feat: [#495] Centralize Error Messages in Framework (PR#2) #666
Conversation
|
Important Review skippedDraft detected. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the WalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant changes across multiple files, primarily focusing on enhancing error handling by integrating the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #666 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 70.37% 70.06% -0.32%
==========================================
Files 189 189
Lines 11950 11999 +49
==========================================
- Hits 8410 8407 -3
- Misses 2959 3009 +50
- Partials 581 583 +2 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
⚠️ Performance Alert ⚠️
Possible performance regression was detected for benchmark.
Benchmark result of this commit is worse than the previous benchmark result exceeding threshold 1.50.
| Benchmark suite | Current: 28066a7 | Previous: 355ba57 | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
BenchmarkFile_ReadWrite |
347675 ns/op 1800 B/op 21 allocs/op |
227590 ns/op 1800 B/op 21 allocs/op |
1.53 |
BenchmarkFile_ReadWrite - ns/op |
347675 ns/op |
227590 ns/op |
1.53 |
This comment was automatically generated by workflow using github-action-benchmark.
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 17
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (65)
facades/app.go (1)
Line range hint
1-15: Overall, excellent progress towards centralized error handling.These changes are a step in the right direction for centralizing error messages within the framework. The new approach:
- Standardizes error handling.
- Facilitates easier updates and potential localization of error messages.
- Provides more context for errors, improving debuggability.
To further improve the framework:
- Consider applying this pattern consistently across other parts of the framework.
- Ensure that error messages are easily localizable, perhaps by using error codes that can be mapped to localized strings.
- Document the new error handling approach for other developers working on the framework.
Would you like assistance in identifying other areas of the codebase where this pattern could be applied?
route/service_provider.go (2)
15-20: LGTM: Improved error handling for nil configuration.The addition of the nil check for the configuration object enhances the robustness of the
Registermethod. The error handling is well-implemented, using a specific error type and including the module information.This change aligns well with the PR objective of centralizing and standardizing error handling within the framework.
Consider adding a log statement before returning the error to provide more context for debugging:
if config == nil { + app.MakeLog().Error("Configuration is nil in route.ServiceProvider.Register") return nil, errors.ErrConfigFacadeNotSet.SetModule(errors.ModuleRoute) }This additional logging can help in troubleshooting by providing more information about where and when the error occurred.
Line range hint
1-28: Overall assessment: Changes improve error handling and align with PR objectives.The modifications to the
Registermethod inroute/service_provider.gosuccessfully implement better error handling for nil configurations. This change contributes to the PR's goal of centralizing error messages and improving the framework's robustness.The implementation is clean, maintains backward compatibility, and follows good practices in error handling. The specific error type used (
errors.ErrConfigFacadeNotSet) with module information (errors.ModuleRoute) will aid in debugging and aligns well with the objective of standardizing error handling across the framework.As you continue to centralize error handling, consider creating a comprehensive error catalog or enum for the entire framework. This would further standardize error types and messages, making it easier to manage, update, and potentially localize error messages in the future.
hash/service_provider.go (1)
15-20: Approve: Robust error handling for nil config.The new error handling improves the
Registermethod by checking for a nil configuration. This aligns well with the PR objective of centralizing error messages and enhances the robustness of the code.Consider adding a comment explaining why a nil config is problematic, e.g.:
// Ensure config is set to avoid potential runtime errors if config == nil { return nil, errors.ErrConfigFacadeNotSet.SetModule(errors.ModuleHash) }grpc/service_provider.go (1)
15-20: LGTM! Consider wrapping the error for additional context.The addition of the nil check for the config is a good improvement in error handling. It aligns well with the PR objective of centralizing error messages by using a standardized error (
errors.ErrConfigFacadeNotSet) with a module-specific setting.Consider wrapping the error with additional context to provide more information about where the error occurred. This can be achieved using the
fmt.Errorffunction:if config == nil { - return nil, errors.ErrConfigFacadeNotSet.SetModule(errors.ModuleGrpc) + return nil, fmt.Errorf("grpc.ServiceProvider.Register: %w", errors.ErrConfigFacadeNotSet.SetModule(errors.ModuleGrpc)) }This change would require adding
"fmt"to the import statement.log/service_provider.go (1)
15-24: LGTM: Improved error handling implemented.The changes introduce robust error handling, which aligns with the PR objectives of centralizing error messages. The code now checks for nil config and JSON parser before proceeding, returning appropriate errors if either is not set. This improves the reliability of the
Registermethod.A minor suggestion for consistency:
Consider using a consistent style for variable declarations. For example:
- config := app.MakeConfig() + config, json := app.MakeConfig(), app.GetJson() - if config == nil { + if config == nil { return nil, errors.ErrConfigFacadeNotSet.SetModule(errors.ModuleLog) } - - json := app.GetJson() - if json == nil { + if json == nil { return nil, errors.ErrJSONParserNotSet.SetModule(errors.ModuleLog) }This change would slightly reduce the number of lines and make the variable declarations more consistent.
filesystem/service_provider.go (1)
Line range hint
1-34: Overall improvements in error handling and efficiency.The changes in this file enhance the
Registermethod by introducing proper error handling for nil config and improving efficiency in the return statement. These modifications align well with the PR objective of centralizing error messages and improving the framework's robustness.However, please ensure that the method signature is updated to match the new implementation, as mentioned in a previous comment.
Consider if similar error handling patterns should be applied consistently across other parts of the framework to further centralize and standardize error handling.
cache/application.go (1)
Line range hint
1-52: Summary: Good progress, consider next steps for error centralizationThe changes in this file represent a good step towards the PR objectives. The removal of the
driverfield and the dynamic creation of driver instances in theStoremethod increase flexibility and potentially simplify error handling.However, to fully meet the objective of centralizing error messages:
- Consider creating a central location for all error messages used in the cache package.
- Ensure that all error messages, including those in
NewDriverImpl, are using this centralized approach.- If not already done, implement a mechanism for easy localization of these centralized error messages.
Would you like assistance in designing a centralized error handling system for the cache package?
queue/utils.go (2)
14-14: LGTM: Centralized error handling injobs2Tasks.The replacement of direct error messages with predefined error variables from the
errorspackage aligns well with the PR objective. This change improves consistency and maintainability of error handling.The use of
errors.ErrQueueDuplicateJobSignature.Args(job.Signature())is particularly good as it allows for dynamic error messages while maintaining centralized error definitions.Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of the
Argsmethod for future maintainers who might not be familiar with this pattern.Also applies to: 18-18
33-33: LGTM: Centralized error handling ineventsToTasks.The replacement of the direct error message with the predefined error variable
errors.ErrQueueEmptyListenerSignaturealigns well with the PR objective. This change improves consistency and maintainability of error handling across the framework.For consistency with the
jobs2Tasksfunction, consider handling duplicate listener signatures similarly. If this is intentional behavior, it might be worth adding a comment explaining why duplicate listeners are allowed but duplicate jobs are not.translation/service_provider.go (1)
Unit tests for ServiceProvider are missing.
No test files were found related to
ServiceProvider. Please add unit tests to cover the new error scenarios introduced in this PR.🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-38: Overall improvements in error handling, but tests are missing.The changes made to the
Registermethod significantly improve error handling by adding nil checks for both config and logger. This aligns well with the PR objective of centralizing error messages and standardizing error handling.However, I noticed that no test cases were added for these new error scenarios. The PR checklist mentions adding test cases for new code.
To ensure proper test coverage, please add unit tests for these new error cases. You can use the following script to check for test files related to this service provider:
If no test files are found, consider adding tests to cover the new error scenarios.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for test files related to the ServiceProvider # Test: Search for test files. Expect: At least one test file for ServiceProvider. fd -e go -e test.go --full-path '.*translation.*service_provider.*'Length of output: 101
cache/service_provider.go (1)
Line range hint
1-42: Overall: Improved error handling aligns with centralization objective.The changes in this file successfully implement part of the PR objective to centralize error messages within the framework. The additions:
- Introduce robust error handling for nil config and log facades.
- Use predefined errors with specific module information, enhancing consistency and clarity.
- Prevent the creation of an invalid application instance by early error detection.
These improvements contribute to a more maintainable and reliable codebase.
Consider applying similar error handling patterns consistently across other service providers in the framework to maintain uniformity.
cache/driver.go (2)
29-29: LGTM: Error handling improvement.The replacement of the custom error message with
errors.ErrCacheDriverNotSupported.Args(driver)aligns well with the PR objective of centralizing error messages. This change enhances consistency in error handling across the framework and potentially facilitates easier updates and localization.Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of
Args(driver)for better code readability, especially for developers who might not be familiar with this error handling pattern.
45-45: LGTM: Consistent error handling improvement.The use of
errors.ErrCacheStoreContractNotFulfilled.Args(store)for error reporting is consistent with the PR objective and the changes made in theNewmethod. This enhances the overall consistency of error handling in the framework.Similar to the suggestion for the
Newmethod, consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose ofArgs(store)to improve code readability.database/gorm/dialector.go (3)
22-22: LGTM: Improved error handling for DSN generation failure.The change to use
errors.ErrOrmFailedToGenerateDNS.Args(config.Connection)aligns with the PR objective of centralizing error messages. This approach allows for easier localization and standardization of error handling across the framework.Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of
Args(config.Connection)for better code readability, especially for developers who might not be familiar with this error handling pattern.
41-41: LGTM: Improved error handling for unsupported database drivers.The change to use
errors.ErrOrmDriverNotSupported.Args(config.Driver)aligns with the PR objective of centralizing error messages. This approach allows for easier localization and standardization of error handling across the framework.Consider adding a constant or variable that lists the supported drivers, and reference it in the error message or in a comment. This would make it easier to maintain the list of supported drivers and ensure consistency across the codebase. For example:
var SupportedDrivers = []string{"mysql", "postgres", "sqlite", "sqlserver"} // In the error definition (wherever it's defined): // ErrOrmDriverNotSupported = errors.New("database driver %s not supported (supported drivers: %s)") // Then use it like this: return nil, errors.ErrOrmDriverNotSupported.Args(config.Driver, strings.Join(SupportedDrivers, ", "))This approach would make it easier to update the list of supported drivers in the future and ensure that the error message always reflects the current set of supported drivers.
Line range hint
1-48: Overall assessment: Good implementation of centralized error handling.The changes in this file successfully implement the centralized error handling mechanism as per the PR objectives. The use of
errors.ErrOrmFailedToGenerateDNSanderrors.ErrOrmDriverNotSupportedwith theArgsmethod allows for standardized, localizable error messages.To further improve the error handling architecture:
- Consider creating an
errors.gofile (if not already present) in thedatabase/gormpackage to define package-specific error types. This would allow for more granular error handling and easier testing.- Implement error wrapping to preserve the original error context. This can be done using the
%wverb infmt.Errorfor by implementing theUnwrapmethod on custom error types.Example:
// In errors.go var ( ErrDSNGeneration = errors.New("failed to generate DSN") ErrUnsupportedDriver = errors.New("unsupported database driver") ) // In dialector.go if dsn == "" { return nil, fmt.Errorf("%w: %s", ErrDSNGeneration, config.Connection) } // ... default: return nil, fmt.Errorf("%w: %s", ErrUnsupportedDriver, config.Driver)This approach would provide more flexibility in error handling while maintaining the benefits of centralized error messages.
log/logger/daily.go (2)
36-36: LGTM: Error handling improvements align with centralization goals.The changes to error handling in the
Handlemethod effectively contribute to the centralization and standardization of error messages:
- Using
errors.ErrLogEmptyLogFilePathfor empty log paths standardizes this specific error across the framework.- Directly returning
errfromrotatelogs.Newsimplifies error handling and preserves original error information.These modifications align well with the PR objectives by reducing verbosity and potential duplication of error messages.
For consistency, consider using a predefined error constant for the error returned from
rotatelogs.New, similar to howErrLogEmptyLogFilePathis used. This would further centralize error definitions and make error handling more uniform across the framework.Also applies to: 50-50
Line range hint
1-63: Overall: Effective implementation of centralized error handling.The changes in this file successfully contribute to the PR's objective of centralizing error messages within the framework. The modifications:
- Introduce a centralized errors package.
- Replace custom error messages with predefined constants.
- Simplify error handling while preserving important information.
These improvements will lead to more standardized error handling, easier updates, and reduced duplication across the framework. The code remains clean and maintainable after these changes.
As you continue to centralize error handling, consider creating a comprehensive error catalog within the
errorspackage. This catalog could include all possible error types, their descriptions, and potentially suggested resolutions. This approach would further enhance consistency and make error handling even more robust across the entire framework.queue/machinery.go (1)
37-37: LGTM: Improved error handling with centralized approach.The change to use
errors.ErrQueueDriverNotSupported.Args(driver)aligns well with the PR objective of centralizing error messages. This approach facilitates easier updates, localization, and standardization of error handling across the framework.For even better clarity, consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of this error check:
// Return an error if the specified queue driver is not supported return nil, errors.ErrQueueDriverNotSupported.Args(driver)This comment would enhance code readability and maintain consistency with best practices for error handling documentation.
log/application.go (2)
Line range hint
21-38: Approve changes with a minor suggestion.The modifications to
NewApplicationfunction improve error handling by propagating errors up the call stack, which is consistent with Go's idiomatic error handling. This change aligns well with the PR objective of centralizing error messages.Consider adding a custom error message to provide more context:
- return nil, err + return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to register hook for default channel: %w", err)This will make debugging easier by providing more information about where the error occurred.
Line range hint
1-80: Summary of changes and suggestions for improvementThe modifications in this file improve error handling, particularly in the
NewApplicationfunction. However, there are opportunities to enhance error handling consistency across theChannelandStackmethods.To fully address the PR objective of centralizing error messages and improving error handling:
- Implement the suggested changes for
ChannelandStackmethods to return errors instead of printing them.- Consider creating custom error types or using error wrapping to provide more context when errors occur.
- Ensure that all callers of these methods are updated to handle the returned errors appropriately.
- Consider adding unit tests to verify the new error handling behavior.
These changes will lead to more consistent and robust error handling throughout the package, aligning better with Go best practices and the PR objectives.
event/task_test.go (2)
Line range hint
64-71: Good coverage of the no listeners scenario.This test case effectively checks the behavior when there are no listeners for an event, which is an important edge case. It correctly expects an error to be returned in this scenario.
Consider enhancing this test by verifying the specific error message returned. This would ensure that the error clearly communicates the "no listeners" situation.
Line range hint
72-80: Good coverage of event handler error scenario.This test case effectively checks the behavior when an event handler returns an error, which is an important scenario to test. It correctly expects an error to be returned in this case.
Consider enhancing this test by verifying the specific error returned from the event handler. This would ensure that the error from the handler is correctly propagated without modification.
testing/docker/database.go (1)
Line range hint
25-37: Consider enhancing error context.While the centralization of error messages is a great improvement, consider enhancing the error context by wrapping the errors with additional information. This can provide more detailed debugging information without losing the benefits of centralized error definitions.
Example:
if config == nil { return nil, fmt.Errorf("NewDatabase: %w", errors.ErrConfigFacadeNotSet) } // ... if artisanFacade == nil { return nil, fmt.Errorf("NewDatabase: %w", errors.ErrArtisanFacadeNotSet) }This approach maintains the centralized error definitions while providing more context about where the error occurred.
crypt/aes.go (2)
29-29: LGTM: Improved error handling with centralized errorsThe changes to error handling in the
NewAESfunction are consistent with the PR objective of centralizing error messages. The use oferrors.ErrCryptAppKeyNotSetanderrors.ErrCryptInvalidAppKeyLength.Args(keyLength)improves consistency and provides more context in error messages.Consider adding a comment explaining the significance of the key lengths (16, 24, or 32 bytes) for AES encryption. This would enhance code readability and maintainability.
Also applies to: 37-37
99-99: LGTM: Consistent error handling for missing value keyThe use of
errors.ErrCryptMissingValueKeyaligns with the centralized error handling approach, improving consistency and maintainability.Consider combining the checks for "iv" and "value" keys into a single operation to reduce code duplication:
requiredKeys := []string{"iv", "value"} for _, key := range requiredKeys { if _, ok := decodeJson[key]; !ok { return "", errors.ErrCryptMissingKey.Args(key) } }This approach would require adding a new error type
ErrCryptMissingKeythat takes the missing key as an argument, but it would make the code more maintainable if you need to add more required keys in the future.queue/task.go (2)
58-58: LGTM: Improved error handling with centralized error type.The use of
errors.ErrQueueDriverNotSupported.Args(driver)is a great improvement. It provides a more specific and informative error message, aligning with the PR's goal of centralizing and standardizing error handling.For even better clarity, consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of this error check:
// Return an error if the specified queue driver is not supported return errors.ErrQueueDriverNotSupported.Args(driver)This comment would make the code more self-documenting and easier to maintain.
Outstanding Issues: Centralized Error Handling Incomplete
The search results indicate that there are still multiple instances of
errors.Newandfmt.Errorfwith string literals across various files. This suggests that the centralization of error handling has not been fully implemented.
Files still using
errors.New:
support/json/errors.gofilesystem/errors.go- ... (list continues as per the output)
Files still using
fmt.Errorf:
support/docker/utils.gosupport/docker/sqlserver.go- ... (list continues as per the output)
Please address these instances to ensure consistent and centralized error management throughout the codebase.
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-180: Overall: Changes successfully implement centralized error handling.The modifications to this file effectively implement the PR's objective of centralizing error messages. The changes are minimal yet impactful, focusing on standardizing error handling without altering the existing functionality.
To ensure consistency across the codebase:
These checks will help identify any areas that might need further attention in the centralization process.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining uses of the standard errors package # and instances of string error messages that could be centralized. # Test 1: Check for imports of the standard errors package echo "Checking for standard errors package imports:" rg --type go 'import\s+(\([^)]*\)\s*)?([^()\s]+\s+)?"errors"' # Test 2: Check for string error messages that might need centralization echo "Checking for potential string error messages:" rg --type go 'errors\.New\(|fmt\.Errorf\(' # Note: Review the results manually to determine if any changes are needed.Length of output: 15739
database/gorm/gorm.go (3)
38-38: LGTM: Error handling improved with centralized constant.The use of
errors.ErrOrmDatabaseConfigNotFoundaligns well with the PR objective of centralizing error messages. This change enhances consistency and will facilitate easier updates and localization in the future.Consider adding a comment explaining the specific condition that triggers this error, to improve code readability:
// Return an error if no write configurations are found if len(writeConfigs) == 0 { return nil, errors.ErrOrmDatabaseConfigNotFound }
96-99: LGTM: Error handling improved with centralized constant.The changes in the
initmethod, including the removal of error formatting and the use oferrors.ErrOrmNoDialectorsFound, align well with the PR objective. These modifications contribute to standardizing error handling and reducing duplication across the framework.For consistency with the previous suggestion, consider adding a comment explaining the condition that triggers this error:
// Return an error if no dialectors are found after processing the configurations if len(dialectors) == 0 { return errors.ErrOrmNoDialectorsFound }
Line range hint
1-132: Summary: Changes successfully implement centralized error handling.The modifications in this file effectively address the PR objective of centralizing error messages within the framework. Key improvements include:
- Importing the centralized errors package.
- Replacing custom error messages with predefined error constants.
- Removing unnecessary formatting of error messages.
These changes contribute to standardizing error handling, facilitating easier updates and localization, and reducing duplication across the framework. The core functionality of the methods remains intact, ensuring that the changes do not introduce any regressions.
To further improve the centralized error handling approach:
Consider creating a custom error type that wraps the predefined error constants and allows for additional context when needed. This can provide more detailed error information while still maintaining centralized error definitions.
Implement error wrapping where appropriate to preserve the error chain, which can be beneficial for debugging and logging.
Document the new error constants in a central location (e.g., in the errors package) to provide developers with a clear overview of all possible errors and their meanings.
database/factory.go (2)
63-63: Approved: Improved error handling with a minor suggestionThe update to use
errors.ErrOrmFactoryMissingAttributes.SetModule(errors.ModuleOrm)for missing attributes errors is a good improvement. It provides more context and aligns with the goal of centralizing error messages.For consistency, consider extracting this error creation to a separate variable at the beginning of the
Makemethod, as it's used in two places:missingAttributesErr := errors.ErrOrmFactoryMissingAttributes.SetModule(errors.ModuleOrm)Then use this variable in both places where the error is returned. This will ensure consistency and make future updates easier.
Also applies to: 87-87
104-104: Approved: Enhanced error handling with a readability suggestionThe update to use
errors.ErrOrmFactoryMissingMethod.Args(reflect.TypeOf(value).String()).SetModule(errors.ModuleOrm)for the missing factory method error is a good improvement. It provides more context and aligns with the goal of centralizing error messages.To improve readability, consider breaking this line into multiple lines:
return errors.ErrOrmFactoryMissingMethod. Args(reflect.TypeOf(value).String()). SetModule(errors.ModuleOrm)This change will make the error construction easier to read and maintain.
database/migration/schema.go (2)
78-78: LGTM: Improved error handling in HasTable method.The use of
errors.ErrSchemaFailedToGetTables.Args()centralizes the error message and provides a more structured approach to error handling. This change aligns well with the PR objectives.Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of this error handling, especially if the behavior (logging and returning false) is intentional rather than propagating the error.
130-130: Approve centralized error message, but consider improving error handling.The use of
errors.ErrSchemaDriverNotSupported.Args()centralizes the error message for unsupported drivers, which aligns with the PR objectives. However, panicking might not be the best approach for handling this scenario in a production environment.Consider returning an error instead of panicking. This would allow the caller to handle the unsupported driver case more gracefully. Here's a suggested refactoring:
-func getGrammar(driver string) migration.Grammar { +func getGrammar(driver string) (migration.Grammar, error) { switch driver { case contractsdatabase.DriverMysql.String(): // TODO Optimize here when implementing Mysql driver - return nil + return nil, nil case contractsdatabase.DriverPostgres.String(): - return grammars.NewPostgres() + return grammars.NewPostgres(), nil case contractsdatabase.DriverSqlserver.String(): // TODO Optimize here when implementing Mysql driver - return nil + return nil, nil case contractsdatabase.DriverSqlite.String(): // TODO Optimize here when implementing Mysql driver - return nil + return nil, nil default: - panic(errors.ErrSchemaDriverNotSupported.Args(driver)) + return nil, errors.ErrSchemaDriverNotSupported.Args(driver) } }This change would require updating the callers of
getGrammarto handle the potential error, but it would make the code more robust and easier to maintain.log/application_test.go (4)
17-18: Improved error handling in TestNewApplicationThe changes enhance the test robustness by adding proper error checks after
NewApplicationcalls and using specific error messages. This aligns well with the PR objective of centralizing error messages.A minor suggestion for improvement:
Consider using
assert.NoError(t, err)instead ofassert.Nil(t, err)for better readability and more specific error assertions. This change would make the intent clearer and provide more informative error messages if the assertion fails.-assert.Nil(t, err) +assert.NoError(t, err)Also applies to: 27-28, 35-37
47-48: Improved error handling in TestApplication_ChannelThe changes enhance the test robustness by adding proper error checks after the
NewApplicationcall and using a specific error message for unsupported drivers. This aligns well with the PR objective of centralizing error messages.A minor suggestion for improvement:
Consider using
assert.NoError(t, err)instead ofassert.Nil(t, err)for better readability and more specific error assertions. This change would make the intent clearer and provide more informative error messages if the assertion fails.-assert.Nil(t, err) +assert.NoError(t, err)Also applies to: 63-63
73-74: Improved error handling in TestApplication_StackThe changes enhance the test robustness by adding proper error checks after the
NewApplicationcall and using a specific error message for unsupported drivers. This aligns well with the PR objective of centralizing error messages.A minor suggestion for improvement:
Consider using
assert.NoError(t, err)instead ofassert.Nil(t, err)for better readability and more specific error assertions. This change would make the intent clearer and provide more informative error messages if the assertion fails.-assert.Nil(t, err) +assert.NoError(t, err)Also applies to: 81-81
Line range hint
1-89: Consider adding new test cases for error scenariosThe changes made to improve error handling and use centralized error messages are consistent and align well with the PR objectives. To further enhance the test coverage:
Consider adding new test cases that specifically cover error scenarios, such as:
- Passing an invalid configuration to
NewApplication.- Testing the behavior when the default logging channel is not set.
- Verifying the application's response to misconfigured logging channels.
These additional test cases would help ensure that the error handling is comprehensive and that the application behaves correctly in various error scenarios.
database/gorm/logger.go (1)
Line range hint
73-95: Improved error handling logic looks good.The new error handling in the
Errormethod is more specific and handles certain scenarios better. The early return for "connection refused" errors and the avoidance of duplicate output for "Access denied" errors are good improvements.However, consider extracting these error checks into separate functions for better readability and maintainability.
Consider refactoring the error checks into separate functions:
func isConnectionRefusedError(err error) bool { if netErr, ok := err.(*net.OpError); ok { return strings.Contains(netErr.Error(), "connection refused") } return false } func isAccessDeniedError(err error) bool { return strings.Contains(err.Error(), "Access denied") }Then use these functions in the
Errormethod:func (l Logger) Error(ctx context.Context, msg string, data ...any) { for _, item := range data { if err, ok := item.(error); ok { if isConnectionRefusedError(err) { return // Let upper layer function deal with connection refused error } if isAccessDeniedError(err) { return // Avoid duplicate output } } } if l.LogLevel >= logger.Error { l.Printf(l.errStr+msg, append([]any{FileWithLineNum()}, data...)...) } }cache/memory.go (3)
28-28: LGTM: Improved method comment clarity.The updated comment for the
Addmethod is clearer and more concise. It accurately describes the method's functionality without unnecessary details.Consider adding a brief description of the method's behavior when the key already exists, for completeness:
// Add an item in the cache if the key does not exist. Returns true if the item was added, false otherwise.
62-62: LGTM: Improved method comment accuracy.The updated comment for the
Forevermethod is more accurate, replacing "Driver" with "Put" to better reflect the method's functionality.Consider adding a brief explanation of "indefinitely" for clarity:
// Forever Put an item in the cache indefinitely (without an expiration time).
135-135: LGTM: Improved method comment grammar.The updated comment for the
Hasmethod is grammatically correct, changing "Check" to "Checks".Consider rephrasing the comment for even better clarity:
// Has checks if an item exists in the cache.This version is more idiomatic and clearly expresses the method's purpose.
filesystem/local.go (1)
Line range hint
1-285: Consider extending error handling improvements to other methods.The changes made to centralize error handling in the
Deletemethod are beneficial. To further improve consistency across theLocalstruct, consider applying similar error handling patterns to other methods where appropriate.For example, methods like
Copy,Move, orPutcould benefit from using predefined error constants for common error scenarios. This would align with the PR's objective of centralizing error messages and improve overall error handling consistency in the framework.auth/auth.go (3)
61-70: LGTM: Improved error handling in User methodThe replacement of error constants with structured errors from the centralized
errorspackage is a good improvement. It aligns with the PR objective and makes error handling more consistent and manageable.Consider adding error wrapping to provide more context:
return errors.ErrAuthParseTokenFirst.Wrap("failed to retrieve auth from context")This additional context can be helpful for debugging and logging.
Line range hint
94-131: LGTM: Improved error handling in Parse methodThe replacement of error constants with structured errors from the centralized
errorspackage is a good improvement. It aligns with the PR objective and makes error handling more consistent and manageable.For consistency, consider adding the module specification to all errors in this method, not just
ErrCacheSupportRequired. For example:return nil, errors.ErrAuthTokenDisabled.SetModule(errors.ModuleAuth)This would make all errors consistently include their module information.
222-228: LGTM: Improved error handling in Logout methodThe replacement of error constants with structured errors from the centralized
errorspackage is a good improvement. It aligns with the PR objective and makes error handling more consistent and manageable. The addition of the module specification toErrCacheSupportRequiredis a nice touch for providing context.For consistency, consider adding the module specification to
ErrCacheForeverFailedas well:return errors.ErrCacheForeverFailed.SetModule(errors.ModuleAuth)This would make all errors in this method consistently include their module information.
errors/list.go (5)
23-31: LGTM: Comprehensive set of authentication-related error variables.The new authentication-related error variables are well-defined and cover a wide range of potential issues. They follow a consistent naming convention and provide clear, specific error messages. This addition significantly enhances the error handling capabilities for authentication scenarios.
Consider adding a brief comment above this group of errors to indicate that they are authentication-related. This can improve readability and organization of the error list.
42-53: LGTM: Well-defined error variables for events, filesystem, and gRPC.The new error variables for events, filesystem, and gRPC are clear, specific, and follow consistent naming conventions within each category. They cover a wide range of scenarios, enhancing the error handling capabilities across different components of the framework.
Consider adding brief comments above each group of errors (events, filesystem, gRPC) to improve readability and organization of the error list.
55-68: LGTM: Comprehensive error variables for logging, language, validation, and routing.The new error variables for logging, language, validation, and routing are well-defined, following consistent naming conventions within each category. They provide clear and specific error messages, enhancing the error handling capabilities across these components.
- Consider adding brief comments above each group of errors (logging, language, validation, routing) to improve readability and organization of the error list.
- The use of
SetModule()for logging errors is a good practice. Consider extending this approach to other error types where module identification would be beneficial.
75-94: LGTM: Comprehensive set of ORM and schema-related error variables.The new ORM and schema-related error variables are well-defined, following consistent naming conventions within each category. They cover a wide range of scenarios, providing clear and specific error messages for various database-related operations. This addition significantly enhances the error handling capabilities for ORM and schema operations.
Consider grouping the ORM-related errors into subcategories (e.g., connection, query, model) and adding brief comments above each group to improve readability and organization of the error list.
1-94: Overall: Excellent centralization and standardization of error messages.The changes in this file significantly enhance the framework's error handling capabilities by centralizing and standardizing error messages across various components. The new error variables are well-organized, follow consistent naming conventions, and provide clear, specific error messages. This aligns perfectly with the PR objective of centralizing error messages.
Key improvements:
- Comprehensive coverage of error scenarios across different framework components.
- Consistent naming conventions within each category of errors.
- Clear and specific error messages that will aid in debugging and error handling.
To further improve the organization and readability of this file:
- Consider adding comments to separate different categories of errors (e.g., // Authentication errors, // Cache errors, etc.).
- For larger categories like ORM errors, consider grouping related errors together with sub-comments.
- Consider using the
SetModule()method consistently across all error types where module identification would be beneficial, as seen in the logging errors.validation/validation.go (1)
Line range hint
1-388: Overall: Excellent centralization of error handling.The changes in this file successfully implement the PR's objective of centralizing error messages within the framework. Key improvements include:
- Consistent use of framework-specific error variables.
- Enhanced error specificity and context in all modified methods.
- Maintained logic and structure of existing methods while improving error reporting.
These modifications will significantly improve debugging, maintain consistency, and facilitate easier updates and potential localization of error messages.
For completeness, consider reviewing other methods in this file (e.g.,
Rules(),Filters(), etc.) to ensure all error messages are centralized consistently.Would you like me to scan the file for any remaining non-centralized error messages?
database/gorm/to_sql_test.go (1)
123-123: LGTM: Improved error handling with centralized error messages.The update to use
errors.ErrOrmQueryInvalidModel.Args("")aligns well with the PR objective of centralizing error messages. This change should improve consistency in error reporting across the framework.Consider whether any additional context could be provided to the error message using the
Args()method. For example, if there's any information about why the model is invalid, it could be passed as an argument to provide more detailed error messages.log/logrus_writer.go (3)
306-306: LGTM: Improved error specificityThe replacement of the generic error with
errors.ErrLogDriverCircularReference.Args("stack")is a good improvement. It provides more specific error information and aligns with the centralized error handling approach.Consider adding a brief comment explaining the circular reference scenario for improved code readability:
// Prevent circular reference in stack driver configuration return errors.ErrLogDriverCircularReference.Args("stack")
344-344: LGTM: Consistent error handling improvementThe replacement of the generic error with
errors.ErrLogDriverNotSupported.Args(channel)is consistent with the previous error handling improvements. It provides more specific error information and includes the unsupported channel in the error message.For consistency with the previous suggestion, consider adding a brief comment:
// Report unsupported log driver return errors.ErrLogDriverNotSupported.Args(channel)
Line range hint
1-424: Overall: Good improvements, consider further refactoringThe changes in this file consistently improve error handling by using the new centralized error system. This aligns well with the PR objectives of centralizing error messages and standardizing error handling.
For future improvements, consider:
- Reviewing the entire file to identify any remaining instances of the standard
errorspackage usage and replace them with the new framework errors.- Evaluating if any other error messages in this file could benefit from centralization and parameterization.
- Updating the documentation (if any) to reflect the new error handling approach.
These changes lay a good foundation for improved error handling across the framework.
foundation/application_test.go (1)
285-293: LGTM! Consider adding an assertion for the default logging driver.The changes improve the test by mocking the configuration and verifying that the log service can be instantiated correctly. This is a good practice for isolating the test and ensuring proper behavior.
Consider adding an assertion to verify that the correct default logging driver is being used. For example:
mockConfig.EXPECT().GetString("logging.default").Return("stack").Once() // ... existing code ... log := s.app.MakeLog() s.NotNil(log) s.Equal("stack", log.Driver()) // Assuming there's a method to get the current driverThis would ensure that the correct driver is being used based on the configuration.
translation/translator_test.go (1)
Line range hint
1-500: Consider adding specific test cases for the new error typeWhile the implementation of the centralized error handling is consistent and effective, consider enhancing the test coverage by adding specific test cases that validate the behavior of the new
errors.ErrLangFileNotExisterror. This could include tests that:
- Explicitly check for this error type when it's expected to be returned.
- Verify that the error message is as expected.
- Test error equality (if applicable) to ensure that error comparisons work as intended.
These additional tests would further strengthen the robustness of the error handling implementation.
log/logrus_writer_test.go (3)
36-36: Improved error handling in TestLogrus function.The changes to capture and check for errors from
NewApplicationcalls are a good improvement. This practice enhances the robustness of the tests by ensuring that any initialization errors are not overlooked.Consider adding a helper function to reduce code duplication:
func initLogApplication(t *testing.T, mockConfig *configmock.Config, j *json.Json) *Application { log, err := NewApplication(mockConfig, j) assert.Nil(t, err) return log }This helper function can be used in place of the repeated
log, err = NewApplication(mockConfig, j)calls, making the test cases more concise and easier to maintain.Also applies to: 47-47, 55-55, 67-67, 82-82, 95-95, 108-108, 121-121, 134-134, 147-147, 160-160, 173-173, 186-186, 201-201, 216-216, 229-229, 242-242, 255-255, 268-268, 295-295, 319-319, 332-332, 345-345, 358-358, 371-371
432-433: Improved error handling in TestLogrus_Fatal.The changes here enhance error handling by properly capturing and checking errors from both
NewApplicationandcmd.Run(). This is consistent with the improvements made throughout the file.Consider adding an error check for
cmd.Run():err = cmd.Run() assert.Error(t, err) assert.EqualError(t, err, "exit status 1")This explicitly verifies that an error occurred during the command execution, which is expected behavior for this test.
Also applies to: 442-442
518-519: Consistent error handling in Benchmark_Error.The changes here continue the pattern of improved error handling seen in previous benchmark functions, maintaining excellent consistency throughout the file.
Given the repetitive nature of these changes across all benchmark functions, consider creating a helper function to reduce code duplication:
func setupBenchmark(b *testing.B) *Application { mockConfig := initMockConfig() mockDriverConfig(mockConfig) log, err := NewApplication(mockConfig, json.NewJson()) assert.Nil(b, err) assert.NotNil(b, log) return log }This helper function can be used at the beginning of each benchmark function, making the code more DRY and easier to maintain.
validation/validation_test.go (1)
Line range hint
1-1201: Overall approval with suggestion for improved test coverage.The changes made to this file consistently improve error handling by utilizing the new centralized error constants from the Goravel framework. This aligns well with the PR objective of centralizing error messages and should lead to more maintainable and consistent tests.
While the current changes are good, consider adding test cases for any new error types that may have been introduced in the centralized error handling system. This would ensure comprehensive coverage of the new error handling mechanism.
route/route.go (1)
Line range hint
16-44: Suggest Adding Unit Tests for New Error CasesTo ensure the newly added error handling works as intended, consider adding unit tests for the following scenarios:
- Default driver is not set (
defaultDriver == "").- An invalid driver is specified, and
NewDriverreturns an error.These tests will help in catching potential issues early and improve code reliability.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (68)
- auth/auth.go (12 hunks)
- auth/auth_test.go (17 hunks)
- auth/errors.go (0 hunks)
- auth/service_provider.go (2 hunks)
- cache/application.go (1 hunks)
- cache/driver.go (3 hunks)
- cache/memory.go (7 hunks)
- cache/service_provider.go (2 hunks)
- console/application.go (1 hunks)
- crypt/aes.go (3 hunks)
- crypt/errors.go (0 hunks)
- crypt/service_provider.go (2 hunks)
- database/factory.go (4 hunks)
- database/gorm/dialector.go (3 hunks)
- database/gorm/dialector_test.go (2 hunks)
- database/gorm/errors.go (0 hunks)
- database/gorm/gorm.go (3 hunks)
- database/gorm/logger.go (1 hunks)
- database/gorm/query.go (15 hunks)
- database/gorm/query_test.go (13 hunks)
- database/gorm/to_sql_test.go (2 hunks)
- database/migration/schema.go (3 hunks)
- database/orm.go (4 hunks)
- database/orm/model.go (0 hunks)
- database/service_provider.go (2 hunks)
- errors/list.go (1 hunks)
- errors/modules.go (1 hunks)
- event/service_provider.go (2 hunks)
- event/task.go (2 hunks)
- event/task_test.go (1 hunks)
- event/test_utils.go (1 hunks)
- facades/app.go (1 hunks)
- facades/errors.go (0 hunks)
- filesystem/application.go (4 hunks)
- filesystem/local.go (2 hunks)
- filesystem/service_provider.go (2 hunks)
- foundation/application_test.go (4 hunks)
- grpc/application.go (3 hunks)
- grpc/service_provider.go (1 hunks)
- hash/service_provider.go (2 hunks)
- log/application.go (4 hunks)
- log/application_test.go (5 hunks)
- log/logger/daily.go (3 hunks)
- log/logger/single.go (2 hunks)
- log/logrus_writer.go (3 hunks)
- log/logrus_writer_test.go (35 hunks)
- log/service_provider.go (2 hunks)
- mail/service_provider.go (2 hunks)
- queue/machinery.go (2 hunks)
- queue/service_provider.go (2 hunks)
- queue/task.go (2 hunks)
- queue/utils.go (2 hunks)
- route/route.go (3 hunks)
- route/service_provider.go (2 hunks)
- schedule/service_provider.go (2 hunks)
- session/errors.go (0 hunks)
- session/manager.go (1 hunks)
- testing/docker/database.go (3 hunks)
- testing/docker/errors.go (0 hunks)
- testing/test_case.go (2 hunks)
- translation/errors.go (0 hunks)
- translation/file_loader.go (2 hunks)
- translation/file_loader_test.go (2 hunks)
- translation/service_provider.go (2 hunks)
- translation/translator.go (2 hunks)
- translation/translator_test.go (15 hunks)
- validation/validation.go (6 hunks)
- validation/validation_test.go (4 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (8)
- auth/errors.go
- crypt/errors.go
- database/gorm/errors.go
- database/orm/model.go
- facades/errors.go
- session/errors.go
- testing/docker/errors.go
- translation/errors.go
🔇 Additional comments (190)
facades/app.go (2)
5-5: LGTM: New import added correctly.The new import for the
errorspackage is correctly added and is necessary for the changes made in theApp()function.
11-11: Excellent enhancement to error handling.The modification to use
errors.ErrApplicationNotSet.SetModule(errors.ModuleFacade)instead of a static error is a significant improvement. This change:
- Provides more context by associating the error with the specific module (ModuleFacade).
- Enhances debugging and error tracking capabilities.
- Aligns with the PR objective of centralizing and standardizing error messages.
This approach to error handling is more informative and maintainable.
route/service_provider.go (1)
5-5: LGTM: New import added for error handling.The addition of the
errorspackage import is appropriate for the new error handling logic introduced in theRegistermethod.hash/service_provider.go (3)
5-5: LGTM: New import for centralized error handling.The addition of the
errorspackage import is appropriate for the new error handling mechanism introduced in this file.
24-24: LGTM: Simplified Boot method signature.The removal of the unused parameter name
appfrom theBootmethod signature is a good practice in Go. It maintains the method's interface while clearly indicating that the parameter is not used within the method.
Line range hint
1-26: Summary: Improvements align with PR objectives.The changes in this file successfully contribute to the goal of centralizing error messages within the framework. The new error handling in the
Registermethod enhances robustness, while the simplifiedBootmethod signature improves code clarity. These modifications align well with Go best practices and the overall objectives of the PR.grpc/service_provider.go (3)
Line range hint
1-25: Summary: Good progress on centralizing error messages, with some verifications needed.Overall, the changes in this file align well with the PR objective of centralizing error messages. The key improvements include:
- Switching from the
logpackage to theerrorspackage for better error handling.- Adding a nil check for the config with a centralized error message.
- Removing the
LogFacadevariable (as mentioned in the AI summary).These changes contribute to standardizing error handling and reducing duplication across the framework. However, to ensure the completeness and consistency of these changes, please:
- Verify the removal of logging functionality across the grpc module.
- Confirm the complete removal of the
LogFacadevariable and its impact on theBootmethod.- Consider wrapping the error in the
Registermethod for additional context.Once these verifications and minor improvements are addressed, the changes will significantly enhance the error handling system in line with the PR objectives.
24-25: Verify the removal of LogFacade and its impact.The AI summary mentions the removal of the
LogFacadevariable, which is consistent with the change from thelogpackage to theerrorspackage. However, this change is not visible in the provided code diff.Please run the following script to confirm the removal of
LogFacadeand check for any remaining references:If the script returns any results, please review them to ensure that the
LogFacadehas been properly removed and that theBootmethod no longer contains any logging-related code that might have been missed during the refactoring.✅ Verification successful
LogFacade removal verified successfully.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the removal of LogFacade and check for any remaining references # Test: Check if LogFacade declaration still exists echo "Checking for LogFacade declaration:" rg --type go 'var\s+LogFacade' grpc/service_provider.go # Test: Check for any remaining uses of LogFacade echo "Checking for LogFacade usage:" rg --type go '\bLogFacade\b' grpc/ # Test: Check the Boot method for any changes related to logging echo "Checking Boot method for logging-related code:" rg --type go -A 10 'func \(.*\) Boot\(' grpc/service_provider.goLength of output: 481
5-5: LGTM! Verify logging removal across the codebase.The change from
logtoerrorspackage aligns with the PR objective of centralizing error messages. This is a good step towards standardizing error handling.To ensure that logging functionality has been properly migrated or removed, please run the following script:
If the script returns any results, please review those occurrences to ensure they are handled appropriately in the new error handling system.
errors/modules.go (1)
4-21: Excellent work on centralizing module constants!The addition of these module constants aligns well with the PR objective of centralizing error messages and standardizing error handling. The implementation demonstrates:
- Consistent naming convention (ModuleX).
- Clear and descriptive names for each module.
- Proper use of exported constants for cross-package usage.
This centralization will facilitate easier updates, improve maintainability, and reduce duplication across the framework.
Consider grouping related modules or adding comments for better organization. For example:
var ( // Core modules ModuleSession = "session" ModuleAuth = "auth" ModuleCache = "cache" // Communication modules ModuleGrpc = "grpc" ModuleMail = "mail" // Data handling modules ModuleOrm = "orm" ModuleSchema = "schema" // ... (other groupings) )Let's verify the usage of these new constants across the codebase:
This script will help identify which new constants are already being used and which might need further integration into the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
All new module constants are actively used in the codebase.
The verification confirms that each newly added module constant is utilized appropriately:
- ModuleAuth: 10 occurrences
- ModuleCache: 3 occurrences
- ModuleCrypt: 3 occurrences
- ModuleEvent: 2 occurrences
- ModuleFacade: 2 occurrences
- ModuleFilesystem: 3 occurrences
- ModuleGrpc: 2 occurrences
- ModuleHash: 2 occurrences
- ModuleLog: 6 occurrences
- ModuleMail: 3 occurrences
- ModuleLang: 3 occurrences
- ModuleTesting: 3 occurrences
- ModuleSchedule: 5 occurrences
- ModuleRoute: 4 occurrences
- ModuleQueue: 3 occurrences
- ModuleOrm: 6 occurrences
- ModuleSchema: 4 occurrences
This ensures that the centralization of module constants is effectively integrated across the codebase, enhancing maintainability and consistency.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check usage of new module constants in the codebase # Array of new module names modules=("Auth" "Cache" "Crypt" "Event" "Facade" "Filesystem" "Grpc" "Hash" "Log" "Mail" "Lang" "Testing" "Schedule" "Route" "Queue" "Orm" "Schema") echo "Checking usage of new module constants:" for module in "${modules[@]}"; do count=$(rg --type go "Module$module" | wc -l) echo "Module$module: $count occurrences" doneLength of output: 2665
crypt/service_provider.go (5)
5-5: LGTM: Import added for structured error handling.The addition of the
errorspackage import is appropriate and aligns with the updated error handling approach in theRegistermethod.
15-17: Improved variable naming and error handling.Great improvements in this section:
- Renaming
ctoconfigenhances code readability.- The new error handling approach using
errors.ErrConfigFacadeNotSet.SetModule(errors.ModuleCrypt)provides a more structured and centralized way of managing errors, which aligns well with the PR objectives.These changes contribute to better maintainability and consistency across the framework.
20-22: Consistent improvement in variable naming and error handling.Excellent continuation of the improvements:
- Renaming
jtojsonfurther enhances code readability.- The error handling approach using
errors.ErrJSONParserNotSet.SetModule(errors.ModuleCrypt)maintains consistency with the previous error and supports the centralized error management objective.These changes reinforce the overall improvement in code clarity and error handling structure.
25-25: LGTM: Consistent use of renamed variables.The
NewAESfunction call correctly uses the renamed variablesconfigandjson. This change maintains consistency with the earlier variable renaming, completing the refactoring in this method.
Line range hint
1-31: Summary: Excellent improvements in error handling and code clarity.The changes in this file successfully address the PR objectives:
- Error messages are now centralized using the
errorspackage, which will facilitate easier updates and localization.- Variable renaming improves code readability.
- The new error handling approach provides more context by setting the module to
errors.ModuleCrypt.These modifications contribute to a more maintainable and consistent codebase. Great job on implementing these improvements!
log/service_provider.go (2)
5-5: LGTM: Import statement added correctly.The new import for the errors package is necessary and correctly placed.
Line range hint
1-24: Summary: Changes align with PR objectives and improve code quality.The modifications to the
Registermethod successfully implement centralized error handling, which aligns with the PR objectives. The introduced checks for nil config and JSON parser enhance the robustness of the code. The use of custom error types with module setting contributes to better error categorization and potential localization in the future.These changes improve the overall quality and reliability of the
ServiceProviderimplementation without introducing breaking changes to the existing functionality.testing/test_case.go (4)
7-7: LGTM: Import statement added correctly.The new import for the
errorspackage is necessary and correctly placed. It aligns with the changes made in the methods to use standardized error handling.
23-23: Excellent: Standardized error handling implemented.The update to use
errors.ErrArtisanFacadeNotSet.SetModule(errors.ModuleTesting)is a significant improvement. This change:
- Centralizes error handling, aligning with the PR objectives.
- Provides a more specific and trackable error message.
- Allows for easier localization and management of error messages.
Great job on implementing this standardized approach!
31-31: LGTM: Consistent error handling applied.The update in the
RefreshDatabasemethod mirrors the change in theSeedmethod, usingerrors.ErrArtisanFacadeNotSet.SetModule(errors.ModuleTesting). This consistency in error handling across methods is commendable and aligns perfectly with the goal of standardizing error messages throughout the framework.
Line range hint
1-34: Summary: Excellent implementation of centralized error handling.The changes in this file successfully implement the centralized error handling approach as outlined in the PR objectives. Key points:
- Consistent use of
errors.ErrArtisanFacadeNotSet.SetModule(errors.ModuleTesting)across methods.- Improved error specificity and traceability.
- Alignment with the goal of easier updates and potential localization.
These changes contribute significantly to standardizing error handling within the framework, which should improve maintainability and user experience.
filesystem/service_provider.go (4)
7-7: LGTM: New import for error handling.The addition of the
errorspackage import is appropriate for the new error handling mechanism introduced in theRegistermethod.
20-23: LGTM: Improved error handling for nil config.The addition of a nil check for the config object enhances the robustness of the
Registermethod. Returning a specific error with the module set helps in precise error reporting and debugging.
25-25: LGTM: Efficient use of config variable in return statement.The new return statement correctly handles the potential error case and efficiently uses the
configvariable instead of callingapp.MakeConfig()again.
19-19:⚠️ Potential issueUpdate method signature to match the changes.
The AI-generated summary indicates that the method signature has been updated to
func (database *ServiceProvider) Register(app foundation.Application) (any, error), but this change is not reflected in the provided code. Please update the method signature to match the new implementation.Apply this change to the method signature:
-func (database *ServiceProvider) Register(app foundation.Application) { +func (database *ServiceProvider) Register(app foundation.Application) (any, error) {Likely invalid or redundant comment.
queue/service_provider.go (2)
6-6: LGTM: New import for error handling.The addition of the
errorspackage import is appropriate for the new error handling logic in theRegistermethod.
17-27: Approve changes with a note on breaking change.The changes to the
Registermethod significantly improve error handling and robustness. The nil checks for config and log facades prevent potential runtime errors. The error messages are clear and provide context usingerrors.ModuleQueue.However, note that changing the method signature to return an error is a breaking change. Ensure that all callers of this method are updated accordingly.
Run the following script to verify the usage of the
Registermethod in the codebase:This script will help identify all occurrences of the
ServiceProviderstruct,Registermethod implementations, andRegistermethod calls in the codebase. Review the results to ensure all usages are consistent with the new method signature.translation/file_loader.go (3)
8-8: LGTM: New import added correctly.The new import for the
errorspackage is correctly added and is necessary for the changes in theLoadmethod.
Line range hint
1-43: Overall impact: Improved error handling consistency.The changes in this file successfully contribute to the PR objective of centralizing error messages in the framework. By using a more specific error type (
errors.ErrLangFileNotExist), the code improves error handling consistency and potentially aids in debugging and error management. These modifications don't introduce additional complexity and maintain the existing functionality of theLoadmethod.
43-43: LGTM: Error type updated for better specificity.The change from the previous error to
errors.ErrLangFileNotExistimproves the specificity of the error message and aligns with the PR objective of centralizing error messages.To ensure consistency, let's verify the definition and usage of this new error type:
✅ Verification successful
Verified:
ErrLangFileNotExistis correctly defined and consistently used.The
ErrLangFileNotExisterror is properly defined inerrors/list.goand is consistently utilized across thetranslationpackage, ensuring standardized error handling.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the definition and usage of ErrLangFileNotExist # Test 1: Check if ErrLangFileNotExist is defined in the errors package echo "Checking ErrLangFileNotExist definition:" rg --type go "var ErrLangFileNotExist" "errors/" # Test 2: Check for other usages of ErrLangFileNotExist in the codebase echo "Checking ErrLangFileNotExist usage:" rg --type go "ErrLangFileNotExist" --glob '!translation/file_loader.go'Length of output: 3131
cache/application.go (1)
Line range hint
1-52: Consider adding documentation for the new driver creation behavior.The changes to the
Applicationstruct andStoremethod introduce a new pattern of driver creation. While this aligns with the goal of centralizing error handling, it would be beneficial to add documentation explaining this new behavior, especially regarding the creation of new driver instances in theStoremethod.Let's verify the consistency of driver creation across the file:
✅ Verification successful
Verified Driver Creation Consistency
The usage of
NewDriverImplis consistent across the codebase, ensuring uniform driver creation patterns.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistent driver creation patterns # Expected: NewDriverImpl used consistently rg --type go 'NewDriverImpl'Length of output: 272
event/service_provider.go (4)
6-6: LGTM: New import added correctly.The new import for the
errorspackage is necessary and correctly placed for the new error handling in theRegistermethod.
17-22: LGTM: Robust error handling added.The new error check for
queueFacadeis a valuable addition:
- It prevents potential runtime errors by not proceeding with a nil
queueFacade.- The use of a predefined error type (
ErrQueueFacadeNotSet) with a set module is a good practice for standardized error handling.- This change aligns well with the PR objective of centralizing error messages in the framework.
The error message is clear and informative, which will aid in debugging and maintenance.
Line range hint
1-35: Overall assessment: Changes improve error handling and align with PR objectives.The modifications to this file successfully contribute to the goal of centralizing error messages in the framework. The new error handling for the
queueFacadeenhances the robustness of theRegistermethod. The use of predefined error types and modules promotes standardization across the framework.These changes should lead to easier updates, better localization capabilities, and reduced duplication of error messages, as outlined in the PR objectives.
15-15: Approve signature change and verify usage.The update to the
Registermethod signature to return an error is a good practice for proper error handling and propagation. This change is consistent with the new error check inside the method.Please ensure that all callers of this method have been updated to handle the potential error return. Run the following script to verify the method usage:
✅ Verification successful
All
Registermethod calls handle the returned error appropriately.No issues found with the usage of the updated
Registermethod across the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all calls to ServiceProvider.Register method handle the returned error. # Test: Search for ServiceProvider.Register method calls rg --type go -e 'ServiceProvider.*Register\s*\(' -A 5Length of output: 10424
queue/utils.go (2)
6-6: LGTM: Import of centralized error package.The addition of the
errorspackage import aligns with the PR objective of centralizing error messages. This change will allow the use of predefined error variables, improving consistency and maintainability.
Line range hint
1-45: Overall assessment: Excellent implementation of centralized error handling.The changes in this file successfully implement centralized error handling, which aligns perfectly with the PR objectives. The use of predefined error variables from the
errorspackage enhances consistency and maintainability across the framework.Key improvements:
- Consistent error handling in both
jobs2TasksandeventsToTasksfunctions.- Use of dynamic error messages where appropriate (
errors.ErrQueueDuplicateJobSignature.Args()).These changes will make it easier to update and localize error messages in the future, as well as reduce duplication throughout the framework.
translation/service_provider.go (3)
7-7: LGTM: Import added for error handling.The addition of the
errorspackage import is appropriate for the new error handling code introduced in theRegistermethod.
18-20: LGTM: Proper nil check for config added.The addition of this nil check for the config is a good practice. It prevents potential nil pointer dereferences and uses a predefined error constant for consistency. Setting the module to
errors.ModuleLangprovides useful context for error handling.
23-25: LGTM: Proper nil check for logger added.The addition of this nil check for the logger is a good practice. It prevents potential nil pointer dereferences and uses a predefined error constant for consistency. The structure is consistent with the config nil check, which enhances code readability.
cache/service_provider.go (3)
7-7: LGTM: Import added for error handling.The addition of the
errorspackage import is appropriate for the new error handling introduced in theRegistermethod.
18-20: LGTM: Robust error handling for nil config.The added check for nil config enhances the robustness of the
Registermethod. Usingerrors.ErrConfigFacadeNotSetwith the specific module set improves error clarity and consistency across the framework.
23-25: LGTM: Consistent error handling for nil log.The added check for nil log further enhances the robustness of the
Registermethod. The error handling is consistent with the previous nil config check, usingerrors.ErrLogFacadeNotSetwith the specific module set.cache/driver.go (4)
8-8: LGTM: Import statement addition is appropriate.The addition of the
errorspackage import is consistent with the changes in error handling throughout the file. This import is necessary for using the new error types such aserrors.ErrCacheDriverNotSupportedanderrors.ErrCacheStoreContractNotFulfilled.
Line range hint
1-45: Summary of changes and recommendationsThe modifications in this file align well with the PR objectives of centralizing error messages and simplifying the code structure. Key points:
- Error handling has been improved and centralized using the new
errorspackage.- The
Driverinterface has been removed, simplifying the overall structure.- The
memorymethod has been simplified, potentially changing error handling behavior.Recommendations:
- Add comments explaining the use of
Args()in error handling for better readability.- Verify that
NewMemoryfunction has been updated to handle errors internally.- Check the impact of removing the
Driverinterface on the rest of the codebase.Overall, these changes enhance consistency and maintainability of the cache driver implementation.
Line range hint
1-45: Verify the impact of removing the Driver interface.The removal of the
Driverinterface, as mentioned in the AI summary, simplifies the code structure. However, this change might affect other parts of the codebase that depend on this interface.Please run the following script to check for any remaining references to the
Driverinterface across the project:#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for references to the removed Driver interface # Test 1: Search for type declarations of Driver echo "Searching for Driver interface declarations:" ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'type Driver interface { $$ }' # Test 2: Search for uses of Driver as a type echo "Searching for uses of Driver as a type:" rg --type go '\bDriver\b' # Note: If these searches return results, it may indicate that the interface removal has not been fully propagated through the codebase.
34-34: Verify error handling in NewMemory function.The simplification of the
memorymethod by directly returning the result ofNewMemoryimproves code conciseness. However, this change assumes thatNewMemoryno longer returns an error.Please confirm that
NewMemoryhas been updated to handle errors internally or no longer produces errors. Run the following script to verify theNewMemoryfunction signature:database/gorm/dialector.go (1)
12-12: LGTM: New import for centralized error handling.The addition of the
errorspackage import is consistent with the changes made to centralize error handling in the framework.event/test_utils.go (3)
Line range hint
1-64: Summary of changes and impactThe primary change in this file is the replacement of the standard
errorspackage with a custom one (github.com/goravel/framework/errors). This modification affects two instances of error creation within the file but maintains the existing functionality of the test utilities.Key points:
- The change aligns with the PR objective of centralizing error messages in the framework.
- No breaking changes were introduced to the public API of this file.
- The test utilities remain functionally equivalent.
This change appears to be part of a larger effort to standardize error handling across the framework, which should improve maintainability and potentially provide additional context or functionality for error handling.
Line range hint
25-25: Confirm correct usage of new errors packageThe change in the import statement affects two instances of error creation in the file:
- In
TestEventHandleError.Handle()(line 25)- In
TestListenerHandleError.Handle()(line 64)Both instances now use the
errors.New()function from the customgithub.com/goravel/framework/errorspackage. This change maintains the existing functionality while potentially providing additional benefits from the custom errors package.To ensure that these are the only instances and that they're using the new package correctly, run the following command:
This command will show all instances of
errors.New()in the file, allowing us to confirm that only these two instances exist and that they're using the newly imported package.Also applies to: 64-64
5-5: Verify consistent usage of the new errors packageThe import of the standard
errorspackage has been replaced with a custom packagegithub.com/goravel/framework/errors. This change could potentially provide additional functionality or context to errors in the framework.Let's verify that this change is consistently applied throughout the file and doesn't introduce any issues:
✅ Verification successful
Let's address the issue with the regex in Test 1 to ensure we accurately verify the removal of the standard
errorspackage import.
Let's update the shell script to correctly handle multiline import statements by enabling multiline mode and adjusting the regex pattern.
Consistent usage of the new errors package confirmed.
All imports of the standard
errorspackage have been successfully removed, and all error creations utilize the customgithub.com/goravel/framework/errorspackage.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the new errors package in the file. # Test 1: Check if there are any remaining imports of the standard errors package echo "Test 1: Checking for standard errors package import" if rg --type go "^import\s+(\(.*\n)*.*\"errors\"" event/test_utils.go; then echo "Warning: Found standard errors package import" else echo "OK: No standard errors package import found" fi # Test 2: Verify that all error creations use the new package echo "Test 2: Verifying error creations" rg --type go "errors\.New\(" event/test_utils.goLength of output: 663
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the removal of the standard errors package import in the file. # Test 1: Check if there are any remaining imports of the standard errors package echo "Test 1: Checking for standard errors package import" if rg --type go 'import\s*\(.*\n.*"errors".*\n*\)' event/test_utils.go; then echo "Warning: Found standard errors package import" else echo "OK: No standard errors package import found" fi # Test 2: Verify that all error creations use the new package echo "Test 2: Verifying error creations" rg --type go "errors\.New\(" event/test_utils.goLength of output: 666
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the removal of the standard errors package import in the file. # Test 1: Check if there are any remaining imports of the standard errors package echo "Test 1: Checking for standard errors package import" if rg -U --type go 'import\s*\(\s*("github.com/goravel/framework/errors"|"errors")\s*\)' event/test_utils.go | grep '"errors"'; then echo "Warning: Found standard errors package import" else echo "OK: No standard errors package import found" fi # Test 2: Verify that all error creations use the new package echo "Test 2: Verifying error creations" rg --type go "errors\.New\(" event/test_utils.goLength of output: 530
event/task.go (3)
6-6: LGTM: Import changes are appropriate.The addition of the
errorspackage import and the removal of the unusedfmtpackage are consistent with the changes made in theDispatchmethod. This helps keep the imports clean and relevant.
27-27: Excellent: Error handling centralized as per PR objectives.The update to use
errors.ErrEventListenerNotBind.Args(receiver.event)instead offmt.Errorfaligns perfectly with the PR objective of centralizing error messages in the framework. This change offers several benefits:
- Standardized error handling: It uses a predefined error type, ensuring consistency across the framework.
- Easier localization: Centralized errors are typically easier to translate and maintain.
- Parameterized error messages: The use of the
Argsmethod allows for more informative error messages.This change maintains the same logic while improving the overall error handling structure of the framework.
Line range hint
1-78: Summary: Changes successfully centralize error handling.The modifications in this file effectively contribute to the PR's objective of centralizing error messages in the framework. The changes are well-implemented, maintaining the existing logic while improving the error handling structure. This update will facilitate easier maintenance, localization, and consistency of error messages across the framework.
log/logger/daily.go (1)
14-14: LGTM: Import change aligns with PR objectives.The addition of
"github.com/goravel/framework/errors"import and the removal of the standarderrorspackage import (as mentioned in the AI summary) align well with the PR objective of centralizing error messages within the framework. This change facilitates the use of predefined error constants, which will help standardize error handling across the codebase.queue/machinery.go (2)
12-12: LGTM: Import changes align with centralized error handling.The addition of the
errorspackage fromgithub.com/goravel/framework/errorsis consistent with the PR objective of centralizing error messages. This change, along with the removal of thefmtpackage (as mentioned in the AI summary), indicates a shift towards a more standardized error handling approach.
Line range hint
1-67: Overall assessment: Changes successfully implement centralized error handling.The modifications in this file effectively address the PR objective of centralizing error messages within the framework. The changes:
- Introduce the centralized
errorspackage.- Replace the custom error creation with a standardized approach.
- Maintain the original functionality while improving maintainability.
These updates will contribute to easier localization, updates, and overall consistency in error handling across the framework.
log/logger/single.go (2)
11-11: LGTM: Import change aligns with centralized error handling.The replacement of the standard
errorspackage withgithub.com/goravel/framework/errorsis in line with the PR objective of centralizing error messages within the framework. This change suggests a move towards using custom, framework-specific error types, which should lead to more consistent and maintainable error handling across the project.
Line range hint
11-31: Overall: Good progress on centralizing error handling.The changes in this file successfully implement part of the centralized error handling objective. They introduce a framework-specific errors package and use a custom error constant, which should improve consistency and maintainability.
To ensure full implementation of the PR objectives:
- Verify that similar changes have been made consistently across the framework.
- Check if there's a need for additional documentation or updates to existing docs regarding the new error handling approach.
To check for consistency across the framework, run:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistent use of the new errors package across the framework # Test 1: Count of files still using the standard errors package echo "Files still using standard errors package:" rg --type go -c '"errors"' | grep -v ':0$' # Test 2: Count of files using the new framework errors package echo "Files using new framework errors package:" rg --type go -c '"github.com/goravel/framework/errors"' # Test 3: Check for any remaining generic error creations echo "Generic error creations:" rg --type go 'errors\.New\('This will help ensure that the centralization of error handling is being applied consistently throughout the project.
event/task_test.go (5)
10-10: Excellent addition of centralized error handling!The introduction of
"github.com/goravel/framework/errors"aligns perfectly with the PR objective of centralizing error messages within the framework. This change will contribute to standardizing error handling and simplifying future updates and localization.
Line range hint
30-46: Well-structured test case for successful synchronous dispatch.This test case effectively covers the happy path scenario for synchronous dispatch. It properly sets up mock objects, defines expectations, and verifies the dispatch behavior. Good job on ensuring thorough testing of the success case.
Line range hint
47-63: Excellent error handling test case.This test case effectively simulates and verifies error handling during synchronous dispatch. It aligns well with the PR objective of improving and centralizing error handling within the framework. The use of
TestListenerHandleErrorand the expectation of an error being returned demonstrate thorough testing of error scenarios.
Line range hint
83-91: Well-structured test execution loop.The test execution loop effectively runs all defined test cases, setting up each one, executing it, and verifying the error expectations. The use of
assert.Equalto check if the error expectation matches the actual result is a good practice.
Line range hint
1-91: Overall excellent improvements to error handling and test coverage.The changes in this file significantly contribute to the PR's objective of centralizing error messages and improving error handling within the framework. The test suite now provides comprehensive coverage of various scenarios, including successful dispatches, error handling, and edge cases.
Key strengths:
- Introduction of centralized error handling from the framework.
- Thorough test cases covering success and multiple error scenarios.
- Consistent and well-structured test execution.
Minor suggestions for further improvement:
- Consider adding specific error message verifications in the "no listeners" and "event handle return error" test cases to ensure precise error propagation.
Great job on enhancing the robustness and maintainability of the event dispatch system!
testing/docker/database.go (3)
12-12: LGTM: Import added for centralized error handling.The addition of the
errorspackage import aligns with the PR objective of centralizing error messages. This change is correct and well-placed within the import block.
27-27: LGTM: Error message centralized.The replacement of the custom error with
errors.ErrConfigFacadeNotSetaligns with the PR objective of centralizing error messages. The error message is appropriate for the context where the config is not set.
36-36: LGTM: Error message centralized.The replacement of the custom error with
errors.ErrArtisanFacadeNotSetaligns with the PR objective of centralizing error messages. The error message is appropriate for the context where the artisan is not set.database/gorm/dialector_test.go (3)
14-14: LGTM: Import of centralized error package.The addition of the
errorspackage import from the framework aligns with the PR objective of centralizing error messages. This change is necessary and correct.
Line range hint
1-114: Overall assessment: Changes align with PR objectives.The modifications to this file are minimal and focused, centering around the use of centralized error messages. This approach maintains the existing test coverage while improving consistency in error handling across the framework. The changes align well with the PR objectives and contribute to a more maintainable codebase.
35-35: Verify the wording of the centralized error message.The change from a manually formatted error to a centralized error message is good and aligns with the PR objectives. However, please verify that the wording of
ErrOrmFailedToGenerateDNSmatches the intent of the original error message, which was "failed to generate DSN for connection: postgres".To verify the error message, please run the following command:
This will help ensure that the new centralized error message conveys the same information as the original.
✅ Verification successful
Further verification needed for the definition of
ErrOrmFailedToGenerateDNS.The initial search did not locate the definition of
ErrOrmFailedToGenerateDNS. To ensure accurate verification, please run the following command:
Error message wording verified successfully.
The centralized error
ErrOrmFailedToGenerateDNScorrectly formats the message as "failed to generate DSN for connection: postgres" using theArgsmethod, matching the original error intent.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the wording of the ErrOrmFailedToGenerateDNS error message # Search for the definition of ErrOrmFailedToGenerateDNS rg --type go "var ErrOrmFailedToGenerateDNS" -A 3Length of output: 51
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the definition of ErrOrmFailedToGenerateDNS across all Go files rg --type go "ErrOrmFailedToGenerateDNS"Length of output: 339
crypt/aes.go (3)
13-13: LGTM: Import of centralized error packageThe addition of
"github.com/goravel/framework/errors"aligns with the PR objective of centralizing error messages. This change enhances consistency in error handling across the framework.
96-96: LGTM: Consistent error handling for missing IV keyThe use of
errors.ErrCryptMissingIVKeyis consistent with the centralized error handling approach. This change improves consistency and makes error management more streamlined.
Line range hint
1-120: Overall assessment: Excellent implementation of centralized error handlingThe changes in this file consistently implement centralized error handling, which aligns perfectly with the PR objectives. The use of the
errorspackage fromgithub.com/goravel/frameworkenhances consistency and maintainability across the framework.Key improvements:
- Consistent use of centralized error types.
- Improved context in error messages using the
Args()method.- Streamlined error handling in both
NewAESandDecryptStringfunctions.These changes will significantly contribute to standardizing error handling processes and simplifying future updates and localizations.
grpc/application.go (5)
13-13: LGTM: Import of centralized errors package.The addition of the centralized errors package import aligns with the PR objective of standardizing error handling. This change will facilitate easier updates and localization of error messages.
36-36: Approved: Centralized error constant for empty client host.The use of
errors.ErrGrpcEmptyClientHostinstead of a string error message improves consistency and aligns with the PR objective of centralizing error messages. This change will make it easier to manage and update error messages across the framework.
49-49: Excellent: Parameterized centralized error for invalid interceptor types.The use of
errors.ErrGrpcInvalidInterceptorsType.Args(name)is a great improvement. It not only centralizes the error message but also allows for context-specific information (the name) to be included. This approach enhances error reporting and debugging capabilities.
65-65: Approved: Centralized error constants for empty server host and port.The use of
errors.ErrGrpcEmptyServerHostanderrors.ErrGrpcEmptyServerPortinstead of string error messages improves consistency and aligns with the PR objective of centralizing error messages. These changes will make it easier to manage and update error messages across the framework.Also applies to: 71-71
Line range hint
1-110: Summary: Successful implementation of centralized error handling.The changes in this file consistently implement centralized error handling, which aligns well with the PR objectives. The use of parameterized errors (e.g.,
ErrGrpcInvalidInterceptorsType.Args(name)) is particularly commendable. Only one minor typo was identified in an error constant name.To ensure completeness:
✅ Verification successful
All error messages are centralized.
The verification scripts confirm that all error messages in
grpc/application.goare using the centralized errors package. No issues were found.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that all error messages in this file use the centralized errors package # Check for any remaining string error messages remaining_errors=$(rg --type go 'return .*, ".*"' grpc/application.go) if [ -n "$remaining_errors" ]; then echo "Warning: The following lines may contain string error messages that haven't been centralized:" echo "$remaining_errors" else echo "All error messages appear to be using the centralized errors package." fi # Check for consistent use of the new errors package centralized_errors=$(rg --type go 'errors\.Err' grpc/application.go) echo "Centralized error usage:" echo "$centralized_errors"Length of output: 1078
database/orm.go (4)
12-12: Approval: Import changes align with PR objectivesThe addition of the
errorspackage fromgithub.com/goravel/framework/errorsand the removal of thefmtpackage align well with the PR objective of centralizing error messages. This change suggests a shift towards a more structured error handling approach, which should improve consistency and maintainability.
81-81: Improved error handling in DB and Transaction methodsThe changes in both methods align well with the centralized error handling approach:
- In the
DBmethod, usingerrors.ErrOrmUnexpectedQueryType.Argsprovides a more structured error with arguments.- In the
Transactionmethod, directly returning the rollback error simplifies the code.These changes contribute to more consistent error handling across the framework.
To ensure the centralized errors provide sufficient information, please run the following commands:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the definition of ErrOrmUnexpectedQueryType ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'var ErrOrmUnexpectedQueryType = $_' | grep -A 3 'ErrOrmUnexpectedQueryType' # Search for any rollback-related errors ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'var $_ = errors.New($str)' | grep -i 'rollback'Also applies to: 114-114
Line range hint
1-141: Summary: Consistent move towards centralized error handlingThe changes in this file consistently move towards a centralized error handling approach, aligning well with the PR objectives. The removal of
fmtusage in favor of a structured errors package is a positive step towards standardization.To ensure the completeness of this refactoring:
- Verify that all necessary error types are defined in the centralized error package.
- Check if any other occurrences of
fmt.Errorffor error creation remain in this file or related files.- Confirm that the new error messages provide sufficient context for debugging.
Run the following command to check for any remaining
fmt.Errorfusage:#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining fmt.Errorf usage rg --type go 'fmt\.Errorf'
47-48: Simplified error handling in BuildOrm functionThe error handling has been simplified by directly returning the error from
gorm.BuildQuery. This aligns with the goal of centralizing error messages and reduces verbosity.However, please verify that the error returned by
gorm.BuildQueryprovides sufficient context about where the error occurred. If not, consider adding a custom error in the centralized error package that includes this context.To ensure the error provides enough context, please run the following command:
queue/task.go (1)
11-11: LGTM: Import change aligns with centralized error handling.The addition of
github.com/goravel/framework/errorsand removal of the standarderrorspackage import aligns well with the PR objective of centralizing error messages within the framework. This change will help standardize error handling across the codebase.database/gorm/gorm.go (1)
15-15: LGTM: Import changes align with centralized error handling.The addition of
github.com/goravel/framework/errorsand the removal of thefmtpackage are consistent with the PR objective of centralizing error messages. This change supports the use of predefined error constants, which will help standardize error handling across the framework.translation/file_loader_test.go (3)
11-11: LGTM: New import aligns with centralized error handling.The addition of the
errorspackage import from thegoravel/frameworklibrary is appropriate and aligns with the PR objective of centralizing error messages within the framework.
94-94: LGTM: Improved error assertion using centralized error.The modification in the
TestLoadNonExistentFilemethod enhances the error assertion by using the centralizederrors.ErrLangFileNotExist.Error(). This change aligns well with the PR objective of centralizing error messages and improves the specificity of the error handling in the test.
Line range hint
1-124: Summary: Successful implementation of centralized error handling in tests.The changes in this file successfully implement the use of centralized error messages from the framework. The new import and the modified error assertion in the
TestLoadNonExistentFilemethod contribute to a more standardized and maintainable approach to error handling in the test suite. These modifications align well with the PR objectives and enhance the overall quality of the codebase.database/factory.go (2)
10-10: Approved: Import change aligns with PR objectivesThe update to import
"github.com/goravel/framework/errors"is in line with the PR's goal of centralizing error messages within the framework. This change will allow for more standardized and specific error handling throughout the codebase.
Line range hint
1-132: Summary: Changes align well with PR objectivesThe modifications in this file successfully centralize error messages and improve error handling consistency. The use of a custom error package and specific error types enhances the clarity and context of error messages throughout the factory implementation. These changes align perfectly with the PR's objective of standardizing and simplifying error handling.
The suggestions provided are minor and aimed at further improving readability and maintainability. Overall, the changes in this file are well-implemented and contribute positively to the framework's error handling system.
database/migration/schema.go (2)
12-12: LGTM: Import of custom error package.The addition of the custom errors package aligns with the PR objective of centralizing error messages. This should lead to more consistent and maintainable error handling throughout the framework.
Line range hint
1-132: Summary: Good progress on centralizing error messages, with room for further improvements.The changes in this file successfully centralize error messages and improve error handling, aligning well with the PR objectives. The introduction of the custom errors package and the use of structured error messages in
HasTableandgetGrammarare positive steps.However, there are opportunities for further improvement:
- Consider adding explanatory comments for error handling logic, especially in the
HasTablemethod.- The
getGrammarfunction could benefit from returning an error instead of panicking for better error handling in production environments.Overall, these changes enhance the maintainability and consistency of error handling in the framework. Great job on making progress towards the centralization of error messages!
log/application_test.go (2)
9-9: LGTM: Import of errors packageThe addition of the
errorspackage import is consistent with the changes made in the test cases to use specific error messages. This aligns well with the PR objective of centralizing error messages in the framework.
Line range hint
1-89: Summary: Effective implementation of centralized error messagesOverall, the changes in this file effectively implement the centralization of error messages, which aligns well with the PR objectives. The modifications improve error handling across all test functions and enhance the robustness of the tests.
Key points:
- Consistent use of specific error messages from the
errorspackage.- Improved error checking after
NewApplicationcalls.- Updated assertions to verify correct behavior with unsupported logging drivers.
The changes are well-implemented, but there's room for minor improvements:
- Consider using
assert.NoErrorinstead ofassert.Nilfor error checks.- Add new test cases to cover specific error scenarios.
These improvements would further enhance the test coverage and readability of the code.
database/gorm/logger.go (2)
Line range hint
97-126: Improved error checking in Trace method.The use of
errors.Is(err, logger.ErrRecordNotFound)is a good improvement, likely providing more robust error checking. This change aligns well with the newerrorspackage import.To ensure the new error checking behaves as expected, consider adding or updating unit tests for the
Tracemethod. Specifically, test the following scenarios:
- When
errislogger.ErrRecordNotFoundandIgnoreRecordNotFoundErroris true.- When
errislogger.ErrRecordNotFoundandIgnoreRecordNotFoundErroris false.- When
erris a different error type.These tests will verify that the new error checking logic works correctly in all scenarios.
Line range hint
1-165: Overall assessment: Improved error handling and logging.The changes in this file represent a positive step towards more robust and specific error handling in the GORM logger implementation. The introduction of the custom
errorspackage and the refinements in error checking logic in both theErrorandTracemethods should lead to more controlled and informative logging.Key improvements:
- More specific handling of connection and access errors in the
Errormethod.- Use of
errors.Isfor more robust error type checking in theTracemethod.To further enhance these changes:
- Consider the suggested refactoring of error checking functions in the
Errormethod.- Ensure comprehensive unit testing, especially for the modified
Tracemethod.- Verify consistent usage of the new
errorspackage throughout the file and related components.These changes align well with the PR objective of centralizing and standardizing error handling within the framework.
console/application.go (1)
39-39: Approved: Good use of a constructor function.The change from
&CliContext{ctx}toNewCliContext(ctx)is a good practice. It allows for more flexibility in initializing theCliContextand can provide a centralized place for any setup or validation logic.To ensure the correctness of this change, please verify the implementation of the
NewCliContextfunction:Additionally, could you clarify how this change relates to the PR objective of centralizing error messages? While it's a good refactoring, it's not immediately clear how it contributes to the stated goal.
cache/memory.go (5)
13-13: LGTM: New import for centralized error handling.The addition of the
errorspackage import aligns with the PR objective of centralizing error messages. This change supports the transition to a more standardized error handling approach.
40-40: LGTM: Improved comment and centralized error handling.The
Decrementmethod changes are positive:
- The comment is now grammatically correct.
- The error handling uses a centralized error type (
errors.ErrCacheMemoryInvalidIntValueType), which aligns with the PR objective of centralizing error messages.These changes improve consistency and make error handling more standardized across the framework.
Also applies to: 58-58
Line range hint
83-83: LGTM: ImprovedFlushmethod implementation.The new implementation of the
Flushmethod is more efficient and robust:
- It replaces the entire
sync.Mapinstance with a new one, ensuring a complete reset of the cache.- This approach is more efficient than attempting to clear all entries individually.
- It guarantees that no stale data remains in the cache after flushing.
This change improves the overall performance and reliability of the cache flushing operation.
158-158: LGTM: Consistent error handling improvement.The error handling in the
Incrementmethod now uses the centralizederrors.ErrCacheMemoryInvalidIntValueTypetype, consistent with the change made in theDecrementmethod. This modification:
- Aligns with the PR objective of centralizing error messages.
- Improves consistency across the codebase.
- Makes error handling more standardized and easier to maintain.
Line range hint
1-235: Summary: Successful implementation of centralized error messages and improved code quality.This PR successfully addresses the objective of centralizing error messages within the framework. The changes made to the
cache/memory.gofile contribute significantly to this goal:
- Consistent use of centralized error types (e.g.,
errors.ErrCacheMemoryInvalidIntValueType) improves error handling standardization.- Updated method comments enhance code clarity and maintainability.
- The improved
Flushmethod implementation increases efficiency and reliability.These modifications align well with the PR's goals of standardizing error handling, simplifying updates, and improving overall code quality. The changes will facilitate easier maintenance and potential future localization efforts.
Great job on implementing these improvements! The code is now more consistent, readable, and maintainable.
auth/auth.go (6)
16-16: LGTM: Import of centralized error packageThe addition of the
errorspackage fromgithub.com/goravel/frameworkaligns with the PR objective of centralizing error messages. This change will enable the use of structured errors throughout the file.
82-85: LGTM: Improved error handling in Id methodThe replacement of error constants with structured errors from the centralized
errorspackage is a good improvement. It aligns with the PR objective and makes error handling more consistent and manageable.
147-147: LGTM: Improved error handling in Login methodThe replacement of the error constant with a structured error from the centralized
errorspackage is a good improvement. It aligns with the PR objective and makes error handling more consistent and manageable.
Line range hint
156-168: LGTM: Improved error handling in LoginUsingID methodThe replacement of error constants with structured errors from the centralized
errorspackage is a good improvement. It aligns with the PR objective and makes error handling more consistent and manageable.
Line range hint
194-209: LGTM: Improved error handling in Refresh methodThe replacement of error constants with structured errors from the centralized
errorspackage is a good improvement. It aligns with the PR objective and makes error handling more consistent and manageable.
Line range hint
1-262: Overall assessment: Successful centralization of error messagesThe changes made in this file successfully implement the PR objective of centralizing error messages. By replacing error constants with structured errors from the
github.com/goravel/framework/errorspackage, the code now has a more consistent and manageable approach to error handling.Key improvements:
- Consistent use of structured errors across all methods.
- More specific and descriptive error messages.
- Addition of module specifications to some errors, providing more context.
These changes will likely lead to easier maintenance, better error tracking, and improved debugging capabilities. The suggested minor improvements for consistency (such as adding module specifications to all errors and using error wrapping) would further enhance these benefits.
Great job on implementing these changes! They significantly contribute to the overall goal of standardizing error handling within the framework.
errors/list.go (6)
4-12: LGTM: Consistent and clear facade-related error variables.The new error variables for various facades and the application instance are well-structured and consistent. They follow the established naming convention and provide clear, concise error messages. This addition aligns well with the PR objective of centralizing error messages.
14-15: LGTM: Well-defined cache-related error variables.The new cache-related error variables are clear, concise, and follow the established naming convention. They contribute to the centralization of error messages and cover important cache-related scenarios.
21-21: LGTM: Improved session driver extension error message.The modification to
ErrSessionDriverExtensionFailedenhances the error message by including placeholders for both the session and the driver. This change provides more context, which can be valuable for debugging purposes.
33-35: LGTM: Well-defined cache-related error variables.The new cache-related error variables are clear, specific, and follow the established naming convention. They cover important scenarios such as unsupported drivers and contract fulfillment, enhancing the error handling capabilities for caching operations.
37-40: LGTM: Comprehensive set of cryptography-related error variables.The new cryptography-related error variables are well-defined and cover important scenarios such as missing app keys and invalid key lengths. They follow a consistent naming convention and provide clear, specific error messages. This addition enhances the error handling capabilities for cryptography operations.
70-73: LGTM: Well-defined queue-related error variables.The new queue-related error variables are clear, specific, and follow a consistent naming convention. They cover important scenarios such as empty job signatures and unsupported drivers, enhancing the error handling capabilities for queue operations.
validation/validation.go (4)
10-10: LGTM: Import statement aligns with centralized error handling.The change to import
github.com/goravel/framework/errorsinstead of the standard libraryerrorspackage aligns well with the PR objective of centralizing error messages within the framework. This modification facilitates the use of custom error types and promotes consistency in error handling across the framework.
27-28: Excellent: Improved error handling in Make method.The replacement of generic error messages with specific error variables (
ErrValidationEmptyData,ErrValidationEmptyRules,ErrValidationDataInvalidType) significantly improves error handling in theMakemethod. These changes:
- Enhance error specificity, making debugging easier.
- Promote consistency across the framework.
- Facilitate easier updates and potential localization of error messages.
The logic of the method remains intact, focusing solely on improving error reporting, which aligns perfectly with the PR objectives.
Also applies to: 30-31, 40-41, 50-51
73-74: Great improvement: Enhanced error reporting in AddFilters method.The replacement of the generic error message with
errors.ErrValidationDuplicateFilter.Args(filter.Signature())is a significant improvement. This change:
- Provides more specific error information by including the duplicate filter's signature.
- Utilizes the centralized error handling mechanism effectively.
- Enhances debugging capabilities by offering more context in the error message.
This modification aligns well with the PR's goal of centralizing and improving error handling within the framework.
87-88: Excellent: Consistent error handling improvement in AddRules method.The modification to use
errors.ErrValidationDuplicateRule.Args(rule.Signature())instead of a generic error message is a great improvement. This change:
- Maintains consistency with the similar change in the
AddFiltersmethod.- Provides more detailed error information by including the duplicate rule's signature.
- Leverages the centralized error handling mechanism effectively.
This consistent approach to error handling across methods enhances the overall code quality and aligns perfectly with the PR's objectives.
translation/translator.go (3)
16-16: New import added correctly: LGTM!The addition of
"github.com/goravel/framework/errors"to the import block is correct and necessary for the updated error handling in thegetLinemethod.
Line range hint
1-280: Overall assessment: Good improvement in error handlingThe changes made to this file are minimal but valuable. The improved error handling in the
getLinemethod and the addition of the necessary import enhance the robustness of the code without introducing any apparent issues. The rest of the file remains unchanged, maintaining the overall structure and functionality of theTranslator.
160-160: Improved error handling: LGTM!The change from
err != ErrFileNotExistto!errors.Is(err, errors.ErrLangFileNotExist)is a good improvement in error handling. It allows for more robust error type checking, especially if the error is wrapped. This aligns with Go's best practices for error handling.To ensure this change doesn't introduce any inconsistencies, let's verify the usage of
ErrLangFileNotExistacross the codebase:✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful: All instances of
ErrFileNotExisthave been replaced withErrLangFileNotExist.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining usage of ErrFileNotExist and verify consistent use of ErrLangFileNotExist # Search for any remaining usage of ErrFileNotExist echo "Searching for any remaining usage of ErrFileNotExist:" rg "ErrFileNotExist" --type go # Search for usage of ErrLangFileNotExist to ensure consistency echo "Searching for usage of ErrLangFileNotExist:" rg "ErrLangFileNotExist" --type goLength of output: 3185
database/gorm/to_sql_test.go (1)
9-9: LGTM: Import change aligns with PR objectives.The addition of the
github.com/goravel/framework/errorsimport aligns well with the PR objective of centralizing error messages within the framework. This change should facilitate more consistent and maintainable error handling across the codebase.log/logrus_writer.go (1)
15-15: LGTM: Import change aligns with PR objectivesThe addition of
"github.com/goravel/framework/errors"and removal of the standarderrorspackage aligns well with the PR objective of centralizing error messages within the framework. This change should facilitate standardized error handling across the codebase.foundation/application_test.go (4)
345-347: LGTM! Good addition of mock log service.Adding a mock log service is a good practice for isolating the test and ensuring that any logging related to ORM operations can be captured if needed. This change enhances the test environment and allows for more comprehensive testing of the ORM functionality.
360-362: LGTM! Consistent use of mock log service.The addition of a mock log service in the TestMakeQueue function is consistent with the changes made in other test functions. This ensures that any logging related to queue operations can be captured and tested if needed. Good job on maintaining consistency across test cases.
Line range hint
1-465: Overall improvements to test isolation and coverageThe changes made to this test file generally enhance the test suite by improving isolation and potentially increasing coverage. Here's a summary of the improvements:
- Mock configurations have been added or updated in various test functions.
- Mock log services have been consistently added to relevant test functions (TestMakeOrm, TestMakeQueue).
- A mock cache service has been added to TestMakeSchedule, which might require further clarification.
These changes allow for more controlled testing environments and can help catch issues related to configuration, logging, and caching in the respective functionalities.
To ensure consistency across all test functions, consider reviewing other tests in this file to see if they could benefit from similar mock service additions.
406-408: LGTM! Good addition of mock cache service. Please clarify the requirement.The addition of a mock cache service in the TestMakeSchedule function is a good practice for isolating the test and ensuring that any caching related to schedule operations can be captured if needed.
Could you please clarify why a cache service is required for the schedule functionality? This addition is different from the log service additions in other tests, and it would be helpful to understand the reasoning behind this change.
To verify the necessity of the cache service, you can run the following script:
This script will help us understand if and how caching is used in the scheduling functionality.
translation/translator_test.go (6)
11-11: Import change looks goodThe change to import the
errorspackage fromgithub.com/goravel/framework/errorsaligns with the PR objective of centralizing error messages within the framework. This will lead to more consistent error handling across the codebase.
55-55: Error handling update in TestChoice looks goodThe change to use
errors.ErrLangFileNotExistinstead of a generic error is consistent with the new centralized error handling approach. This specific error type will improve error handling and debugging capabilities.
88-88: Error handling updates in TestGet are consistent and appropriateThe changes to use
errors.ErrLangFileNotExistinstead of generic errors throughout the TestGet function are consistent with the new centralized error handling approach. These updates improve error specificity and will enhance debugging capabilities. The changes have been applied consistently across all relevant test cases.Also applies to: 98-98, 107-107, 115-115, 129-129, 143-143, 157-157, 166-167, 173-175
267-267: Error handling updates in TestHas are appropriateThe changes to use
errors.ErrLangFileNotExistin the TestHas function are consistent with the new centralized error handling approach. These updates improve error specificity and maintain consistency with the rest of the file.Also applies to: 276-276, 285-285
347-347: Error handling update in TestLoad is appropriateThe change to use
errors.ErrLangFileNotExistin the TestLoad function aligns with the new centralized error handling approach. This update improves error specificity and maintains consistency with the rest of the file.
Line range hint
1-500: Overall implementation of centralized error handling is effective and consistentThe changes throughout the file consistently implement the new centralized error handling approach by using
errors.ErrLangFileNotExistfrom the framework's error package. This consistency enhances the code's maintainability and debugging capabilities. The implementation appears thorough, with no apparent missed opportunities or inconsistencies.auth/auth_test.go (10)
17-17: LGTM: Import of centralized error package.The addition of the
errorspackage fromgithub.com/goravel/framework/errorsaligns with the PR objective of centralizing error messages. This change will enable the use of standardized errors throughout the test file.
120-120: LGTM: Updated error assertion in TestLoginUsingID_EmptySecret.The change from
ErrorEmptySecrettoerrors.ErrAuthEmptySecretis consistent with the new centralized error handling approach. This update improves error specificity and aligns with the PR objectives.
131-131: LGTM: Updated error assertion in TestLoginUsingID_InvalidKey.The change from
ErrorInvalidKeytoerrors.ErrAuthInvalidKeyis in line with the new centralized error handling approach. This update enhances error specificity and consistency across the auth module.
201-201: LGTM: Updated error assertion in TestLogin_ErrorModel.The change to use
errors.ErrAuthNoPrimaryKeyField.Error()aligns with the new centralized error handling approach. This update provides a more specific error message related to the absence of a primary key in the auth module.
215-215: LGTM: Updated error assertion in TestLogin_NoPrimaryKey.The change from
ErrorNoPrimaryKeyFieldtoerrors.ErrAuthNoPrimaryKeyFieldis consistent with the new centralized error handling approach. This update improves error specificity for cases where a primary key is missing in the auth module.
224-224: LGTM: Updated error assertion in TestParse_TokenDisabled.The change to use
errors.ErrAuthTokenDisabled.Error()aligns with the new centralized error handling approach. This update provides a more specific error message for the scenario where a token is disabled in the auth module.
263-263: LGTM: Updated error assertion in TestParse_TokenExpired.The change from
ErrorTokenExpiredtoerrors.ErrAuthTokenExpiredis in line with the new centralized error handling approach. This update enhances error specificity for token expiration scenarios in the auth module.
274-274: LGTM: Enhanced error handling in TestParse_InvalidCache.The change to use
errors.ErrCacheSupportRequired.SetModule(errors.ModuleAuth).Error()is an excellent improvement. It not only aligns with the new centralized error handling approach but also utilizes theSetModule()method to provide module-specific error tracking. This enhancement allows for more granular error reporting and easier debugging.
743-743: LGTM: Improved error handling in TestLogout_Error_TTL_Is_0.The change to use
errors.ErrCacheForeverFailed.SetModule(errors.ModuleAuth).Error()is a great improvement. It aligns with the new centralized error handling approach and utilizes theSetModule()method for module-specific error tracking. This enhancement provides more detailed error information, facilitating easier debugging and error tracing within the auth module.
Line range hint
1-763: Overall assessment: Successful implementation of centralized error handling.The changes in this file consistently update the error handling to use the new centralized error package from
github.com/goravel/framework/errors. This implementation aligns well with the PR objective of centralizing error messages. The use ofSetModule()for some errors adds an extra layer of specificity, which will be beneficial for debugging and error tracing. These changes improve the overall consistency and maintainability of the error handling in the auth module.log/logrus_writer_test.go (7)
409-410: Consistent error handling in TestLogrusWithCustomLogger.The changes here align with the improved error handling pattern implemented throughout the file. Good job on maintaining consistency.
454-455: Consistent error handling in TestLogrus_Fatalf.The changes here mirror those made in TestLogrus_Fatal, maintaining consistency in error handling improvements throughout the file.
As suggested for TestLogrus_Fatal, consider adding an explicit error check for
cmd.Run()here as well.Also applies to: 464-464
476-477: Improved error handling in Benchmark_Debug.The changes here align with the error handling improvements implemented throughout the file. Good job on maintaining consistency, even in benchmark functions.
490-491: Consistent error handling in Benchmark_Info.The changes here are identical to those made in Benchmark_Debug, maintaining consistency in error handling improvements across all benchmark functions.
504-505: Consistent error handling in Benchmark_Warning.The changes here mirror those made in previous benchmark functions, maintaining a high level of consistency in error handling improvements throughout the file.
536-537: Consistent error handling in Benchmark_Panic.The changes here maintain the pattern of improved error handling seen in all previous benchmark functions, demonstrating excellent consistency throughout the file.
As suggested for the previous benchmark function, consider implementing the
setupBenchmarkhelper function to reduce code duplication across all benchmark functions.
Line range hint
1-853: Overall assessment of changes in logrus_writer_test.goThe changes made to this file consistently improve error handling for
NewApplicationcalls across all test and benchmark functions. This enhancement increases the robustness of the tests by ensuring that initialization errors are not overlooked.Key points:
- Error handling is now consistent throughout the file.
- The changes align with best practices for Go error handling.
- There's an opportunity to reduce code duplication by introducing helper functions for both test and benchmark setups.
These improvements contribute to better code quality and easier maintenance of the test suite.
validation/validation_test.go (4)
11-11: Approval: Updated import for centralized error handling.The change from the standard
errorspackage togithub.com/goravel/framework/errorsaligns with the PR objective of centralizing error messages in the framework. This modification will allow for more consistent and maintainable error handling across the project.
57-57: Approval: Updated error assertion for invalid data type.The test case now uses
errors.ErrValidationDataInvalidTypeinstead of a custom error message. This change improves consistency in error handling across the framework.
66-66: Approval: Updated error assertion for empty data.The test case now uses
errors.ErrValidationEmptyDatainstead of a custom error message. This change aligns with the centralized error handling approach.
72-72: Approval: Updated error assertion for empty rules.The test case now uses
errors.ErrValidationEmptyRulesinstead of a custom error message. This modification supports the goal of centralizing error messages in the framework.route/route.go (5)
16-30: Enhanced Error Handling inNewRouteFunctionThe updated
NewRoutefunction now returns an error along with the*Routepointer. This change improves the robustness of the function by properly handling scenarios where the default driver is not set or when the driver initialization fails. Excellent implementation of error propagation.
24-24: Proper Error Propagation in Driver InitializationReturning the error encountered during
NewDriverinitialization ensures that any issues are surfaced to the caller, allowing for appropriate handling upstream.
30-30: Successful Initialization Return Statement UpdatedIncluding
nilas the error in the successful return statement maintains consistency with the updated function signature.
44-44: Error Handling for Invalid Driver inNewDriverFunctionReturning a detailed error when an invalid driver is specified enhances debuggability:
return nil, errors.ErrRouteInvalidDriver.Args(driver).SetModule(errors.ModuleRoute)Ensure that the
ErrRouteInvalidDrivererror message properly includes the invalid driver name for clearer context.To verify the error message, you can run:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check that ErrRouteInvalidDriver error message includes the driver name. # Test: Expect the error message to include the invalid driver specified. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'var ErrRouteInvalidDriver = errors.New("Invalid route driver: %s")'
19-19: Ensure the Error Message Provides Sufficient ContextWhen returning an error due to the default driver not being set:
return nil, errors.ErrRouteDefaultDriverNotSet.SetModule(errors.ModuleRoute)Verify that the
ErrRouteDefaultDriverNotSeterror includes a clear and descriptive message to aid in debugging.To confirm the error message, you can run the following script:
mail/service_provider.go (3)
7-7: Importing the errors package is necessaryThe addition of the import statement for
github.com/goravel/framework/errorsis appropriate, as the code now utilizes theerrorspackage for enhanced error handling.
19-22: Proper error handling for missing Config facadeAdding a nil check for the
configfacade and returning a specific error improves the robustness of theRegistermethod. This ensures that the application does not proceed without essential configuration dependencies.
24-27: Proper error handling for missing Queue facadeSimilarly, the nil check for the
queueFacadealong with returning an appropriate error enhances the stability of the application by preventing operations without necessary queue dependencies.auth/service_provider.go (4)
11-11: Importing theerrorspackage is appropriate.The addition of the
errorspackage import is necessary for the enhanced error handling introduced in this PR.
23-25: Good practice: Checking for nilconfigfacade.Adding a nil check for
configwith a descriptive error message improves the robustness of the application by preventing potential nil pointer dereferences.
26-29: Good practice: Checking for nilcacheFacade.The nil check for
cacheFacadeensures that the application handles the absence of the cache facade gracefully, enhancing stability.
31-34: Good practice: Checking for nilormFacade.Verifying that
ormFacadeis not nil before use prevents runtime errors and improves error handling in the registration process.filesystem/application.go (6)
8-8: Import errors package for centralized error handlingThe addition of the
errorspackage import aligns with the goal of centralizing error messages within the framework.
27-27: Use centralized error when default disk is not setReturning
errors.ErrFilesystemDefaultDiskNotSet.SetModule(errors.ModuleFilesystem)provides a standardized error message, enhancing consistency and maintainability.
32-32: Proper error propagation fromNewDriverReturning
nil, errensures that any errors encountered while creating a new driver are correctly propagated up the call stack.
41-41: Return success with no errorIncluding
, nilin the return statement confirms that theNewStoragefunction returns no error upon successful execution.
60-60: Use centralized error for invalid custom driverReplacing the generic error with
errors.ErrFilesystemInvalidCustomDriver.Args(disk)improves error specificity and aligns with centralized error handling practices.
63-63: Use centralized error for unsupported driverReturning
errors.ErrFilesystemDriverNotSupported.Args(driver)standardizes the error message for unsupported drivers, enhancing clarity and maintainability.database/service_provider.go (1)
48-50:⚠️ Potential issueVerify the correct error module is set when ORM facade is not available.
At lines 49-50, when
ormisnil, the error returned useserrors.ModuleSchemainSetModule. Since the issue pertains to the ORM facade not being set, consider whethererrors.ModuleOrmwould be a more appropriate module to associate with this error.Please confirm if
errors.ModuleOrmshould be used instead oferrors.ModuleSchema. This ensures the error message accurately reflects the module where the issue originated.database/gorm/query.go (17)
23-23: Importing the custom errors packageThe addition of
"github.com/goravel/framework/errors"correctly imports the custom errors package necessary for centralized error handling.
58-58: Return custom error for database configuration not foundReplacing the generic error with
errors.ErrOrmDatabaseConfigNotFoundaligns with the goal of centralizing error messages.
102-102: Return specific error for select and omit conflictUsing
errors.ErrOrmQuerySelectAndOmitsConflictprovides a clearer, standardized error message when bothSelectandOmitare used simultaneously.
294-294: Return custom error for missing query conditionThe use of
errors.ErrOrmQueryConditionRequiredenhances consistency in error messaging for required query conditions.
438-438: Return custom error for empty relation inLoadmethodUsing
errors.ErrOrmQueryEmptyRelationprovides a standardized error message when the relation parameter is empty.
443-443: Return custom error when model is not a pointerThe error
errors.ErrOrmQueryModelNotPointerclearly indicates that the provided model must be a pointer, improving error clarity.
447-447: Return custom error for empty ID inLoadmethodReturning
errors.ErrOrmQueryEmptyIdstandardizes the error when an ID is missing, aiding in consistent error handling.
470-470: Return custom error when model is not a pointer inLoadMissingConsistently using
errors.ErrOrmQueryModelNotPointermaintains error standardization across methods.
623-623: Return specific error for select and omit conflict inSavemethodUsing
errors.ErrOrmQuerySelectAndOmitsConflictensures consistent error messaging when bothSelectandOmitare specified.
744-744: Return custom error for invalid update parametersThe introduction of
errors.ErrOrmQueryInvalidParameterprovides a clear message when invalid parameters are passed to theUpdatemethod.
1272-1272: Address conflict with associations inomitCreateReturning
errors.ErrOrmQueryAssociationsConflictclarifies the conflict whenAssociationsis used with other omits during creation.
1366-1366: Resolve associations conflict inselectCreateUsing
errors.ErrOrmQueryAssociationsConflictprovides a clear error when there's a conflict withAssociationsin select clauses.
1427-1427: Return specific error for select and omit conflict inupdatesConsistently applying
errors.ErrOrmQuerySelectAndOmitsConflictenhances error standardization in theupdatesmethod.
1475-1482: Return custom error for missing where clauseUsing
errors.ErrOrmMissingWhereClauseprovides a standardized error message when the where clause is missing in query conditions.
1513-1515: Review error message formatting ingetModelConnectionWhen returning errors using
errors.ErrOrmQueryInvalidModel.Args("")anderrors.ErrOrmQueryInvalidModel.Args(fmt.Sprintf(": %s.%s", modelType.PkgPath(), modelType.Name())), ensure that the error messages are formatted correctly. Passing an empty string or prefixing with a colon may result in error messages with redundant or misplaced colons.Consider adjusting the error messages to avoid unnecessary colons. For example:
- return "", errors.ErrOrmQueryInvalidModel.Args("") + return "", errors.ErrOrmQueryInvalidModelAnd:
- return "", errors.ErrOrmQueryInvalidModel.Args(fmt.Sprintf(": %s.%s", modelType.PkgPath(), modelType.Name())) + return "", errors.ErrOrmQueryInvalidModel.Args(fmt.Sprintf("%s.%s", modelType.PkgPath(), modelType.Name()))
324-324:⚠️ Potential issueConsistent error handling: Potential compatibility issue
Replacing
gormio.ErrRecordNotFoundwitherrors.ErrOrmRecordNotFoundcould affect code that checks for the former error type. Verify that all such instances are updated to use the new error.Run the following script to find usages of
gormio.ErrRecordNotFound:#!/bin/bash # Description: Locate all error checks involving gormio.ErrRecordNotFound. # Expected result: Code segments where gormio.ErrRecordNotFound is used in error handling. rg 'errors\.Is\([^,]+,\s*gormio\.ErrRecordNotFound\)' --glob '!vendor/'
240-240:⚠️ Potential issuePotential compatibility issue with changed error type
By returning
errors.ErrOrmRecordNotFoundinstead ofgormio.ErrRecordNotFound, there may be compatibility issues if other parts of the codebase rely ongormio.ErrRecordNotFoundfor error checking. Ensure that all error handling logic is updated to handle the new error type.To identify where
gormio.ErrRecordNotFoundis currently used, run the following script:✅ Verification successful
Verification Complete: No Compatibility Issues Found
gormio.ErrRecordNotFoundis exclusively used indatabase/gorm/query.go.- No other parts of the codebase rely on
gormio.ErrRecordNotFoundfor error checking.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all occurrences of error checks against gormio.ErrRecordNotFound. # Expected result: List of code locations where gormio.ErrRecordNotFound is used in error comparisons. rg 'errors\.Is\([^,]+,\s*gormio\.ErrRecordNotFound\)' --glob '!vendor/'Length of output: 386
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all occurrences of error checks against gormio.ErrRecordNotFound. # Expected result: List of code locations where gormio.ErrRecordNotFound is used in error comparisons. rg 'errors\.Is\([^,]+,\s*gormio\.ErrRecordNotFound\)' --glob '!vendor/'Length of output: 292
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all occurrences of gormio.ErrRecordNotFound across the entire codebase. # Expected result: List of code locations where gormio.ErrRecordNotFound is used outside of database/gorm/query.go. rg 'gormio\.ErrRecordNotFound' --glob '!vendor/' --ignore-file database/gorm/query.goLength of output: 59778
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all occurrences of gormio.ErrRecordNotFound across the entire codebase, # excluding the vendor directory and the database/gorm/query.go file. rg 'gormio\.ErrRecordNotFound' --glob '!vendor/**' --glob '!database/gorm/query.go'Length of output: 85
database/gorm/query_test.go (1)
18-18: Import statement is appropriateThe addition of the import statement
github.com/goravel/framework/errorsis necessary for accessing the centralized error constants used throughout the file.
|
Looks good to me, please check all comments from AI, resolve them if no changes are needed. And when the PR is ready to be reviewed, please change its tatus to open from draft. |
…kumar-gcc/define-errors
📑 Description
Closes goravel/goravel#495
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Refactor
✅ Checks