-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 649
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Create addon boot failed issue for repair #5397
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@ | ||
"""Helpers to fix addon by disabling boot.""" | ||
|
||
import logging | ||
|
||
from ...const import AddonBoot | ||
from ...coresys import CoreSys | ||
from ..const import ContextType, IssueType, SuggestionType | ||
from .base import FixupBase | ||
|
||
_LOGGER: logging.Logger = logging.getLogger(__name__) | ||
|
||
|
||
def setup(coresys: CoreSys) -> FixupBase: | ||
"""Check setup function.""" | ||
return FixupAddonDisableBoot(coresys) | ||
|
||
|
||
class FixupAddonDisableBoot(FixupBase): | ||
"""Storage class for fixup.""" | ||
|
||
async def process_fixup(self, reference: str | None = None) -> None: | ||
"""Initialize the fixup class.""" | ||
if not (addon := self.sys_addons.get(reference, local_only=True)): | ||
_LOGGER.info("Cannot change addon %s as it does not exist", reference) | ||
return | ||
|
||
# Disable boot on addon | ||
addon.boot = AddonBoot.MANUAL | ||
|
||
mdegat01 marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
@property | ||
def suggestion(self) -> SuggestionType: | ||
"""Return a SuggestionType enum.""" | ||
return SuggestionType.DISABLE_BOOT | ||
|
||
@property | ||
def context(self) -> ContextType: | ||
"""Return a ContextType enum.""" | ||
return ContextType.ADDON | ||
|
||
@property | ||
def issues(self) -> list[IssueType]: | ||
"""Return a IssueType enum list.""" | ||
return [IssueType.BOOT_FAIL] | ||
|
||
@property | ||
def auto(self) -> bool: | ||
"""Return if a fixup can be apply as auto fix.""" | ||
return False |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@ | ||
"""Helpers to fix addon by starting it.""" | ||
|
||
import logging | ||
|
||
from ...const import AddonState | ||
from ...coresys import CoreSys | ||
from ...exceptions import AddonsError, ResolutionFixupError | ||
from ..const import ContextType, IssueType, SuggestionType | ||
from .base import FixupBase | ||
|
||
_LOGGER: logging.Logger = logging.getLogger(__name__) | ||
|
||
|
||
def setup(coresys: CoreSys) -> FixupBase: | ||
"""Check setup function.""" | ||
return FixupAddonExecuteStart(coresys) | ||
|
||
|
||
class FixupAddonExecuteStart(FixupBase): | ||
"""Storage class for fixup.""" | ||
|
||
async def process_fixup(self, reference: str | None = None) -> None: | ||
"""Initialize the fixup class.""" | ||
if not (addon := self.sys_addons.get(reference, local_only=True)): | ||
_LOGGER.info("Cannot start addon %s as it does not exist", reference) | ||
return | ||
|
||
mdegat01 marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
# Start addon | ||
try: | ||
start_task = await addon.start() | ||
except AddonsError as err: | ||
_LOGGER.error("Could not start %s due to %s", reference, err) | ||
raise ResolutionFixupError() from None | ||
|
||
# Wait for addon start. If it ends up in error or unknown state it's not fixed | ||
await start_task | ||
if addon.state in {AddonState.ERROR, AddonState.UNKNOWN}: | ||
_LOGGER.error("Addon %s could not start successfully", reference) | ||
raise ResolutionFixupError() | ||
|
||
mdegat01 marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
@property | ||
def suggestion(self) -> SuggestionType: | ||
"""Return a SuggestionType enum.""" | ||
return SuggestionType.EXECUTE_START | ||
|
||
@property | ||
def context(self) -> ContextType: | ||
"""Return a ContextType enum.""" | ||
return ContextType.ADDON | ||
|
||
@property | ||
def issues(self) -> list[IssueType]: | ||
"""Return a IssueType enum list.""" | ||
return [IssueType.BOOT_FAIL] | ||
|
||
@property | ||
def auto(self) -> bool: | ||
"""Return if a fixup can be apply as auto fix.""" | ||
return False |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Calling
boot_failed_issue
will lead to a new object created, is there maybe a better way to check for this issue type?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I followed the same pattern we had used in
Mounts
. But yea I guess I could cache the object for reuse? The only weird part of that would be the UUID would always be identical each time the property was accessed but I guess that's not really a big deal, we don't use that for anything other then referencing it in the API anyway.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah it does feel weird to me to create an object just to check if it's in there. But since we use that pattern already, let's go with that for now.
Maybe worth a follow up which does this a bit more efficient.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok fixed it in both places. Issue is created on initialization and reused. When actually added to the resolution center we clone it first. I don't think the UUID sharing thing is an issue but just in case. That's the only time we kind of want a new object.