Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix duplicate power sensors for Matter 1.3 powerplugs #126269

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: dev
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

marcelveldt
Copy link
Member

Proposed change

We have added support for the new Matter 1.3 ElectricalPower/ElectricalEnergy clusters (for native power measurements on e.g. powerplugs) a few weeks back and added a bit of logic to prevent discovery of the old (custom cluster) attributes.

There was however a small oversight (I now realize with an actual device to test with), which is that the new attributes are not on the same endpoint so the check fails and you have duplicate attributes.

This adds support for "absent_clusters" to the discovery schema where you can give a set of clusters that need to be absent (on all endpoints) before an attribute can be discovered. I adjusted the discovery schemas of the custom attributes.

Tested with an Eve plug updated to 3.5.0 (Matter 1.3) and its now working well. No more duplicate entities.
Only downside is that the user has to cleanup the old orphaned entities but we also marked that as breaking issue in the previous PR.

Updated the test fixture as well.

Type of change

  • Dependency upgrade
  • Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New integration (thank you!)
  • New feature (which adds functionality to an existing integration)
  • Deprecation (breaking change to happen in the future)
  • Breaking change (fix/feature causing existing functionality to break)
  • Code quality improvements to existing code or addition of tests

Additional information

  • This PR fixes or closes issue: fixes #
  • This PR is related to issue:
  • Link to documentation pull request:

Checklist

  • The code change is tested and works locally.
  • Local tests pass. Your PR cannot be merged unless tests pass
  • There is no commented out code in this PR.
  • I have followed the development checklist
  • I have followed the perfect PR recommendations
  • The code has been formatted using Ruff (ruff format homeassistant tests)
  • Tests have been added to verify that the new code works.

If user exposed functionality or configuration variables are added/changed:

If the code communicates with devices, web services, or third-party tools:

  • The manifest file has all fields filled out correctly.
    Updated and included derived files by running: python3 -m script.hassfest.
  • New or updated dependencies have been added to requirements_all.txt.
    Updated by running python3 -m script.gen_requirements_all.
  • For the updated dependencies - a link to the changelog, or at minimum a diff between library versions is added to the PR description.

To help with the load of incoming pull requests:

@home-assistant
Copy link

Hey there @home-assistant/matter, mind taking a look at this pull request as it has been labeled with an integration (matter) you are listed as a code owner for? Thanks!

Code owner commands

Code owners of matter can trigger bot actions by commenting:

  • @home-assistant close Closes the pull request.
  • @home-assistant rename Awesome new title Renames the pull request.
  • @home-assistant reopen Reopen the pull request.
  • @home-assistant unassign matter Removes the current integration label and assignees on the pull request, add the integration domain after the command.
  • @home-assistant add-label needs-more-information Add a label (needs-more-information, problem in dependency, problem in custom component) to the pull request.
  • @home-assistant remove-label needs-more-information Remove a label (needs-more-information, problem in dependency, problem in custom component) on the pull request.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant