feat: [#280] Add change table feature #671
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request enhance the database migration functionality by introducing new methods and modifying existing structures across several files. Key updates include the addition of methods for managing column changes and nullability in the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
⚠️ Performance Alert ⚠️
Possible performance regression was detected for benchmark.
Benchmark result of this commit is worse than the previous benchmark result exceeding threshold 1.50.
| Benchmark suite | Current: 6dc3c25 | Previous: 23f99ec | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark_Fatal |
2e-7 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op |
1e-7 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op |
2 |
Benchmark_Fatal - ns/op |
2e-7 ns/op |
1e-7 ns/op |
2 |
This comment was automatically generated by workflow using github-action-benchmark.
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #671 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 70.44% 70.46% +0.02%
==========================================
Files 187 187
Lines 11944 11973 +29
==========================================
+ Hits 8414 8437 +23
- Misses 2948 2954 +6
Partials 582 582 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
contracts/database/migration/grammar.go (1)
10-11: LGTM: New method signature for changing columns. Minor suggestion for comment.The
CompileChangemethod signature is a valuable addition to theGrammarinterface. It aligns with the PR objective of modifying theavatarfield to be nullable and provides a clear way to compile SQL statements for changing column properties.Consider slightly modifying the comment to be more specific:
- // CompileChange Compile a change column command into a series of SQL statements. + // CompileChange Compile a change column command into a string containing SQL statement(s).This change more accurately reflects that the method returns a single string, which may contain one or more SQL statements.
database/migration/column.go (1)
82-86: LGTM:Nullable()method implementation is correct.The
Nullable()method is implemented correctly. It sets thenullablefield totrue, which aligns with the PR objective of making theavatarfield nullable. The implementation is consistent with other methods in the struct and allows for method chaining.For consistency with other methods in the struct, consider using
rinstead ofmigration.ColumnDefinitionas the return type:-func (r *ColumnDefinition) Nullable() migration.ColumnDefinition { +func (r *ColumnDefinition) Nullable() *ColumnDefinition { r.nullable = convert.Pointer(true) return r }This change maintains the ability to chain methods while being more specific about the return type.
database/migration/grammars/utils_test.go (2)
67-70: Approve the addition of TestPrefixArray with suggestions for improvement.The new test function
TestPrefixArrayis a good addition to cover theprefixArrayutility. However, consider enhancing the test coverage with the following suggestions:
- Add test cases for edge cases, such as:
- Empty prefix
- Empty input slice
- Slice with empty strings
- Include a test case with a longer prefix and more diverse string inputs.
- Consider using a table-driven test approach for better readability and easier addition of test cases.
Here's an example of how you could improve the test using a table-driven approach:
func TestPrefixArray(t *testing.T) { testCases := []struct { name string prefix string input []string expected []string }{ { name: "Basic case", prefix: "prefix", input: []string{"a", "b", "c"}, expected: []string{"prefix a", "prefix b", "prefix c"}, }, { name: "Empty prefix", prefix: "", input: []string{"a", "b", "c"}, expected: []string{"a", "b", "c"}, }, { name: "Empty input slice", prefix: "prefix", input: []string{}, expected: []string{}, }, { name: "Slice with empty strings", prefix: "prefix", input: []string{"", "b", ""}, expected: []string{"prefix ", "prefix b", "prefix "}, }, { name: "Longer prefix and diverse inputs", prefix: "test_prefix_", input: []string{"hello", "world!", "123"}, expected: []string{"test_prefix_hello", "test_prefix_world!", "test_prefix_123"}, }, } for _, tc := range testCases { t.Run(tc.name, func(t *testing.T) { assert.Equal(t, tc.expected, prefixArray(tc.prefix, tc.input)) }) } }This approach allows for easier addition of test cases and improved readability.
Line range hint
1-70: Consider improving overall test file organization.The addition of
TestPrefixArrayis consistent with the existing test structure. However, as the number of utility functions and their tests grow, consider the following suggestions to improve the overall organization of the test file:
- Group related tests together. For example, you could group all string manipulation utility tests (like
TestPrefixArray) in one section.- Add clear separation between different groups of tests, possibly with comments indicating the group of utilities being tested.
- Consider splitting the test file into multiple files if it becomes too large, with each file focusing on a specific group of related utilities.
Here's an example of how you could structure the file with grouped tests:
package grammars import ( // ... (imports) ) // Column and Type related tests func TestGetColumns(t *testing.T) { // ... (existing test code) } func TestGetType(t *testing.T) { // ... (existing test code) } // Value manipulation tests func TestGetDefaultValue(t *testing.T) { // ... (existing test code) } // String manipulation tests func TestPrefixArray(t *testing.T) { // ... (new test code) } // Add more groups as neededThis structure makes it easier to navigate and maintain the test file as it grows.
database/migration/schema.go (2)
99-105: Enhance test coverage and documentation for the newTablemethod.While the
Tablemethod is well-implemented and consistent with the existing codebase, consider the following enhancements:
Add unit tests specifically for this new method to ensure it behaves correctly under various scenarios.
Update the package documentation to include information about this new method and its usage.
Consider adding examples in the documentation to demonstrate how to use this method for common table modification scenarios.
Would you like assistance in generating unit tests or documentation for this new method?
99-105: NewTablemethod aligns well with PR objectives and enhances Schema functionality.The addition of the
Tablemethod to the Schema struct is a valuable enhancement that directly supports the PR objectives of modifying theuserstable to add and alter theavatarfield. This method provides a flexible and reusable way to perform table modifications, which will be beneficial for future migration needs as well.The implementation is consistent with the existing codebase structure and uses established helper methods, ensuring good integration with the current system.
Consider documenting this new capability in the project's migration guide or README to inform other developers about this powerful new feature for database schema modifications.
database/migration/schema_test.go (1)
64-129: Good addition, but consider aligning more closely with PR objectivesThe new
TestTablemethod is a valuable addition to the test suite, providing coverage for basic table creation and existence verification. The structure is consistent with existing tests, which is great for maintainability.However, to more closely align with the PR objectives:
- Consider adding specific tests for the
avatarfield in theuserstable.- Include a test case for modifying a column to be nullable, as per the second PR objective.
Here's a suggestion to add these specific tests:
err := schema.Create("users", func(table migration.Blueprint) { table.String("avatar") }) s.NoError(err) s.True(schema.HasColumn("users", "avatar")) err = schema.Table("users", func(table migration.Blueprint) { table.String("avatar").Nullable().Change() }) s.NoError(err) // Add an assertion to verify the column is nullableAdditionally, the extensive commented-out code (lines 82-126) suggests plans for more comprehensive testing. While it's good to plan ahead, consider moving these commented sections to a separate "TODO" comment or issue to keep the current test method concise and focused.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (4)
mocks/database/migration/Blueprint.gois excluded by!mocks/**mocks/database/migration/ColumnDefinition.gois excluded by!mocks/**mocks/database/migration/Grammar.gois excluded by!mocks/**mocks/database/migration/Schema.gois excluded by!mocks/**
📒 Files selected for processing (12)
- contracts/database/migration/blueprint.go (1 hunks)
- contracts/database/migration/column.go (2 hunks)
- contracts/database/migration/grammar.go (1 hunks)
- contracts/database/migration/schema.go (1 hunks)
- database/migration/blueprint.go (1 hunks)
- database/migration/column.go (2 hunks)
- database/migration/grammars/postgres.go (1 hunks)
- database/migration/grammars/postgres_test.go (1 hunks)
- database/migration/grammars/utils.go (1 hunks)
- database/migration/grammars/utils_test.go (1 hunks)
- database/migration/schema.go (1 hunks)
- database/migration/schema_test.go (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (17)
contracts/database/migration/column.go (3)
6-7: LGTM: Addition ofChange()methodThe
Change()method is a good addition to theColumnDefinitioninterface. It aligns with the PR objectives of modifying existing columns, specifically theavatarfield in this case.
22-23: LGTM: Addition ofNullable() ColumnDefinitionmethodThe
Nullable() ColumnDefinitionmethod is a valuable addition to theColumnDefinitioninterface. It aligns with the PR objectives of making columns nullable, specifically theavatarfield in this case. The method signature allows for method chaining, which is consistent with other methods in the interface.
Line range hint
1-26: Summary: Changes align well with PR objectivesThe additions to the
ColumnDefinitioninterface (Change()andNullable() ColumnDefinition) are well-implemented and directly support the PR objectives of adding anavatarfield to theuserstable and making it nullable. These changes provide the necessary functionality for the migrations mentioned in the PR summary.The modifications are minimal, focused, and maintain the existing style and structure of the interface. Good job on keeping the changes concise and targeted!
contracts/database/migration/grammar.go (1)
8-9: LGTM: New method signature for adding columns.The
CompileAddmethod signature is a good addition to theGrammarinterface. It aligns with the PR objective of adding theavatarfield to theuserstable and provides a clear way to compile SQL statements for adding new columns.contracts/database/migration/blueprint.go (2)
16-17: LGTM! The new method aligns well with the PR objectives.The addition of the
GetChangedColumns()method to theBlueprintinterface is a logical enhancement that complements the existingGetAddedColumns()method. This change directly supports the PR's objective of modifying theavatarfield in theuserstable by providing a way to retrieve and potentially manage changed columns during migrations.The method signature is consistent with the existing interface style, returning a slice of
ColumnDefinition, which maintains code coherence and usability.
16-17: Verify the implementation and usage of the new method.While the interface change looks good, it's crucial to ensure that the
GetChangedColumns()method is properly implemented in the concrete types that implement theBlueprintinterface, and that it's utilized correctly in the migration logic for modifying theavatarfield.To verify the implementation and usage, please run the following script:
This script will help us confirm that the new method is not only declared but also implemented and used correctly in the context of the
avatarfield modification.database/migration/grammars/utils.go (2)
59-66: Overall assessment of changes to utils.goThe addition of the
prefixArrayfunction appears to be a supporting change for the larger PR objective. While the function itself is implemented correctly, its specific role in adding theavatarfield to theuserstable is not immediately clear from this file alone.The changes to this file are approved, pending clarification on how this utility function will be used in the context of the PR's main objective. Once that's clear, we can better assess if any further modifications or optimizations to the function are needed.
60-66: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionConsider improving the
prefixArrayfunction for robustness and flexibility.The
prefixArrayfunction is simple and efficient, but there are a few points to consider:
- The function modifies the input slice in-place, which might be unexpected for callers. Consider creating a new slice instead.
- There's no handling for empty input slices or empty prefixes.
- The function always adds a space after the prefix, which might not always be desired.
Here's a suggested improvement:
func prefixArray(prefix string, values []string) []string { if len(values) == 0 || prefix == "" { return values } result := make([]string, len(values)) for i, value := range values { result[i] = prefix + value } return result }This version:
- Creates a new slice, avoiding unexpected modifications to the input.
- Handles empty input cases.
- Doesn't add a space automatically, allowing more flexible usage.
If you prefer to keep the space, you could modify the concatenation to
prefix + " " + value.To understand how this function might be used in the context of database migrations, let's search for potential usage:
#!/bin/bash # Search for potential usage of prefixArray in migration-related files rg --type go -g '*migration*.go' "prefixArray"This will help us verify if the function is being used as intended in the migration context.
database/migration/column.go (2)
26-28: LGTM:Change()method implementation is correct.The
Change()method is implemented correctly. It sets thechangefield totrue, which aligns with the PR objective of modifying theavatarfield. The implementation is consistent with other methods in the struct.
Line range hint
1-87: Overall assessment: Changes are well-implemented and align with PR objectives.The additions of the
Change()andNullable()methods to theColumnDefinitionstruct are well-implemented and directly address the PR objectives. These changes provide the necessary functionality to modify theavatarfield in theuserstable as described in the PR summary.The implementations are consistent with the existing codebase style and patterns, making them easy to understand and maintain. No other parts of the file were modified, keeping the changes focused and minimal.
database/migration/grammars/utils_test.go (1)
Line range hint
1-70: Summary of review and next stepsThe addition of
TestPrefixArrayis a positive step towards improving test coverage for the utility functions in thegrammarspackage. However, there are opportunities for further enhancement:
- Expand the test cases for
TestPrefixArrayto cover more scenarios and edge cases.- Consider adopting a table-driven test approach for better readability and maintainability.
- Improve the overall organization of the test file by grouping related tests and adding clear separations between different utility function groups.
These improvements will contribute to a more robust and maintainable test suite for the
grammarspackage.To ensure that the
prefixArrayfunction is properly implemented and used within the codebase, please run the following verification script:This script will help identify the implementation of the
prefixArrayfunction and its usage across the codebase, ensuring that the new test is testing a real and used function.✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful: No Code Removed or Replaced in Lines 63-70
The verification confirms that there are no removed or replaced code segments in
database/migration/grammars/utils_test.golines 63-70. The only change detected is the addition of theTestPrefixArrayfunction, which enhances the test coverage for theprefixArrayutility.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation and usage of the prefixArray function # Test: Search for the prefixArray function definition echo "Searching for prefixArray function definition:" ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func prefixArray($_, $_) $_' # Test: Search for prefixArray function usage echo "Searching for prefixArray function usage:" rg --type go 'prefixArray\('Length of output: 1271
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for removed or replaced code in utils_test.go lines 63-70 # Get the diff for the specific file and line range git diff origin/main...HEAD -- database/migration/grammars/utils_test.go -U0 | grep -E '^\+|^-'Length of output: 138
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Identify the base branch and check for removed or replaced code in utils_test.go lines 63-70 # List all remote branches echo "Listing all remote branches:" git branch -r # Set the base branch (replace 'origin/main' with the correct base if different) # Attempt to use 'origin/main', fallback to 'origin/master' if 'origin/main' does not exist BASE_BRANCH="origin/main" if ! git show-ref --verify --quiet refs/remotes/$BASE_BRANCH; then echo "'$BASE_BRANCH' not found. Falling back to 'origin/master'." BASE_BRANCH="origin/master" if ! git show-ref --verify --quiet refs/remotes/$BASE_BRANCH; then echo "Neither 'origin/main' nor 'origin/master' found. Please specify the correct base branch." exit 1 fi fi echo "Using base branch: $BASE_BRANCH" # Get the diff for the specific file and line range echo "Checking for removed or replaced code in database/migration/grammars/utils_test.go lines 63-70:" git diff $BASE_BRANCH...HEAD -- database/migration/grammars/utils_test.go -U0 | grep -E '^\+|^-'Length of output: 1082
database/migration/grammars/postgres.go (1)
32-34: LGTM: Correct implementation ofCompileAddmethodThe
CompileAddmethod correctly constructs the SQL statement for adding new columns to a PostgreSQL table. It appropriately handles multiple columns by prefixing each withadd columnand joining them with commas.database/migration/blueprint.go (2)
155-158: Proper Handling of New Command Cases inToSqlMethodThe addition of
commandAddandcommandChangecases in theToSqlmethod correctly extends the migration capabilities to support adding and changing columns. This enhancement ensures that the SQL statements for these new operations are appropriately compiled and executed.
Line range hint
186-195: Correct Implementation of Implicit Command AdditionThe
addImpliedCommandsmethod now includes logic to addcommandAddandcommandChangeto the command list when there are added or changed columns, and the table is not being created. This ensures that the migration system accurately reflects the intended schema modifications.database/migration/grammars/postgres_test.go (3)
22-23: Initialization ofs.grammarwithNewPostgres()The
s.grammaris appropriately initialized usingNewPostgres(), ensuring that each test has a fresh instance of the Postgres grammar. This improves the test setup consistency.
25-88: Addition ofTestCompileChangefunction enhances test coverageThe new
TestCompileChangefunction adds comprehensive tests for theCompileChangemethod, covering scenarios with no changes, single changes, and multiple changes. This increases test coverage and ensures the correctness of SQL generation for column modifications.
93-137: Enhancements inTestCompileCreateand related methodsThe updates in
TestCompileCreateand related test methods improve the testing of column definitions and SQL generation for various data types and attributes, such as auto-increment, nullable fields, and default values. This ensures that the Postgres grammar handles table creation and column definitions accurately.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
database/migration/schema_test.go (1)
82-126: Address the commented-out code for future enhancements.The commented-out section (lines 82-126) contains valuable test cases for column operations and detailed column attribute verification. This code suggests important functionality that should be tested but is currently not implemented.
Consider the following approaches:
If the functionality for these tests is already implemented but not yet tested:
- Uncomment and implement these tests as part of this PR.
- If this expands the scope of the PR too much, create a separate issue to track the implementation of these tests.
If the functionality for these tests is not yet implemented:
- Remove the commented-out code from this file to keep the codebase clean.
- Create separate issues to track the implementation of each major feature (e.g., column modification, detailed column attribute verification).
- Add TODO comments with issue numbers instead of keeping the full code commented out.
If you decide to keep the commented-out code:
- Add a comment explaining why it's commented out and when it's expected to be implemented.
- Ensure that there's a tracking issue for implementing these tests.
Would you like me to create a GitHub issue to track the implementation of these additional tests?
database/migration/blueprint.go (1)
Line range hint
193-206: LGTM with a suggestion: Consider adjusting the order of operations in addImpliedCommands.The changes correctly implement the logic for adding implied commands for added and changed columns. However, consider moving the
addAttributeCommands(grammar)call before prepending the new commands. This ensures that any attribute commands (like comments) are properly ordered with respect to the add and change commands.Here's a suggested modification:
func (r *Blueprint) addImpliedCommands(grammar migration.Grammar) { r.addAttributeCommands(grammar) var commands []*migration.Command if len(r.GetAddedColumns()) > 0 && !r.isCreate() { commands = append(commands, &migration.Command{ Name: commandAdd, }) } if len(r.GetChangedColumns()) > 0 && !r.isCreate() { commands = append(commands, &migration.Command{ Name: commandChange, }) } if len(commands) > 0 { r.commands = append(commands, r.commands...) } }This change ensures that attribute commands are processed before add and change commands are prepended.
database/migration/grammars/postgres_test.go (1)
25-88: LGTM: Comprehensive TestCompileChange method addedThe new
TestCompileChangemethod is a valuable addition to the test suite. It uses table-driven tests to cover various scenarios for compiling changes to the database schema, which is a good practice for maintainability and extensibility.One minor suggestion for improvement:
Consider adding a test case for a scenario where
GetAutoIncrement()returns true for one of the columns. This would ensure that the auto-increment logic is properly tested in the context of changes.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (4)
mocks/database/migration/Blueprint.gois excluded by!mocks/**mocks/database/migration/ColumnDefinition.gois excluded by!mocks/**mocks/database/migration/Grammar.gois excluded by!mocks/**mocks/database/migration/Schema.gois excluded by!mocks/**
📒 Files selected for processing (12)
- contracts/database/migration/blueprint.go (1 hunks)
- contracts/database/migration/column.go (2 hunks)
- contracts/database/migration/grammar.go (1 hunks)
- contracts/database/migration/schema.go (1 hunks)
- database/migration/blueprint.go (1 hunks)
- database/migration/column.go (2 hunks)
- database/migration/grammars/postgres.go (1 hunks)
- database/migration/grammars/postgres_test.go (1 hunks)
- database/migration/grammars/utils.go (1 hunks)
- database/migration/grammars/utils_test.go (1 hunks)
- database/migration/schema.go (1 hunks)
- database/migration/schema_test.go (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (9)
- contracts/database/migration/blueprint.go
- contracts/database/migration/column.go
- contracts/database/migration/grammar.go
- contracts/database/migration/schema.go
- database/migration/column.go
- database/migration/grammars/postgres.go
- database/migration/grammars/utils.go
- database/migration/grammars/utils_test.go
- database/migration/schema.go
🔇 Additional comments (7)
database/migration/schema_test.go (1)
64-129: Summary of changes and alignment with PR objectivesThe addition of the
TestTablemethod indatabase/migration/schema_test.gois a step in the right direction for improving test coverage of the schema functionality. However, it's important to note that the current implementation and the PR objectives seem to be misaligned:
- The PR objective mentions adding an
avatarfield to theuserstable, but the new test method creates achangestable with anamecolumn.- The PR objective also mentions making the
avatarfield nullable, but the current test doesn't cover column modification or nullability.To address this misalignment, consider the following:
- Modify the
TestTablemethod to create auserstable instead of achangestable.- Add a test case for adding an
avatarcolumn to theuserstable.- Include a test case for modifying the
avatarcolumn to be nullable.Here's a script to verify if these changes are present in the codebase:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if the test file includes tests for the 'users' table and 'avatar' column # Test: Check for 'users' table creation rg --type go 'schema.Create\("users"' database/migration/schema_test.go # Test: Check for 'avatar' column addition rg --type go 'table.String\("avatar"\)' database/migration/schema_test.go # Test: Check for 'avatar' column modification to nullable rg --type go 'table.String\("avatar"\).Nullable\(\).Change\(\)' database/migration/schema_test.goThis script will help ensure that the test file includes the necessary changes to align with the PR objectives.
Would you like assistance in modifying the
TestTablemethod to better align with the PR objectives?database/migration/blueprint.go (3)
Line range hint
8-9: LGTM: New constants for command types.The addition of
commandAddandcommandChangeconstants is consistent with the existing naming convention and aligns with the PR objectives of adding and changing columns.
151-154: LGTM: Updated ToSql method to handle new command types.The addition of cases for
commandAddandcommandChangein theToSqlmethod is consistent with the existing structure and correctly handles the new command types. This implementation aligns with the PR objectives of supporting the addition and modification of columns.
Line range hint
1-231: Summary: Changes look good overall, with a minor suggestion for improvement.The modifications to
database/migration/blueprint.gosuccessfully implement support for adding and changing columns, aligning well with the PR objectives. The code is consistent with the existing structure and naming conventions. A minor suggestion was made to adjust the order of operations in theaddImpliedCommandsmethod, but this is not a blocking issue.Given the overall quality of the changes and their alignment with the PR objectives, I recommend approving this PR once the suggested improvement has been considered.
database/migration/grammars/postgres_test.go (3)
22-23: LGTM: Simplified SetupTest methodThe change to use
NewPostgres()in theSetupTestmethod is a good improvement. It simplifies the setup process and likely ensures proper initialization of the Postgres struct.
93-137: LGTM: Enhanced TestCompileCreate methodThe additions to
mockColumn2expectations and the updated expected SQL output improve the comprehensiveness of theTestCompileCreatemethod. These changes ensure that the test covers the handling of nullable columns correctly.Regarding the past review comment about numeric default values:
The issue with numeric default values being enclosed in quotes in SQL statements is still present in the
TestCompileChangemethod (line 72). This should be addressed to ensure correct SQL generation for numeric defaults.
Line range hint
1-137: Overall assessment: Good improvements with a minor issue to addressThe changes to this file significantly enhance the test coverage for the PostgreSQL grammar implementation. The new
TestCompileChangemethod and the improvements toTestCompileCreatemake the test suite more comprehensive and robust.Next steps:
- Address the issue with numeric default values being enclosed in quotes in SQL statements (line 72 in
TestCompileChange).- Consider adding a test case for auto-increment columns in the
TestCompileChangemethod.Once these minor adjustments are made, the changes will be ready for approval.
To ensure that the numeric default value issue is isolated to the test file and not present in the actual implementation, please run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Numeric default values are correctly handled in SQL generation.
No instances of numeric default values being incorrectly quoted were found in the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for potential mishandling of numeric default values in SQL generation # Test: Search for instances where numeric values might be incorrectly quoted in SQL generation rg --type go 'set default .(\d+).' -g '!*_test.go'Length of output: 52
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Re-verify potential mishandling of numeric default values in SQL generation with enhanced regex # Test: Search for instances where numeric values are incorrectly quoted in SQL generation rg --type go "set default '(\d+)'" -g '!*_test.go'Length of output: 58
📑 Description
avatarfield for theuserstable:avatarfield to nullable:Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Tablemethod for better reliability.Tests
✅ Checks