Merge pull request #45 from kilbergr/rek-update-about

Removing no longer relevant content

src/templates/cap-about-page.js

@@ -155,18 +155,6 @@ export class CapAboutPage extends LitElement {
 						Case text and general head matter has been generated by machine OCR
 						and has not received human review.
 					</p>
-					<p>
-						You can report errors of all kinds at our
-						<a href='{% url "contact" %}'>contact form</a>, or view existing
-						issues at our
-						<a href="https://github.com/harvard-lil/capstone/issues/"
-							>Github issue tracker</a
-						>. We particularly welcome volume-level metadata corrections,
-						feature requests, and suggestions for large-scale algorithmic
-						changes. We are not currently able to process individual OCR
-						corrections, but welcome general suggestions on the OCR correction
-						process.
-					</p>
 					<h2 class="c-decoratedHeader" id="data-citation">Data citation</h2>
 					<p>
 						Data made available through the Caselaw Access Project API and bulk
@@ -200,30 +188,6 @@ export class CapAboutPage extends LitElement {
 							The CAP data is free for the public to use and access.
 						</strong>
 					</p>
-					<p>
-						Case metadata, such as the case name, citation, court, date, etc.,
-						is freely and openly accessible without limitation. Full case text
-						can be freely viewed or downloaded but you must register for an
-						account to do so, and currently you may view or download no more
-						than 500 cases per day. In addition, research scholars can qualify
-						for bulk data access by agreeing to certain use and redistribution
-						restrictions. You can request a bulk access agreement by creating an
-						account and then visiting your account page.
-					</p>
-					<p>
-						Access limitations on full text and bulk data are a component of
-						Harvard’s collaboration agreement with Ravel Law, Inc. (now part of
-						Lexis-Nexis). These limitations will end, at the latest, in February
-						of 2024. In addition, these limitations apply only to cases from
-						jurisdictions that continue to publish their official case law in
-						print form. Once a jurisdiction transitions from print-first
-						publishing to digital-first publishing, these limitations cease.
-						Thus far, Illinois, Arkansas, New Mexico, and North Carolina have
-						made this important and positive shift and, as a result, all
-						historical cases from these jurisdictions are freely available to
-						the public without restriction. We hope many other jurisdictions
-						will follow their example soon.
-					</p>
 					<h2 class="c-decoratedHeader" id="press">Press</h2>
 					<cap-media-list></cap-media-list>