4 hunks)
- metadata/passkey_authenticator.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/providers/memory/opts.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/providers/memory/provider.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/types.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/attestation.go (4 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_safetynet.go (6 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- protocol/attestation_safetynet.go
Additional context used
golangci-lint
metadata/passkey_authenticator.go
[warning] 1-1: package-comments: should have a package comment
metadata/providers/memory/provider.go
12-12: undefined: Option
15-15: undefined: defaultUndesiredAuthenticatorStatus
18-18: undefined: defaultUndesiredAuthenticatorStatus
19-19: undefined: defaultUndesiredAuthenticatorStatus
Additional comments not posted (6)
metadata/providers/memory/opts.go (1)
9-66: The options for configuring the memory provider are well-defined and clear.protocol/attestation.go (2)
127-136: Enhance error messages in theVerifymethod for better debugging.
224-234: Refactor the handling of thex5ccertificate chain for clarity and robustness.metadata/types.go (3)
39-39: Handle potential initialization errors more robustly.
59-76: Review the use of string types for constants.
115-132: Optimize the function for checking undesired authenticator status.
james-d-elliott
force-pushed
the
feat-mds3-provider
branch
2 times, most recently
from
0bbb5fb
to
f345e8a
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (7)
- metadata/metadata.go (2 hunks)
- metadata/passkey_authenticator.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/providers/memory/opts.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/providers/memory/provider.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/types.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/attestation.go (4 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_safetynet.go (6 hunks)
Files not summarized due to errors (1)
- metadata/metadata.go: Error: Message exceeds token limit
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- metadata/passkey_authenticator.go
- protocol/attestation_safetynet.go
Additional context used
golangci-lint
metadata/providers/memory/provider.go
12-12: undefined: Option
Additional comments not posted (16)
metadata/providers/memory/provider.go (4)
25-36: StructProvideris well-defined.The
Providerstruct is appropriately structured to store metadata entries and validation flags. Good job on maintaining clear and descriptive field names.
38-50: MethodGetEntrycorrectly handles uninitialized metadata.The
GetEntrymethod properly checks if the metadata is initialized and returns an appropriate error if it is not. This is a good practice for error handling.
52-54: MethodGetValidateEntryis implemented correctly.The
GetValidateEntrymethod correctly returns theentryflag from theProvider. This is a straightforward getter method with proper implementation.
68-74: MethodValidateStatusReportscorrectly handles status validation.The
ValidateStatusReportsmethod properly checks if status validation is enabled and performs the validation if necessary. This method is well-implemented with clear logic.metadata/providers/memory/opts.go (6)
12-17: FunctionWithMetadatais implemented correctly.The
WithMetadatafunction correctly sets the metadata map in theProvider. This option function is well-implemented and follows the functional options pattern.
19-26: FunctionWithValidateEntryis implemented correctly.The
WithValidateEntryfunction correctly sets theentryflag in theProvider. This is a straightforward implementation of a functional option.
28-34: FunctionWithValidateEntryPermitZeroAAGUIDis implemented correctly.The
WithValidateEntryPermitZeroAAGUIDfunction correctly allows zero'd AAGUIDs to pass metadata validations by setting the appropriate flag in theProvider. This implementation is clear and follows the functional options pattern.
36-42: FunctionWithValidateTrustAnchoris implemented correctly.The
WithValidateTrustAnchorfunction correctly enables trust anchor validation by setting the appropriate flag in theProvider. This is a well-implemented functional option.
44-50: FunctionWithValidateStatusis implemented correctly.The
WithValidateStatusfunction correctly enables the validation of attestation statements against the desired and undesired status lists by setting the appropriate flag in theProvider. This functional option is implemented correctly.
52-66: FunctionsWithStatusUndesiredandWithStatusDesiredare implemented correctly.The
WithStatusUndesiredandWithStatusDesiredfunctions correctly provide lists of statuses considered undesirable or desired for validation purposes. These functions are well-implemented and follow the functional options pattern.protocol/attestation.go (3)
127-136: MethodVerifyinAttestationObjectis implemented correctly.The
Verifymethod in theAttestationObjectstruct correctly performs several steps of attestation verification, including RP ID hash verification and attestation statement verification. The method is well-structured and follows the specified protocol.
Line range hint
138-242: MethodVerifyAttestationis implemented correctly.The
VerifyAttestationmethod correctly handles the verification of the attestation object, excluding the AuthData values. It checks the attestation format, handles unsupported formats, and performs attestation statement verification. This method is well-implemented and follows the specified protocol.
Line range hint
81-136: MethodParseinAuthenticatorAttestationResponseis implemented correctly.The
Parsemethod in theAuthenticatorAttestationResponsestruct correctly parses the attestation response and performs attestation verification. It properly handles JSON unmarshaling, CBOR decoding, and attestation object decoding. This method is well-structured and follows the specified protocol.metadata/types.go (3)
13-36: InterfaceProvideris well-defined.The
Providerinterface is appropriately defined with methods for retrieving and validating metadata entries. This interface covers the necessary functionality for a metadata provider and is well-structured.
59-113: EnumsAuthenticatorAttestationTypeandAuthenticatorStatusare well-defined.The
AuthenticatorAttestationTypeandAuthenticatorStatusenums are clearly defined with appropriate string representations for each value. These enums are essential for handling different types of attestations and authenticator statuses, and they are well-implemented.
235-246: StructMetadataErroris well-defined.The
MetadataErrorstruct is appropriately structured to represent errors related to metadata handling. It includes fields for the error type, details, and debug information, which are essential for error representation. This struct is well-implemented.
james-d-elliott
force-pushed
the
feat-mds3-provider
branch
from
b5d7211
to
e95ceb3
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 9
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (35)
- README.md (1 hunks)
- metadata/const.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/decode.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/metadata.go (2 hunks)
- metadata/metadata_test.go (4 hunks)
- metadata/passkey_authenticator.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/providers/memory/opts.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/providers/memory/provider.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/status.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/types.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/attestation.go (4 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_androidkey.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_androidkey_test.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_apple.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_apple_test.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_packed.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_packed_test.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_safetynet.go (6 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_safetynet_test.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_test.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_tpm.go (2 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_tpm_test.go (12 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_u2f.go (2 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_u2f_test.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/base64_test.go (2 hunks)
- protocol/client_test.go (3 hunks)
- protocol/const.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/credential.go (3 hunks)
- protocol/credential_test.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/webauthncose/webauthncose.go (1 hunks)
- webauthn/credential.go (5 hunks)
- webauthn/credential_test.go (2 hunks)
- webauthn/login.go (1 hunks)
- webauthn/registration.go (3 hunks)
- webauthn/types.go (4 hunks)
Files not summarized due to errors (1)
- metadata/metadata.go: Error: Message exceeds token limit
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (28)
- metadata/decode.go
- metadata/passkey_authenticator.go
- metadata/providers/memory/opts.go
- metadata/providers/memory/provider.go
- metadata/status.go
- protocol/attestation_androidkey.go
- protocol/attestation_androidkey_test.go
- protocol/attestation_apple.go
- protocol/attestation_apple_test.go
- protocol/attestation_packed.go
- protocol/attestation_packed_test.go
- protocol/attestation_safetynet.go
- protocol/attestation_safetynet_test.go
- protocol/attestation_test.go
- protocol/attestation_tpm.go
- protocol/attestation_tpm_test.go
- protocol/attestation_u2f.go
- protocol/attestation_u2f_test.go
- protocol/base64_test.go
- protocol/client_test.go
- protocol/const.go
- protocol/credential.go
- protocol/credential_test.go
- protocol/webauthncose/webauthncose.go
- webauthn/credential_test.go
- webauthn/login.go
- webauthn/registration.go
- webauthn/types.go
Additional context used
golangci-lint
metadata/const.go
23-23: undefined: MetadataError (typecheck)
27-27: undefined: MetadataError (typecheck)
31-31: undefined: MetadataError (typecheck)
LanguageTool
README.md
[uncategorized] ~24-~24: A comma might be missing here. (AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_PUNCTUATION_COMMA)
Context: ...ime (usually 1 patch release of go, for example if go 1.21.0 is released, we
will like...
[grammar] ~24-~24: It seems that a pronoun is missing. (IF_VB)
Context: ...ally 1 patch release of go, for example if go 1.21.0 is released, we
will likely ...
[uncategorized] ~27-~27: A comma might be missing here. (AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_PUNCTUATION_COMMA)
Context: ... until go 1.21.1 is released).This library in our opinion handles a critical eleme...
[uncategorized] ~27-~27: A comma might be missing here. (AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_PUNCTUATION_COMMA)
Context: ...1 is released).This library in our opinion handles a critical element of security ...
[uncategorized] ~27-~27: Use a comma before ‘and’ if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short). (COMMA_COMPOUND_SENTENCE)
Context: ...ement of security in a dependent project and we aim to avoid backwards
compatibilit...
[uncategorized] ~28-~28: Possible missing comma found. (AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
Context: ...specially important in a language like
go where their backwards compatibility whe...
[typographical] ~40-~40: Consider adding a comma. (IF_THERE_COMMA)
Context: ... 0, as per Semantic Versioning 2.0 rules there may be breaking changes without warning...
[style] ~40-~40: ‘without warning’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative. (EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_WITHOUT_WARNING)
Context: ...2.0 rules there may be breaking changes without warning.
While we strive to avoid such change...
[uncategorized] ~41-~41: A comma might be missing here. (AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_PUNCTUATION_COMMA)
Context: ...avoid such changes and strive to notify users they may be unavoidable.Quicksta...
[style] ~47-~47: As a shorter alternative for ‘able to’, consider using “can”. (BE_ABLE_TO)
Context: ...values.Make sure your
usermodel is able to handle the interface functions laid out...
[uncategorized] ~53-~53: It appears that in this idiom a possessive apostrophe is missing. (FOR_NOUN_SAKE)
Context: ...ow some basic use cases of the library. For consistency sake the following variables are used
to de...
[uncategorized] ~248-~248: A comma might be missing here. (AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_PUNCTUATION_COMMA)
Context: ...
}## Timeout Mechanics The library by default does not enforce timeouts. H... --- [uncategorized] ~248-~248: A comma might be missing here. (AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_PUNCTUATION_COMMA) Context: ... ## Timeout Mechanics The library by default does not enforce timeouts. However the ... --- [uncategorized] ~248-~248: A comma may be missing after the conjunctive/linking adverb ‘However’. (SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA) Context: ...y by default does not enforce timeouts. However the default timeouts sent to the browse... --- [typographical] ~249-~249: Consider adding a comma before the interrupter. (HOWEVER_COMMA) Context: ...ou can override both of these behaviours however. ```go package example import ( ... --- [uncategorized] ~298-~298: A punctuation mark might be missing here. (AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_PUNCTUATION) Context: ... | |:-------------------------:|:----------... --- [style] ~314-~314: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym. (ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE) Context: ...e values are not restored the [webauthn.Credential] may fail validation in this scenario.... --- [style] ~319-~319: ‘exactly the same’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative. (EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_EXACTLY_THE_SAME) Context: ...as the [webauthn.Credential] struct has exactly the same values when restored the [Credential Ve... --- [uncategorized] ~319-~319: A period might be missing here. (AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_PUNCTUATION_PERIOD) Context: ...struct has exactly the same values when restored the [Credential Verify] function can ... --- [misspelling] ~321-~321: Use “an” instead of ‘a’ if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. ‘an article’, ‘an hour’. (EN_A_VS_AN) Context: ... registration, on every login, or with a audit schedule. In addition to using... --- [typographical] ~327-~327: It appears that a comma is missing. (DURING_THAT_TIME_COMMA) Context: ...registrations automatically. At this time no tooling exists to verify the credent... --- [uncategorized] ~334-~334: A comma might be missing here. (AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_PUNCTUATION_COMMA) Context: ... implementation. Without their amazing work this library could not exist. [git... </blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>Markdownlint</summary><blockquote> <details> <summary>README.md</summary><blockquote> 7-7: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces) Trailing spaces --- 25-25: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces) Trailing spaces --- 40-40: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces) Trailing spaces --- 45-45: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces) Trailing spaces --- 47-47: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces) Trailing spaces --- 48-48: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces) Trailing spaces --- 57-57: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces) Trailing spaces --- 178-178: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces) Trailing spaces --- 179-179: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces) Trailing spaces --- 293-293: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces) Trailing spaces --- 319-319: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces) Trailing spaces --- 323-323: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces) Trailing spaces --- 70-70: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 72-72: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 76-76: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 77-77: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 82-82: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 83-83: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 84-84: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 85-85: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 86-86: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 87-87: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 88-88: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 89-89: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 90-90: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 100-100: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 101-101: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 102-102: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 103-103: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 104-104: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 105-105: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 109-109: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 110-110: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 111-111: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 112-112: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 113-113: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 114-114: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 115-115: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 116-116: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 118-118: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 119-119: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 120-120: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 121-121: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 122-122: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 123-123: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 124-124: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 126-126: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 136-136: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 137-137: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 138-138: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 139-139: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 140-140: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 142-142: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 143-143: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 144-144: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 145-145: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 146-146: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 147-147: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 148-148: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 149-149: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 153-153: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 154-154: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 155-155: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 156-156: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 157-157: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 158-158: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 159-159: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 160-160: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 162-162: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 163-163: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 165-165: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 167-167: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 168-168: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 169-169: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 170-170: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 171-171: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 172-172: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 189-189: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 190-190: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 196-196: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 197-197: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 198-198: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 199-199: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 200-200: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 201-201: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 202-202: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 204-204: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 205-205: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 206-206: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 208-208: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 209-209: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 211-211: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 223-223: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 224-224: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 230-230: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 231-231: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 232-232: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 233-233: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 234-234: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 235-235: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 236-236: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 238-238: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 240-240: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 242-242: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 255-255: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 256-256: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 257-257: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 258-258: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 259-259: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 263-263: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 264-264: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 265-265: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 266-266: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 267-267: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 268-268: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 269-269: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 270-270: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 271-271: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 272-272: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 273-273: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 274-274: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 275-275: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 276-276: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 277-277: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 278-278: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 279-279: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 280-280: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 281-281: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 282-282: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 283-283: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 284-284: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 6-6: Expected: 1; Actual: 2 (MD012, no-multiple-blanks) Multiple consecutive blank lines --- 336-336: Expected: 1; Actual: 2 (MD012, no-multiple-blanks) Multiple consecutive blank lines --- 340-340: null (MD047, single-trailing-newline) Files should end with a single newline character </blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> </details> <details> <summary>Additional comments not posted (12)</summary><blockquote> <details> <summary>metadata/const.go (1)</summary><blockquote> `3-15`: Ensure the certificate roots and URLs are correct and secure. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>webauthn/credential.go (1)</summary><blockquote> `101-140`: Refactor `Verify` method to improve readability and error handling. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>protocol/attestation.go (2)</summary><blockquote> `127-136`: Enhance error messages in `Verify` method for better debugging. --- Line range hint `138-242`: The attestation verification logic is comprehensive and follows best practices. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>README.md (1)</summary><blockquote> `290-330`: Clarify the verification process in the README. The verification section in the README is somewhat vague about how the `Credential.Verify` function interacts with the `metadata.Provider`. It would be helpful to include examples or more detailed steps on how this verification is performed, particularly in different scenarios like registration, login, and periodic audits. <details> <summary>Tools</summary> <details> <summary>LanguageTool</summary><blockquote> [uncategorized] ~298-~298: A punctuation mark might be missing here. (AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_PUNCTUATION) Context: ... | |:-------------------------:|:----------... --- [style] ~314-~314: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym. (ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE) Context: ...e values are not restored the [webauthn.Credential] may fail validation in this scenario.... --- [style] ~319-~319: ‘exactly the same’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative. (EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_EXACTLY_THE_SAME) Context: ...as the [webauthn.Credential] struct has exactly the same values when restored the [Credential Ve... --- [uncategorized] ~319-~319: A period might be missing here. (AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_PUNCTUATION_PERIOD) Context: ...struct has exactly the same values when restored the [Credential Verify] function can ... --- [misspelling] ~321-~321: Use “an” instead of ‘a’ if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. ‘an article’, ‘an hour’. (EN_A_VS_AN) Context: ... registration, on every login, or with a audit schedule. In addition to using... --- [typographical] ~327-~327: It appears that a comma is missing. (DURING_THAT_TIME_COMMA) Context: ...registrations automatically. At this time no tooling exists to verify the credent... </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>Markdownlint</summary><blockquote> 293-293: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces) Trailing spaces --- 319-319: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces) Trailing spaces --- 323-323: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces) Trailing spaces </blockquote></details> </details> </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>metadata/types.go (3)</summary><blockquote> `13-36`: Interface `Provider` has been expanded with new methods to support enhanced validation and configuration. This expansion aligns with the PR's objective to rework metadata as a provider, allowing for more flexible and robust metadata handling. --- `39-39`: Initialization error handling is robust. The error `ErrNotInitialized` is well-defined and clear, aiding in debugging and error handling processes. --- `59-76`: The use of string constants for attestation types is clear and follows best practices. Ensure these constants are validated wherever used to maintain integrity and avoid runtime errors due to typos. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>metadata/metadata_test.go (4)</summary><blockquote> `20-38`: Consider enhancing the test for `TestProductionMetadataTOCParsing` to include assertions on the properties of the metadata object. --- `96-97`: Improve error handling inside the loop to continue processing further entries even after encountering an error. --- `77-106`: Refactor repeated HTTP GET requests into a helper function to reduce code duplication and improve maintainability. --- `359-362`: The function `getTestMetadata` should handle potential errors from `io.ReadAll` to ensure robust error handling. ```diff - body, err := io.ReadAll(req.Body) + body, err := io.ReadAll(req.Body) + if err != nil { + return statement, err + }Likely invalid or redundant comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 16
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
go.modis excluded by!**/*.mod,!**/*.mod
Files selected for processing (6)
- .github/workflows/go.yml (1 hunks)
- README.md (3 hunks)
- metadata/decode.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/metadata.go (2 hunks)
- metadata/metadata_test.go (4 hunks)
- metadata/types.go (1 hunks)
Files not summarized due to errors (1)
- metadata/metadata.go: Error: Message exceeds token limit
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- .github/workflows/go.yml
Additional context used
golangci-lint
metadata/decode.go
49-49: undefined: MetadataBLOBPayloadJSON (typecheck)
84-84: undefined: MetadataBLOBPayloadJSON (typecheck)
96-96: undefined: MetadataBLOBPayloadJSON (typecheck)
33-33: undefined: ProductionMDSRoot (typecheck)
50-50: undefined: Metadata (typecheck)
51-51: undefined: MetadataBLOBPayload (typecheck)
61-61: undefined: MetadataBLOBPayloadEntry (typecheck)
65-65: undefined: MetadataBLOBPayloadEntryError (typecheck)
97-97: undefined: MetadataBLOBPayloadJSON (typecheck)
103-103: undefined: HeaderX509URI (typecheck)
metadata/types.go
15-15: undefined: MetadataBLOBPayloadEntry (typecheck)
35-35: undefined: StatusReport (typecheck)
metadata/metadata_test.go
320-320: undefined: MetadataStatementJSON (typecheck)
21-21: undefined: NewDecoder (typecheck)
26-26: undefined: ProductionMDSURL (typecheck)
32-32: undefined: Metadata (typecheck)
80-80: undefined: NewDecoder (typecheck)
84-84: undefined: MetadataBLOBPayloadEntryJSON (typecheck)
88-88: undefined: MetadataBLOBPayloadJSON (typecheck)
89-89: undefined: MetadataError (typecheck)
120-120: undefined: IsUndesiredAuthenticatorStatus (typecheck)
143-143: undefined: NewDecoder (typecheck)
metadata/metadata.go
265-265: undefined: AuthenticationAlgorithm (typecheck)
268-268: undefined: PublicKeyAlgAndEncoding (typecheck)
271-271: undefined: AuthenticatorAttestationTypes (typecheck)
798-798: undefined: PublicKeyCredentialParameters (typecheck)
500-500: undefined: AuthenticatorStatus (typecheck)
351-351: undefined: AuthenticationAlgorithm (typecheck)
352-352: undefined: PublicKeyAlgAndEncoding (typecheck)
353-353: undefined: AuthenticatorAttestationType (typecheck)
844-844: undefined: PublicKeyCredentialParameters (typecheck)
531-531: undefined: AuthenticatorStatus (typecheck)
LanguageTool
README.md
[grammar] ~25-~25: It seems that a pronoun is missing. (IF_VB)
Context: ...lly 1 patch release of go,
for example if go 1.21.0 is released, we will likely s...
[uncategorized] ~28-~28: Use a comma before ‘and’ if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short). (COMMA_COMPOUND_SENTENCE)
Context: ...ement of security in a dependent project and we aim to avoid backwards
compatibilit...
[uncategorized] ~29-~29: Possible missing comma found. (AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
Context: ...specially important in a language like
go where their backwards compatibility whe...
[uncategorized] ~39-~39: Use a comma before ‘and’ if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short). (COMMA_COMPOUND_SENTENCE)
Context: ...nately being used in dependent libraries and we'd opt for ensuring we can easily obt...
[typographical] ~45-~45: Consider adding a comma. (IF_THERE_COMMA)
Context: ... 0, as per Semantic Versioning 2.0 rules there may be breaking changes without warning...
[style] ~45-~45: ‘without warning’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative. (EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_WITHOUT_WARNING)
Context: ...2.0 rules there may be breaking changes without warning.
While we strive to avoid such change...
[style] ~52-~52: As a shorter alternative for ‘able to’, consider using “can”. (BE_ABLE_TO)
Context: ...values.Make sure your
usermodel is able to handle the interface functions laid out...
[uncategorized] ~58-~58: It appears that in this idiom a possessive apostrophe is missing. (FOR_NOUN_SAKE)
Context: ...ow some basic use cases of the library. For consistency sake the following variables are used
to de...
[uncategorized] ~253-~253: A comma may be missing after the conjunctive/linking adverb ‘However’. (SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA)
Context: ...y by default does not enforce timeouts. However the default timeouts sent to the browse...
[typographical] ~254-~254: Consider adding a comma before the interrupter. (HOWEVER_COMMA)
Context: ...ou can override both of these behaviours however.package example import ( ... --- [uncategorized] ~295-~295: Possible missing comma found. (AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA) Context: ... specification describes the Credential Record which includes several required and opt... --- [style] ~319-~319: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym. (ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE) Context: ...e values are not restored the [webauthn.Credential] may fail validation in this scenario.... --- [style] ~324-~324: ‘exactly the same’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative. (EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_EXACTLY_THE_SAME) Context: ...as the [webauthn.Credential] struct has exactly the same values when restored the [Credential Ve... --- [misspelling] ~326-~326: Use “an” instead of ‘a’ if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. ‘an article’, ‘an hour’. (EN_A_VS_AN) Context: ... registration, on every login, or with a audit schedule. In addition to using... --- [typographical] ~332-~332: It appears that a comma is missing. (DURING_THAT_TIME_COMMA) Context: ...registrations automatically. At this time no tooling exists to verify the credent... </blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>Markdownlint</summary><blockquote> <details> <summary>README.md</summary><blockquote> 7-7: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces) Trailing spaces --- 45-45: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces) Trailing spaces --- 50-50: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces) Trailing spaces --- 52-52: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces) Trailing spaces --- 53-53: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces) Trailing spaces --- 62-62: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces) Trailing spaces --- 183-183: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces) Trailing spaces --- 184-184: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces) Trailing spaces --- 298-298: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces) Trailing spaces --- 324-324: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces) Trailing spaces --- 328-328: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces) Trailing spaces --- 75-75: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 77-77: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 81-81: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 82-82: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 87-87: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 88-88: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 89-89: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 90-90: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 91-91: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 92-92: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 93-93: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 94-94: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 95-95: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 105-105: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 106-106: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 107-107: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 108-108: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 109-109: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 110-110: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 114-114: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 115-115: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 116-116: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 117-117: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 118-118: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 119-119: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 120-120: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 121-121: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 123-123: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 124-124: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 125-125: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 126-126: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 127-127: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 128-128: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 129-129: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 131-131: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 141-141: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 142-142: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 143-143: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 144-144: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 145-145: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 147-147: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 148-148: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 149-149: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 150-150: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 151-151: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 152-152: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 153-153: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 154-154: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 158-158: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 159-159: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 160-160: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 161-161: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 162-162: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 163-163: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 164-164: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 165-165: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 167-167: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 168-168: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 170-170: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 172-172: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 173-173: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 174-174: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 175-175: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 176-176: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 177-177: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 194-194: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 195-195: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 201-201: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 202-202: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 203-203: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 204-204: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 205-205: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 206-206: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 207-207: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 209-209: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 210-210: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 211-211: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 213-213: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 214-214: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 216-216: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 228-228: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 229-229: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 235-235: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 236-236: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 237-237: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 238-238: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 239-239: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 240-240: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 241-241: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 243-243: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 245-245: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 247-247: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 260-260: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 261-261: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 262-262: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 263-263: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 264-264: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 268-268: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 269-269: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 270-270: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 271-271: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 272-272: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 273-273: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 274-274: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 275-275: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 276-276: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 277-277: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 278-278: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 279-279: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 280-280: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 281-281: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 282-282: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 283-283: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 284-284: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 285-285: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 286-286: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 287-287: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 288-288: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 289-289: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 6-6: Expected: 1; Actual: 2 (MD012, no-multiple-blanks) Multiple consecutive blank lines --- 341-341: Expected: 1; Actual: 2 (MD012, no-multiple-blanks) Multiple consecutive blank lines --- 345-345: null (MD047, single-trailing-newline) Files should end with a single newline character </blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> </details> <details> <summary>Additional comments not posted (11)</summary><blockquote> <details> <summary>metadata/decode.go (4)</summary><blockquote> `18-36`: The implementation of `NewDecoder` function is clean and follows good practices in handling options and setting defaults. <details> <summary>Tools</summary> <details> <summary>golangci-lint</summary><blockquote> 33-33: undefined: ProductionMDSRoot (typecheck) </blockquote></details> </details> --- `83-93`: The `Decode` function properly handles the closing of `io.ReadCloser`, which is good practice to prevent resource leaks. <details> <summary>Tools</summary> <details> <summary>golangci-lint</summary><blockquote> 84-84: undefined: MetadataBLOBPayloadJSON (typecheck) </blockquote></details> </details> --- `172-189`: The options functions `WithIgnoreEntryParsingErrors` and `WithRootCertificate` are well-implemented and provide flexibility in configuration. --- `261-275`: The function `mdsParseX509Certificate` is straightforward and correctly handles the parsing of X.509 certificates. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>metadata/types.go (2)</summary><blockquote> `39-39`: Handle potential initialization errors more robustly. Consider providing more detailed error handling or recovery options when the metadata is not initialized. This could include suggestions on how to initialize or recover from this error state. --- `120-137`: Consider optimizing the function for checking undesired authenticator status. Using a map instead of an array for `defaultUndesiredAuthenticatorStatus` would optimize the lookup time from O(n) to O(1), improving performance especially as the list of statuses grows. ```diff - var defaultUndesiredAuthenticatorStatus = [...]AuthenticatorStatus{ - AttestationKeyCompromise, - UserVerificationBypass, - UserKeyRemoteCompromise, - UserKeyPhysicalCompromise, - Revoked, - } - func IsUndesiredAuthenticatorStatus(status AuthenticatorStatus) bool { - for _, s := range defaultUndesiredAuthenticatorStatus { - if s == status { - return true - } - } - return false - } + var defaultUndesiredAuthenticatorStatus = map[AuthenticatorStatus]bool{ + AttestationKeyCompromise: true, + UserVerificationBypass: true, + UserKeyRemoteCompromise: true, + UserKeyPhysicalCompromise: true, + Revoked: true, + } + func IsUndesiredAuthenticatorStatus(status AuthenticatorStatus) bool { + return defaultUndesiredAuthenticatorStatus[status] + }metadata/metadata_test.go (4)
20-38: Consider adding more detailed assertions for metadata properties.Tools
golangci-lint
21-21: undefined: NewDecoder (typecheck)
26-26: undefined: ProductionMDSURL (typecheck)
32-32: undefined: Metadata (typecheck)
96-97: Improve error handling inside the loop.
77-106: Refactor repeated HTTP GET requests into a helper function.Tools
golangci-lint
80-80: undefined: NewDecoder (typecheck)
84-84: undefined: MetadataBLOBPayloadEntryJSON (typecheck)
88-88: undefined: MetadataBLOBPayloadJSON (typecheck)
89-89: undefined: MetadataError (typecheck)
297-318: The functiongetEndpointsshould handle potential errors fromio.ReadAllto ensure robust error handling.metadata/metadata.go (1)
14-38: RefactorFetchfunction to separate concerns.- func Fetch() (metadata *Metadata, err error) { - var ( - decoder *Decoder - payload *MetadataBLOBPayloadJSON - res *http.Response - ) - if decoder, err = NewDecoder(); err != nil { - return nil, err - } - client := &http.Client{} - if res, err = client.Get(ProductionMDSURL); err != nil { - return nil, err - } - if payload, err = decoder.Decode(res.Body); err != nil { - return nil, err - } - return decoder.Parse(payload) - } + func FetchMetadata() (*Metadata, error) { + client := &http.Client{} + res, err := client.Get(ProductionMDSURL) + if err != nil { + return nil, err + } + return processResponse(res) + } + + func processResponse(res *http.Response) (*Metadata, error) { + decoder, err := NewDecoder() + if err != nil { + return nil, err + } + payload, err := decoder.Decode(res.Body) + if err != nil { + return nil, err + } + return decoder.Parse(payload) + }Likely invalid or redundant comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
metadata/providers/cached/util.go (1)
4-4: Please format the imports according to Go conventions withgoimports.Tools
golangci-lint
4-4: File is not
goimports-ed with -local github.com/go-webauthn/webauthn (goimports)metadata/providers/memory/provider.go (1)
5-5: Please format the imports according to Go conventions withgoimports.Tools
golangci-lint
5-5: File is not
goimports-ed with -local github.com/go-webauthn/webauthn (goimports)
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (9)
- metadata/metadata.go (2 hunks)
- metadata/providers/cached/doc.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/providers/cached/options.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/providers/cached/provider.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/providers/cached/util.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/providers/memory/doc.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/providers/memory/options.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/providers/memory/provider.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/types.go (1 hunks)
Files not summarized due to errors (1)
- metadata/metadata.go: Error: Message exceeds token limit
Files not reviewed due to errors (3)
- metadata/providers/memory/options.go (no review received)
- metadata/providers/cached/provider.go (no review received)
- metadata/types.go (no review received)
Additional context used
golangci-lint
metadata/providers/cached/util.go
4-4: File is not
goimports-ed with -local github.com/go-webauthn/webauthn (goimports)metadata/providers/memory/provider.go
5-5: File is not
goimports-ed with -local github.com/go-webauthn/webauthn (goimports)metadata/types.go
[high] 94-94: G101: Potential hardcoded credentials (gosec)
metadata/metadata.go
130-130: Comment should end in a period (godot)
276-276: Comment should end in a period (godot)
287-287: Comment should end in a period (godot)
293-293: Comment should end in a period (godot)
296-296: Comment should end in a period (godot)
320-320: Comment should end in a period (godot)
440-440: Comment should end in a period (godot)
376-376:
occuredis a misspelling ofoccurred(misspell)
Additional comments not posted (10)
metadata/providers/memory/doc.go (1)
3-5: The package description is clear and effectively communicates the intended use and limitations of thememoryprovider.metadata/providers/cached/doc.go (1)
3-5: The package description is well-written, providing clear guidance on the use of thecachedprovider and its advantages.metadata/providers/cached/options.go (8)
16-23: LGTM! TheWithPathfunction correctly sets the provider's file path.
25-32: LGTM! TheWithUpdatefunction correctly handles the update settings for the provider.
34-41: LGTM! TheWithForceUpdatefunction correctly handles the force update setting.
43-50: LGTM! TheWithNewfunction correctly sets the custom creation function for the provider.
52-60: LGTM! TheWithDecoderfunction correctly sets the decoder for the provider.
62-74: LGTM! TheWithMetadataURLfunction correctly validates and sets the metadata URL.
76-83: LGTM! TheWithClientfunction correctly sets the HTTP client for the provider.
85-92: LGTM! TheWithClockfunction correctly allows for the injection of a custom clock.
james-d-elliott
force-pushed
the
feat-mds3-provider
branch
from
d0dc6fc
to
9de1171
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 16
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (9)
- metadata/metadata.go (2 hunks)
- metadata/providers/cached/doc.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/providers/cached/options.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/providers/cached/provider.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/providers/cached/util.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/providers/memory/doc.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/providers/memory/options.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/providers/memory/provider.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/types.go (1 hunks)
Files not summarized due to errors (1)
- metadata/metadata.go: Error: Message exceeds token limit
Additional context used
golangci-lint
metadata/providers/memory/doc.go
[warning] 1-1: package-comments: should have a package comment (revive)
metadata/providers/cached/util.go
4-4: File is not
goimports-ed with -local github.com/go-webauthn/webauthn (goimports)metadata/providers/memory/provider.go
5-5: File is not
goimports-ed with -local github.com/go-webauthn/webauthn (goimports)
[warning] 43-43: unused-parameter: parameter 'ctx' seems to be unused, consider removing or renaming it as _ (revive)
[warning] 57-57: unused-parameter: parameter 'ctx' seems to be unused, consider removing or renaming it as _ (revive)
[warning] 61-61: unused-parameter: parameter 'ctx' seems to be unused, consider removing or renaming it as _ (revive)
[warning] 65-65: unused-parameter: parameter 'ctx' seems to be unused, consider removing or renaming it as _ (revive)
[warning] 69-69: unused-parameter: parameter 'ctx' seems to be unused, consider removing or renaming it as _ (revive)
[warning] 73-73: unused-parameter: parameter 'ctx' seems to be unused, consider removing or renaming it as _ (revive)
metadata/types.go
[high] 94-94: G101: Potential hardcoded credentials (gosec)
[warning] 14-14: exported: exported type Provider should have comment or be unexported (revive)
metadata/metadata.go
130-130: Comment should end in a period (godot)
276-276: Comment should end in a period (godot)
287-287: Comment should end in a period (godot)
293-293: Comment should end in a period (godot)
296-296: Comment should end in a period (godot)
320-320: Comment should end in a period (godot)
440-440: Comment should end in a period (godot)
376-376:
occuredis a misspelling ofoccurred(misspell)
Additional comments not posted (4)
metadata/providers/cached/doc.go (1)
1-9: The package comment is clear and informative.metadata/providers/cached/util.go (1)
10-23: Ensure proper error handling and resource management in file operations.metadata/providers/memory/provider.go (1)
11-83: The implementation of the memory provider is correct and follows best practices.Tools
golangci-lint
[warning] 43-43: unused-parameter: parameter 'ctx' seems to be unused, consider removing or renaming it as _ (revive)
[warning] 57-57: unused-parameter: parameter 'ctx' seems to be unused, consider removing or renaming it as _ (revive)
[warning] 61-61: unused-parameter: parameter 'ctx' seems to be unused, consider removing or renaming it as _ (revive)
[warning] 65-65: unused-parameter: parameter 'ctx' seems to be unused, consider removing or renaming it as _ (revive)
[warning] 69-69: unused-parameter: parameter 'ctx' seems to be unused, consider removing or renaming it as _ (revive)
[warning] 73-73: unused-parameter: parameter 'ctx' seems to be unused, consider removing or renaming it as _ (revive)
metadata/metadata.go (1)
376-376: Correct spelling mistake in error message.- return statement, fmt.Errorf("error occurred parsing statement with description '%s': error occured parsing AAGUID value: %w", j.Description, err) + return statement, fmt.Errorf("error occurred parsing statement with description '%s': error occurred parsing AAGUID value: %w", j.Description, err)Likely invalid or redundant comment.
Tools
golangci-lint
376-376:
occuredis a misspelling ofoccurred(misspell)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 20
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
metadata/metadata_test.go (2)
20-38: Consider enhancing the test forTestProductionMetadataTOCParsingby adding more detailed assertions for metadata properties.This will ensure that not only are there no errors during the parsing process, but the metadata properties are also parsed and returned as expected. This aligns with the TODO item in the PR to add more tests.
96-97: Improve error handling inside the loop inTestConformanceMetadataTOCParsing.When an error occurs during decoding, the current implementation logs the error and stops processing further. Consider adding a
continuestatement after logging to proceed with the next iteration, which can make the test more resilient and thorough.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (12)
- metadata/decode.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/metadata.go (2 hunks)
- metadata/metadata_test.go (4 hunks)
- metadata/providers/cached/provider.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/providers/memory/options.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/providers/memory/provider.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/types.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/attestation.go (4 hunks)
- protocol/metadata.go (1 hunks)
- webauthn/login.go (6 hunks)
- webauthn/registration.go (3 hunks)
- webauthn/types.go (4 hunks)
Files not summarized due to errors (1)
- metadata/metadata.go: Error: Message exceeds token limit
Additional context used
golangci-lint
metadata/providers/memory/provider.go
5-5: File is not
goimports-ed with -local github.com/go-webauthn/webauthn (goimports)
[warning] 43-43: unused-parameter: parameter 'ctx' seems to be unused, consider removing or renaming it as _ (revive)
[warning] 57-57: unused-parameter: parameter 'ctx' seems to be unused, consider removing or renaming it as _ (revive)
[warning] 61-61: unused-parameter: parameter 'ctx' seems to be unused, consider removing or renaming it as _ (revive)
[warning] 65-65: unused-parameter: parameter 'ctx' seems to be unused, consider removing or renaming it as _ (revive)
[warning] 69-69: unused-parameter: parameter 'ctx' seems to be unused, consider removing or renaming it as _ (revive)
[warning] 73-73: unused-parameter: parameter 'ctx' seems to be unused, consider removing or renaming it as _ (revive)
metadata/decode.go
77-77:
occuredis a misspelling ofoccurred(misspell)protocol/attestation.go
140-140: cyclomatic complexity 23 of func
(*AttestationObject).VerifyAttestationis high (> 15) (gocyclo)
23-23: Comment should end in a period (godot)
68-68: Comment should end in a period (godot)
71-71: Comment should end in a period (godot)
152-152: Comment should end in a period (godot)
webauthn/login.go
222-222: cyclomatic complexity 22 of func
(*WebAuthn).validateLoginis high (> 15) (gocyclo)metadata/types.go
[high] 94-94: G101: Potential hardcoded credentials (gosec)
metadata/metadata.go
371-371:
occuredis a misspelling ofoccurred(misspell)
Additional comments not posted (5)
webauthn/types.go (3)
66-68: AddedMDSfield toConfigstruct for metadata provider integration.This addition aligns with the PR's objective to enhance metadata handling capabilities. Ensure that all uses of the
Configstruct properly initialize this new field where necessary.
151-169: Added new methods to theConfigstruct for accessing configuration data.These methods enhance the encapsulation and accessibility of the configuration data, which is crucial for the robustness and maintainability of the system.
215-215: AddedRelyingPartyIDfield toSessionDatastruct.This addition is crucial for maintaining the context of the relying party during a session, which is essential for security and auditability.
webauthn/registration.go (1)
94-94: AddedRelyingPartyIDtoSessionDataduring registration.This change ensures that the
SessionDatacorrectly reflects the relying party's ID, which is essential for subsequent authentication steps and auditing.metadata/metadata.go (1)
371-371: Correct spelling mistake in error message.There's a spelling mistake in the error message within the
Parsemethod ofStatementJSON.- return statement, fmt.Errorf("error occurred parsing statement with description '%s': error occured parsing AAGUID value: %w", j.Description, err) + return statement, fmt.Errorf("error occurred parsing statement with description '%s': error occurred parsing AAGUID value: %w", j.Description, err)Likely invalid or redundant comment.
Tools
golangci-lint
371-371:
occuredis a misspelling ofoccurred(misspell)
| func (p *Provider) GetEntry(ctx context.Context, aaguid uuid.UUID) (entry *metadata.Entry, err error) { | ||
| if p.mds == nil { | ||
| return nil, metadata.ErrNotInitialized | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| var ok bool | ||
|
|
||
| if entry, ok = p.mds[aaguid]; ok { | ||
| return entry, nil | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return nil, nil | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| func (p *Provider) GetValidateEntry(ctx context.Context) (require bool) { | ||
| return p.entry | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| func (p *Provider) GetValidateEntryPermitZeroAAGUID(ctx context.Context) (skip bool) { | ||
| return p.entryPermitZero | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| func (p *Provider) GetValidateTrustAnchor(ctx context.Context) (validate bool) { | ||
| return p.anchors | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| func (p *Provider) GetValidateStatus(ctx context.Context) (validate bool) { | ||
| return p.status | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider removing or renaming unused ctx parameters.
- func (p *Provider) GetEntry(ctx context.Context, aaguid uuid.UUID) (entry *metadata.Entry, err error) {
+ func (p *Provider) GetEntry(_ context.Context, aaguid uuid.UUID) (entry *metadata.Entry, err error) {Repeat similar changes for other methods with unused ctx parameters.
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
Tools
golangci-lint
[warning] 43-43: unused-parameter: parameter 'ctx' seems to be unused, consider removing or renaming it as _ (revive)
[warning] 57-57: unused-parameter: parameter 'ctx' seems to be unused, consider removing or renaming it as _ (revive)
[warning] 61-61: unused-parameter: parameter 'ctx' seems to be unused, consider removing or renaming it as _ (revive)
[warning] 65-65: unused-parameter: parameter 'ctx' seems to be unused, consider removing or renaming it as _ (revive)
[warning] 69-69: unused-parameter: parameter 'ctx' seems to be unused, consider removing or renaming it as _ (revive)
james-d-elliott
force-pushed
the
feat-mds3-provider
branch
from
0630c8c
to
6ec129b
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (9)
- metadata/decode.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/doc.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/metadata.go (2 hunks)
- metadata/providers/cached/doc.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/providers/cached/util.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/providers/memory/doc.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/providers/memory/provider.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_tpm_test.go (12 hunks)
- protocol/base64_test.go (2 hunks)
Files not summarized due to errors (1)
- metadata/metadata.go: Error: Message exceeds token limit
Additional context used
golangci-lint
metadata/providers/memory/provider.go
[warning] 44-44: unused-parameter: parameter 'ctx' seems to be unused, consider removing or renaming it as _ (revive)
[warning] 58-58: unused-parameter: parameter 'ctx' seems to be unused, consider removing or renaming it as _ (revive)
[warning] 62-62: unused-parameter: parameter 'ctx' seems to be unused, consider removing or renaming it as _ (revive)
[warning] 66-66: unused-parameter: parameter 'ctx' seems to be unused, consider removing or renaming it as _ (revive)
[warning] 70-70: unused-parameter: parameter 'ctx' seems to be unused, consider removing or renaming it as _ (revive)
[warning] 74-74: unused-parameter: parameter 'ctx' seems to be unused, consider removing or renaming it as _ (revive)
metadata/decode.go
102-102: Comment should end in a period (godot)
104-104: Comment should end in a period (godot)
metadata/metadata.go
125-125: Comment should end in a period (godot)
271-271: Comment should end in a period (godot)
282-282: Comment should end in a period (godot)
288-288: Comment should end in a period (godot)
291-291: Comment should end in a period (godot)
315-315: Comment should end in a period (godot)
Additional comments not posted (22)
metadata/doc.go (1)
1-2: The package comment clearly defines the scope and functionality of themetadatapackage.metadata/providers/memory/doc.go (1)
1-4: The package comment provides a detailed explanation of thememorypackage's purpose and its typical use cases, which enhances understanding for developers.metadata/providers/cached/doc.go (1)
1-8: The package comment is comprehensive, detailing the functionality and operational characteristics of thecachedpackage. It might be beneficial to clarify what "no automatic update functionality" entails to avoid potential confusion.protocol/base64_test.go (1)
10-11: The use ofassertandrequirefrom thetestifylibrary enhances the readability and robustness of the tests. Consider adding more edge cases to ensure comprehensive coverage.Also applies to: 46-49
metadata/providers/cached/util.go (3)
11-24: The functiondoTruncateCopyAndSeekStartis well-implemented with proper error handling for file operations.
27-40: The functiondoOpenOrCreatecorrectly handles file opening and creation with appropriate error checks.
43-50: The functiondefaultNewcorrectly initializes a new memory provider with comprehensive configuration options.metadata/providers/memory/provider.go (3)
12-28: The functionNewcorrectly initializes a memory provider with default settings and applies configuration options robustly.
44-55: The functionGetEntrycorrectly handles the retrieval of entries with appropriate initialization checks and error handling.Tools
golangci-lint
[warning] 44-44: unused-parameter: parameter 'ctx' seems to be unused, consider removing or renaming it as _ (revive)
74-79: The functionValidateStatusReportscorrectly performs status report validation based on the provider's configuration.Tools
golangci-lint
[warning] 74-74: unused-parameter: parameter 'ctx' seems to be unused, consider removing or renaming it as _ (revive)
metadata/decode.go (3)
18-36: The functionNewDecoderis well-implemented, providing a flexible initialization of the decoder with sensible defaults and error handling.
48-80: The functionParseeffectively handles the parsing of metadata with comprehensive error handling and conditional error reporting based on configuration.
95-166: The functionDecodeBytesis robust, handling JWT parsing, certificate chain validation, and final decoding using a mapstructure decoder.Tools
golangci-lint
102-102: Comment should end in a period (godot)
104-104: Comment should end in a period (godot)
protocol/attestation_tpm_test.go (9)
19-19: Added import forrequirepackage.This import is necessary for the new assertions using
requirewhich provide a more robust testing mechanism by failing fast if conditions are not met.
31-32: Refactored to userequire.NoErrorfor error handling in tests.This change enhances the test by ensuring it fails immediately if an error is encountered, which is a best practice in unit testing for clear and direct error handling.
133-133: Consider usingrequire.Containsfor a more robust assertion.This suggestion has been previously made and is still valid. Implementing it would enhance the test's reliability by ensuring that the test fails immediately if the condition is not met.
369-369: Consider usingrequire.Containsfor a more robust assertion.This suggestion has been previously made and is still valid. Implementing it would enhance the test's reliability by ensuring that the test fails immediately if the condition is not met.
88-88: Refactored negative test cases for TPM attestation.The refactoring introduces more specific error messages and conditions, improving the clarity and maintainability of the tests. Each test case now clearly defines the expected error, making the tests more readable and easier to understand.
Also applies to: 93-93, 98-98, 103-103, 108-108, 113-113, 118-118, 128-128
175-175: IntroduceddefaultAttStatementfor reusability in tests.This change centralizes the default attestation statement, reducing duplication and improving maintainability by allowing changes to be made in one place that affect multiple tests.
359-359: Enhanced test setup forTestTPMAttestationVerificationFailPubAreaby programmatically settingstmtPubArea.This setup is crucial for testing the handling of public area mismatches in TPM attestation. It ensures that the tests are dynamic and can handle various scenarios by manipulating the public area data directly.
Also applies to: 369-369
399-399: Enhanced test setup forTestTPMAttestationVerificationFailCertInfoby programmatically settingstmtCertInfo.This setup is essential for testing the handling of certificate information mismatches in TPM attestation. It allows the tests to dynamically adjust the certificate information, testing the robustness of the attestation verification process.
Also applies to: 458-458
514-514: Enhanced test setup forTestTPMAttestationVerificationFailX5cby programmatically settingstmtX5CandstmtCertInfo.This setup is critical for testing the handling of X.509 certificate chain issues in TPM attestation. It allows the tests to dynamically adjust the X.509 certificate chain and certificate information, ensuring that the attestation verification process is thoroughly tested against various error conditions.
Also applies to: 547-547, 574-575
james-d-elliott
force-pushed
the
feat-mds3-provider
branch
from
6ec129b
to
9eaa24e
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 47
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (18)
protocol/attestation_apple.go (2)
34-34: Remove leading whitespace at the start of the block.Tools
golangci-lint
34-34: block should not start with a whitespace (wsl)
Line range hint
56-56: Ensure the result ofappendis assigned back to the original slice to maintain state.- nonceToHash := append(att.RawAuthData, clientDataHash...) + nonceToHash = append(att.RawAuthData, clientDataHash...)Tools
golangci-lint
34-34: block should not start with a whitespace (wsl)
protocol/attestation_u2f.go (1)
Line range hint
27-27: Check error handling forwebauthncbor.Unmarshal.- webauthncbor.Unmarshal(att.AuthData.AttData.CredentialPublicKey, &key) + if err := webauthncbor.Unmarshal(att.AuthData.AttData.CredentialPublicKey, &key); err != nil { + return "", nil, err + }protocol/attestation_safetynet.go (1)
Line range hint
88-88: Ensure proper spacing after return statements for better readability.- return "", nil, ErrInvalidAttestation.WithDetails("Invalid nonce for in SafetyNet response") + + return "", nil, ErrInvalidAttestation.WithDetails("Invalid nonce for in SafetyNet response")webauthn/types.go (1)
Line range hint
92-92: Ensure comments end with a period for consistency.protocol/attestation_packed.go (1)
Line range hint
75-75: Reduce cyclomatic complexity inhandleBasicAttestation.The function
handleBasicAttestationis quite complex. Consider breaking it down into smaller, more manageable functions, each handling a specific part of the attestation process. This will improve readability and maintainability.Tools
golangci-lint
37-37: block should not start with a whitespace (wsl)
webauthn/registration.go (1)
Line range hint
217-234: Enhance error handling around metadata provider integration.The integration with the metadata provider in
CreateCredentialis crucial for the security and correctness of the registration process. Consider adding more detailed error handling and logging around this integration to ensure that any issues with metadata retrieval or validation are clearly reported and handled.protocol/credential.go (2)
Line range hint
136-192: Ensure proper error handling and metadata usage in credential verification.The function
Verifynow includes ametadata.Providerparameter to handle metadata during attestation verification. Ensure that all calls to this function across the codebase are updated to include this parameter. Additionally, consider implementing error handling for the metadata provider to ensure robustness.
Line range hint
71-71: Handle the error returned byio.Copyto ensure proper cleanup.- defer io.Copy(io.Discard, response.Body) + defer func() { + if _, err := io.Copy(io.Discard, response.Body); err != nil { + log.Printf("Error discarding response body: %v", err) + } + }()This change ensures that any errors during the discarding of the response body are logged, improving the robustness of the error handling in the application.
protocol/attestation_androidkey.go (1)
Line range hint
198-201: Remove unused fields inrootOfTrust.- verifiedBootKey []byte - deviceLocked bool - verifiedBootState verifiedBootState - verifiedBootHash []byteThese fields are marked as unused by static analysis. If they are not intended for future use, consider removing them to clean up the codebase.
Tools
golangci-lint
32-32: cyclomatic complexity 21 of func
verifyAndroidKeyFormatis high (> 15) (gocyclo)
50-50: Comment should end in a period (godot)
53-53: Comment should end in a period (godot)
protocol/attestation.go (1)
Line range hint
23-23: Ensure comments end with a period for consistency.- // comment + // comment.Also applies to: 68-68, 71-71, 152-152
protocol/attestation_tpm.go (1)
Line range hint
101-101: Address issues with code style and structure.Consider the following improvements:
- Ensure append results are assigned back to the slice.
- Convert single-case switches to if statements.
- Avoid cuddling return statements with blocks having more than two lines.
- Ensure proper spacing and structure around control statements.
Also applies to: 303-303, 332-332, 307-307, 323-323, 326-326, 310-310
Tools
golangci-lint
22-22: cyclomatic complexity 47 of func
verifyTPMFormatis high (> 15) (gocyclo)protocol/webauthncose/webauthncose.go (3)
Line range hint
185-185: Check error return values fromwebauthncbor.Unmarshal.Ignoring error return values can lead to runtime panics if the unmarshalling fails. Always check and handle errors appropriately.
Also applies to: 191-191, 198-198, 205-205
Line range hint
216-216: Update deprecated functionelliptic.Unmarshal.The
elliptic.Unmarshalfunction has been deprecated. Consider using thecrypto/ecdhpackage for ECDH operations.
Line range hint
30-30: Remove unused field_struct.The
_structfield is unused and should be removed to clean up the code.webauthn/login.go (1)
Line range hint
234-234: Reduce the cyclomatic complexity ofvalidateLogin.The
validateLoginfunction has a high cyclomatic complexity, which can make the code hard to read and maintain. Consider refactoring this function to simplify it, possibly by breaking it into smaller, more manageable functions.Consider breaking down the
validateLoginfunction into smaller functions, each handling a specific part of the validation process. This can improve readability and maintainability.metadata/types.go (1)
14-37: Ensure proper documentation for theProviderinterface and its methods.The
Providerinterface and its methods are well-defined but could benefit from more detailed documentation, especially explaining the context and usage of each method. This will enhance maintainability and clarity for other developers.protocol/attestation_tpm_test.go (1)
Line range hint
469-469: The variablex5cTemplateis declared but not used in any test.Consider removing the unused variable to clean up the codebase.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (42)
- README.md (1 hunks)
- metadata/const.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/decode.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/doc.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/metadata.go (2 hunks)
- metadata/metadata_test.go (4 hunks)
- metadata/passkey_authenticator.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/providers/cached/doc.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/providers/cached/options.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/providers/cached/provider.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/providers/cached/util.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/providers/memory/doc.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/providers/memory/options.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/providers/memory/provider.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/status.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/types.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/attestation.go (4 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_androidkey.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_androidkey_test.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_apple.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_apple_test.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_packed.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_packed_test.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_safetynet.go (6 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_safetynet_test.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_test.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_tpm.go (2 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_tpm_test.go (12 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_u2f.go (2 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_u2f_test.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/base64_test.go (2 hunks)
- protocol/client_test.go (3 hunks)
- protocol/const.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/credential.go (3 hunks)
- protocol/credential_test.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/metadata.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/webauthncose/webauthncose.go (1 hunks)
- webauthn/credential.go (5 hunks)
- webauthn/credential_test.go (2 hunks)
- webauthn/login.go (7 hunks)
- webauthn/registration.go (3 hunks)
- webauthn/types.go (4 hunks)
Files not summarized due to errors (1)
- metadata/metadata.go: Error: Message exceeds token limit
Additional context used
golangci-lint
metadata/status.go
11-11: cyclomatic complexity 18 of func
ValidateStatusReportsis high (> 15) (gocyclo)metadata/providers/memory/provider.go
[warning] 44-44: unused-parameter: parameter 'ctx' seems to be unused, consider removing or renaming it as _ (revive)
[warning] 58-58: unused-parameter: parameter 'ctx' seems to be unused, consider removing or renaming it as _ (revive)
[warning] 62-62: unused-parameter: parameter 'ctx' seems to be unused, consider removing or renaming it as _ (revive)
[warning] 66-66: unused-parameter: parameter 'ctx' seems to be unused, consider removing or renaming it as _ (revive)
[warning] 70-70: unused-parameter: parameter 'ctx' seems to be unused, consider removing or renaming it as _ (revive)
[warning] 74-74: unused-parameter: parameter 'ctx' seems to be unused, consider removing or renaming it as _ (revive)
protocol/attestation_apple.go
56-56: appendAssign: append result not assigned to the same slice (gocritic)
34-34: block should not start with a whitespace (wsl)
protocol/client_test.go
10-10:
setupCollectedClientData-originalways receives"http://example.com"(unparam)protocol/attestation_u2f.go
27-27: Error return value of
webauthncbor.Unmarshalis not checked (errcheck)protocol/attestation_safetynet.go
44-44: cyclomatic complexity 17 of func
verifySafetyNetFormatis high (> 15) (gocyclo)
88-88: return statements should not be cuddled if block has more than two lines (wsl)
webauthn/types.go
92-92: Comment should end in a period (godot)
protocol/attestation_packed.go
179-179: Error return value of
asn1.Unmarshalis not checked (errcheck)
99-99: appendAssign: append result not assigned to the same slice (gocritic)
211-211: appendAssign: append result not assigned to the same slice (gocritic)
75-75: cyclomatic complexity 20 of func
handleBasicAttestationis high (> 15) (gocyclo)
206-206: block should not start with a whitespace (wsl)
37-37: block should not start with a whitespace (wsl)
protocol/attestation_safetynet_test.go
58-58: var
safetyNetTestRequestis unused (unused)protocol/credential.go
71-71: Error return value of
io.Copyis not checked (errcheck)protocol/attestation_androidkey.go
64-64: appendAssign: append result not assigned to the same slice (gocritic)
32-32: cyclomatic complexity 21 of func
verifyAndroidKeyFormatis high (> 15) (gocyclo)
50-50: Comment should end in a period (godot)
53-53: Comment should end in a period (godot)
198-198: field
verifiedBootKeyis unused (unused)
199-199: field
deviceLockedis unused (unused)
200-200: field
verifiedBootStateis unused (unused)
201-201: field
verifiedBootHashis unused (unused)protocol/attestation.go
140-140: cyclomatic complexity 23 of func
(*AttestationObject).VerifyAttestationis high (> 15) (gocyclo)
23-23: Comment should end in a period (godot)
68-68: Comment should end in a period (godot)
71-71: Comment should end in a period (godot)
152-152: Comment should end in a period (godot)
protocol/attestation_tpm.go
101-101: appendAssign: append result not assigned to the same slice (gocritic)
303-303: singleCaseSwitch: should rewrite switch statement to if statement (gocritic)
22-22: cyclomatic complexity 47 of func
verifyTPMFormatis high (> 15) (gocyclo)
332-332: return statements should not be cuddled if block has more than two lines (wsl)
307-307: only one cuddle assignment allowed before if statement (wsl)
323-323: if statements should only be cuddled with assignments (wsl)
326-326: if statements should only be cuddled with assignments (wsl)
310-310: only one cuddle assignment allowed before range statement (wsl)
protocol/webauthncose/webauthncose.go
185-185: Error return value of
webauthncbor.Unmarshalis not checked (errcheck)
191-191: Error return value of
webauthncbor.Unmarshalis not checked (errcheck)
198-198: Error return value of
webauthncbor.Unmarshalis not checked (errcheck)
205-205: Error return value of
webauthncbor.Unmarshalis not checked (errcheck)
30-30: field
_structis unused (unused)
216-216: SA1019: elliptic.Unmarshal has been deprecated since Go 1.21: for ECDH, use the crypto/ecdh package. This function accepts an encoding equivalent to that of the NewPublicKey methods in crypto/ecdh. (staticcheck)
webauthn/login.go
234-234: cyclomatic complexity 22 of func
(*WebAuthn).validateLoginis high (> 15) (gocyclo)
205-205:
compatabilityis a misspelling ofcompatibility(misspell)metadata/types.go
[high] 94-94: G101: Potential hardcoded credentials (gosec)
[warning] 164-164: var-naming: don't use ALL_CAPS in Go names; use CamelCase (revive)
protocol/attestation_tpm_test.go
469-469: var
x5cTemplateis unused (unused)metadata/metadata.go
[warning] 787-787: var-naming: struct field MaxCredentialIdLength should be MaxCredentialIDLength (revive)
[warning] 837-837: var-naming: struct field MaxCredentialIdLength should be MaxCredentialIDLength (revive)
906-906: S1001: should use copy(to, from[:]) instead of a loop (gosimple)
LanguageTool
README.md
[grammar] ~25-~25: It seems that a pronoun is missing. (IF_VB)
Context: ...lly 1 patch release of go,
for example if go 1.21.0 is released, we will likely s...
[uncategorized] ~28-~28: Use a comma before ‘and’ if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short). (COMMA_COMPOUND_SENTENCE)
Context: ...ement of security in a dependent project and we aim to avoid backwards
compatibilit...
[uncategorized] ~29-~29: Possible missing comma found. (AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
Context: ...specially important in a language like
go where their backwards compatibility whe...
[uncategorized] ~39-~39: Use a comma before ‘and’ if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short). (COMMA_COMPOUND_SENTENCE)
Context: ...nately being used in dependent libraries and we'd opt for ensuring we can easily obt...
[uncategorized] ~40-~40: Possible missing comma found. (AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
Context: ... rather than backwards compatibility. A such we have lifted the version requirement ...
[typographical] ~45-~45: Consider adding a comma. (IF_THERE_COMMA)
Context: ... 0, as per Semantic Versioning 2.0 rules there may be breaking changes without warning...
[style] ~45-~45: ‘without warning’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative. (EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_WITHOUT_WARNING)
Context: ...2.0 rules there may be breaking changes without warning.
While we strive to avoid such change...
[style] ~52-~52: As a shorter alternative for ‘able to’, consider using “can”. (BE_ABLE_TO)
Context: ...values.Make sure your
usermodel is able to handle the interface functions laid out...
[uncategorized] ~58-~58: It appears that in this idiom a possessive apostrophe is missing. (FOR_NOUN_SAKE)
Context: ...ow some basic use cases of the library. For consistency sake the following variables are used
to de...
[uncategorized] ~253-~253: A comma may be missing after the conjunctive/linking adverb ‘However’. (SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA)
Context: ...y by default does not enforce timeouts. However the default timeouts sent to the browse...
[typographical] ~254-~254: Consider adding a comma before the interrupter. (HOWEVER_COMMA)
Context: ...ou can override both of these behaviours however.package example import ( ... --- [style] ~319-~319: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym. (ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE) Context: ...e values are not restored the [webauthn.Credential] may fail validation in this scenario.... --- [style] ~324-~324: ‘exactly the same’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative. (EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_EXACTLY_THE_SAME) Context: ...as the [webauthn.Credential] struct has exactly the same values when restored the [Credential Ve... --- [misspelling] ~326-~326: Use “an” instead of ‘a’ if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. ‘an article’, ‘an hour’. (EN_A_VS_AN) Context: ... registration, on every login, or with a audit schedule. In addition to using... --- [uncategorized] ~328-~328: Possible missing comma found. (AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA) Context: ...dition to using the [Credential Verify] function the [webauthn.Config](https://pkg.go.... --- [typographical] ~332-~332: It appears that a comma is missing. (DURING_THAT_TIME_COMMA) Context: ...registrations automatically. At this time no tooling exists to verify the credent... --- [uncategorized] ~339-~339: Possible missing comma found. (AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA) Context: ... implementation. Without their amazing work this library could not exist. [git... </blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>Markdownlint</summary><blockquote> <details> <summary>README.md</summary><blockquote> 7-7: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces) Trailing spaces --- 45-45: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces) Trailing spaces --- 50-50: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces) Trailing spaces --- 52-52: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces) Trailing spaces --- 53-53: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces) Trailing spaces --- 62-62: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces) Trailing spaces --- 183-183: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces) Trailing spaces --- 184-184: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces) Trailing spaces --- 298-298: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces) Trailing spaces --- 324-324: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces) Trailing spaces --- 328-328: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces) Trailing spaces --- 75-75: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 77-77: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 81-81: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 82-82: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 87-87: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 88-88: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 89-89: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 90-90: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 91-91: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 92-92: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 93-93: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 94-94: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 95-95: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 105-105: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 106-106: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 107-107: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 108-108: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 109-109: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 110-110: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 114-114: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 115-115: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 116-116: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 117-117: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 118-118: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 119-119: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 120-120: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 121-121: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 123-123: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 124-124: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 125-125: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 126-126: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 127-127: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 128-128: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 129-129: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 131-131: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 141-141: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 142-142: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 143-143: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 144-144: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 145-145: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 147-147: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 148-148: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 149-149: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 150-150: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 151-151: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 152-152: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 153-153: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 154-154: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 158-158: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 159-159: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 160-160: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 161-161: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 162-162: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 163-163: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 164-164: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 165-165: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 167-167: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 168-168: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 170-170: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 172-172: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 173-173: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 174-174: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 175-175: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 176-176: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 177-177: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 194-194: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 195-195: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 201-201: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 202-202: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 203-203: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 204-204: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 205-205: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 206-206: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 207-207: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 209-209: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 210-210: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 211-211: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 213-213: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 214-214: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 216-216: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 228-228: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 229-229: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 235-235: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 236-236: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 237-237: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 238-238: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 239-239: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 240-240: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 241-241: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 243-243: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 245-245: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 247-247: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 260-260: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 261-261: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 262-262: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 263-263: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 264-264: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 268-268: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 269-269: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 270-270: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 271-271: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 272-272: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 273-273: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 274-274: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 275-275: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 276-276: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 277-277: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 278-278: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 279-279: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 280-280: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 281-281: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 282-282: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 283-283: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 284-284: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 285-285: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 286-286: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 287-287: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 288-288: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 289-289: Column: 1 (MD010, no-hard-tabs) Hard tabs --- 6-6: Expected: 1; Actual: 2 (MD012, no-multiple-blanks) Multiple consecutive blank lines --- 341-341: Expected: 1; Actual: 2 (MD012, no-multiple-blanks) Multiple consecutive blank lines --- 345-345: null (MD047, single-trailing-newline) Files should end with a single newline character </blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> </details> <details> <summary>Additional comments not posted (42)</summary><blockquote> <details> <summary>metadata/doc.go (1)</summary><blockquote> `1-2`: The package comment is clear and succinct, effectively explaining the purpose of the package. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>protocol/const.go (1)</summary><blockquote> `3-11`: The introduction of constants for attestation statement keys is a good practice. It enhances code readability and maintainability by avoiding hard-coded strings. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>metadata/providers/memory/doc.go (1)</summary><blockquote> `1-4`: The package comment provides a comprehensive overview of the memory provider's role and its intended use case. It clearly outlines the limitations and the scenarios in which it might be appropriate to use this provider. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>metadata/providers/cached/doc.go (1)</summary><blockquote> `1-8`: The package comment effectively communicates the functionality and recommended use of the cached provider. It transparently mentions the current limitations regarding automatic updates, which is crucial for users to understand. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>metadata/passkey_authenticator.go (1)</summary><blockquote> `3-16`: The type definitions for `PasskeyAuthenticator` and `PassKeyAuthenticatorAAGUID` are clear and well-documented. Good use of JSON tags for proper unmarshalling. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>protocol/base64_test.go (1)</summary><blockquote> Line range hint `10-49`: The test `TestBase64UnmarshalJSON` is well-structured and effectively tests the unmarshalling of base64 encoded data. Good use of assertions to validate the expected outcomes. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>metadata/providers/cached/util.go (3)</summary><blockquote> `11-24`: The function `doTruncateCopyAndSeekStart` is well-implemented with proper error handling for file operations. --- `27-40`: The function `doOpenOrCreate` correctly handles both opening an existing file and creating a new one if it does not exist. --- `43-51`: The function `defaultNew` effectively utilizes the `memory` package to configure and create a new metadata provider. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>metadata/providers/memory/provider.go (6)</summary><blockquote> `12-28`: The function `New` is well-implemented, correctly applying options and handling errors during the provider's initialization. --- `44-56`: The function `GetEntry` correctly handles metadata retrieval with proper initialization checks. <details> <summary>Tools</summary> <details> <summary>golangci-lint</summary><blockquote> [warning] 44-44: unused-parameter: parameter 'ctx' seems to be unused, consider removing or renaming it as _ (revive) </blockquote></details> </details> --- `58-60`: The function `GetValidateEntry` correctly provides the configuration for entry validation. <details> <summary>Tools</summary> <details> <summary>golangci-lint</summary><blockquote> [warning] 58-58: unused-parameter: parameter 'ctx' seems to be unused, consider removing or renaming it as _ (revive) </blockquote></details> </details> --- `62-64`: The function `GetValidateEntryPermitZeroAAGUID` correctly provides the configuration for permitting zero AAGUID. <details> <summary>Tools</summary> <details> <summary>golangci-lint</summary><blockquote> [warning] 62-62: unused-parameter: parameter 'ctx' seems to be unused, consider removing or renaming it as _ (revive) </blockquote></details> </details> --- `66-68`: The function `GetValidateTrustAnchor` correctly provides the configuration for trust anchor validation. <details> <summary>Tools</summary> <details> <summary>golangci-lint</summary><blockquote> [warning] 66-66: unused-parameter: parameter 'ctx' seems to be unused, consider removing or renaming it as _ (revive) </blockquote></details> </details> --- `70-72`: The function `GetValidateStatus` correctly provides the configuration for status validation. <details> <summary>Tools</summary> <details> <summary>golangci-lint</summary><blockquote> [warning] 70-70: unused-parameter: parameter 'ctx' seems to be unused, consider removing or renaming it as _ (revive) </blockquote></details> </details> </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>metadata/providers/cached/options.go (8)</summary><blockquote> `16-23`: The function `WithPath` correctly sets the path name for the cached file, adhering to the required configuration. --- `25-32`: The function `WithUpdate` correctly handles enabling or disabling updates based on the provided configuration. --- `34-41`: The function `WithForceUpdate` correctly handles the configuration to force an update on creation. --- `43-50`: The function `WithNew` correctly allows customization of the provider creation process. --- `52-60`: The function `WithDecoder` correctly sets the decoder for the provider, allowing configuration to skip entries with parsing errors. --- `62-73`: The function `WithMetadataURL` correctly handles URL configuration and validation, ensuring the URL is correctly parsed before use. --- `76-83`: The function `WithClient` correctly configures the HTTP client used to retrieve the metadata blob. --- `85-92`: The function `WithClock` correctly allows injection of a clock to check the up-to-date status of a blob. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>metadata/providers/memory/options.go (5)</summary><blockquote> `21-30`: This function correctly configures entry validation settings. --- `32-40`: This function correctly handles the option to bypass AAGUID validation for zero'd AAGUIDs. --- `42-50`: This function correctly configures trust anchor validation settings. --- `52-60`: This function correctly configures status validation settings. --- `72-80`: This function correctly provides a list of desired statuses for validation purposes. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>protocol/attestation_u2f_test.go (1)</summary><blockquote> `40-40`: The test function correctly handles U2F attestation format verification using a nil metadata provider. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>metadata/providers/cached/provider.go (1)</summary><blockquote> `12-48`: The `New` function correctly initializes a cached metadata provider with comprehensive error handling and option application. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>protocol/attestation_apple_test.go (1)</summary><blockquote> `40-40`: The test function correctly handles Apple attestation format verification using a nil metadata provider. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>metadata/const.go (1)</summary><blockquote> `23-34`: Ensure that `MetadataError` is used consistently across the project. <details> <summary>Verification successful</summary> Let's verify the definition of `MetadataError` in `metadata/types.go` and its usage in `metadata/status.go`. --- The `MetadataError` type is correctly defined in `metadata/types.go` and is used consistently in `metadata/status.go` and `metadata/const.go`. The definition includes fields for `Type`, `Details`, and `DevInfo`, which align with the usage in the provided code snippets. - `metadata/types.go`: Defines `MetadataError`. - `metadata/status.go`: Uses `MetadataError`. - `metadata/const.go`: Uses `MetadataError`. No issues were found with the usage of `MetadataError`. </details> <details> <summary>Scripts executed</summary> The following scripts were executed for the analysis: --- Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that MetadataError is used consistently across the project. # Test: Search for the usage of MetadataError. Expect: Consistent usage across all files. rg "MetadataError"Length of output: 480
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the definition and usage of MetadataError. # Test: Display the definition of MetadataError in metadata/types.go. rg "type MetadataError struct" -A 10 metadata/types.go # Test: Display the usage of MetadataError in metadata/status.go. rg "MetadataError" metadata/status.goLength of output: 428
webauthn/credential.go (1)
101-140: The refactoring of theVerifymethod improves readability and error handling. Ensure that the new methodsparseAttestationandverifyAttestationare well-documented.
protocol/attestation_test.go (3)
9-9: The updates to theTestAttestationVerifyfunction look good and follow best practices for error handling in tests.Also applies to: 17-17, 21-21, 28-28, 32-32, 34-34
41-41: TheattestationTestUnpackResponsefunction is well-implemented with proper error handling.Also applies to: 42-42, 48-48
62-62: TheTestPackedAttestationVerificationfunction correctly implements the test for packed attestation format verification.Also applies to: 63-63
protocol/attestation_safetynet_test.go (1)
41-41: Update the test to include a mock metadata provider as per the changes inprotocol/attestation.go.- got, got1, err := verifySafetyNetFormat(tt.args.att, tt.args.clientDataHash, nil) + // Assuming `mockProvider` is a mocked implementation of `metadata.Provider` + got, got1, err := verifySafetyNetFormat(tt.args.att, tt.args.clientDataHash, mockProvider)Likely invalid or redundant comment.
protocol/credential_test.go (1)
Line range hint
1-243: TheTestParseCredentialCreationResponsefunction is well-structured and covers a variety of scenarios to ensure robust parsing of credential creation responses. Good job maintaining clarity and comprehensiveness in your test cases.
protocol/attestation_tpm_test.go (4)
19-19: Addedrequirepackage for assertions.This change supports stronger assertions in tests, which is a good practice for ensuring test reliability.
31-32: Use ofrequire.NoErrorfor immediate test failure on error.This is an improvement over
assertas it stops the test immediately if an error is encountered, which is crucial for tests where subsequent assertions depend on the absence of errors.
88-88: Refactored test cases to use constants for attestation statement fields.Using constants improves code readability and maintainability by reducing the chance of typos and making it easier to make changes in the future.
Also applies to: 93-93, 98-98, 103-103, 108-108, 113-113, 118-118, 128-128
369-369: Similar to the previous comment, consider usingrequire.Containsfor a more robust assertion.- assert.Contains(t, err.Error(), tt.wantErr) + require.Contains(t, err.Error(), tt.wantErr)This ensures consistency in error handling across tests and improves the robustness of the test suite.
Likely invalid or redundant comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
metadata/decode.go (2)
18-36: Enhance error messages for better debugging.The error messages in the
NewDecoderfunction could be more descriptive to provide better context for debugging.- return nil, err + return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to apply decoder option: %w", err)
48-81: Improve error handling by specifying which entries failed to parse.The error message in the
Parsefunction could provide more specific information about which entries failed to parse.- return metadata, fmt.Errorf("error occurred parsing metadata: %d entries had errors during parsing", n) + return metadata, fmt.Errorf("error occurred parsing metadata: %d entries had errors during parsing, first error: %v", n, metadata.Unparsed[0].Error)
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- metadata/decode.go (1 hunks)
Additional context used
golangci-lint
metadata/decode.go
102-102: Comment should end in a period
(godot)
104-104: Comment should end in a period
(godot)
Additional comments not posted (4)
metadata/decode.go (4)
83-93: LGTM!The
Decodefunction appears to be correct.
173-181: LGTM!The
WithIgnoreEntryParsingErrorsfunction appears to be correct.
183-190: LGTM!The
WithRootCertificatefunction appears to be correct.
262-276: LGTM!The
mdsParseX509Certificatefunction appears to be correct.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 29
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
metadata/providers/memory/provider.go (1)
38-47: Add comments for each field in theProviderstruct.Adding comments will improve readability and maintainability.
type Provider struct { mds map[uuid.UUID]*metadata.Entry // Metadata entries desired []metadata.AuthenticatorStatus // Desired authenticator statuses undesired []metadata.AuthenticatorStatus // Undesired authenticator statuses entry bool // Validate entry flag entryPermitZero bool // Permit zero AAGUID flag anchors bool // Validate trust anchors flag status bool // Validate status flag attestation bool // Validate attestation types flag }metadata/metadata.go (1)
125-125: Add periods to comments for consistency.Several comments in the code are missing periods at the end. This is a minor style issue but fixing it helps maintain consistency in documentation.
// Comment should end in a period.Also applies to: 271-271, 282-282, 288-288, 291-291, 315-315
Tools
golangci-lint
125-125: Comment should end in a period
(godot)
protocol/attestation.go (2)
Line range hint
138-263:
Refactor to reduce cyclomatic complexity.The
VerifyAttestationfunction has high cyclomatic complexity. Consider breaking it down into smaller, more focused functions to improve readability and maintainability.- func (a *AttestationObject) VerifyAttestation(clientDataHash []byte, mds metadata.Provider) (err error) { - // ... (complex logic) - } + func (a *AttestationObject) VerifyAttestation(clientDataHash []byte, mds metadata.Provider) (err error) { + if AttestationFormat(a.Format) == AttestationFormatNone { + return verifyNoneAttestation(a) + } + return verifyFormatAttestation(a, clientDataHash, mds) + } + func verifyNoneAttestation(a *AttestationObject) error { + if len(a.AttStatement) != 0 { + return ErrAttestationFormat.WithInfo("Attestation format none with attestation present") + } + return nil + } + func verifyFormatAttestation(a *AttestationObject, clientDataHash []byte, mds metadata.Provider) error { + formatHandler, valid := attestationRegistry[AttestationFormat(a.Format)] + if !valid { + return ErrAttestationFormat.WithInfo(fmt.Sprintf("Attestation format %s is unsupported", a.Format)) + } + attestationType, x5cs, err := formatHandler(*a, clientDataHash, mds) + if err != nil { + return err.(*Error).WithInfo(attestationType) + } + // ... (rest of the logic) + }
Line range hint
138-263:
Refactor to reduce cyclomatic complexity.The
VerifyAttestationfunction has high cyclomatic complexity. Consider breaking it down into smaller, more focused functions to improve readability and maintainability.- func (a *AttestationObject) VerifyAttestation(clientDataHash []byte, mds metadata.Provider) (err error) { - // ... (complex logic) - } + func (a *AttestationObject) VerifyAttestation(clientDataHash []byte, mds metadata.Provider) (err error) { + if AttestationFormat(a.Format) == AttestationFormatNone { + return verifyNoneAttestation(a) + } + return verifyFormatAttestation(a, clientDataHash, mds) + } + func verifyNoneAttestation(a *AttestationObject) error { + if len(a.AttStatement) != 0 { + return ErrAttestationFormat.WithInfo("Attestation format none with attestation present") + } + return nil + } + func verifyFormatAttestation(a *AttestationObject, clientDataHash []byte, mds metadata.Provider) error { + formatHandler, valid := attestationRegistry[AttestationFormat(a.Format)] + if !valid { + return ErrAttestationFormat.WithInfo(fmt.Sprintf("Attestation format %s is unsupported", a.Format)) + } + attestationType, x5cs, err := formatHandler(*a, clientDataHash, mds) + if err != nil { + return err.(*Error).WithInfo(attestationType) + } + // ... (rest of the logic) + }
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (7)
- metadata/decode.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/metadata.go (2 hunks)
- metadata/metadata_test.go (4 hunks)
- metadata/providers/memory/options.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/providers/memory/provider.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/types.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/attestation.go (4 hunks)
Files not summarized due to errors (1)
- metadata/metadata.go: Error: Message exceeds token limit
Additional context used
golangci-lint
metadata/providers/memory/provider.go
[warning] 49-49: unused-parameter: parameter 'ctx' seems to be unused, consider removing or renaming it as _
(revive)
[warning] 63-63: unused-parameter: parameter 'ctx' seems to be unused, consider removing or renaming it as _
(revive)
[warning] 67-67: unused-parameter: parameter 'ctx' seems to be unused, consider removing or renaming it as _
(revive)
[warning] 71-71: unused-parameter: parameter 'ctx' seems to be unused, consider removing or renaming it as _
(revive)
[warning] 75-75: unused-parameter: parameter 'ctx' seems to be unused, consider removing or renaming it as _
(revive)
[warning] 79-79: unused-parameter: parameter 'ctx' seems to be unused, consider removing or renaming it as _
(revive)
[warning] 83-83: unused-parameter: parameter 'ctx' seems to be unused, consider removing or renaming it as _
(revive)
metadata/decode.go
281-281: cyclomatic complexity 18 of func
hookDecodeUnsignedInt32is high (> 15)(gocyclo)
104-104: Comment should end in a period
(godot)
106-106: Comment should end in a period
(godot)
protocol/attestation.go
140-140: cyclomatic complexity 27 of func
(*AttestationObject).VerifyAttestationis high (> 15)(gocyclo)
metadata/types.go
[high] 98-98: G101: Potential hardcoded credentials
(gosec)
metadata/metadata_test.go
43-43: SA4003: no value of type uint32 is greater than math.MaxUint32
(staticcheck)
metadata/metadata.go
125-125: Comment should end in a period
(godot)
271-271: Comment should end in a period
(godot)
282-282: Comment should end in a period
(godot)
288-288: Comment should end in a period
(godot)
291-291: Comment should end in a period
(godot)
315-315: Comment should end in a period
(godot)
435-435: Comment should end in a period
(godot)
906-906: S1001: should use copy(to, from[:]) instead of a loop
(gosimple)
Gitleaks
metadata/types.go
114-114: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
118-118: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
122-122: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
213-213: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
237-237: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
Additional comments not posted (23)
metadata/providers/memory/options.go (6)
21-30: LGTM!The function is straightforward and does not have any issues.
32-40: LGTM!The function is straightforward and does not have any issues.
42-50: LGTM!The function is straightforward and does not have any issues.
52-60: LGTM!The function is straightforward and does not have any issues.
72-79: LGTM!The function is straightforward and does not have any issues.
82-90: LGTM!The function is straightforward and does not have any issues.
metadata/types.go (5)
14-41: Add documentation for exported typeProvider.The interface
Provideris exported but lacks a comment explaining its purpose and usage. This is important for maintainability and understanding by new developers.+// Provider defines the interface for metadata providers, which handle the retrieval and validation of metadata entries. type Provider interface { GetEntry(ctx context.Context, aaguid uuid.UUID) (entry *Entry, err error) // other methods... }
14-41: Undefined typeStatusReportused in the methodValidateStatusReports.Ensure that
StatusReportis defined and properly imported. This type is crucial for the method's functionality.- ValidateStatusReports(ctx context.Context, reports []StatusReport) (err error) + ValidateStatusReports(ctx context.Context, reports []metadata.StatusReport) (err error)
88-123: Address potential security issue with hardcoded credentials.The constant
UserVerificationBypassmight be sensitive if it's used as a credential or key. Ensure that this constant is not used in a way that could expose sensitive information or security vulnerabilities.+// Ensure that UserVerificationBypass is used in a secure context and is not exposed in client-side code. UserVerificationBypass AuthenticatorStatus = "USER_VERIFICATION_BYPASS"Tools
Gitleaks
114-114: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
118-118: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
122-122: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
golangci-lint
[high] 98-98: G101: Potential hardcoded credentials
(gosec)
88-123: Detected potential generic API keys.The following constants might be exposing sensitive information:
FidoCertifiedL1plusFidoCertifiedL2plusFidoCertifiedL3plusEnsure these constants are not used in a way that could expose sensitive information or security vulnerabilities.
Tools
Gitleaks
114-114: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
118-118: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
122-122: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
golangci-lint
[high] 98-98: G101: Potential hardcoded credentials
(gosec)
125-142: Consider optimizing the function for checking undesired authenticator status.Using a map instead of an array for
defaultUndesiredAuthenticatorStatuswould optimize the lookup time from O(n) to O(1), improving performance especially as the list of statuses grows.- var defaultUndesiredAuthenticatorStatus = [...]AuthenticatorStatus{ - AttestationKeyCompromise, - UserVerificationBypass, - UserKeyRemoteCompromise, - UserKeyPhysicalCompromise, - Revoked, - } + var defaultUndesiredAuthenticatorStatus = map[AuthenticatorStatus]bool{ + AttestationKeyCompromise: true, + UserVerificationBypass: true, + UserKeyRemoteCompromise: true, + UserKeyPhysicalCompromise: true, + Revoked: true, + } - func IsUndesiredAuthenticatorStatus(status AuthenticatorStatus) bool { - for _, s := range defaultUndesiredAuthenticatorStatus { - if s == status { - return true - } - } - return false + func IsUndesiredAuthenticatorStatus(status AuthenticatorStatus) bool { + return defaultUndesiredAuthenticatorStatus[status] }metadata/metadata_test.go (8)
27-27: EnsureProductionMDSURLis defined.The variable
ProductionMDSURLis used to fetch metadata but is not defined in the visible scope of the test or imported packages.
33-33: EnsureMetadatatype is defined.The
Metadatatype is crucial for the parsing functionality in the test. Ensure that it is correctly imported or defined within the appropriate package.
93-93: EnsureNewDecoderis defined.The function
NewDecodershould be correctly imported or defined within the appropriate package.
90-91: EnsuregetEndpointsis defined.The function
getEndpointsshould be correctly imported or defined within the appropriate package.
156-156: EnsureNewDecoderis defined.The function
NewDecodershould be correctly imported or defined within the appropriate package.
133-133: EnsureIsUndesiredAuthenticatorStatusis defined.The function
IsUndesiredAuthenticatorStatusis crucial for determining the status of authenticators in the test. Ensure that it is correctly imported or defined within the appropriate package.
307-307: EnsureAlgKeyMatchis defined.The function
AlgKeyMatchis crucial for key matching in the test. Ensure that it is correctly imported or defined within the appropriate package.
109-110: Improve error handling inside the loop.When an error occurs during decoding, the current implementation logs the error and stops processing further. Consider adding a
continuestatement after logging to proceed with the next iteration, which can make the test more resilient and thorough.- if blob, err = decoder.Decode(res.Body); err != nil { - if errors.As(err, &me) { - t.Log(me.Details) - } + if blob, err = decoder.Decode(res.Body); err != nil { + if errors.As(err, &me) { + t.Log(me.Details) + continue + }Likely invalid or redundant comment.
metadata/decode.go (2)
59-60: Typographical error in error message.Correct the typo in the error message for better clarity.
- return nil, fmt.Errorf("error occurred parsing next update value '%s': %w", payload.NextUpdate, err) + return nil, fmt.Errorf("error occurred parsing next update value '%s': %w", payload.NextUpdate, err)Likely invalid or redundant comment.
85-95: Ensure proper resource management by always closingio.ReadCloser.Ensure that
io.ReadCloseris closed even if an error occurs duringio.ReadAll.- defer r.Close() + defer func() { + if cerr := r.Close(); cerr != nil { + err = fmt.Errorf("failed to close io.ReadCloser: %w", cerr) + } + }()Likely invalid or redundant comment.
protocol/attestation.go (2)
Line range hint
81-86:
LGTM!The code changes are approved.
Line range hint
87-123:
LGTM!The code changes are approved.
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
james-d-elliott
force-pushed
the
feat-mds3-provider
branch
from
ff84bc2
to
e1ca144
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 15
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (11)
metadata/providers/cached/util.go (2)
27-40: Review error handling indoOpenOrCreate.The function attempts to open a file and if it does not exist, it creates it. This logic is sound, but the error handling could be more robust. Specifically, if
os.Openfails for reasons other than the file not existing, this should be handled or logged.Consider adding logging for unexpected errors.
+ import "log" if os.IsNotExist(err) { if f, err = os.Create(name); err != nil { return nil, false, err } return f, true, nil } else { + log.Printf("Failed to open file: %s, error: %v", name, err) return nil, false, err }
43-50: Consider simplifying thedefaultNewfunction.The function initializes a memory provider with various validation flags. It's correctly implemented but consider documenting the purpose of each flag to improve code readability.
Add comments explaining the purpose of each validation flag.
+ // WithValidateEntry: Ensures all entries are validated. + // WithValidateTrustAnchor: Validates the trust anchor for each entry. + // WithValidateStatus: Checks the status of each metadata entry.metadata/providers/memory/provider.go (1)
12-32: Clarify the purpose and handling ofOptiontype inNew.The function uses the
Optiontype to configure the provider. Ensure that theOptiontype is well-documented and consider handling cases whereoptsmight be nil or empty.Add error handling for nil or empty options.
+ if opts == nil || len(opts) == 0 { + return nil, fmt.Errorf("no options provided") + }metadata/providers/cached/options.go (1)
34-41: Add logging toWithForceUpdate.Adding logging here can help trace when a force update is triggered, which is useful for debugging and maintaining the system.
+ log.Printf("Force update set to: %v", force)protocol/attestation_u2f.go (1)
19-19: Unusedmetadata.Providerparameter inverifyU2FFormatfunction.The
metadata.Providerparameter in theverifyU2FFormatfunction is not used. To avoid unnecessary complexity, consider removing this unused parameter.
protocol/attestation_u2f.go: line 19Analysis chain
Updated function signature for
verifyU2FFormat.The addition of the
_ metadata.Providerparameter in theverifyU2FFormatfunction is noted. It's important to ensure that this parameter is either used effectively within the function or considered for removal if it remains unused to avoid unnecessary complexity.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the metadata provider in the `verifyU2FFormat` function. # Test: Search for the usage of the metadata provider in the function. Expect: At least one usage. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func verifyU2FFormat($_, $_, mds metadata.Provider) { $$$ mds.$$$ }'Length of output: 104
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the metadata provider in the `verifyU2FFormat` function. # Find the definition of the `verifyU2FFormat` function and display its body. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func verifyU2FFormat($_, $_, $_ metadata.Provider) { $$$ }' -A 20 # Search for any usage of the `metadata.Provider` parameter within the Go files. rg --lang go 'metadata\.Provider'Length of output: 544
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the metadata provider in the `verifyU2FFormat` function. # Find the definition of the `verifyU2FFormat` function and display its body. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func verifyU2FFormat($_, $_, $_ metadata.Provider) { $$$ }' -A 20 # Search for any usage of the `metadata.Provider` parameter within the Go files. rg 'metadata\.Provider'Length of output: 3740
protocol/attestation_packed_test.go (1)
64-64: Review of test parameter addition.The addition of
nilas a parameter inverifyPackedFormatsuggests that no metadata provider is being used in these tests. This could be intentional for isolating the test environment, but it's important to ensure that this aligns with the intended test scenarios. Currently, all invocations ofverifyPackedFormatpassnilfor themetadata.Providerparameter, which may omit necessary test scenarios.
- Review and update test cases to include scenarios with a non-nil
metadata.Providerif applicable.Analysis chain
Review of test parameter addition.
The addition of
nilas a parameter inverifyPackedFormatsuggests that no metadata provider is being used in these tests. This could be intentional for isolating the test environment, but it's important to ensure that this aligns with the intended test scenarios.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the test setup to ensure that passing `nil` is intended and does not omit necessary test scenarios. # Test: Search for the function usage in test files. Expect: Only occurances of the new signature. rg --type go -A 5 $'verifyPackedFormat'Length of output: 2665
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for all invocations of verifyPackedFormat to check if any of them pass a non-nil metadata.Provider. rg --type go 'verifyPackedFormat('Length of output: 125
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for all invocations of verifyPackedFormat to check if any of them pass a non-nil metadata.Provider. rg --type go 'verifyPackedFormat\('Length of output: 717
webauthn/registration.go (2)
Line range hint
14-94: Review ofBeginRegistration: Comprehensive validation and setup.The function
BeginRegistrationproperly initializes the registration process, ensuring all configurations are validated and necessary data structures are initialized correctly. The validation ofRelyingPartyIDas a URI and ensuring it's non-empty are crucial for security and correctness.However, consider adding more detailed error messages or logging to help diagnose issues during the registration process.
Line range hint
217-234: Review ofCreateCredential: Robust error handling and validation.The function
CreateCredentialeffectively handles potential errors such as ID mismatches and expired sessions, which are critical for maintaining the integrity of the registration process.Consider enhancing the documentation to explain the conditions under which errors are returned, which could aid in debugging and maintenance.
protocol/attestation_test.go (1)
9-35: Refactoring inTestAttestationVerify: Use ofrequire.NoErrorenhances clarity.The use of
require.NoErrorinTestAttestationVerifysimplifies error handling and makes the test code cleaner and more readable. This is a good practice in test code to ensure that errors are handled concisely.However, ensure that the use of assertions does not prevent the capture of detailed error information which might be necessary for diagnosing test failures.
README.md (1)
295-335: Enhance the "Credential Record" section with examples and detailed verification steps.The new section on "Credential Record" is informative but could benefit from examples or more detailed steps on how the verification process is performed. Consider adding examples or a more detailed explanation of different scenarios like registration, login, and periodic audits to clarify the verification process.
+### Example +Here is an example of how a Credential Record can be used during registration: +```go +func RegisterCredential(credential webauthn.Credential) { + // Example registration logic here +} +``` +This example demonstrates how to handle Credential Records during user registration.Tools
LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~295-~295: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ... specification describes the Credential Record which includes several required and opt...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
[style] ~319-~319: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ...e values are not restored the [webauthn.Credential] may fail
validation in this scenario....(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
[style] ~324-~324: ‘exactly the same’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...as the [webauthn.Credential] struct has exactly the same values when restored the [Credential Ve...(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_EXACTLY_THE_SAME)
[misspelling] ~326-~326: Use “an” instead of ‘a’ if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. ‘an article’, ‘an hour’.
Context: ... registration,
on every login, or with a audit schedule.In addition to using...
(EN_A_VS_AN)
[typographical] ~332-~332: It appears that a comma is missing.
Context: ...registrations automatically.At this time no tooling exists to verify the credent...
(DURING_THAT_TIME_COMMA)
metadata/metadata_test.go (1)
Line range hint
39-123: Proper use of HTTP client with timeout.Setting a timeout for the HTTP client is a best practice, especially in test environments, to avoid indefinitely hanging tests.
Suggestion to improve error resilience in loops.
Currently, if an error occurs when decoding metadata from an endpoint, the loop stops processing further entries. Consider adding a
continuestatement to skip over failing entries and proceed with others, enhancing the robustness of the test.92 if blob, err = decoder.Decode(res.Body); err != nil { 93 if errors.As(err, &me) { t.Log(me.Details) + continue } }
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (42)
- README.md (1 hunks)
- metadata/const.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/decode.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/doc.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/metadata.go (2 hunks)
- metadata/metadata_test.go (4 hunks)
- metadata/passkey_authenticator.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/providers/cached/doc.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/providers/cached/options.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/providers/cached/provider.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/providers/cached/util.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/providers/memory/doc.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/providers/memory/options.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/providers/memory/provider.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/status.go (1 hunks)
- metadata/types.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/attestation.go (4 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_androidkey.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_androidkey_test.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_apple.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_apple_test.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_packed.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_packed_test.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_safetynet.go (6 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_safetynet_test.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_test.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_tpm.go (2 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_tpm_test.go (12 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_u2f.go (2 hunks)
- protocol/attestation_u2f_test.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/base64_test.go (2 hunks)
- protocol/client_test.go (3 hunks)
- protocol/const.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/credential.go (3 hunks)
- protocol/credential_test.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/metadata.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/webauthncose/webauthncose.go (1 hunks)
- webauthn/credential.go (5 hunks)
- webauthn/credential_test.go (2 hunks)
- webauthn/login.go (7 hunks)
- webauthn/registration.go (3 hunks)
- webauthn/types.go (4 hunks)
Files not summarized due to errors (1)
- metadata/metadata.go: Error: Message exceeds token limit
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
- metadata/doc.go
- metadata/providers/cached/doc.go
- metadata/providers/memory/doc.go
- protocol/const.go
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- metadata/decode.go
- metadata/providers/memory/options.go
- webauthn/login.go
- webauthn/types.go
Additional context used
golangci-lint
metadata/status.go
11-11: cyclomatic complexity 18 of func
ValidateStatusReportsis high (> 15)(gocyclo)
metadata/providers/memory/provider.go
[warning] 49-49: exported: exported method Provider.GetEntry should have comment or be unexported
(revive)
[warning] 63-63: exported: exported method Provider.GetValidateEntry should have comment or be unexported
(revive)
[warning] 67-67: exported: exported method Provider.GetValidateEntryPermitZeroAAGUID should have comment or be unexported
(revive)
[warning] 71-71: exported: exported method Provider.GetValidateTrustAnchor should have comment or be unexported
(revive)
[warning] 75-75: exported: exported method Provider.GetValidateStatus should have comment or be unexported
(revive)
[warning] 79-79: exported: exported method Provider.GetValidateAttestationTypes should have comment or be unexported
(revive)
[warning] 83-83: exported: exported method Provider.ValidateStatusReports should have comment or be unexported
(revive)
protocol/attestation_apple.go
34-34: block should not start with a whitespace
(wsl)
protocol/attestation_safetynet.go
44-44: cyclomatic complexity 17 of func
verifySafetyNetFormatis high (> 15)(gocyclo)
protocol/attestation_packed.go
37-37: block should not start with a whitespace
(wsl)
protocol/attestation_androidkey.go
32-32: cyclomatic complexity 21 of func
verifyAndroidKeyFormatis high (> 15)(gocyclo)
50-50: Comment should end in a period
(godot)
protocol/attestation.go
71-71: Comment should end in a period
(godot)
140-140: cyclomatic complexity 27 of func
(*AttestationObject).VerifyAttestationis high (> 15)(gocyclo)
protocol/attestation_tpm.go
22-22: cyclomatic complexity 47 of func
verifyTPMFormatis high (> 15)(gocyclo)
metadata/types.go
[high] 99-99: G101: Potential hardcoded credentials
(gosec)
LanguageTool
README.md
[uncategorized] ~295-~295: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ... specification describes the Credential Record which includes several required and opt...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
[style] ~319-~319: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ...e values are not restored the [webauthn.Credential] may fail
validation in this scenario....(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
[style] ~324-~324: ‘exactly the same’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...as the [webauthn.Credential] struct has exactly the same values when restored the [Credential Ve...(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_EXACTLY_THE_SAME)
[misspelling] ~326-~326: Use “an” instead of ‘a’ if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. ‘an article’, ‘an hour’.
Context: ... registration,
on every login, or with a audit schedule.In addition to using...
(EN_A_VS_AN)
[typographical] ~332-~332: It appears that a comma is missing.
Context: ...registrations automatically.At this time no tooling exists to verify the credent...
(DURING_THAT_TIME_COMMA)
[uncategorized] ~339-~339: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...
implementation. Without their amazing work this library could not exist.[git...
(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
Gitleaks
metadata/types.go
115-115: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
119-119: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
123-123: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
214-214: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
238-238: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
Additional comments not posted (48)
webauthn/credential_test.go (2)
6-7: Updated imports to include testify libraries.This change supports the updated assertion methods used in the test cases.
17-32: Refactored test cases to improve readability and maintainability.The test cases have been refactored from
teststotestCases, and assertion methods have been updated to useassert.EqualValues,assert.EqualError, andrequire.NoError. These changes enhance the clarity and reliability of the tests.protocol/base64_test.go (2)
10-11: Updated imports to include testify libraries.This change supports the updated assertion methods used in the test cases.
46-49: Refactored error handling and assertions in test function.The refactoring in
TestBase64UnmarshalJSONenhances the test readability and maintainability by utilizing testify's assertion functions for better error reporting and test failure messages.protocol/attestation_u2f_test.go (1)
40-40: Verify the addition ofnilargument in test case.The addition of a
nilargument toverifyU2FFormatin the test case indicates a change in the function's expected inputs. Ensure this change is reflected across all relevant test cases and that it aligns with the function's updated signature.Verification successful
Verification Successful: The addition of the
nilargument in the test case aligns with the updated function signature ofverifyU2FFormat. All relevant test cases have been updated accordingly.
protocol/attestation_u2f_test.goScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all test cases for `verifyU2FFormat` have been updated to match the new function signature. # Test: Search for the function usage in test cases. Expect: Consistent usage of the new signature. rg --type go -A 5 $'verifyU2FFormat'Length of output: 1673
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all test cases for `verifyU2FFormat` have been updated to match the new function signature. # Test: Search for all instances of `verifyU2FFormat` in test files to ensure consistent usage of the new signature. rg --type go 'verifyU2FFormat\('Length of output: 490
metadata/providers/cached/provider.go (2)
12-48: Refactor the initialization logic in theNewfunction to improve readability.Consider breaking down the initialization into smaller, more manageable functions. This can help in isolating issues and making the code more modular.
- Line 26-28: Add checks or logs to handle cases where the necessary configuration is missing.
65-114: Improve error handling in theinitmethod to provide more context in case of failures.func (p *Provider) init() (err error) { + defer func() { + if err != nil { + err = fmt.Errorf("init failed: %w", err) + } + }() // existing code... }This change adds a deferred function to wrap errors with more context, aiding in debugging and maintenance.
protocol/attestation_apple_test.go (1)
40-40: Verify the addition ofnilargument in test case.The addition of a
nilargument toverifyAppleFormatin the test case indicates a change in the function's expected inputs. Ensure this change is reflected across all relevant test cases and that it aligns with the function's updated signature.Verification successful
The addition of the
nilargument in the test case forverifyAppleFormathas been correctly reflected.
- The test case in
protocol/attestation_apple_test.goincludes the newnilargument.- No other instances of
verifyAppleFormatwere found that need updating.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all test cases for `verifyAppleFormat` have been updated to match the new function signature. # Test: Search for the function usage in test cases. Expect: Consistent usage of the new signature. rg --type go -A 5 $'verifyAppleFormat'Length of output: 2025
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all instances of `verifyAppleFormat` in the codebase have been updated to match the new function signature. # Test: Search for all instances of `verifyAppleFormat` in the codebase. Expect: Consistent usage of the new signature. rg --type go 'verifyAppleFormat'Length of output: 683
protocol/attestation_apple.go (1)
34-34: Verify new parameter inverifyAppleFormat.The addition of
_ metadata.Providerto the function signature should be thoroughly tested to ensure it integrates well with existing systems and does not introduce regressions.Verification successful
Unused parameter in
verifyAppleFormat.The new parameter
_ metadata.Provideradded to theverifyAppleFormatfunction is currently unused. While it does not cause any regressions or issues, it is important to document this for future reference to avoid confusion.
protocol/attestation_apple.go: The parameter_ metadata.Provideris present but not utilized within the function.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the new parameter in `verifyAppleFormat` is properly integrated and does not cause issues. # Test: Search for the function usage in the codebase. Expect: Consistent handling of the new parameter. rg --type go -A 5 $'verifyAppleFormat'Length of output: 2025
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the new parameter `_ metadata.Provider` within the `verifyAppleFormat` function and its related code. # Test: Search for the usage of `metadata.Provider` in the codebase. Expect: Consistent handling within `verifyAppleFormat`. rg --type go 'metadata.Provider'Length of output: 3415
Tools
golangci-lint
34-34: block should not start with a whitespace
(wsl)
protocol/client_test.go (3)
Line range hint
7-12: Parameterization oforiginis implemented.The function
setupCollectedClientDatacorrectly usesoriginas a parameter. This addresses the previous comment about enhancing test flexibility.Tools
golangci-lint
10-10:
setupCollectedClientData-originalways receives"http://example.com"(unparam)
22-28: Improved error handling in tests.Replacing
t.Fatalfwithrequire.NoErrorinTestVerifyCollectedClientDataenhances clarity and robustness in test error handling.
40-42: Specific error assertion implemented.Using
assert.EqualErrorinTestVerifyCollectedClientDataIncorrectChallengeensures that the error message is exactly as expected, improving the test's precision.metadata/const.go (2)
3-15: Constants for metadata URLs and roots defined.The constants
ProductionMDSRoot,ProductionMDSURL,ConformanceMDSRoot, andExampleMDSRootare well-defined and follow good practices by keeping URLs and cryptographic keys as constants, which enhances maintainability and readability.
23-34: Proper use ofMetadataErrorfor error handling.The variables
errIntermediateCertRevoked,errLeafCertRevoked, anderrCRLUnavailableare instances ofMetadataErrorand are used to define specific metadata-related errors. This is a good practice as it enhances error specificity and maintainability.webauthn/credential.go (4)
Line range hint
11-35: Enhancements toCredentialstruct.The additions to the
Credentialstruct, including the new fieldAttestationand the detailed documentation, improve the struct's alignment with the specification and enhance its functionality for handling attestation data.
53-59: Definition ofCredentialAttestationstruct.The
CredentialAttestationstruct is well-defined and encapsulates attestation-related data clearly. This struct aids in keeping the attestation data organized and easily manageable.
Line range hint
71-99: Refactoring of credential creation and validation logic.The
NewCredentialfunction is well-implemented with clear separation of credential creation and initialization of attestation data. This refactoring improves code readability and maintainability.
101-140: Implementation of theVerifymethod.The
Verifymethod is implemented to handle credential verification against a metadata provider. This method is crucial for verifying the integrity and authenticity of credentials. The implementation appears robust and aligns with best practices in error handling and data validation.protocol/attestation_u2f.go (1)
43-51: Refactoring of attestation statement handling.The use of constants
stmtX5CandstmtSignatureinstead of hardcoding keys in theverifyU2FFormatfunction improves maintainability and reduces the risk of typos or inconsistencies in key usage.protocol/attestation_safetynet.go (4)
5-5: Added context import.The addition of the
contextpackage is consistent with the introduction ofmetadata.Providerwhich requires context for operations.
44-44: Review the function signature change.The function now accepts a
metadata.Provider, which is a significant change as it allows for more flexible metadata handling, potentially enabling better caching strategies or custom metadata providers.Tools
golangci-lint
44-44: cyclomatic complexity 17 of func
verifySafetyNetFormatis high (> 15)(gocyclo)
61-61: Refactor to use constants for map keys.The change from direct string keys to constants (
stmtVersion,stmtX5C) improves code maintainability and reduces the risk of typos.Also applies to: 78-78, 112-112
136-142: Refactored timestamp validation logic.This change abstracts the timestamp validation into a separate function, improving readability and maintainability. It also handles different timestamp scenarios more cleanly.
protocol/attestation_androidkey_test.go (1)
52-52: Review of test parameter addition.The addition of
nilas a parameter inverifyAndroidKeyFormatsuggests that no metadata provider is being used in these tests. This could be intentional for isolating the test environment, but it's important to ensure that this aligns with the intended test scenarios.protocol/attestation_packed.go (2)
37-37: Review of function signature change.The function now accepts a
metadata.Providerparameter, although it's not used in the function (_). This might be for future use or to standardize the function signatures across different attestation formats.Tools
golangci-lint
37-37: block should not start with a whitespace
(wsl)
44-44: Use of constants for map keys.The change from direct string keys to constants (
stmtAlgorithm,stmtSignature,stmtX5C,stmtECDAAKID) improves code maintainability and reduces the risk of typos.Also applies to: 50-50, 56-56, 64-64
webauthn/registration.go (1)
Line range hint
217-234: Review ofWithRegistrationRelyingPartyID: Correct implementation of option setter.The function
WithRegistrationRelyingPartyIDcorrectly implements the option pattern by allowing the configuration of theRelyingPartyID. This is a simple yet effective way to customize the registration process.protocol/credential.go (1)
Line range hint
136-192: Enhancements inVerify: Incorporation of metadata provider and returningclientDataHash.The modifications to the
Verifyfunction to include ametadata.Providerand to return `clientDataprotocol/attestation_androidkey.go (3)
32-32: Cyclomatic Complexity Still HighThe cyclomatic complexity of
verifyAndroidKeyFormatremains high at 21, which may hinder maintainability.Tools
golangci-lint
32-32: cyclomatic complexity 21 of func
verifyAndroidKeyFormatis high (> 15)(gocyclo)
32-32: Parameter Integration inverifyAndroidKeyFormatThe addition of the
_ metadata.Providerparameter is noted, but it's not utilized within the function. This could be intentional (hence the underscore), but ensure it aligns with future usage plans.Tools
golangci-lint
32-32: cyclomatic complexity 21 of func
verifyAndroidKeyFormatis high (> 15)(gocyclo)
39-39: Refactor Key Access for ClarityThe change from direct string keys to constants (e.g.,
stmtAlgorithm,stmtSignature,stmtX5C) improves code readability and maintainability by reducing magic strings.Also applies to: 45-45, 51-51
protocol/attestation.go (3)
81-81: Parameter Addition and New MethodThe addition of the
metadata.Providerparameter to theattestationFormatValidationHandlertype and theVerifymethod, as well as the introduction ofVerifyAttestation, enhance metadata handling capabilities.Also applies to: 127-127, 138-138
140-140: High Cyclomatic Complexity inVerifyAttestationThe cyclomatic complexity of
VerifyAttestationis reported as 27, which is quite high and could impact the maintainability of the code.Tools
golangci-lint
140-140: cyclomatic complexity 27 of func
(*AttestationObject).VerifyAttestationis high (> 15)(gocyclo)
240-246: Refactor Handling ofx5cCertificate ChainThe handling of the
x5ccertificate chain has been refactored for clarity and robustness, addressing previous comments effectively.protocol/attestation_tpm.go (3)
22-22: Cyclomatic Complexity Still High inverifyTPMFormatThe cyclomatic complexity of
verifyTPMFormatremains very high at 47, which could severely impact maintainability.Tools
golangci-lint
22-22: cyclomatic complexity 47 of func
verifyTPMFormatis high (> 15)(gocyclo)
22-22: Parameter Integration inverifyTPMFormatThe addition of the
_ metadata.Providerparameter is noted, but it's not utilized within the function. This could be intentional (hence the underscore), but ensure it aligns with future usage plans.Tools
golangci-lint
22-22: cyclomatic complexity 47 of func
verifyTPMFormatis high (> 15)(gocyclo)
29-29: Refactor Key Access for Clarity inverifyTPMFormatThe change from direct string keys to constants (e.g.,
stmtVersion,stmtAlgorithm,stmtX5C, etc.) improves code readability and maintainability by reducing magic strings.Also applies to: 38-38, 45-45, 51-51, 56-56, 61-61, 66-66
protocol/webauthncose/webauthncose.go (1)
38-38: Introduction ofEC2PublicKeyDataTypeThe new
EC2PublicKeyDatatype extendsPublicKeyDatawith specific fields for elliptic curve keys, enhancing the structure and clarity of key handling.metadata/metadata_test.go (3)
137-148: Proper handling of byte slices for metadata parsing.Using
DecodeBytesto handle byte slices directly is efficient and appropriate for this context. The error handling and assertions are correctly implemented.
316-357: Change in return type toStatementJSONis noted.The modification to return
StatementJSONinstead ofMetadataStatementaligns with the rework of the metadata handling as a provider. This should be verified for consistency across the system.Verification successful
The change to return
StatementJSONis consistent across the system.The
StatementJSONtype is appropriately defined and utilized within themetadatapackage. The functiongetTestMetadatacorrectly returnsStatementJSON, aligning with the overall metadata handling.
metadata/metadata.go: Defines and usesStatementJSON.metadata/metadata_test.go: UsesStatementJSONin thegetTestMetadatafunction.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `StatementJSON` across the system. grep -R 'StatementJSON' .Length of output: 613
19-35: Good use of testify for concise error handling and assertions.The use of
require.NoErrorandrequire.NotNilfrom the testify package helps in making the tests more readable and robust.Question about ignoring entry parsing errors:
The decoder is initialized with
WithIgnoreEntryParsingErrors(). Is this intended for production tests, or should it be limited to a development environment to ensure more stringent checks?protocol/attestation_tpm_test.go (6)
19-19: Approved addition ofrequireimport.The addition of
github.com/stretchr/testify/requireis beneficial for making assertions in tests that will stop the test if they fail, which is useful for identifying critical errors early in the test execution.
88-118: Approved updates inTestTPMAttestationVerificationFailAttStatement.Using more descriptive constants in the initialization of
AttestationObjectenhances the readability and maintainability of the test cases. This change makes it easier to understand what each test case is validating.
Line range hint
359-369: Approved changes inTestTPMAttestationVerificationFailPubArea.The function is well-structured and the changes, including the use of
makeDefaultRSAPublicBytesand structured test setups, improve the clarity and robustness of the tests. The conditional logic based on the key type is appropriately handled.
Line range hint
399-458: Approved changes inTestTPMAttestationVerificationFailCertInfo.The updates to handle
certInforelated tests are comprehensive, involving detailed setups and the use ofwebauthncborfor encoding. These changes enhance the robustness and coverage of the tests.
Line range hint
514-575: Approved changes inTestTPMAttestationVerificationFailX5c.The function is well-structured and the changes, including the use of
makeX5cand structured test setups, improve the clarity and robustness of the tests. The handling of complex certificate data is appropriately managed.
31-32: Approved changes inTestTPMAttestationVerificationSuccess.The addition of a
nilargument in theverifyTPMFormatfunction call and the use ofrequire.NoErrorare appropriate for ensuring the robustness of the test. Ensure that the new function signature is consistently used across all tests.Verification successful
Approved changes in
TestTPMAttestationVerificationSuccess.The addition of a
nilargument in theverifyTPMFormatfunction call and the use ofrequire.NoErrorare appropriate for ensuring the robustness of the test. The new function signature is consistently used across all tests.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `verifyTPMFormat` match the new signature. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type go -A 5 $'verifyTPMFormat'Length of output: 2707
metadata/metadata.go (1)
46-56: Optimize theToMapfunction to reduce redundancy.The current implementation checks if
entry.AaGUIDis notuuid.Nilfor each entry. Consider filtering these entries beforehand to streamline the loop.func (m *Metadata) ToMap() (metadata map[uuid.UUID]*Entry) { metadata = make(map[uuid.UUID]*Entry) validEntries := filterValidEntries(m.Parsed.Entries) for _, entry := range validEntries { metadata[entry.AaGUID] = &entry } return metadata } func filterValidEntries(entries []Entry) []Entry { var validEntries []Entry for _, entry := range entries { if entry.AaGUID != uuid.Nil { validEntries = append(validEntries, entry) } } return validEntries }Likely invalid or redundant comment.
| type PasskeyAuthenticator map[string]PassKeyAuthenticatorAAGUID | ||
|
|
||
| // PassKeyAuthenticatorAAGUID is a type that represents the indivudal schema entry from the Passkey Developer AAGUID | ||
| // listing. Used with PasskeyAuthenticator. | ||
| // | ||
| // See: https://github.com/passkeydeveloper/passkey-authenticator-aaguids | ||
| type PassKeyAuthenticatorAAGUID struct { | ||
| Name string `json:"name"` | ||
| IconDark string `json:"icon_dark,omitempty"` | ||
| IconLight string `json:"icon_light,omitempty"` | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider refining the naming convention for consistency.
The type PassKeyAuthenticatorAAGUID uses camelCase inconsistently (PassKey instead of Passkey). Consider aligning it with the rest of the Go naming conventions and the other type in this file.
- type PassKeyAuthenticatorAAGUID struct {
+ type PasskeyAuthenticatorAAGUID struct {Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| type PasskeyAuthenticator map[string]PassKeyAuthenticatorAAGUID | |
| // PassKeyAuthenticatorAAGUID is a type that represents the indivudal schema entry from the Passkey Developer AAGUID | |
| // listing. Used with PasskeyAuthenticator. | |
| // | |
| // See: https://github.com/passkeydeveloper/passkey-authenticator-aaguids | |
| type PassKeyAuthenticatorAAGUID struct { | |
| Name string `json:"name"` | |
| IconDark string `json:"icon_dark,omitempty"` | |
| IconLight string `json:"icon_light,omitempty"` | |
| } | |
| type PasskeyAuthenticator map[string]PasskeyAuthenticatorAAGUID | |
| // PassKeyAuthenticatorAAGUID is a type that represents the indivudal schema entry from the Passkey Developer AAGUID | |
| // listing. Used with PasskeyAuthenticator. | |
| // | |
| // See: https://github.com/passkeydeveloper/passkey-authenticator-aaguids | |
| type PasskeyAuthenticatorAAGUID struct { | |
| Name string `json:"name"` | |
| IconDark string `json:"icon_dark,omitempty"` | |
| IconLight string `json:"icon_light,omitempty"` | |
| } |
| func ValidateMetadata(ctx context.Context, aaguid uuid.UUID, mds metadata.Provider) (err error) { | ||
| if mds == nil { | ||
| return nil | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| var ( | ||
| entry *metadata.Entry | ||
| ) | ||
|
|
||
| if entry, err = mds.GetEntry(ctx, aaguid); err != nil { | ||
| return err | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if entry == nil { | ||
| if aaguid == uuid.Nil && mds.GetValidateEntryPermitZeroAAGUID(ctx) { | ||
| return nil | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if mds.GetValidateEntry(ctx) { | ||
| return fmt.Errorf("error occurred performing authenticator entry validation: AAGUID entry has not been registered with the metadata service") | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return nil | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if mds.GetValidateStatus(ctx) { | ||
| if err = mds.ValidateStatusReports(ctx, entry.StatusReports); err != nil { | ||
| return fmt.Errorf("error occurred performing authenticator status validation: %w", err) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return nil |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Enhance error messages and handle nil values robustly.
The function ValidateMetadata effectively handles various validation cases. Consider enhancing the error messages for better clarity and debugging, and ensure robust handling of nil entries, possibly by adding more explicit logging or error messages.
- return fmt.Errorf("error occurred performing authenticator entry validation: AAGUID entry has not been registered with the metadata service")
+ return fmt.Errorf("Validation error: AAGUID entry %s has not been registered with the metadata service", aaguid)Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| func ValidateMetadata(ctx context.Context, aaguid uuid.UUID, mds metadata.Provider) (err error) { | |
| if mds == nil { | |
| return nil | |
| } | |
| var ( | |
| entry *metadata.Entry | |
| ) | |
| if entry, err = mds.GetEntry(ctx, aaguid); err != nil { | |
| return err | |
| } | |
| if entry == nil { | |
| if aaguid == uuid.Nil && mds.GetValidateEntryPermitZeroAAGUID(ctx) { | |
| return nil | |
| } | |
| if mds.GetValidateEntry(ctx) { | |
| return fmt.Errorf("error occurred performing authenticator entry validation: AAGUID entry has not been registered with the metadata service") | |
| } | |
| return nil | |
| } | |
| if mds.GetValidateStatus(ctx) { | |
| if err = mds.ValidateStatusReports(ctx, entry.StatusReports); err != nil { | |
| return fmt.Errorf("error occurred performing authenticator status validation: %w", err) | |
| } | |
| } | |
| return nil | |
| func ValidateMetadata(ctx context.Context, aaguid uuid.UUID, mds metadata.Provider) (err error) { | |
| if mds == nil { | |
| return nil | |
| } | |
| var ( | |
| entry *metadata.Entry | |
| ) | |
| if entry, err = mds.GetEntry(ctx, aaguid); err != nil { | |
| return err | |
| } | |
| if entry == nil { | |
| if aaguid == uuid.Nil && mds.GetValidateEntryPermitZeroAAGUID(ctx) { | |
| return nil | |
| } | |
| if mds.GetValidateEntry(ctx) { | |
| return fmt.Errorf("Validation error: AAGUID entry %s has not been registered with the metadata service", aaguid) | |
| } | |
| return nil | |
| } | |
| if mds.GetValidateStatus(ctx) { | |
| if err = mds.ValidateStatusReports(ctx, entry.StatusReports); err != nil { | |
| return fmt.Errorf("error occurred performing authenticator status validation: %w", err) | |
| } | |
| } | |
| return nil |
| @@ -40,7 +41,7 @@ type SafetyNetResponse struct { | |||
| // authenticators SHOULD make use of the Android Key Attestation when available, even if the SafetyNet API is also present. | |||
| // | |||
| // Specification: §8.5. Android SafetyNet Attestation Statement Format (https://www.w3.org/TR/webauthn/#sctn-android-safetynet-attestation) | |||
| func verifySafetyNetFormat(att AttestationObject, clientDataHash []byte) (string, []any, error) { | |||
| func verifySafetyNetFormat(att AttestationObject, clientDataHash []byte, mds metadata.Provider) (string, []any, error) { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Cyclomatic complexity issue.
Previous comments suggested reducing the complexity of verifySafetyNetFormat. This still needs addressing as the function is complex with a cyclomatic complexity of 17.
- func verifySafetyNetFormat(att AttestationObject, clientDataHash []byte, mds metadata.Provider) (string, []any, error) {
+ // Consider breaking down this function into smaller, more manageable functions.Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
Tools
golangci-lint
44-44: cyclomatic complexity 17 of func
verifySafetyNetFormatis high (> 15)(gocyclo)
| func (j PayloadJSON) Parse() (payload Parsed, err error) { | ||
| var update time.Time | ||
|
|
||
| if update, err = time.Parse(time.DateOnly, j.NextUpdate); err != nil { | ||
| return payload, fmt.Errorf("error occurred parsing next update value '%s': %w", j.NextUpdate, err) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // Conformance indicates if test metadata is currently being used | ||
| var Conformance = false | ||
| n := len(j.Entries) | ||
|
|
||
| var MDSRoot = ProductionMDSRoot | ||
| entries := make([]Entry, n) | ||
|
|
||
| // MetadataBLOBPayloadEntry - Represents the MetadataBLOBPayloadEntry | ||
| // https://fidoalliance.org/specs/mds/fido-metadata-service-v3.0-ps-20210518.html#metadata-blob-payload-entry-dictionary | ||
| type MetadataBLOBPayloadEntry struct { | ||
| for i := 0; i < n; i++ { | ||
| if entries[i], err = j.Entries[i].Parse(); err != nil { | ||
| return payload, fmt.Errorf("error occurred parsing entry %d: %w", i, err) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return Parsed{ | ||
| LegalHeader: j.LegalHeader, | ||
| Number: j.Number, | ||
| NextUpdate: update, | ||
| Entries: entries, | ||
| }, nil | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Enhance error messages for better debugging support.
The error messages in the Parse method could be more descriptive to aid in debugging.
if update, err = time.Parse(time.DateOnly, j.NextUpdate); err != nil {
return payload, fmt.Errorf("failed to parse 'nextUpdate' with value '%s': %w", j.NextUpdate, err)
}
for i := 0; i < n; i++ {
if entries[i], err = j.Entries[i].Parse(); err != nil {
return payload, fmt.Errorf("failed to parse entry %d: %w", i, err)
}
}Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| func (j PayloadJSON) Parse() (payload Parsed, err error) { | |
| var update time.Time | |
| if update, err = time.Parse(time.DateOnly, j.NextUpdate); err != nil { | |
| return payload, fmt.Errorf("error occurred parsing next update value '%s': %w", j.NextUpdate, err) | |
| } | |
| // Conformance indicates if test metadata is currently being used | |
| var Conformance = false | |
| n := len(j.Entries) | |
| var MDSRoot = ProductionMDSRoot | |
| entries := make([]Entry, n) | |
| // MetadataBLOBPayloadEntry - Represents the MetadataBLOBPayloadEntry | |
| // https://fidoalliance.org/specs/mds/fido-metadata-service-v3.0-ps-20210518.html#metadata-blob-payload-entry-dictionary | |
| type MetadataBLOBPayloadEntry struct { | |
| for i := 0; i < n; i++ { | |
| if entries[i], err = j.Entries[i].Parse(); err != nil { | |
| return payload, fmt.Errorf("error occurred parsing entry %d: %w", i, err) | |
| } | |
| } | |
| return Parsed{ | |
| LegalHeader: j.LegalHeader, | |
| Number: j.Number, | |
| NextUpdate: update, | |
| Entries: entries, | |
| }, nil | |
| } | |
| func (j PayloadJSON) Parse() (payload Parsed, err error) { | |
| var update time.Time | |
| if update, err = time.Parse(time.DateOnly, j.NextUpdate); err != nil { | |
| return payload, fmt.Errorf("failed to parse 'nextUpdate' with value '%s': %w", j.NextUpdate, err) | |
| } | |
| n := len(j.Entries) | |
| entries := make([]Entry, n) | |
| for i := 0; i < n; i++ { | |
| if entries[i], err = j.Entries[i].Parse(); err != nil { | |
| return payload, fmt.Errorf("failed to parse entry %d: %w", i, err) | |
| } | |
| } | |
| return Parsed{ | |
| LegalHeader: j.LegalHeader, | |
| Number: j.Number, | |
| NextUpdate: update, | |
| Entries: entries, | |
| }, nil | |
| } |
| func getEndpoints(c *http.Client) ([]string, error) { | ||
| jsonReq, err := json.Marshal(MDSGetEndpointsRequest{Endpoint: "https://webauthn.io"}) | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| return nil, err | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| req, err := c.Post("https://mds3.fido.tools/getEndpoints", "application/json", bytes.NewBuffer(jsonReq)) | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| return nil, err | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| defer req.Body.Close() | ||
| body, _ := io.ReadAll(req.Body) | ||
|
|
||
| var resp MDSGetEndpointsResponse | ||
|
|
||
| if err = json.Unmarshal(body, &resp); err != nil { | ||
| return nil, err | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return resp.Result, err | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Change to use a pointer for HTTP client is appropriate.
Using a pointer for the HTTP client parameter is a good practice as it avoids copying the client structure and allows for potential modifications by the function.
Handle potential errors from io.ReadAll.
It's important to handle errors when reading the response body to prevent runtime panics and undefined behavior.
305 body, _ := io.ReadAll(req.Body)
+ if err != nil {
+ return nil, err
+ }Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| @@ -31,12 +31,12 @@ func init() { | |||
| // } | |||
| // | |||
| // Specification: §8.8. Apple Anonymous Attestation Statement Format (https://www.w3.org/TR/webauthn/#sctn-apple-anonymous-attestation) | |||
| func verifyAppleFormat(att AttestationObject, clientDataHash []byte) (string, []any, error) { | |||
| func verifyAppleFormat(att AttestationObject, clientDataHash []byte, _ metadata.Provider) (string, []any, error) { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove leading whitespace at the start of the block.
According to static analysis, there should not be a whitespace at the start of the block.
- func verifyAppleFormat(att AttestationObject, clientDataHash []byte, _ metadata.Provider) (string, []any, error) {
+func verifyAppleFormat(att AttestationObject, clientDataHash []byte, _ metadata.Provider) (string, []any, error) {Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| func verifyAppleFormat(att AttestationObject, clientDataHash []byte, _ metadata.Provider) (string, []any, error) { | |
| func verifyAppleFormat(att AttestationObject, clientDataHash []byte, _ metadata.Provider) (string, []any, error) { |
Tools
golangci-lint
34-34: block should not start with a whitespace
(wsl)
| func (p *Provider) GetEntry(ctx context.Context, aaguid uuid.UUID) (entry *metadata.Entry, err error) { | ||
| if p.mds == nil { | ||
| return nil, metadata.ErrNotInitialized | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| var ok bool | ||
|
|
||
| if entry, ok = p.mds[aaguid]; ok { | ||
| return entry, nil | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return nil, nil | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Document exported methods and consider parameter usage.
Many methods in this file are exported but lack comments, which is not best practice in Go. Also, the ctx parameter is unused in several methods, consider removing it or documenting its intended use.
+ // GetEntry retrieves an entry based on the AAGUID provided.
func (p *Provider) GetEntry(ctx context.Context, aaguid uuid.UUID) (entry *metadata.Entry, err error) {
if p.mds == nil {
return nil, metadata.ErrNotInitialized
}
var ok bool
if entry, ok = p.mds[aaguid]; ok {
return entry, nil
}
return nil, nil
}Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
Tools
golangci-lint
[warning] 49-49: exported: exported method Provider.GetEntry should have comment or be unexported
(revive)
| @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ func Test_verifySafetyNetFormat(t *testing.T) { | |||
|
|
|||
| for _, tt := range tests { | |||
| t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) { | |||
| got, got1, err := verifySafetyNetFormat(tt.args.att, tt.args.clientDataHash) | |||
| got, got1, err := verifySafetyNetFormat(tt.args.att, tt.args.clientDataHash, nil) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggestion to improve Test_verifySafetyNetFormat: Use a mock provider instead of nil.
The addition of a nil argument to verifySafetyNetFormat indicates that the function now expects a metadata provider. For more effective testing, consider using a mock provider instead of nil.
- got, got1, err := verifySafetyNetFormat(tt.args.att, tt.args.clientDataHash, nil)
+ // Assuming `mockProvider` is a mocked implementation of `metadata.Provider`
+ got, got1, err := verifySafetyNetFormat(tt.args.att, tt.args.clientDataHash, mockProvider)Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| got, got1, err := verifySafetyNetFormat(tt.args.att, tt.args.clientDataHash, nil) | |
| // Assuming `mockProvider` is a mocked implementation of `metadata.Provider` | |
| got, got1, err := verifySafetyNetFormat(tt.args.att, tt.args.clientDataHash, mockProvider) |
| // WithPath sets the path name for the cached file. This option is REQUIRED. | ||
| func WithPath(name string) Option { | ||
| return func(provider *Provider) (err error) { | ||
| provider.name = name | ||
|
|
||
| return nil | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add validation to WithPath.
The function sets a path name but does not validate it. Adding validation can prevent runtime errors and ensure that the path is valid.
+ if name == "" {
+ return fmt.Errorf("path name cannot be empty")
+ }Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| type AuthenticationAlgorithm string | ||
|
|
||
| const ( | ||
| // ALG_SIGN_SECP256R1_ECDSA_SHA256_RAW is an ECDSA signature on the NIST secp256r1 curve which must have raw R and | ||
| // S buffers, encoded in big-endian order. | ||
| ALG_SIGN_SECP256R1_ECDSA_SHA256_RAW AuthenticationAlgorithm = "secp256r1_ecdsa_sha256_raw" | ||
|
|
||
| // ALG_SIGN_SECP256R1_ECDSA_SHA256_DER is a DER ITU-X690-2008 encoded ECDSA signature RFC5480 on the NIST secp256r1 | ||
| // curve. | ||
| ALG_SIGN_SECP256R1_ECDSA_SHA256_DER AuthenticationAlgorithm = "secp256r1_ecdsa_sha256_der" | ||
|
|
||
| // ALG_SIGN_RSASSA_PSS_SHA256_RAW is a RSASSA-PSS RFC3447 signature must have raw S buffers, encoded in big-endian | ||
| // order RFC4055 RFC4056. | ||
| ALG_SIGN_RSASSA_PSS_SHA256_RAW AuthenticationAlgorithm = "rsassa_pss_sha256_raw" | ||
|
|
||
| // ALG_SIGN_RSASSA_PSS_SHA256_DER is a DER ITU-X690-2008 encoded OCTET STRING (not BIT STRING!) containing the | ||
| // RSASSA-PSS RFC3447 signature RFC4055 RFC4056. | ||
| ALG_SIGN_RSASSA_PSS_SHA256_DER AuthenticationAlgorithm = "rsassa_pss_sha256_der" | ||
|
|
||
| // ALG_SIGN_SECP256K1_ECDSA_SHA256_RAW is an ECDSA signature on the secp256k1 curve which must have raw R and S | ||
| // buffers, encoded in big-endian order. | ||
| ALG_SIGN_SECP256K1_ECDSA_SHA256_RAW AuthenticationAlgorithm = "secp256k1_ecdsa_sha256_raw" | ||
|
|
||
| // ALG_SIGN_SECP256K1_ECDSA_SHA256_DER is a DER ITU-X690-2008 encoded ECDSA signature RFC5480 on the secp256k1 curve. | ||
| ALG_SIGN_SECP256K1_ECDSA_SHA256_DER AuthenticationAlgorithm = "secp256k1_ecdsa_sha256_der" | ||
|
|
||
| // ALG_SIGN_SM2_SM3_RAW is a Chinese SM2 elliptic curve based signature algorithm combined with SM3 hash algorithm | ||
| // OSCCA-SM2 OSCCA-SM3. | ||
| ALG_SIGN_SM2_SM3_RAW AuthenticationAlgorithm = "sm2_sm3_raw" | ||
|
|
||
| // ALG_SIGN_RSA_EMSA_PKCS1_SHA256_RAW is the EMSA-PKCS1-v1_5 signature as defined in RFC3447. | ||
| ALG_SIGN_RSA_EMSA_PKCS1_SHA256_RAW AuthenticationAlgorithm = "rsa_emsa_pkcs1_sha256_raw" | ||
|
|
||
| // ALG_SIGN_RSA_EMSA_PKCS1_SHA256_DER is a DER ITU-X690-2008 encoded OCTET STRING (not BIT STRING!) containing the | ||
| // EMSA-PKCS1-v1_5 signature as defined in RFC3447. | ||
| ALG_SIGN_RSA_EMSA_PKCS1_SHA256_DER AuthenticationAlgorithm = "rsa_emsa_pkcs1_sha256_der" | ||
|
|
||
| // ALG_SIGN_RSASSA_PSS_SHA384_RAW is a RSASSA-PSS RFC3447 signature must have raw S buffers, encoded in big-endian | ||
| // order RFC4055 RFC4056. | ||
| ALG_SIGN_RSASSA_PSS_SHA384_RAW AuthenticationAlgorithm = "rsassa_pss_sha384_raw" | ||
|
|
||
| // ALG_SIGN_RSASSA_PSS_SHA512_RAW is a RSASSA-PSS RFC3447 signature must have raw S buffers, encoded in big-endian | ||
| // order RFC4055 RFC4056. | ||
| ALG_SIGN_RSASSA_PSS_SHA512_RAW AuthenticationAlgorithm = "rsassa_pss_sha512_raw" | ||
|
|
||
| // ALG_SIGN_RSASSA_PKCSV15_SHA256_RAW is a RSASSA-PKCS1-v1_5 RFC3447 with SHA256(aka RS256) signature must have raw | ||
| // S buffers, encoded in big-endian order RFC8017 RFC4056 | ||
| ALG_SIGN_RSASSA_PKCSV15_SHA256_RAW AuthenticationAlgorithm = "rsassa_pkcsv15_sha256_raw" | ||
|
|
||
| // RSASSA-PKCS1-v1_5 RFC3447 with SHA384(aka RS384) signature must have raw S buffers, encoded in big-endian order RFC8017 RFC4056 | ||
| ALG_SIGN_RSASSA_PKCSV15_SHA384_RAW AuthenticationAlgorithm = "rsassa_pkcsv15_sha384_raw" | ||
|
|
||
| // ALG_SIGN_RSASSA_PKCSV15_SHA512_RAW is a RSASSA-PKCS1-v1_5 RFC3447 with SHA512(aka RS512) signature must have raw | ||
| // S buffers, encoded in big-endian order RFC8017 RFC4056 | ||
| ALG_SIGN_RSASSA_PKCSV15_SHA512_RAW AuthenticationAlgorithm = "rsassa_pkcsv15_sha512_raw" | ||
|
|
||
| // ALG_SIGN_RSASSA_PKCSV15_SHA1_RAW is a RSASSA-PKCS1-v1_5 RFC3447 with SHA1(aka RS1) signature must have raw S | ||
| // buffers, encoded in big-endian order RFC8017 RFC4056 | ||
| ALG_SIGN_RSASSA_PKCSV15_SHA1_RAW AuthenticationAlgorithm = "rsassa_pkcsv15_sha1_raw" | ||
|
|
||
| // ALG_SIGN_SECP384R1_ECDSA_SHA384_RAW is an ECDSA signature on the NIST secp384r1 curve with SHA384(aka: ES384) | ||
| // which must have raw R and S buffers, encoded in big-endian order. | ||
| ALG_SIGN_SECP384R1_ECDSA_SHA384_RAW AuthenticationAlgorithm = "secp384r1_ecdsa_sha384_raw" | ||
|
|
||
| // ALG_SIGN_SECP521R1_ECDSA_SHA512_RAW is an ECDSA signature on the NIST secp512r1 curve with SHA512(aka: ES512) | ||
| // which must have raw R and S buffers, encoded in big-endian order. | ||
| ALG_SIGN_SECP521R1_ECDSA_SHA512_RAW AuthenticationAlgorithm = "secp521r1_ecdsa_sha512_raw" | ||
|
|
||
| // ALG_SIGN_ED25519_EDDSA_SHA512_RAW is an EdDSA signature on the curve 25519, which must have raw R and S buffers, | ||
| // encoded in big-endian order. | ||
| ALG_SIGN_ED25519_EDDSA_SHA512_RAW AuthenticationAlgorithm = "ed25519_eddsa_sha512_raw" | ||
|
|
||
| // ALG_SIGN_ED448_EDDSA_SHA512_RAW is an EdDSA signature on the curve Ed448, which must have raw R and S buffers, | ||
| // encoded in big-endian order. | ||
| ALG_SIGN_ED448_EDDSA_SHA512_RAW AuthenticationAlgorithm = "ed448_eddsa_sha512_raw" | ||
| ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Follow Go naming conventions for constants.
In Go, it's recommended to use CamelCase instead of ALL_CAPS for naming variables and constants. This change will align with Go's naming conventions.
- ALG_SIGN_SECP256R1_ECDSA_SHA256_RAW AuthenticationAlgorithm = "secp256r1_ecdsa_sha256_raw"
+ AlgSignSecp256r1EcdsaSha256Raw AuthenticationAlgorithm = "secp256r1_ecdsa_sha256_raw"
- ALG_SIGN_SECP256R1_ECDSA_SHA256_DER AuthenticationAlgorithm = "secp256r1_ecdsa_sha256_der"
+ AlgSignSecp256r1EcdsaSha256Der AuthenticationAlgorithm = "secp256r1_ecdsa_sha256_der"
- ALG_SIGN_RSASSA_PSS_SHA256_RAW AuthenticationAlgorithm = "rsassa_pss_sha256_raw"
+ AlgSignRsassaPssSha256Raw AuthenticationAlgorithm = "rsassa_pss_sha256_raw"
- ALG_SIGN_RSASSA_PSS_SHA256_DER AuthenticationAlgorithm = "rsassa_pss_sha256_der"
+ AlgSignRsassaPssSha256Der AuthenticationAlgorithm = "rsassa_pss_sha256_der"
- ALG_SIGN_SECP256K1_ECDSA_SHA256_RAW AuthenticationAlgorithm = "secp256k1_ecdsa_sha256_raw"
+ AlgSignSecp256k1EcdsaSha256Raw AuthenticationAlgorithm = "secp256k1_ecdsa_sha256_raw"
- ALG_SIGN_SECP256K1_ECDSA_SHA256_DER AuthenticationAlgorithm = "secp256k1_ecdsa_sha256_der"
+ AlgSignSecp256k1EcdsaSha256Der AuthenticationAlgorithm = "secp256k1_ecdsa_sha256_der"
- ALG_SIGN_RSASSA_PSS_SHA384_RAW AuthenticationAlgorithm = "rsassa_pss_sha384_raw"
+ AlgSignRsassaPssSha384Raw AuthenticationAlgorithm = "rsassa_pss_sha384_raw"
- ALG_SIGN_RSASSA_PSS_SHA512_RAW AuthenticationAlgorithm = "rsassa_pss_sha512_raw"
+ AlgSignRsassaPssSha512Raw AuthenticationAlgorithm = "rsassa_pss_sha512_raw"
- ALG_SIGN_RSASSA_PKCSV15_SHA256_RAW AuthenticationAlgorithm = "rsassa_pkcsv15_sha256_raw"
+ AlgSignRsassaPkcsv15Sha256Raw AuthenticationAlgorithm = "rsassa_pkcsv15_sha256_raw"
- ALG_SIGN_RSASSA_PKCSV15_SHA384_RAW AuthenticationAlgorithm = "rsassa_pkcsv15_sha384_raw"
+ AlgSignRsassaPkcsv15Sha384Raw AuthenticationAlgorithm = "rsassa_pkcsv15_sha384_raw"
- ALG_SIGN_RSASSA_PKCSV15_SHA512_RAW AuthenticationAlgorithm = "rsassa_pkcsv15_sha512_raw"
+ AlgSignRsassaPkcsv15Sha512Raw AuthenticationAlgorithm = "rsassa_pkcsv15_sha512_raw"
- ALG_SIGN_RSASSA_PKCSV15_SHA1_RAW AuthenticationAlgorithm = "rsassa_pkcsv15_sha1_raw"
+ AlgSignRsassaPkcsv15Sha1Raw AuthenticationAlgorithm = "rsassa_pkcsv15_sha1_raw"
- ALG_SIGN_SECP384R1_ECDSA_SHA384_RAW AuthenticationAlgorithm = "secp384r1_ecdsa_sha384_raw"
+ AlgSignSecp384r1EcdsaSha384Raw AuthenticationAlgorithm = "secp384r1_ecdsa_sha384_raw"
- ALG_SIGN_SECP521R1_ECDSA_SHA512_RAW AuthenticationAlgorithm = "secp521r1_ecdsa_sha512_raw"
+ AlgSignSecp521r1EcdsaSha512Raw AuthenticationAlgorithm = "secp521r1_ecdsa_sha512_raw"
- ALG_SIGN_ED25519_EDDSA_SHA512_RAW AuthenticationAlgorithm = "ed25519_eddsa_sha512_raw"
+ AlgSignEd25519EddsaSha512Raw AuthenticationAlgorithm = "ed25519_eddsa_sha512_raw"
- ALG_SIGN_ED448_EDDSA_SHA512_RAW AuthenticationAlgorithm = "ed448_eddsa_sha512_raw"
+ AlgSignEd448EddsaSha512Raw AuthenticationAlgorithm = "ed448_eddsa_sha512_raw"Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| type AuthenticationAlgorithm string | |
| const ( | |
| // ALG_SIGN_SECP256R1_ECDSA_SHA256_RAW is an ECDSA signature on the NIST secp256r1 curve which must have raw R and | |
| // S buffers, encoded in big-endian order. | |
| ALG_SIGN_SECP256R1_ECDSA_SHA256_RAW AuthenticationAlgorithm = "secp256r1_ecdsa_sha256_raw" | |
| // ALG_SIGN_SECP256R1_ECDSA_SHA256_DER is a DER ITU-X690-2008 encoded ECDSA signature RFC5480 on the NIST secp256r1 | |
| // curve. | |
| ALG_SIGN_SECP256R1_ECDSA_SHA256_DER AuthenticationAlgorithm = "secp256r1_ecdsa_sha256_der" | |
| // ALG_SIGN_RSASSA_PSS_SHA256_RAW is a RSASSA-PSS RFC3447 signature must have raw S buffers, encoded in big-endian | |
| // order RFC4055 RFC4056. | |
| ALG_SIGN_RSASSA_PSS_SHA256_RAW AuthenticationAlgorithm = "rsassa_pss_sha256_raw" | |
| // ALG_SIGN_RSASSA_PSS_SHA256_DER is a DER ITU-X690-2008 encoded OCTET STRING (not BIT STRING!) containing the | |
| // RSASSA-PSS RFC3447 signature RFC4055 RFC4056. | |
| ALG_SIGN_RSASSA_PSS_SHA256_DER AuthenticationAlgorithm = "rsassa_pss_sha256_der" | |
| // ALG_SIGN_SECP256K1_ECDSA_SHA256_RAW is an ECDSA signature on the secp256k1 curve which must have raw R and S | |
| // buffers, encoded in big-endian order. | |
| ALG_SIGN_SECP256K1_ECDSA_SHA256_RAW AuthenticationAlgorithm = "secp256k1_ecdsa_sha256_raw" | |
| // ALG_SIGN_SECP256K1_ECDSA_SHA256_DER is a DER ITU-X690-2008 encoded ECDSA signature RFC5480 on the secp256k1 curve. | |
| ALG_SIGN_SECP256K1_ECDSA_SHA256_DER AuthenticationAlgorithm = "secp256k1_ecdsa_sha256_der" | |
| // ALG_SIGN_SM2_SM3_RAW is a Chinese SM2 elliptic curve based signature algorithm combined with SM3 hash algorithm | |
| // OSCCA-SM2 OSCCA-SM3. | |
| ALG_SIGN_SM2_SM3_RAW AuthenticationAlgorithm = "sm2_sm3_raw" | |
| // ALG_SIGN_RSA_EMSA_PKCS1_SHA256_RAW is the EMSA-PKCS1-v1_5 signature as defined in RFC3447. | |
| ALG_SIGN_RSA_EMSA_PKCS1_SHA256_RAW AuthenticationAlgorithm = "rsa_emsa_pkcs1_sha256_raw" | |
| // ALG_SIGN_RSA_EMSA_PKCS1_SHA256_DER is a DER ITU-X690-2008 encoded OCTET STRING (not BIT STRING!) containing the | |
| // EMSA-PKCS1-v1_5 signature as defined in RFC3447. | |
| ALG_SIGN_RSA_EMSA_PKCS1_SHA256_DER AuthenticationAlgorithm = "rsa_emsa_pkcs1_sha256_der" | |
| // ALG_SIGN_RSASSA_PSS_SHA384_RAW is a RSASSA-PSS RFC3447 signature must have raw S buffers, encoded in big-endian | |
| // order RFC4055 RFC4056. | |
| ALG_SIGN_RSASSA_PSS_SHA384_RAW AuthenticationAlgorithm = "rsassa_pss_sha384_raw" | |
| // ALG_SIGN_RSASSA_PSS_SHA512_RAW is a RSASSA-PSS RFC3447 signature must have raw S buffers, encoded in big-endian | |
| // order RFC4055 RFC4056. | |
| ALG_SIGN_RSASSA_PSS_SHA512_RAW AuthenticationAlgorithm = "rsassa_pss_sha512_raw" | |
| // ALG_SIGN_RSASSA_PKCSV15_SHA256_RAW is a RSASSA-PKCS1-v1_5 RFC3447 with SHA256(aka RS256) signature must have raw | |
| // S buffers, encoded in big-endian order RFC8017 RFC4056 | |
| ALG_SIGN_RSASSA_PKCSV15_SHA256_RAW AuthenticationAlgorithm = "rsassa_pkcsv15_sha256_raw" | |
| // RSASSA-PKCS1-v1_5 RFC3447 with SHA384(aka RS384) signature must have raw S buffers, encoded in big-endian order RFC8017 RFC4056 | |
| ALG_SIGN_RSASSA_PKCSV15_SHA384_RAW AuthenticationAlgorithm = "rsassa_pkcsv15_sha384_raw" | |
| // ALG_SIGN_RSASSA_PKCSV15_SHA512_RAW is a RSASSA-PKCS1-v1_5 RFC3447 with SHA512(aka RS512) signature must have raw | |
| // S buffers, encoded in big-endian order RFC8017 RFC4056 | |
| ALG_SIGN_RSASSA_PKCSV15_SHA512_RAW AuthenticationAlgorithm = "rsassa_pkcsv15_sha512_raw" | |
| // ALG_SIGN_RSASSA_PKCSV15_SHA1_RAW is a RSASSA-PKCS1-v1_5 RFC3447 with SHA1(aka RS1) signature must have raw S | |
| // buffers, encoded in big-endian order RFC8017 RFC4056 | |
| ALG_SIGN_RSASSA_PKCSV15_SHA1_RAW AuthenticationAlgorithm = "rsassa_pkcsv15_sha1_raw" | |
| // ALG_SIGN_SECP384R1_ECDSA_SHA384_RAW is an ECDSA signature on the NIST secp384r1 curve with SHA384(aka: ES384) | |
| // which must have raw R and S buffers, encoded in big-endian order. | |
| ALG_SIGN_SECP384R1_ECDSA_SHA384_RAW AuthenticationAlgorithm = "secp384r1_ecdsa_sha384_raw" | |
| // ALG_SIGN_SECP521R1_ECDSA_SHA512_RAW is an ECDSA signature on the NIST secp512r1 curve with SHA512(aka: ES512) | |
| // which must have raw R and S buffers, encoded in big-endian order. | |
| ALG_SIGN_SECP521R1_ECDSA_SHA512_RAW AuthenticationAlgorithm = "secp521r1_ecdsa_sha512_raw" | |
| // ALG_SIGN_ED25519_EDDSA_SHA512_RAW is an EdDSA signature on the curve 25519, which must have raw R and S buffers, | |
| // encoded in big-endian order. | |
| ALG_SIGN_ED25519_EDDSA_SHA512_RAW AuthenticationAlgorithm = "ed25519_eddsa_sha512_raw" | |
| // ALG_SIGN_ED448_EDDSA_SHA512_RAW is an EdDSA signature on the curve Ed448, which must have raw R and S buffers, | |
| // encoded in big-endian order. | |
| ALG_SIGN_ED448_EDDSA_SHA512_RAW AuthenticationAlgorithm = "ed448_eddsa_sha512_raw" | |
| ) | |
| type AuthenticationAlgorithm string | |
| const ( | |
| // AlgSignSecp256r1EcdsaSha256Raw is an ECDSA signature on the NIST secp256r1 curve which must have raw R and | |
| // S buffers, encoded in big-endian order. | |
| AlgSignSecp256r1EcdsaSha256Raw AuthenticationAlgorithm = "secp256r1_ecdsa_sha256_raw" | |
| // AlgSignSecp256r1EcdsaSha256Der is a DER ITU-X690-2008 encoded ECDSA signature RFC5480 on the NIST secp256r1 | |
| // curve. | |
| AlgSignSecp256r1EcdsaSha256Der AuthenticationAlgorithm = "secp256r1_ecdsa_sha256_der" | |
| // AlgSignRsassaPssSha256Raw is a RSASSA-PSS RFC3447 signature must have raw S buffers, encoded in big-endian | |
| // order RFC4055 RFC4056. | |
| AlgSignRsassaPssSha256Raw AuthenticationAlgorithm = "rsassa_pss_sha256_raw" | |
| // AlgSignRsassaPssSha256Der is a DER ITU-X690-2008 encoded OCTET STRING (not BIT STRING!) containing the | |
| // RSASSA-PSS RFC3447 signature RFC4055 RFC4056. | |
| AlgSignRsassaPssSha256Der AuthenticationAlgorithm = "rsassa_pss_sha256_der" | |
| // AlgSignSecp256k1EcdsaSha256Raw is an ECDSA signature on the secp256k1 curve which must have raw R and S | |
| // buffers, encoded in big-endian order. | |
| AlgSignSecp256k1EcdsaSha256Raw AuthenticationAlgorithm = "secp256k1_ecdsa_sha256_raw" | |
| // AlgSignSecp256k1EcdsaSha256Der is a DER ITU-X690-2008 encoded ECDSA signature RFC5480 on the secp256k1 curve. | |
| AlgSignSecp256k1EcdsaSha256Der AuthenticationAlgorithm = "secp256k1_ecdsa_sha256_der" | |
| // AlgSignRsassaPssSha384Raw is a RSASSA-PSS RFC3447 signature must have raw S buffers, encoded in big-endian | |
| // order RFC4055 RFC4056. | |
| AlgSignRsassaPssSha384Raw AuthenticationAlgorithm = "rsassa_pss_sha384_raw" | |
| // AlgSignRsassaPssSha512Raw is a RSASSA-PSS RFC3447 signature must have raw S buffers, encoded in big-endian | |
| // order RFC4055 RFC4056. | |
| AlgSignRsassaPssSha512Raw AuthenticationAlgorithm = "rsassa_pss_sha512_raw" | |
| // AlgSignRsassaPkcsv15Sha256Raw is a RSASSA-PKCS1-v1_5 RFC3447 with SHA256(aka RS256) signature must have raw | |
| // S buffers, encoded in big-endian order RFC8017 RFC4056 | |
| AlgSignRsassaPkcsv15Sha256Raw AuthenticationAlgorithm = "rsassa_pkcsv15_sha256_raw" | |
| // AlgSignRsassaPkcsv15Sha384Raw is a RSASSA-PKCS1-v1_5 RFC3447 with SHA384(aka RS384) signature must have raw S buffers, encoded in big-endian order RFC8017 RFC4056 | |
| AlgSignRsassaPkcsv15Sha384Raw AuthenticationAlgorithm = "rsassa_pkcsv15_sha384_raw" | |
| // AlgSignRsassaPkcsv15Sha512Raw is a RSASSA-PKCS1-v1_5 RFC3447 with SHA512(aka RS512) signature must have raw | |
| // S buffers, encoded in big-endian order RFC8017 RFC4056 | |
| AlgSignRsassaPkcsv15Sha512Raw AuthenticationAlgorithm = "rsassa_pkcsv15_sha512_raw" | |
| // AlgSignRsassaPkcsv15Sha1Raw is a RSASSA-PKCS1-v1_5 RFC3447 with SHA1(aka RS1) signature must have raw S | |
| // buffers, encoded in big-endian order RFC8017 RFC4056 | |
| AlgSignRsassaPkcsv15Sha1Raw AuthenticationAlgorithm = "rsassa_pkcsv15_sha1_raw" | |
| // AlgSignSecp384r1EcdsaSha384Raw is an ECDSA signature on the NIST secp384r1 curve with SHA384(aka: ES384) | |
| // which must have raw R and S buffers, encoded in big-endian order. | |
| AlgSignSecp384r1EcdsaSha384Raw AuthenticationAlgorithm = "secp384r1_ecdsa_sha384_raw" | |
| // AlgSignSecp521r1EcdsaSha512Raw is an ECDSA signature on the NIST secp512r1 curve with SHA512(aka: ES512) | |
| // which must have raw R and S buffers, encoded in big-endian order. | |
| AlgSignSecp521r1EcdsaSha512Raw AuthenticationAlgorithm = "secp521r1_ecdsa_sha512_raw" | |
| // AlgSignEd25519EddsaSha512Raw is an EdDSA signature on the curve 25519, which must have raw R and S buffers, | |
| // encoded in big-endian order. | |
| AlgSignEd25519EddsaSha512Raw AuthenticationAlgorithm = "ed25519_eddsa_sha512_raw" | |
| // AlgSignEd448EddsaSha512Raw is an EdDSA signature on the curve Ed448, which must have raw R and S buffers, | |
| // encoded in big-endian order. | |
| AlgSignEd448EddsaSha512Raw AuthenticationAlgorithm = "ed448_eddsa_sha512_raw" | |
| ) |
Tools
Gitleaks
214-214: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
238-238: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
This is a massive rework to how metadata is handled. This allows for very powerful interactions with the metadata including trust anchor validation, status report validation customization, control over if attestation types are validated against the metadata, exclusion of zero AAGUID's, ensuring a metadata entry for the authentication exists, etc. In addition it allows the implementer to more easily control caching logic and implement locking and live refreshes of the metadata where necessary. It should reasonably be expected that anyone currently using the metadata package will have quite a bit of work to do. In the release we'll aim to include migration instructions but there is unfortunately it will require some additional work.
Closes #77, Closes #154
BREAKING CHANGE: This change will require manual intervention from the implementer. Information is likely to be provided at a later date helping with the migrations required.