Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert #50 #175

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 14, 2023
Merged

Revert #50 #175

merged 2 commits into from
May 14, 2023

Conversation

rossabaker
Copy link
Member

This uses the implementations prior to #50. Those were cleaner, but less performant (#171), and misused the parallel dispatcher (#172).

I find these implementations much harder to reason about correctness, but there is more empirical evidence of correctness. Or at least no empirical evidence of incorrectness.

@TimWSpence
Copy link

Thanks for your hard work on this Ross!

@rossabaker
Copy link
Member Author

Reopening to see build error. It works locally.

@rossabaker rossabaker closed this May 14, 2023
@rossabaker rossabaker reopened this May 14, 2023
@rossabaker
Copy link
Member Author

I don't know why I still see stale builds. I'm just going to rebase.

@rossabaker rossabaker added this to the 0.23.14 milestone May 14, 2023
@rossabaker rossabaker merged commit de2dc5e into series/0.23 May 14, 2023
@rossabaker rossabaker deleted the revert-50 branch June 6, 2024 17:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants