Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove base-compat dependency from servant #1744

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 30, 2024

Conversation

tchoutri
Copy link
Contributor

@tchoutri tchoutri commented Apr 25, 2024

First batch of removing extraneous dependencies.

@tchoutri tchoutri force-pushed the remove-base-compat-dependency-from-servant branch from 904876e to 448267a Compare April 25, 2024 17:47
@tchoutri tchoutri marked this pull request as ready for review April 25, 2024 18:43
Comment on lines 673 to 676
instance {-# OVERLAPPABLE #-} TypeError (NoInstanceForSub

#if __GLASGOW_HASKELL__ >= 904
@(Type -> Constraint)

#endif
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why 904?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You're watching the second commit, which reinstates these lines after they were mistakenly removed in the first commit.

@tchoutri tchoutri merged commit e80d2aa into master Apr 30, 2024
8 checks passed
@tchoutri tchoutri deleted the remove-base-compat-dependency-from-servant branch April 30, 2024 06:53
@maksbotan
Copy link
Contributor

Do I understand correctly that these changes (and ones in #1745) do not have to be released on their own, but can wait until next big release of respective packages?

@tchoutri
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yes they should be fairly transparent for the end users.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants