-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 172
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Handle deprecation of gcr.io/kubebuilder #503
Conversation
592ea33
to
06c6fb0
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @monteiro-renato, thanks for working on this!
I believe this is actually part of #235 and that issue should be solved with ~ "option 1".
I'm happy to merge this as is now, except for one small change request. But in case you'd like to work on ~ option 1, please feel free to, assuming you have the time for this work this coming week 🙂 I'll also have the time to review and test it as needs be on this week.
PS signing CLA is mandatory! I can't merge anything without that.
bundle.yaml
Outdated
@@ -12252,7 +12252,7 @@ spec: | |||
- --upstream=http://127.0.0.1:8080/ | |||
- --logtostderr=true | |||
- --v=10 | |||
image: gcr.io/kubebuilder/kube-rbac-proxy:v0.15.0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This change should be removed: bundle.yaml is generated on each release and is not kept up-to-date to main
otherwise.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done!
06c6fb0
to
4bc73da
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, @monteiro-renato!
Hello 👋
It will soon not be possible to pull images from gcr.io/kubebuilder. See this discussion for more details: kubernetes-sigs/kubebuilder#3907 (Also in the operator-sdk README).
This PR opts for option 3 but I guess ideally we should go with option 1. I'm not sure if you were aware of this so I'm opening this PR for awareness. Feel free to provide me some guidance if you feel like we should tackle this issue in some other way. I believe I will have the time to work on this.