[EN] HassGetState optimizations

[tetele]

Apart from optimizing the sentences for HassGetState a bit, I've also introduced a new set of sentences specifically for querying lights.

Is the light off in the kitchen usually means asking if all of the lights are off.

Inspired by #2218

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Enhanced querying capabilities for Home Assistant entity states, including specific areas like the bedroom and kitchen.
  • Added new sentence structures for more detailed and varied queries.

• Refactor

  • Improved clarity and coverage of existing sentence structures for querying entity states.

• Tests

  • Added and refined test queries for specific devices and areas to ensure accurate responses.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The recent updates to the Home Assistant HassGetState intent involve enhancing the sentence structures and responses for querying the state of various entities. The changes focus on improving the clarity and coverage of queries related to specific devices in different areas, such as the bedroom and kitchen. This includes refined queries for specific devices and detailed responses based on the state of the queried entities.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
sentences/en/homeassistant_HassGetState.yaml	Added new sentence structures for querying entity states, modified responses, updated slots, and refactored existing structures.
tests/en/homeassistant_HassGetState.yaml	Added and refined queries for specific devices and areas, enhanced responses for state queries.

Sequence Diagram(s) (Beta)

No sequence diagrams are necessary for these changes, as they primarily involve updates to sentence structures and responses without altering control flows or introducing new features.

---

Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 59de8eb and d40f394.

Files selected for processing (2)

• sentences/en/homeassistant_HassGetState.yaml (1 hunks)
• tests/en/homeassistant_HassGetState.yaml (4 hunks)

Additional comments not posted (12)

sentences/en/homeassistant_HassGetState.yaml (6)

6-12: LGTM! The added sentences enhance the flexibility of queries for entity states.

---

15-18: LGTM! The modifications here support a broader range of queries for entity states, improving user interaction.

---

21-25: The addition of light-specific queries under the all response category is a good enhancement, aligning with the PR's objectives to better handle light-related queries.

---

29-37: LGTM! These changes introduce more detailed queries for specific devices and areas, improving the granularity of information retrieval.

---

48-53: The modifications to the one_yesno response type are well-aligned with the PR's objectives. However, ensure that the exclusion of the cover domain is justified.

Verification successful

---

The search for dependencies on the cover domain in other intents did not produce any results. This indicates that the exclusion of the cover domain in the one_yesno response type does not affect other necessary functionalities.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the exclusion of the `cover` domain does not affect other necessary functionalities.

# Test: Search for any dependencies on the `cover` domain in other intents.
rg --type yaml $'domain:\n  - cover' sentences/en/homeassistant_*.yaml

Length of output: 745

---

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the exclusion of the `cover` domain does not affect other necessary functionalities.

# Test: Search for any dependencies on the `cover` domain in other intents using multiline mode.
rg --multiline --type yaml $'domain:\n  - cover' sentences/en/homeassistant_*.yaml

Length of output: 565

---

41-47: The addition of a new query format for general state inquiries is a good enhancement. However, ensure that the exclusion of scene and script domains does not inadvertently limit necessary functionality.

Verification successful

---

The search did not return any results, indicating that there are no other dependencies on the scene and script domains in the specified YAML files. This suggests that the exclusion of these domains in the new query format should not inadvertently limit necessary functionality.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the exclusion of `scene` and `script` domains does not affect other necessary functionalities.

# Test: Search for any dependencies on `scene` and `script` domains in other intents.
rg --type yaml $'domain:\n  - scene\n  - script' sentences/en/homeassistant_*.yaml

Length of output: 756

---

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the exclusion of `scene` and `script` domains does not affect other necessary functionalities.

# Test: Search for any dependencies on `scene` and `script` domains in other intents with multiline mode enabled.
rg --multiline --type yaml $'domain:\n  - scene\n  - script' sentences/en/homeassistant_*.yaml

Length of output: 576

tests/en/homeassistant_HassGetState.yaml (6)

21-30: The addition of area-specific queries in the test cases is a good enhancement, ensuring that the new functionality is properly covered.

---

31-40: LGTM! These test cases validate the functionality of querying switches' states, ensuring that the new sentences are effectively tested.

---

64-74: The test cases for checking all switches in a specific area like the bedroom are well thought out and align with the new sentence structures.

---

85-97: The detailed test cases for light states in the kitchen ensure that the new functionality for querying light states is thoroughly tested.

---

107-117: These test cases for querying which lights are on in the kitchen are crucial for verifying the new functionality. Good coverage!

---

127-137: The test cases for counting lights in a specific area like the kitchen are well-aligned with the new functionality and ensure that the feature works as expected.

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[ViViDboarder]

I have a branch where I'm looking to condense some of these common patterns in _common.yaml. For example (is|are [there]) is something that is likely useful for any any query. If more is added in common expansions and they are used more, every intent will benefit from expanded sentence structures.

I can rebase my proposal on this regardless and submit that elsewhere, but I thought I'd at least float it since you're making a bigger change to this file anyway.

[tetele]

There are other HassGetState files where your modification would be needed (e.g. binary_sensor_HassGetState), so that's probably a good starting point for a refactoring PR that is not directly tied to this.