Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Begin converting TenantIndex, BlockMeta, CompactedBlockMeta to proto #3946

Draft
wants to merge 10 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

zalegrala
Copy link
Contributor

What this PR does:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #

Checklist

  • Tests updated
  • Documentation added
  • CHANGELOG.md updated - the order of entries should be [CHANGE], [FEATURE], [ENHANCEMENT], [BUGFIX]

string data_encoding = 14;
uint32 bloom_shard_count = 15;
uint32 footer_size = 16;
repeated tempopb.DedicatedColumn dedicated_columns = 17;
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This causes the encodings to require updates in lots of ways. I'm not sure how to reduce scope.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Perhaps this could be moved off the blockmeta object. Need to check where this is consumed, which could be too many places for us to want here.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oof. Yes. This is the sticking point. We already have a dedicated columns proto in /pkg/tempopb.

Wdyt about moving BlockMeta and Dedicated Columns proto to /pkg/tempopb/backend?

Then the messages in /pkg/tempopb could easily reference them and that would consolidate all of backend and request proto? or is that just going to cause a bigger mess?

@zalegrala zalegrala force-pushed the tenantIndexProto branch 2 times, most recently from 501aa7c to baff6f0 Compare August 26, 2024 16:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants