Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

HPCC-30787 #19168

Draft
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

HPCC-30787 #19168

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

jackdelv
Copy link
Contributor

@jackdelv jackdelv commented Oct 1, 2024

Type of change:

  • This change is a bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue).
  • This change is a new feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality).
  • This change improves the code (refactor or other change that does not change the functionality)
  • This change fixes warnings (the fix does not alter the functionality or the generated code)
  • This change is a breaking change (fix or feature that will cause existing behavior to change).
  • This change alters the query API (existing queries will have to be recompiled)

Checklist:

  • My code follows the code style of this project.
    • My code does not create any new warnings from compiler, build system, or lint.
  • The commit message is properly formatted and free of typos.
    • The commit message title makes sense in a changelog, by itself.
    • The commit is signed.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
    • I have updated the documentation accordingly, or...
    • I have created a JIRA ticket to update the documentation.
    • Any new interfaces or exported functions are appropriately commented.
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTORS document.
  • The change has been fully tested:
    • I have added tests to cover my changes.
    • All new and existing tests passed.
    • I have checked that this change does not introduce memory leaks.
    • I have used Valgrind or similar tools to check for potential issues.
  • I have given due consideration to all of the following potential concerns:
    • Scalability
    • Performance
    • Security
    • Thread-safety
    • Cloud-compatibility
    • Premature optimization
    • Existing deployed queries will not be broken
    • This change fixes the problem, not just the symptom
    • The target branch of this pull request is appropriate for such a change.
  • There are no similar instances of the same problem that should be addressed
    • I have addressed them here
    • I have raised JIRA issues to address them separately
  • This is a user interface / front-end modification
    • I have tested my changes in multiple modern browsers
    • The component(s) render as expected

Smoketest:

  • Send notifications about my Pull Request position in Smoketest queue.
  • Test my draft Pull Request.

Testing:

ghalliday and others added 3 commits August 7, 2024 16:27
ILogicalRowStream - a stream of logical records with different functions to call depending on whether the target is a roxie row or something else.   Possibly rename to ILogicalRowStream

ILogicalRowSink - a sink for a stream of records which may or may not be linked

IDiskRowReader - class for managing a reader which wraps a logical row stream coming from disk

IDiskRowWriter - class for managing a writer to disk (including filenames etc)

Signed-off-by: Gavin Halliday <[email protected]>
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 1, 2024

Jira Issue: https://hpccsystems.atlassian.net//browse/HPCC-30775

Jirabot Action Result:
Workflow Transition To: Merge Pending
Updated PR

@jackdelv jackdelv changed the title HPCC-30775 HPCC-30787 Oct 1, 2024
@jackdelv
Copy link
Contributor Author

jackdelv commented Oct 1, 2024

@ghalliday I added a CHThorGenericDiskWriteActivity/BaseActivity that calls into a BinaryDiskRowWriter. I got it to call into the new generic write functions, but it doesn't do anything at the moment.

I am not sure what information is available (file location, file type, etc) or how to access it. It is still using the current IHThorDiskWriteArg and I'm not sure if there should be a new interface defined. I didn't know of a way to turn on generic writing, so I had to force it on in createActivity.

Is this on the right track?

Copy link
Contributor

@dcamper dcamper left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not knowledgeable enough to comment on the implementation, but the overall code looks good to my untrained eye. Gavin will provide much better feedback.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants