Feat:finish task #7
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes introduce a new Go module named Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 8
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (10)
sh4ll0t/prepare.md (4)
1-3: Enhance main sections with more detailThe document provides a good starting point with its title and main sections. However, to improve clarity and completeness, consider the following suggestions:
- Add a brief introduction explaining the purpose and scope of the system.
- Expand on the "登录注册" (Login and Registration) section by listing specific features or requirements (e.g., email verification, password policies).
- Provide more context for the "回答功能" (Answer Functionality) section, such as the type of Q&A system being implemented.
4-5: Elaborate on basic Q&A functionalityThe inclusion of basic Q&A functionality and CRUD operations is good. To make this section more comprehensive, consider adding:
- Specific details about question and answer structures (e.g., character limits, formatting options).
- Any restrictions on CRUD operations (e.g., who can edit or delete questions/answers).
- How questions and answers will be displayed or organized (e.g., threading, pagination).
6-11: Prioritize and detail additional featuresThe inclusion of advanced features is promising. To improve this section:
- Prioritize the features based on importance and implementation complexity.
- Provide more details for each feature, especially for complex ones like AI-generated answers.
- Consider the impact of these features on the system's architecture and performance.
- Clarify the scope of admin privileges and how they differ from regular user permissions.
- Explain how the friend functionality integrates with the Q&A system.
Additionally, consider adding a section on non-functional requirements such as performance, security, and scalability.
1-11: Enhance document structure and completenessWhile this initial design document provides a good starting point, there are several areas for improvement:
- Adopt a standardized format for the design document, including sections for system overview, functional requirements, non-functional requirements, and system architecture.
- Expand each section with more detailed information, including user stories or use cases where appropriate.
- Consider adding diagrams (e.g., system architecture, data flow) to visualize the system's structure and interactions.
- Include information about the technology stack, database schema, and API endpoints.
- Address potential challenges and risks associated with implementing the proposed features.
- Outline the next steps for development, including any prototyping or proof-of-concept work needed.
By addressing these points, you'll create a more comprehensive and useful design document that will guide the development process more effectively.
Would you like assistance in creating a more structured template for this design document?
sh4ll0t/go.mod (2)
16-67: Indirect dependencies look comprehensive, consider periodic updates.The list of indirect dependencies is extensive and includes necessary supporting libraries for the project. While these are managed automatically by Go modules, it's good practice to periodically update them to ensure you're using the latest versions, especially for security-related packages.
Consider running
go get -uperiodically and testing your application to ensure it works with the latest versions of all dependencies.
1-67: Overall, the go.mod file is well-structured and appropriate for the project.The file follows the standard Go module format and includes all necessary components. The chosen dependencies align well with the project description of a web application with user management, database interactions, and potential AI integration.
To maintain the project's health and security:
- Regularly update dependencies using
go get -ufollowed by thorough testing.- Consider using a dependency scanning tool to check for known vulnerabilities.
- Review the usage of indirect dependencies periodically to remove any that become unnecessary.
As the project grows, consider modularizing your application further if it becomes complex. This might lead to splitting the go.mod file or creating internal modules for better organization and maintainability.
sh4ll0t/templates/register.html (1)
1-79: Overall assessment of the registration pageThe registration page provides a functional form for user sign-up. However, there are several areas where it can be improved:
- Update to HTML5 DOCTYPE for better compatibility with modern web standards.
- Enhance CSS for better maintainability and responsiveness.
- Improve JavaScript functionality with input validation and better error handling.
- Strengthen security measures, including CSRF protection and password complexity requirements.
- Enhance the form structure with a confirmation password field and password strength indicator.
These improvements will result in a more robust, secure, and user-friendly registration process. Consider implementing these changes incrementally, prioritizing security enhancements first.
As the application grows, consider adopting a frontend framework like React, Vue, or Angular for better state management and component-based architecture. This would allow for easier maintenance and scalability of the user interface.
sh4ll0t/templates/login.html (1)
1-83: Overall assessment: Functional but needs improvementsThe login page implementation is functional but requires several improvements to align with modern web development best practices and security standards:
Update to HTML5 and implement CSRF protection.
Improve CSS maintainability and accessibility.
Enhance JavaScript functionality with better error handling and user experience.
Consider implementing additional security measures such as:
- Rate limiting to prevent brute-force attacks.
- Multi-factor authentication option.
- Secure password requirements (if not already implemented on the server-side).
Implement proper error logging on the client-side to aid in debugging and monitoring.
Consider adding internationalization support for multi-language functionality.
Addressing these points will significantly improve the quality, security, and user experience of the login page.
sh4ll0t/main.go (2)
20-25: Consider using a common naming convention for struct fields.While the current naming is acceptable, it's recommended to follow a consistent naming convention for struct fields, such as using camelCase for better readability and adherence to Go's idiomatic style.
Apply this diff to update the struct field names:
type Answer struct { - AnswerID int `json:"answer_id"` - AnswerText string `json:"answer_text"` + AnswerID int `json:"answerId"` + AnswerText string `json:"answerText"` Respondent string `json:"respondent"` - LikesCount int `json:"likes_count"` + LikesCount int `json:"likesCount"` } type Question struct { ID int `json:"id"` - QuestionText string `json:"question_text"` + QuestionText string `json:"questionText"` - TotalLikes int `json:"total_likes"` + TotalLikes int `json:"totalLikes"` Answers []Answer `json:"answers"` Questioner string `json:"questioner"` }Also applies to: 27-33
125-158: Consider handling errors and improving error messages.The
generateAIAnswerfunction uses the Volcengine SDK to generate an AI answer for a given question. However, there are a few improvements that can be made:
- The error message in case of an API error could be more descriptive.
- The function returns an empty string in case of an error, which may not be the best approach. Consider returning a more meaningful error message or a default answer.
Apply this diff to improve error handling and messages:
func generateAIAnswer(question string) (string, error) { // ... resp, err := client.CreateChatCompletion(ctx, req) if err != nil { - fmt.Printf("standard chat error: %v\n", err) - return "", err + errMsg := fmt.Sprintf("Failed to generate AI answer: %v", err) + return "", errors.New(errMsg) } answer := *resp.Choices[0].Message.Content.StringValue return answer, nil }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (7)
sh4ll0t/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sumsh4ll0t/img/bg.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngsh4ll0t/img/box_bg.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngsh4ll0t/img/preloader.gifis excluded by!**/*.gifsh4ll0t/img/register.jpgis excluded by!**/*.jpgsh4ll0t/img/register.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngsh4ll0t/img/submit.pngis excluded by!**/*.png
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
- sh4ll0t/go.mod (1 hunks)
- sh4ll0t/main.go (1 hunks)
- sh4ll0t/prepare.md (1 hunks)
- sh4ll0t/templates/index.html (1 hunks)
- sh4ll0t/templates/login.html (1 hunks)
- sh4ll0t/templates/register.html (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- sh4ll0t/templates/index.html
🔇 Additional comments (21)
sh4ll0t/go.mod (2)
1-5: LGTM: Module declaration and Go version are appropriate.The module name
hduhelp_textis suitable for the project. Using Go version 1.21.0 is a good choice as it's a recent version, allowing the use of newer language features. The toolchain version (go1.21.5) is slightly newer, which is acceptable and may include some tooling improvements.
7-14: Dependencies look good, consider checking for updates.The direct dependencies are appropriate for a web application with database access and potential AI integration. Using specific versions is good for reproducibility. However, it's worth checking if there are any newer versions available, especially for security-critical packages like the database driver.
To check for potential updates, you can run:
sh4ll0t/templates/register.html (2)
48-77: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionEnhance form structure and user experience
The current form structure is good, but there are opportunities to improve user experience and security:
- Add a confirmation password field to prevent typos during registration.
- Implement password strength requirements and a visual indicator.
- Consider adding a username availability check.
Here's an example of how you could enhance the form:
<form id="signupForm" onsubmit="submitForm(event)"> <div class="fieldContainer"> <div class="formRow"> <div class="label"> <label for="username">用户:</label> </div> <div class="field"> <input type="text" name="username" id="username" required minlength="3" maxlength="20" /> </div> </div> <div class="formRow"> <div class="label"> <label for="password">密码:</label> </div> <div class="field"> <input type="password" name="password" id="password" required minlength="8" pattern="(?=.*\d)(?=.*[a-z])(?=.*[A-Z]).{8,}" title="Must contain at least one number and one uppercase and lowercase letter, and at least 8 or more characters" /> </div> </div> <div class="formRow"> <div class="label"> <label for="confirm-password">确认密码:</label> </div> <div class="field"> <input type="password" name="confirm-password" id="confirm-password" required /> </div> </div> <div id="password-strength"></div> </div> <!-- Rest of the form remains the same --> </form>Add JavaScript to check password strength and match:
document.getElementById('password').addEventListener('input', checkPasswordStrength); document.getElementById('confirm-password').addEventListener('input', checkPasswordMatch); function checkPasswordStrength() { // Implement password strength check and update #password-strength } function checkPasswordMatch() { // Implement password match check }To ensure the backend supports these enhancements, run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if the backend supports password complexity and username uniqueness # Search for password validation in Go files rg --type go -e 'password.*validation' -e 'validate.*password' # Search for username uniqueness check rg --type go -e 'username.*exists' -e 'check.*username'
23-45: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionEnhance JavaScript functionality and security
The current JavaScript implementation handles form submission well, but there are areas for improvement:
- Add input validation before sending the request to ensure data integrity.
- Consider using
async/awaitfor better readability of asynchronous code.- Implement CSRF protection to enhance security.
Here's an example of how you could refactor the JavaScript code:
async function submitForm(event) { event.preventDefault(); const username = document.getElementById('username').value.trim(); const password = document.getElementById('password').value; const errorMessageDiv = document.getElementById('error-message'); if (!username || !password) { displayError('用户名和密码不能为空'); return; } try { const response = await fetch('/register', { method: 'POST', headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/x-www-form-urlencoded', 'X-CSRF-Token': getCsrfToken() // Implement this function to get CSRF token }, body: new URLSearchParams({ username, password }) }); const data = await response.json(); displayMessage(data.message || data.error, data.message === "注册成功" ? 'green' : 'red'); } catch (error) { displayError('注册请求失败: ' + error); } } function displayMessage(message, color) { const errorMessageDiv = document.getElementById('error-message'); errorMessageDiv.textContent = message; errorMessageDiv.style.color = color; } function displayError(message) { displayMessage(message, 'red'); } // Implement CSRF token retrieval function getCsrfToken() { // Return CSRF token from meta tag or cookie }To ensure CSRF protection is implemented server-side, run the following script:
sh4ll0t/main.go (17)
1-18: LGTM!The imports are appropriate for the functionality provided in the file. The use of the Gin framework, MySQL driver, and other necessary packages is correct.
53-66: LGTM!The
initfunction properly initializes the database connection and sets appropriate connection parameters. Error handling and panic statements are used correctly.
67-87: LGTM!The
registerfunction correctly handles user registration by hashing the password and inserting the user into the database. Error handling and response generation are implemented appropriately.
89-123: LGTM!The
askfunction correctly handles asking a question by inserting the question into the database, generating an AI answer, and associating the answer with the question. Session handling, error handling, and response generation are implemented appropriately.
159-216: LGTM!The
ShowQuestionAndAnswerfunction correctly retrieves questions and answers from the database, builds the response structure, and returns the data as JSON. Session handling, error handling, and response generation are implemented appropriately.
218-247: LGTM!The
deleteQuestionfunction correctly handles deleting a question by checking the user's authorization, deleting associated answers, and deleting the question itself. Session handling, error handling, and response generation are implemented appropriately.
249-276: LGTM!The
deleteAnswerfunction correctly handles deleting an answer by checking the user's authorization and deleting the answer from the database. Session handling, error handling, and response generation are implemented appropriately.
278-306: LGTM!The
changeQuestionfunction correctly handles modifying a question by checking the user's authorization and updating the question text in the database. Session handling, error handling, and response generation are implemented appropriately.
307-333: LGTM!The
changeAnswerfunction correctly handles modifying an answer by checking the user's authorization and updating the answer text in the database. Session handling, error handling, and response generation are implemented appropriately.
335-373: LGTM!The
Likefunction correctly handles liking an answer by incrementing the like count for the answer and updating the total likes for the associated question. Session handling, error handling, and response generation are implemented appropriately.
374-452: LGTM!The
like_sortfunction correctly retrieves questions and answers from the database, sorted by the total likes of the question and the likes of each answer. Session handling, error handling, and response generation are implemented appropriately.
454-491: LGTM!The
checkAnswerfunction correctly handles updating the check status of an answer by verifying the user's authorization as an admin, checking if the answer exists, and updating the check status in the database. Session handling, error handling, and response generation are implemented appropriately.
492-526: LGTM!The
checkQuestionfunction correctly handles updating the check status of a question by verifying the user's authorization as an admin, checking if the question exists, and updating the check status in the database. Session handling, error handling, and response generation are implemented appropriately.
528-585: LGTM!The
adminfunction correctly retrieves all questions and answers from the database for the admin user. Session handling, error handling, and response generation are implemented appropriately.
586-602: LGTM!The
answerfunction correctly handles submitting an answer to a question by inserting the answer into the database with the associated question ID and respondent. Session handling, error handling, and response generation are implemented appropriately.
604-623: LGTM!The
loginfunction correctly handles user login by comparing the provided password with the hashed password stored in the database. Session handling, error handling, and response generation are implemented appropriately.
625-630: LGTM!The
logoutfunction correctly handles user logout by invalidating the session and returning a success message. Session handling and response generation are implemented appropriately.
| <style> | ||
| * { margin: 0; padding: 0; } | ||
| body { font-size: 0.825em; color: #eee; background: url("../img/bg.png") repeat-x #222222; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; padding-top: 100px; } | ||
| #carbonForm { background-color: #1C1C1C; border: 1px solid #080808; margin: 20px auto; padding-top: 20px; width: 500px; box-shadow: 0 0 1px #444 inset; border-radius: 12px; } | ||
| #carbonForm h1 { font-size: 60px; padding: 0 0 30px 10px; text-align: left; } | ||
| .fieldContainer { background-color: #1E1E1E; border: 1px solid #0E0E0E; padding: 30px 10px; box-shadow: 0 0 20px #292929 inset; border-radius: 12px; } | ||
| .formRow { height: 35px; padding: 10px; position: relative; } | ||
| .label { float: left; padding: 0 20px 0 0; text-align: right; width: 70px; } | ||
| .field { float: left; } | ||
| .field input { border: 1px solid white; color: #666666; font-size: 22px; padding: 4px 5px; background: #FFFFFF; outline: none; } | ||
| .signupButton { text-align: center; padding: 30px 0 10px; } | ||
| #register { border: 1px solid #f4f4f4; cursor: pointer; height: 40px; text-transform: uppercase; width: 110px; background: #d0ecfd; border-radius: 6px; } | ||
| #register:hover { background-color: #dcf2ff; border: 1px solid white; } | ||
| .error-message { color: red; text-align: center; margin-top: 10px; } | ||
| a, a:visited { color: #0196e3; text-decoration: none; } | ||
| a:hover { text-decoration: underline; } | ||
| </style> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider improving CSS for better maintainability and responsiveness
While the current CSS provides a consistent dark theme, there are a few areas for improvement:
- Consider moving the styles to a separate CSS file for better maintainability.
- Replace pixel units with relative units (e.g.,
em,rem, or percentages) for better responsiveness and accessibility. - Use CSS variables for colors and repeated values to improve maintainability.
Here's an example of how you could refactor a portion of your CSS:
:root {
--bg-color: #222222;
--form-bg-color: #1C1C1C;
--input-color: #666666;
--link-color: #0196e3;
}
body {
font-size: 0.825rem;
color: #eee;
background: url("../img/bg.png") repeat-x var(--bg-color);
font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
padding-top: 6.25rem;
}
#carbonForm {
background-color: var(--form-bg-color);
border: 1px solid #080808;
margin: 1.25rem auto;
padding-top: 1.25rem;
width: 31.25rem;
box-shadow: 0 0 1px #444 inset;
border-radius: 0.75rem;
}
/* Continue refactoring other styles... */| <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> | ||
| <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> | ||
| <head> | ||
| <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /> | ||
| <title>注册</title> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider updating to HTML5 DOCTYPE
The current DOCTYPE declaration is for XHTML 1.0 Strict, which is outdated. Consider updating to the HTML5 DOCTYPE for better compatibility with modern web standards.
Apply this change to update the DOCTYPE:
-<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
-<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
+<!DOCTYPE html>
+<html lang="zh">Also, add a lang attribute to the <html> tag to specify the language of the document.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> | |
| <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> | |
| <head> | |
| <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /> | |
| <title>注册</title> | |
| <!DOCTYPE html> | |
| <html lang="zh"> | |
| <head> | |
| <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /> | |
| <title>注册</title> |
| <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> | ||
| <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> | ||
| <head> | ||
| <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /> | ||
| <title>登录</title> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Update DOCTYPE and add CSRF protection
The HTML structure is well-organized, but there are a couple of improvements to consider:
-
Update the DOCTYPE to HTML5 for better compatibility with modern web standards:
<!DOCTYPE html> <html lang="zh">
Also, add the
langattribute to the<html>tag for better accessibility and SEO. -
Implement CSRF protection for the login form. This is crucial for security. You can add a CSRF token to your form:
<input type="hidden" name="csrf_token" value="{{ .CSRFToken }}">
Ensure that your backend generates and validates this token.
Also applies to: 50-83
| <style> | ||
| * { margin: 0; padding: 0; } | ||
| body { font-size: 0.825em; color: #eee; background: url("../img/bg.png") repeat-x #222222; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; padding-top: 100px; } | ||
| #carbonForm { background-color: #1C1C1C; border: 1px solid #080808; margin: 20px auto; padding-top: 20px; width: 500px; box-shadow: 0 0 1px #444 inset; border-radius: 12px; } | ||
| #carbonForm h1 { font-size: 60px; padding: 0 0 30px 10px; text-align: left; } | ||
| .fieldContainer { background-color: #1E1E1E; border: 1px solid #0E0E0E; padding: 30px 10px; box-shadow: 0 0 20px #292929 inset; border-radius: 12px; } | ||
| .formRow { height: 35px; padding: 10px; position: relative; } | ||
| .label { float: left; padding: 0 20px 0 0; text-align: right; width: 70px; } | ||
| .field { float: left; } | ||
| .field input { border: 1px solid white; color: #666666; font-size: 22px; padding: 4px 5px; background: #FFFFFF; outline: none; } | ||
| .signupButton { text-align: center; padding: 30px 0 10px; } | ||
| #submit { border: 1px solid #f4f4f4; cursor: pointer; height: 40px; text-transform: uppercase; width: 110px; background: #d0ecfd; border-radius: 6px; } | ||
| #submit:hover { background-color: #dcf2ff; border: 1px solid white; } | ||
| .error-message { color: red; text-align: center; margin-top: 10px; } | ||
| a, a:visited { color: #0196e3; text-decoration: none; } | ||
| a:hover { text-decoration: underline; } | ||
| </style> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve CSS maintainability and accessibility
While the styles create a cohesive dark theme, there are several areas for improvement:
-
Consider moving the styles to a separate CSS file for better maintainability:
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/static/css/login.css">
-
Use relative units for font sizes to improve accessibility:
body { font-size: 16px; } /* Base font size */ #carbonForm h1 { font-size: 3.75rem; } /* 60px / 16px = 3.75rem */
-
Ensure color contrasts meet WCAG 2.1 Level AA standards. For example, the current body text color (#eee) on the dark background (#222222) might not have sufficient contrast. Use a tool like WebAIM's Contrast Checker to verify and adjust colors if necessary.
-
Consider adding focus styles for form inputs to improve keyboard navigation:
.field input:focus { outline: 2px solid #0196e3; box-shadow: 0 0 3px #0196e3; }
| <script> | ||
| function submitLoginForm(event) { | ||
| event.preventDefault(); | ||
| const username = document.getElementById('username').value; | ||
| const password = document.getElementById('password').value; | ||
| const errorMessageDiv = document.getElementById('error-message'); | ||
|
|
||
| fetch('/login', { | ||
| method: 'POST', | ||
| headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/x-www-form-urlencoded' }, | ||
| body: new URLSearchParams({ username, password }) | ||
| }) | ||
| .then(response => response.json()) | ||
| .then(data => { | ||
| errorMessageDiv.textContent = data.message || data.error; | ||
| errorMessageDiv.style.color = data.message === "登录成功" ? 'green' : 'red'; | ||
|
|
||
| if (data.message === "登录成功") { | ||
| window.location.href = '/test'; | ||
| } | ||
| }) | ||
| .catch(error => { | ||
| errorMessageDiv.textContent = '登录请求失败: ' + error; | ||
| errorMessageDiv.style.color = 'red'; | ||
| }); | ||
| } | ||
| </script> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance JavaScript functionality and error handling
The current implementation handles basic form submission, but there are several areas for improvement:
-
Add input validation before sending the request:
if (!username || !password) { errorMessageDiv.textContent = '请填写用户名和密码'; errorMessageDiv.style.color = 'red'; return; }
-
Use
async/awaitfor better readability and error handling:async function submitLoginForm(event) { event.preventDefault(); // ... (existing code) try { const response = await fetch('/login', { method: 'POST', headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/x-www-form-urlencoded' }, body: new URLSearchParams({ username, password }) }); if (!response.ok) { throw new Error(`HTTP error! status: ${response.status}`); } const data = await response.json(); // ... (handle response) } catch (error) { console.error('Login error:', error); errorMessageDiv.textContent = '登录请求失败: ' + error.message; errorMessageDiv.style.color = 'red'; } }
-
Add a loading indicator to improve user experience:
const submitButton = document.getElementById('submit'); submitButton.disabled = true; submitButton.value = '登录中...'; // ... (after fetch) submitButton.disabled = false; submitButton.value = '登录';
-
Consider using the Fetch API's
credentials: 'include'option to ensure cookies are sent with the request:fetch('/login', { method: 'POST', credentials: 'include', // ... (other options) })
sh4ll0t/main.go
Outdated
| var ( | ||
| store = cookie.NewStore([]byte("shallot")) | ||
| ) | ||
|
|
||
| var ( | ||
| Db *sql.DB | ||
| err error | ||
| dbHost = "127.0.0.1" | ||
| dbPort = "8888" | ||
| dbUser = "root" | ||
| dbName = "users" | ||
| dbPwd = "123456" | ||
| sqlStr = dbUser + ":" + dbPwd + "@tcp(" + dbHost + ":" + dbPort + ")/" + dbName | ||
| ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid hardcoding sensitive information.
It's generally not recommended to hardcode sensitive information such as database credentials directly in the source code. Consider using environment variables or configuration files to store these values securely.
To address this, you can use the os package to read environment variables:
import "os"
var (
dbHost = os.Getenv("DB_HOST")
dbPort = os.Getenv("DB_PORT")
dbUser = os.Getenv("DB_USER")
dbName = os.Getenv("DB_NAME")
dbPwd = os.Getenv("DB_PASSWORD")
)Make sure to set these environment variables appropriately when running the application.
sh4ll0t/main.go
Outdated
| func main() { | ||
| r := gin.Default() | ||
| r.LoadHTMLGlob("templates/*") | ||
| r.Static("/img", "./img") | ||
|
|
||
| r.GET("/", func(c *gin.Context) { | ||
| c.HTML(http.StatusOK, "index.html", gin.H{}) | ||
| }) | ||
| r.GET("/login", func(c *gin.Context) { | ||
| c.HTML(http.StatusOK, "login.html", gin.H{}) | ||
| }) | ||
| r.POST("/login", login) | ||
| r.GET("/register", func(c *gin.Context) { | ||
| c.HTML(http.StatusOK, "register.html", gin.H{}) | ||
| }) | ||
| r.POST("/register", register) | ||
| r.GET("/logout", logout) | ||
| r.POST("/ask", ask) | ||
| r.POST("/answer", answer) | ||
| r.GET("/show", ShowQuestionAndAnswer) | ||
| r.POST("deleteAnswer", deleteAnswer) | ||
| r.POST("/deleteQuestion", deleteQuestion) | ||
| r.POST("/changeQuestion", changeQuestion) | ||
| r.POST("/changeAnswer", changeAnswer) | ||
| r.POST("like", Like) | ||
| r.GET("like_sort", like_sort) | ||
| r.GET("admin", admin) | ||
| r.POST("checkAnswer", checkAnswer) | ||
| r.POST("checkQuestion", checkQuestion) | ||
| r.Run(":8000") | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider adding proper access control to sensitive routes.
While the code sets up the necessary routes and handlers for the application, it's important to ensure that sensitive routes, such as those related to admin functionality or user-specific actions, have proper access control mechanisms in place.
Here are a few suggestions:
- Use middleware functions to check user authentication and authorization before allowing access to sensitive routes.
- Implement role-based access control (RBAC) to restrict access to admin-only routes.
- Validate and sanitize user input to prevent potential security vulnerabilities.
For example, you can create a middleware function to check if the user is authenticated:
func authMiddleware() gin.HandlerFunc {
return func(c *gin.Context) {
session, _ := store.Get(c.Request, "session-name")
if auth, ok := session.Values["authenticated"].(bool); !ok || !auth {
c.JSON(http.StatusUnauthorized, gin.H{"error": "Unauthorized"})
c.Abort()
return
}
c.Next()
}
}Then, apply the middleware to routes that require authentication:
r.POST("/ask", authMiddleware(), ask)
r.POST("/answer", authMiddleware(), answer)
// ...Similarly, you can create middleware functions for admin-only routes and apply them accordingly.
sh4ll0t/main.go
Outdated
| var question string | ||
| var id int |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove unused global variables.
The question and id variables are declared globally but not used anywhere in the code. It's best to remove unused variables to keep the codebase clean and maintainable.
Apply this diff to remove the unused variables:
-var question string
-var id int📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| var question string | |
| var id int |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 64
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (18)
sh4ll0t/main.go (1)
8-10: LGTM: Main function is concise and well-structured.The main function is minimal and delegates the application startup to the router package, which is a good practice for separation of concerns.
Consider adding error handling for the
router.Run()call:func main() { - router.Run() + if err := router.Run(); err != nil { + log.Fatalf("Failed to start server: %v", err) + } }This will ensure that any startup errors are properly logged.
sh4ll0t/api/user/logout.go (2)
17-18: Address commented-out code.There are commented-out lines related to session max age. If these lines are no longer needed, consider removing them. If they represent a potential future implementation, add a TODO comment explaining the intention.
Consider either removing these lines or adding a explanatory comment:
- //session.Options.MaxAge = -1 - //session.Save(c.Request, c.Writer) + // TODO: Consider implementing immediate session invalidation + // session.Options.MaxAge = -1 + // session.Save(c.Request, c.Writer)
9-20: Consider enhancing security and robustness.While the current implementation is functional, consider the following improvements:
- Implement CSRF protection if not already present in the middleware.
- Add rate limiting to prevent potential abuse of the logout endpoint.
- Consider implementing a server-side session invalidation mechanism for more robust security.
Here's a conceptual example of how you might implement rate limiting:
import "golang.org/x/time/rate" var limiter = rate.NewLimiter(rate.Every(time.Second), 10) // 10 requests per second func Logout(c *gin.Context) { if !limiter.Allow() { c.JSON(http.StatusTooManyRequests, gin.H{"error": "Rate limit exceeded"}) return } // ... rest of the logout logic }Would you like assistance in implementing these security enhancements?
sh4ll0t/api/user/register.go (1)
23-32: Consider logging database errors for debugging.The error handling for database operations is good, but consider adding logging for the non-duplicate error case. This will help with debugging if unexpected errors occur during user creation.
Example improvement:
if result.Error != nil { if result.Error == gorm.ErrDuplicatedKey { c.JSON(http.StatusConflict, gin.H{"error": "用户名已存在"}) return } // Log the error log.Printf("Error creating user: %v", result.Error) c.JSON(http.StatusInternalServerError, gin.H{"error": "注册失败"}) return }sh4ll0t/api/user/login.go (1)
25-35: Consider including user data in the success response.The session handling and response logic are implemented correctly. However, the success response could be more informative for the client.
Consider including some non-sensitive user data in the success response. This could save an additional API call from the client to fetch user details. For example:
c.JSON(http.StatusOK, gin.H{ "message": "登录成功", "user": gin.H{ "username": user.Username, "email": user.Email, // Add other non-sensitive fields as needed }, })Ensure to only include non-sensitive information that doesn't compromise user privacy or security.
sh4ll0t/api/answer/answer.go (2)
38-39: Enhance the success response with more details.While the current success response is functional, it could be more informative. Consider including additional details in the response, such as the ID of the created answer or a timestamp. This can be useful for client-side operations or logging.
Example:
c.JSON(http.StatusCreated, gin.H{ "message": "Answer submitted successfully", "answerId": answer.ID, "timestamp": time.Now().Unix(), })This provides more context about the created resource, which can be beneficial for the client.
1-39: Overall assessment: Functional but with room for improvement.The
Answerfunction provides the basic functionality for submitting answers to questions. However, there are several areas where the code could be enhanced to improve its robustness, error handling, and overall design:
- Authentication could be moved to a middleware for better separation of concerns.
- Input validation should be more thorough, especially for the answer text.
- Database interactions could benefit from transaction management and more detailed error handling.
- The success response could be more informative.
These improvements would make the code more resilient to errors, easier to maintain, and more informative for clients consuming the API.
Would you like assistance in implementing any of these suggested improvements? I can provide more detailed code examples or open a GitHub issue to track these enhancements.
sh4ll0t/api/user/show_question_and_answer.go (1)
10-15: LGTM: Answer struct is well-defined.The
Answerstruct captures the essential information for an answer, and the use of JSON tags is appropriate for API responses. The field names are clear and descriptive.Consider using
IDinstead ofAnswerIDfor consistency with theQuestionstruct:type Answer struct { - AnswerID int `json:"answer_id"` + ID int `json:"id"` AnswerText string `json:"answer_text"` Respondent string `json:"respondent"` LikesCount int `json:"likes_count"` }sh4ll0t/router/router.go (1)
1-58: Overall good structure, but several improvements needed.The router setup provides a solid foundation for the API, but there are several areas that need attention:
- Session management security (hardcoded secret, long session duration)
- Lack of authentication middleware for protected routes
- Naming inconsistencies in some endpoints
- Admin route security
These issues should be addressed to improve the overall security and maintainability of the application.
Would you like assistance in implementing any of the suggested changes or creating issues to track these improvements?
sh4ll0t/api/answer/delete_answer.go (1)
23-23: Ensure proper type assertion when retrieving session dataWhen accessing the username from the session, perform a type assertion to prevent potential runtime errors.
Apply this diff to include type assertion:
-if session.Get("username") != question.Questioner { +if username, ok := session.Get("username").(string); !ok || username != question.Questioner {This ensures that
usernameis a string before comparison.sh4ll0t/api/answer/change_answer.go (1)
35-35: Confirm success message consistencyThe success message
"修改成功"is appropriate. Ensure that it aligns with the response messages used throughout your API for consistency.sh4ll0t/api/question/delete_question.go (2)
36-36: Consider consistent response messagesFor better user experience, consider providing consistent and informative response messages. For example, when the deletion is successful, you might include additional details or maintain consistency with other API responses.
Example:
c.JSON(http.StatusOK, gin.H{ + "success": true, "message": "删除成功", + "question_id": id, })
3-8: Organize imports and remove unused packagesTo keep the code clean and maintainable, organize the imports and remove any unused packages.
Ensure that all imported packages are necessary. If any of the imported packages are unused, consider removing them.
sh4ll0t/api/admin/check_question.go (1)
18-21: Consider implementing role-based access control (RBAC)Checking if the
usernameequals"admin"is not scalable for applications with multiple administrators or varying user roles. Implementing RBAC allows for flexible and secure permission management.This could involve assigning roles to users and checking their permissions:
role, _ := session.Get("role").(string) if role != "admin" { c.JSON(http.StatusUnauthorized, gin.H{"error": "管理员才可以访问！"}) return }sh4ll0t/api/admin/check_answer.go (1)
42-42: Remove Commented Notes from Production CodeThe comment
// 假设你在 Answer 结构体中添加了 CheckStatus 字段is a reminder or assumption intended for development. Remove such comments from production code to maintain code cleanliness and professionalism.Apply this diff:
// 更新审核状态 -answer.CheckStatus = checkStatus // 假设你在 Answer 结构体中添加了 CheckStatus 字段 +answer.CheckStatus = checkStatussh4ll0t/api/user/like.go (2)
48-48: Include 'total_likes' in the JSON responseTo provide more comprehensive feedback to the client, consider returning the updated
TotalLikesof the question along with thelikes_countof the answer.Modify the response as follows:
c.JSON(http.StatusOK, gin.H{ "likes_count": answer.LikesCount, + "total_likes": question.TotalLikes, })
13-13: Ensure consistency in error message languageThe error message
"未登录"is in Chinese, while other error messages are derived fromerr.Error(), which may be in English. For consistency and better user experience, consider using the same language for all messages.Option 1: Translate all error messages to Chinese.
Option 2: Change"未登录"to"Not Logged In"if the application is intended for an English-speaking audience.Example:
- c.JSON(http.StatusUnauthorized, gin.H{"error": "未登录"}) + c.JSON(http.StatusUnauthorized, gin.H{"error": "Not Logged In"})sh4ll0t/db/db.go (1)
52-69: Ensure consistent language in log messages and errors.The log messages and errors are in Chinese. For consistency and to cater to a wider audience, consider using English for all user-facing messages, or ensure they match the application's localization strategy.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
sh4ll0t/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sum
📒 Files selected for processing (20)
- sh4ll0t/api/admin/admin.go (1 hunks)
- sh4ll0t/api/admin/check_answer.go (1 hunks)
- sh4ll0t/api/admin/check_question.go (1 hunks)
- sh4ll0t/api/answer/answer.go (1 hunks)
- sh4ll0t/api/answer/change_answer.go (1 hunks)
- sh4ll0t/api/answer/delete_answer.go (1 hunks)
- sh4ll0t/api/question/ask.go (1 hunks)
- sh4ll0t/api/question/change_question.go (1 hunks)
- sh4ll0t/api/question/delete_question.go (1 hunks)
- sh4ll0t/api/user/like.go (1 hunks)
- sh4ll0t/api/user/login.go (1 hunks)
- sh4ll0t/api/user/logout.go (1 hunks)
- sh4ll0t/api/user/register.go (1 hunks)
- sh4ll0t/api/user/show_question_and_answer.go (1 hunks)
- sh4ll0t/api/user/sort_by_like.go (1 hunks)
- sh4ll0t/db/db.go (1 hunks)
- sh4ll0t/go.mod (1 hunks)
- sh4ll0t/main.go (1 hunks)
- sh4ll0t/router/router.go (1 hunks)
- sh4ll0t/utils/generateAIAnswer.go (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (19)
sh4ll0t/main.go (2)
1-6: LGTM: Package declaration and imports look good.The package declaration and imports are correctly set up. Good job on separating the routing logic into its own package, which promotes better code organization.
1-10: Overall, the main.go file is well-structured and follows good practices.The file correctly sets up the main package and delegates the application startup to a separate router package, promoting good code organization and separation of concerns.
While this file looks good, please ensure that the concerns mentioned in previous comments are addressed in other parts of the application, particularly in the router package:
- Avoid hardcoding sensitive information like database credentials.
- Implement proper access control for sensitive routes.
- Remove any unused variables in other files.
To verify these concerns, you can run the following script:
This script will help identify potential issues related to the previous comments in other parts of the codebase.
sh4ll0t/api/user/logout.go (1)
1-7: LGTM: Package declaration and imports are appropriate.The package name
useris suitable for user-related functionality, and the imports are relevant to the function's requirements, including session handling and HTTP responses.sh4ll0t/api/user/sort_by_like.go (1)
1-8: LGTM: Package declaration and imports are appropriate.The package name and imports are correctly defined and relevant to the function's purpose.
sh4ll0t/api/admin/admin.go (1)
1-9: LGTM: Package declaration and imports are appropriate.The package name and imports are well-suited for the functionality of this admin module. The use of the Gin framework, sessions, and custom packages from the
hduhelp_textmodule is consistent with the requirements of theAdminfunction.sh4ll0t/api/user/register.go (3)
3-9: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and well-organized.The imports cover all necessary functionalities for user registration, including HTTP handling (gin), password hashing (bcrypt), database operations (gorm), and custom database models. The import order follows Go conventions.
11-11: LGTM: Function signature is appropriate for a Gin HTTP handler.The
Registerfunction is correctly defined as an exported function that takes a*gin.Contextparameter, following Gin framework conventions for HTTP request handlers.
16-21: LGTM: Proper password hashing and error handling.The code correctly uses bcrypt for password hashing, which is a secure method. Error handling is in place, and the hashed password is properly stored in the user struct.
sh4ll0t/api/user/login.go (1)
1-9: LGTM: Package declaration and imports are appropriate.The package name and imports are well-chosen for the login functionality. All imported packages are utilized in the code.
sh4ll0t/api/answer/answer.go (1)
1-9: LGTM: Package declaration and imports are appropriate.The package name 'answer' and the imported packages are well-suited for the functionality of handling answer submissions. The use of the Gin framework and sessions is appropriate for web routing and user authentication.
sh4ll0t/api/user/show_question_and_answer.go (2)
1-8: LGTM: Package declaration and imports are appropriate.The package name and imports are well-chosen for the functionality provided. The use of a separate database package (
hduhelp_text/db) is a good practice for separation of concerns.
17-23: LGTM: Question struct is well-defined and comprehensive.The
Questionstruct effectively captures the essential information for a question, including its answers. The use of JSON tags is appropriate for API responses, and the field names are clear and descriptive. The inclusion ofAnswersas a slice ofAnswerstructs allows for multiple answers per question, which is a good design choice.sh4ll0t/api/question/change_question.go (2)
1-9: LGTM: Package declaration and imports are appropriate.The package name and imports are well-suited for the functionality of changing questions in a web application using the Gin framework.
1-38: Overall assessment: Good implementation with room for improvements.The
ChangeQuestionfunction provides a solid foundation for updating questions in your application. However, consider implementing the suggested improvements:
- Add logging for unauthorized access attempts.
- Implement input validation for question ID and text.
- Optimize to avoid unnecessary database writes.
- Return updated question data with the success message.
These changes will enhance security, efficiency, and the overall user experience of your application.
sh4ll0t/utils/generateAIAnswer.go (2)
3-9: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and concise.The imported packages are all relevant to the function's implementation, covering context management, formatting, and the volcengine SDK components needed for AI interaction.
11-11: LGTM: Function signature is well-defined and appropriate.The
GenerateAIAnswerfunction has a clear, descriptive name and appropriate parameter and return types. The inclusion of an error return allows for proper error handling by the caller.sh4ll0t/router/router.go (1)
3-11: LGTM: Imports are well-organized and relevant.The imports cover all necessary packages for the Gin framework, session management, and local API functionalities. The structure suggests a well-organized project with separate packages for different API components.
sh4ll0t/api/answer/change_answer.go (2)
12-15: Use appropriate HTTP status code for authentication failureWhen the user is not authenticated, you're correctly returning
http.StatusUnauthorized(401). This status code is appropriate for authentication failures.
16-17: Verify that form data is properly submittedEnsure that the client is sending the
idandAnswerfields as form data in a POST request. Misalignment between the client and server expectations can lead to issues.You can add logging or debug statements to confirm that these fields are received correctly.
| c.JSON(http.StatusOK, gin.H{"message": "登出成功"}) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Standardize success response format.
For consistency, consider using a standard response format for success messages.
Consider applying this change:
- c.JSON(http.StatusOK, gin.H{"message": "登出成功"})
+ c.JSON(http.StatusOK, gin.H{"status": "success", "message": "登出成功"})📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| c.JSON(http.StatusOK, gin.H{"message": "登出成功"}) | |
| } | |
| c.JSON(http.StatusOK, gin.H{"status": "success", "message": "登出成功"}) | |
| } |
| func Logout(c *gin.Context) { | ||
| session := sessions.Default(c) | ||
| session.Clear() | ||
| err := session.Save() | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| c.JSON(http.StatusOK, gin.H{"message": "登出失败"}) | ||
| return | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve error handling and message specificity.
While error handling is implemented, consider enhancing it:
- Log the error for debugging purposes.
- Provide a more specific error message to the client.
Consider applying this change:
func Logout(c *gin.Context) {
session := sessions.Default(c)
session.Clear()
err := session.Save()
if err != nil {
- c.JSON(http.StatusOK, gin.H{"message": "登出失败"})
+ c.JSON(http.StatusInternalServerError, gin.H{"error": "Failed to save session", "message": "登出失败"})
+ // TODO: Log the error for debugging
return
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| func Logout(c *gin.Context) { | |
| session := sessions.Default(c) | |
| session.Clear() | |
| err := session.Save() | |
| if err != nil { | |
| c.JSON(http.StatusOK, gin.H{"message": "登出失败"}) | |
| return | |
| } | |
| func Logout(c *gin.Context) { | |
| session := sessions.Default(c) | |
| session.Clear() | |
| err := session.Save() | |
| if err != nil { | |
| c.JSON(http.StatusInternalServerError, gin.H{"error": "Failed to save session", "message": "登出失败"}) | |
| // TODO: Log the error for debugging | |
| return | |
| } |
| c.JSON(http.StatusOK, questions) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance response handling with pagination and metadata.
Consider implementing pagination and including metadata in the response:
func LikeSort(c *gin.Context) {
// ... (previous code)
page, _ := strconv.Atoi(c.DefaultQuery("page", "1"))
pageSize, _ := strconv.Atoi(c.DefaultQuery("page_size", "10"))
var total int64
db.DB.Model(&db.Question{}).Where("check = 1").Count(&total)
offset := (page - 1) * pageSize
var questions []db.Question
if err := db.DB.Where("check = 1").Order("likes_count DESC").Offset(offset).Limit(pageSize).Find(&questions).Error; err != nil {
log.Printf("Database error: %v", err)
c.JSON(http.StatusInternalServerError, gin.H{"error": "An internal error occurred"})
return
}
c.JSON(http.StatusOK, gin.H{
"questions": questions,
"total": total,
"page": page,
"page_size": pageSize,
})
}This implementation adds pagination and includes metadata about the total number of questions and current page information.
sh4ll0t/api/user/sort_by_like.go
Outdated
| var questions []db.Question | ||
| if err := db.DB.Preload("Answers", "check = 1").Where("check = 1").Order("likes_count DESC").Find(&questions).Error; err != nil { | ||
| c.JSON(http.StatusInternalServerError, gin.H{"error": err.Error()}) | ||
| return | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Optimize database query and improve error handling.
- Consider removing the preloading of answers if they're not used in the response:
- if err := db.DB.Preload("Answers", "check = 1").Where("check = 1").Order("likes_count DESC").Find(&questions).Error; err != nil {
+ if err := db.DB.Where("check = 1").Order("likes_count DESC").Find(&questions).Error; err != nil {- Avoid exposing raw error messages to the client. Instead, log the error and return a generic message:
- c.JSON(http.StatusInternalServerError, gin.H{"error": err.Error()})
+ log.Printf("Database error: %v", err)
+ c.JSON(http.StatusInternalServerError, gin.H{"error": "An internal error occurred"})- Consider adding pagination to the query to handle large datasets efficiently.
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| func Like_sort(c *gin.Context) { | ||
| session := sessions.Default(c) | ||
| if auth, ok := session.Get("authenticated").(bool); !ok || !auth { | ||
| c.JSON(http.StatusUnauthorized, gin.H{"error": "未登录"}) | ||
| return | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve function naming and consider extracting authentication logic.
- Rename the function to follow Go naming conventions:
- func Like_sort(c *gin.Context) {
+ func LikeSort(c *gin.Context) {-
Consider extracting the authentication check into a middleware for better reusability across different handlers.
-
Use internationalization for error messages to support multiple languages.
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| Username string `gorm:"column:username"` | ||
| Password string `gorm:"column:password"` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hash passwords before storing them in the database.
Storing passwords in plain text is a serious security risk. It's important to hash passwords using a strong algorithm like bcrypt before saving them.
sh4ll0t/db/db.go
Outdated
| AnswerText string `gorm:"column:answer_text"` | ||
| Respondent string `gorm:"column:respondent"` | ||
| LikesCount int `gorm:"column:likes_count"` | ||
| QuestionID uint `gorm:"column:question_id;"` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove unnecessary semicolon in struct tag.
In the QuestionID field of the Answer struct, the GORM tag has an unnecessary semicolon at the end. This might cause issues with tag parsing.
Apply this diff to fix the tag:
QuestionID uint `gorm:"column:question_id;"`
-QuestionID uint `gorm:"column:question_id;"`
+QuestionID uint `gorm:"column:question_id"`📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| QuestionID uint `gorm:"column:question_id;"` | |
| QuestionID uint `gorm:"column:question_id"` |
| type User struct { | ||
| Username string `gorm:"column:username"` | ||
| Password string `gorm:"column:password"` | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add a primary key to the User struct.
The User struct lacks a primary key field, which is essential for database operations. Consider adding an ID field to uniquely identify each user.
Apply this diff to add an ID field:
type User struct {
+ ID uint `gorm:"column:id;primaryKey;autoIncrement"`
Username string `gorm:"column:username"`
Password string `gorm:"column:password"`
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| type User struct { | |
| Username string `gorm:"column:username"` | |
| Password string `gorm:"column:password"` | |
| } | |
| type User struct { | |
| ID uint `gorm:"column:id;primaryKey;autoIncrement"` | |
| Username string `gorm:"column:username"` | |
| Password string `gorm:"column:password"` | |
| } |
| var ( | ||
| dbHost = "127.0.0.1" | ||
| dbPort = "8888" | ||
| dbUser = "root" | ||
| dbName = "users" | ||
| dbPwd = "123456" | ||
| DB *gorm.DB | ||
| ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid hard-coded database credentials; use environment variables instead.
Hard-coding database credentials is insecure and can lead to credential leakage. Use environment variables or a secure configuration system to manage sensitive information.
[security_issue]
Apply this refactor to use environment variables:
var (
- dbHost = "127.0.0.1"
- dbPort = "8888"
- dbUser = "root"
- dbName = "users"
- dbPwd = "123456"
+ dbHost = os.Getenv("DB_HOST")
+ dbPort = os.Getenv("DB_PORT")
+ dbUser = os.Getenv("DB_USER")
+ dbName = os.Getenv("DB_NAME")
+ dbPwd = os.Getenv("DB_PASSWORD")
DB *gorm.DB
)Don't forget to import the os package:
import (
"fmt"
"gorm.io/driver/mysql"
"gorm.io/gorm"
"log"
+ "os"
)📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| var ( | |
| dbHost = "127.0.0.1" | |
| dbPort = "8888" | |
| dbUser = "root" | |
| dbName = "users" | |
| dbPwd = "123456" | |
| DB *gorm.DB | |
| ) | |
| var ( | |
| dbHost = os.Getenv("DB_HOST") | |
| dbPort = os.Getenv("DB_PORT") | |
| dbUser = os.Getenv("DB_USER") | |
| dbName = os.Getenv("DB_NAME") | |
| dbPwd = os.Getenv("DB_PASSWORD") | |
| DB *gorm.DB | |
| ) | |
| ``` | |
| Note: As mentioned in the review comment, don't forget to import the `os` package in the import section of the file: | |
| ```go | |
| import ( | |
| "fmt" | |
| "gorm.io/driver/mysql" | |
| "gorm.io/gorm" | |
| "log" | |
| "os" | |
| ) |
sh4ll0t/go.mod
Outdated
| require ( | ||
| github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-go/sdk/ai/azopenai v0.6.2 | ||
| github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-go/sdk/azcore v1.13.0 | ||
| github.com/gin-contrib/sessions v1.0.1 | ||
| github.com/gin-gonic/gin v1.10.0 | ||
| github.com/go-sql-driver/mysql v1.8.1 | ||
| github.com/spf13/viper v1.19.0 | ||
| ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider running go mod tidy to clean up unused dependencies
The go.mod file contains a large number of indirect dependencies. Running go mod tidy will remove unnecessary dependencies and ensure that only the required ones are listed, improving maintainability.
Also applies to: 16-72
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Combine the require blocks for better organization
Currently, there are two separate require blocks. Combining them into a single block enhances readability and maintains a cleaner go.mod file.
Apply this diff to combine the require blocks:
module hduhelp_text
go 1.21.0
toolchain go1.21.5
-require (
- github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-go/sdk/ai/azopenai v0.6.2
- github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-go/sdk/azcore v1.13.0
- github.com/gin-contrib/sessions v1.0.1
- github.com/gin-gonic/gin v1.10.0
- github.com/go-sql-driver/mysql v1.8.1
- github.com/spf13/viper v1.19.0
-)
+require (
+ github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-go/sdk/ai/azopenai v0.6.2
+ github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-go/sdk/azcore v1.13.0
+ github.com/gin-contrib/sessions v1.0.1
+ github.com/gin-gonic/gin v1.10.0
+ github.com/go-sql-driver/mysql v1.8.1
+ github.com/spf13/viper v1.19.0
+ filippo.io/edwards25519 v1.1.0 // indirect
+ github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-go/sdk/internal v1.10.0 // indirect
+ ... (other indirect dependencies)
+)
-require (
- filippo.io/edwards25519 v1.1.0 // indirect
- github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-go/sdk/internal v1.10.0 // indirect
- ... (other indirect dependencies)
-)Also applies to: 16-72
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
sh4ll0t/apidoc/apifox.md (1)
1-817: Overall API documentation review.The API documentation provides a comprehensive overview of the application's functionality. However, there are several areas where it can be improved:
Consistency: Ensure consistent use of language (English throughout) and response formats across all endpoints.
Security: Enhance security-related documentation, especially around authentication and admin access.
Pagination: Implement and document pagination for endpoints that may return large datasets.
Input Validation: Provide clear guidelines on input validation for all endpoints.
Error Handling: Standardize error response formats and provide more detailed error messages.
Versioning: Implement API versioning to facilitate future updates.
Organization: Reorganize the documentation into logical groups for better navigation.
Examples: Provide more comprehensive examples, including sample requests and responses for each endpoint.
Addressing these points will significantly improve the quality and usability of the API documentation.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- sh4ll0t/apidoc/apifox.md (1 hunks)
- sh4ll0t/router/router.go (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- sh4ll0t/router/router.go
🔇 Additional comments (1)
sh4ll0t/apidoc/apifox.md (1)
1-19: LGTM: Well-structured YAML front matter.The YAML front matter at the beginning of the file is well-structured and provides necessary metadata for the API documentation. It includes important details such as the title, supported programming languages, and generator information.
| # Authentication | ||
|
|
||
| # Default |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Authentication section needs expansion.
The authentication section is currently incomplete. It's crucial to provide detailed information about the authentication mechanisms used in the API, including:
- Supported authentication methods (e.g., JWT, OAuth2)
- How to obtain authentication tokens
- How to include authentication information in API requests
- Token expiration and refresh procedures
Consider expanding this section to ensure developers can properly implement authentication in their API integrations.
| ## POST 注册 | ||
|
|
||
| POST /api/user/register | ||
|
|
||
| 输入username ,password,并在sql数据库中查找是否有该账号 | ||
|
|
||
| > Body 请求参数 | ||
|
|
||
| ```yaml | ||
| username: test | ||
| password: test | ||
|
|
||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| ### 请求参数 | ||
|
|
||
| |名称|位置|类型|必选|说明| | ||
| |---|---|---|---|---| | ||
| |body|body|object| 否 |none| | ||
| |» username|body|string| 否 |none| | ||
| |» password|body|string| 否 |none| | ||
|
|
||
| > 返回示例 | ||
|
|
||
| ```json | ||
| { | ||
| "error": "用户名已存在" | ||
| } | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| ```json | ||
| { | ||
| "error": "注册失败" | ||
| } | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| ```json | ||
| { | ||
| "message": "注册成功" | ||
| } | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| ### 返回结果 | ||
|
|
||
| |状态码|状态码含义|说明|数据模型| | ||
| |---|---|---|---| | ||
| |200|[OK](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7231#section-6.3.1)|none|Inline| | ||
|
|
||
| ### 返回数据结构 | ||
|
|
||
| ## POST 登出 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve consistency and security in authentication endpoints.
-
Naming Conventions: The registration endpoint uses Chinese characters in its description, while others use English. Maintain consistency by using English throughout the documentation.
-
Response Structure: The login and registration endpoints have different response structures. Standardize the response format across all authentication-related endpoints for consistency.
-
Password Security: There's no mention of password hashing or minimum password requirements. Add a note about server-side password hashing and implement minimum password strength requirements.
-
Error Handling: Provide more specific error messages for different scenarios (e.g., user already exists, invalid password format) while being cautious not to reveal too much information that could be exploited.
-
Rate Limiting: Consider implementing and documenting rate limiting for these endpoints to prevent brute-force attacks.
Also applies to: 773-814, 80-100
| ## POST 提问 | ||
|
|
||
| POST /api/question | ||
|
|
||
| 需要登录，否则不能使用该api，需要传入question，本函数会插入问题，并记录提问者，同时会默认由ai 先产生一个回答，作为默认回答 | ||
|
|
||
| > Body 请求参数 | ||
|
|
||
| ```yaml | ||
| question: say"1" | ||
|
|
||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| ### 请求参数 | ||
|
|
||
| |名称|位置|类型|必选|说明| | ||
| |---|---|---|---|---| | ||
| |body|body|object| 否 |none| | ||
| |» question|body|string| 否 |none| | ||
|
|
||
| > 返回示例 | ||
|
|
||
| ```json | ||
| { | ||
| "message": "提问成功" | ||
| } | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| ```json | ||
| { | ||
| "error": "无法生成答案" | ||
| } | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| ```json | ||
| { | ||
| "error": "未登录" | ||
| } | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| ### 返回结果 | ||
|
|
||
| |状态码|状态码含义|说明|数据模型| | ||
| |---|---|---|---| | ||
| |200|[OK](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7231#section-6.3.1)|none|Inline| | ||
|
|
||
| ### 返回数据结构 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance consistency and clarity in Q&A management endpoints.
-
Authentication: Clearly specify the authentication mechanism required for these endpoints (e.g., "Requires a valid JWT token in the Authorization header").
-
Error Responses: Standardize error response formats across all endpoints. Currently, some use "error" key while others use "message" for error information.
-
Input Validation: Add information about input validation (e.g., maximum length for questions/answers, allowed characters) to help clients prepare valid requests.
-
Pagination: For the endpoint that retrieves questions and answers, consider implementing and documenting pagination to handle large datasets efficiently.
-
Versioning: Consider adding API versioning information to each endpoint (e.g., /api/v1/question) to facilitate future updates without breaking existing integrations.
-
CRUD Operations: The CRUD operations (Create, Read, Update, Delete) for questions and answers are well-covered. However, consider grouping these operations together in the documentation for better readability.
Also applies to: 150-198, 534-588, 590-638, 640-692, 694-746, 246-308
| ## GET 管理员查看所有未审核的问题和回答 | ||
|
|
||
| GET /api/admin | ||
|
|
||
| 只有登录并且用户名为admin 的用户才能查看，会显示所有问题和答案，不管审核还是未审核 | ||
|
|
||
| > 返回示例 | ||
|
|
||
| ```json | ||
| [ | ||
| { | ||
| "id": 1, | ||
| "question_text": "what is hduhelp", | ||
| "total_likes": 1, | ||
| "answers": [ | ||
| { | ||
| "answer_id": 1, | ||
| "answer_text": "HDUhelp could refer to different things depending on the context.\n\nIn the context of Hangzhou Dianzi University (HDU), it might be some kind of assistance or support related to the university. For example, it could be an online platform, a student - run help service, or an internal system within the university designed to provide help with various aspects such as academic support (course - related questions, study resources), campus life guidance (dormitory issues, campus facilities), or administrative assistance.\n\nIt could also potentially be the name of a self - developed software or service by HDU students or faculty for the benefit of the HDU community.", | ||
| "respondent": "ai", | ||
| "likes_count": 1 | ||
| } | ||
| ], | ||
| "questioner": "111" | ||
| } | ||
| ] | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| ```json | ||
| { | ||
| "error": "未登录" | ||
| } | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| ```json | ||
| { | ||
| "error": "管理员才可以访问！" | ||
| } | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| ```json | ||
| { | ||
| "error": "err.Error()" | ||
| } | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| ### 返回结果 | ||
|
|
||
| |状态码|状态码含义|说明|数据模型| | ||
| |---|---|---|---| | ||
| |200|[OK](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7231#section-6.3.1)|none|Inline| | ||
|
|
||
| ### 返回数据结构 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve security and flexibility of admin endpoints.
-
Admin Authentication: Clearly document how admin status is determined and authenticated. Consider using role-based access control (RBAC) instead of username-based admin checks.
-
Approval Process: The current binary approval system (1 for approve) is limiting. Consider expanding this to allow for more states (e.g., approved, rejected, needs_revision) to provide more flexibility in content moderation.
-
Audit Trail: For admin actions, especially approvals/rejections, consider adding fields to record who performed the action and when. This creates an audit trail for accountability.
-
Batch Operations: For efficiency, consider adding endpoints that allow batch approval/rejection of multiple questions or answers at once.
-
Pagination and Filtering: For the endpoint that retrieves all questions and answers for admin review, implement pagination and filtering options to manage large datasets effectively.
Also applies to: 363-417, 419-479
| ## POST 点赞 | ||
|
|
||
| POST /api/user/like | ||
|
|
||
| 需要登录，否则不能使用该api，传入要点点赞的答案id，完成点赞功能 | ||
|
|
||
| > Body 请求参数 | ||
|
|
||
| ```yaml | ||
| id: "1" | ||
|
|
||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| ### 请求参数 | ||
|
|
||
| |名称|位置|类型|必选|说明| | ||
| |---|---|---|---|---| | ||
| |body|body|object| 否 |none| | ||
| |» id|body|string| 否 |none| | ||
|
|
||
| > 返回示例 | ||
|
|
||
| ```json | ||
| "{\n \"message\": \"点赞成功\"\n}\n{\"likes_count\": count}" | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| ```json | ||
| { | ||
| "error": "err" | ||
| } | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| ```json | ||
| { | ||
| "error": "未登录" | ||
| } | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| ### 返回结果 | ||
|
|
||
| |状态码|状态码含义|说明|数据模型| | ||
| |---|---|---|---| | ||
| |200|[OK](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7231#section-6.3.1)|none|Inline| | ||
|
|
||
| ### 返回数据结构 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance user engagement features and improve overall structure.
-
Like Feature: The like functionality is a good addition. Consider adding an unlike option and possibly a way to view who liked an answer (if privacy allows).
-
Sorting: The sorting endpoint is useful. Consider expanding sorting options (e.g., most recent, most answered) and allow clients to specify ascending or descending order.
-
Main Interface: The description of the main interface is too brief. Provide more details about what users can expect to see and do on the main page.
-
API Structure: Consider reorganizing the endpoints into logical groups (e.g., User Management, Question Management, Answer Management, Admin Operations) for better readability and easier navigation of the documentation.
-
Rate Limiting: Implement and document rate limiting for all endpoints to prevent abuse and ensure fair usage of the API.
-
Webhooks: Consider implementing webhooks for real-time notifications of new questions, answers, or other relevant events.
-
API Versioning: Implement API versioning (e.g., /api/v1/) to allow for future updates without breaking existing integrations.
Also applies to: 481-532, 748-768
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 14
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
sh4ll0t/api/answer/search_answer.go (1)
1-37: Summary: New search functionality implemented with areas for improvement.The new
search_answer.gofile introduces a search functionality for answers and associated questions. While the implementation is functional, several improvements have been suggested:
- Enhance security by using parameterized queries.
- Improve error handling and client-facing error messages.
- Handle edge cases, such as when questions are not found for matching answers.
- Optimize performance by limiting result sets and improving slice allocation.
Please review the suggested changes and update the code accordingly. These improvements will make the search functionality more robust, secure, and efficient.
sh4ll0t/api/question/search_question.go (2)
15-15: Ensure consistent error handlingThere's an inconsistency in how errors are handled:
- At line 15, the error is returned as
err.- At line 24, the error is returned as
err.Error().Make sure to handle errors consistently throughout the code.
Also applies to: 24-24
10-10: Consider using GET request for search functionalityUsing a POST request for searching is unconventional. Typically, GET requests are used for retrieving data. Consider changing the request method to GET and accepting the search query as a URL query parameter.
Apply this diff to adjust the request method:
-func SearchQuestion(c *gin.Context) { - question := c.PostForm("question") +func SearchQuestion(c *gin.Context) { + question := c.Query("question")Update any associated route definitions to accept GET requests.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- sh4ll0t/api/answer/search_answer.go (1 hunks)
- sh4ll0t/api/question/search_question.go (1 hunks)
- sh4ll0t/api/user/search_user.go (1 hunks)
- sh4ll0t/db/db.go (1 hunks)
- sh4ll0t/router/router.go (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- sh4ll0t/db/db.go
- sh4ll0t/router/router.go
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (3)
sh4ll0t/api/answer/search_answer.go (1)
1-7: LGTM: Package declaration and imports are appropriate.The package name "answer" aligns with the file's functionality, and the imports are relevant and used within the code.
sh4ll0t/api/user/search_user.go (2)
49-49: Ensure thatquestionsis properly populated before respondingBefore returning
questionsin the JSON response, verify that it has been populated correctly. Ifquestionsis empty, the client may receive an empty response without any indication. Consider adding a check and returning an appropriate message.
37-38:⚠️ Potential issueEnsure logical grouping in query conditions
When using
WhereandOrin your query, the conditions might not be grouped as intended, potentially leading to unexpected results. Consider using parentheses to group your conditions properly to ensure the SQL query behaves as expected.Consider rewriting the query to explicitly group conditions:
err = db.DB.Preload("Answers", "`check` = ?", 1). Where("(`id` IN ? OR `id` IN ?) AND `check` = ?", append(questionIDs, answerIDs...), 1). Find(&questions).Error
| func SearchAnswer(c *gin.Context) { | ||
| answer := c.PostForm("answer") | ||
| var answers []db.Answer | ||
| var questions []db.Question | ||
| err := db.DB.Where("answer_text LIKE ? AND `check` = ?", "%"+answer+"%", 1).Find(&answers).Error | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| c.JSON(http.StatusInternalServerError, gin.H{"error": err}) | ||
| return | ||
| } | ||
| if len(answers) == 0 { | ||
| c.JSON(http.StatusNotFound, gin.H{"message": "未查询到相关答案"}) | ||
| return | ||
| } | ||
| err = db.DB.Preload("Answers").Where("id IN ?", getQuestionIDs(answers)).Find(&questions).Error | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| c.JSON(http.StatusInternalServerError, gin.H{"error": err.Error()}) | ||
| return | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| c.JSON(http.StatusOK, questions) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve security, error handling, and performance in SearchAnswer function.
While the overall structure is good, there are several areas for improvement:
- SQL Injection vulnerability: Replace string concatenation with parameterized queries.
- Error handling: Avoid exposing internal error details to clients.
- Edge case handling: Handle the scenario where questions are not found after finding answers.
- Performance: Consider limiting the number of results returned.
Here's a suggested refactor:
func SearchAnswer(c *gin.Context) {
answer := c.PostForm("answer")
var answers []db.Answer
var questions []db.Question
// Use parameterized query to prevent SQL injection
err := db.DB.Where("answer_text LIKE ? AND `check` = ?", "%"+answer+"%", 1).Limit(100).Find(&answers).Error
if err != nil {
c.JSON(http.StatusInternalServerError, gin.H{"error": "Internal server error"})
return
}
if len(answers) == 0 {
c.JSON(http.StatusNotFound, gin.H{"message": "未查询到相关答案"})
return
}
err = db.DB.Preload("Answers").Where("id IN ?", getQuestionIDs(answers)).Limit(100).Find(&questions).Error
if err != nil {
c.JSON(http.StatusInternalServerError, gin.H{"error": "Internal server error"})
return
}
if len(questions) == 0 {
c.JSON(http.StatusNotFound, gin.H{"message": "未查询到相关问题"})
return
}
c.JSON(http.StatusOK, questions)
}This refactored version addresses the identified issues and improves the overall robustness of the function.
| func getQuestionIDs(answers []db.Answer) []uint { | ||
| var ids []uint | ||
| for _, answer := range answers { | ||
| ids = append(ids, answer.QuestionID) | ||
| } | ||
| return ids | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Optimize getQuestionIDs function for better performance.
The function correctly extracts question IDs, but its efficiency can be improved by pre-allocating the slice.
Consider this optimized version:
func getQuestionIDs(answers []db.Answer) []uint {
ids := make([]uint, 0, len(answers))
for _, answer := range answers {
ids = append(ids, answer.QuestionID)
}
return ids
}This change pre-allocates the slice with the expected capacity, reducing the number of potential memory allocations and improving performance, especially for larger datasets.
| var question []db.Question | ||
| var questions []db.Question |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Clarify variable names to improve readability
The variables question and questions are both slices of db.Question, which can be confusing. Consider renaming them to more descriptive names, such as userQuestions and resultQuestions, to improve code clarity.
| if len(question) == 0 { | ||
| c.JSON(http.StatusNotFound, gin.H{"message": "未查询到此用户"}) | ||
| return | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Check correct variable when determining if no data was found
Currently, you're checking len(question) == 0 to determine if no data was found. However, this only checks the questions asked by the user, not the answers they've provided. Consider checking if both len(question) == 0 and len(answers) == 0, or if len(questions) == 0 after combining the results, to provide accurate feedback.
| err := db.DB.Where("questioner = ? AND `check` = ?", username, 1).Find(&question).Error | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| c.JSON(http.StatusInternalServerError, gin.H{"error": err.Error()}) | ||
| return | ||
| } | ||
| err = db.DB.Where("respondent = ? AND `check` = ?", username, 1).Find(&answers).Error | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| c.JSON(http.StatusInternalServerError, gin.H{"error": err.Error()}) | ||
| return | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Reduce duplicated database query code
The database queries for questions and answers are similar. Consider abstracting the common functionality into a helper function to reduce code duplication and improve maintainability.
| if auth, ok := session.Get("authenticated").(bool); !ok || !auth { | ||
| c.JSON(http.StatusUnauthorized, gin.H{"error": "未登录"}) | ||
| return | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure safe type assertion for session values
While you're using type assertion for the authenticated session value, if the value is nil or not a boolean, it could cause a panic. Consider checking for the existence of the key before asserting its type.
Modify the code to ensure safe type assertion:
authValue := session.Get("authenticated")
auth, ok := authValue.(bool)
if !ok || !auth {
c.JSON(http.StatusUnauthorized, gin.H{"error": "未登录"})
return
}| if err != nil { | ||
| c.JSON(http.StatusInternalServerError, gin.H{"error": err}) | ||
| return | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Prevent exposing internal errors to clients
Returning internal error messages to the client can expose sensitive information. Instead, log the error internally and return a generic error message to the client.
Apply this diff to handle errors securely:
import (
"github.com/gin-gonic/gin"
+ "log"
"net/http"
"sh4ll0t/db"
)
if err != nil {
- c.JSON(http.StatusInternalServerError, gin.H{"error": err})
+ log.Println("Error querying questions:", err)
+ c.JSON(http.StatusInternalServerError, gin.H{"error": "Internal server error"})
return
}
...
if err != nil {
- c.JSON(http.StatusInternalServerError, gin.H{"error": err.Error()})
+ log.Println("Error fetching questions with answers:", err)
+ c.JSON(http.StatusInternalServerError, gin.H{"error": "Internal server error"})
return
}Ensure to import the log package for logging purposes.
Also applies to: 23-26
| question := c.PostForm("question") | ||
| var Question []db.Question | ||
| var questions []db.Question | ||
| err := db.DB.Where("question_text LIKE ? AND `check` = ?", "%"+question+"%", 1).Find(&Question).Error |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Potential performance issue with wildcard search
Using LIKE '%query%' in SQL queries can be inefficient on large datasets because it prevents the use of indexes. Consider implementing full-text search capabilities or using an external search engine to improve query performance.
| var Question []db.Question | ||
| var questions []db.Question |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid confusing variable names: 'Question' and 'questions'
Using variable names that differ only in capitalization can lead to confusion and potential errors. Consider renaming the variables to be more descriptive and distinct.
Apply this diff to improve clarity:
-var Question []db.Question
-var questions []db.Question
+var matchedQuestions []db.Question
+var questionsWithAnswers []db.Question📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| var Question []db.Question | |
| var questions []db.Question | |
| var matchedQuestions []db.Question | |
| var questionsWithAnswers []db.Question |
| func getIDs(questions []db.Question) []uint { | ||
| var ids []uint | ||
| for _, question := range questions { | ||
| ids = append(ids, question.ID) | ||
| } | ||
| return ids | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify the getIDs function
The getIDs function can be made more efficient and concise by preallocating the slice and using a simple loop.
Apply this diff to optimize the function:
func getIDs(questions []db.Question) []uint {
- var ids []uint
- for _, question := range questions {
- ids = append(ids, question.ID)
+ ids := make([]uint, len(questions))
+ for i, question := range questions {
+ ids[i] = question.ID
}
return ids
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| func getIDs(questions []db.Question) []uint { | |
| var ids []uint | |
| for _, question := range questions { | |
| ids = append(ids, question.ID) | |
| } | |
| return ids | |
| } | |
| func getIDs(questions []db.Question) []uint { | |
| ids := make([]uint, len(questions)) | |
| for i, question := range questions { | |
| ids[i] = question.ID | |
| } | |
| return ids | |
| } |
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
User Interface
index.html), login page (login.html), and registration page (register.html) with user-friendly designs.Documentation
prepare.md) outlining system functionalities and enhancements.apifox.md) for developers integrating with the API.These updates enhance user engagement and streamline interactions within the platform.