Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(hydroflow_plus): adjust default features to allow compilation to musl targets #1464

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 24, 2024

Conversation

shadaj
Copy link
Member

@shadaj shadaj commented Sep 23, 2024

Previously, the default deploy feature would pull in Hydro Deploy and its transitive native dependencies.

Also sets up examples/paxos.rs with CLI flags to deploy to GCP.

Copy link

cloudflare-workers-and-pages bot commented Sep 23, 2024

Deploying hydroflow with  Cloudflare Pages  Cloudflare Pages

Latest commit: c6107f4
Status: ✅  Deploy successful!
Preview URL: https://96063739.hydroflow.pages.dev
Branch Preview URL: https://pr1464.hydroflow.pages.dev

View logs

@@ -16,7 +16,4 @@
"files.watcherExclude": {
"**/target": true
},
"rust-analyzer.cargo.features": [
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Latest Rust Analyzer update complains about python not being a recognized feature on some crates.

…musl targets

Previously, the default `deploy` feature would pull in Hydro Deploy and its transitive native dependencies.

Also sets up `examples/paxos.rs` with CLI flags to deploy to GCP.
Copy link
Member

@MingweiSamuel MingweiSamuel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What is musl compilation for?

@shadaj
Copy link
Member Author

shadaj commented Sep 24, 2024

What is musl compilation for?

When we deploy to GCP (or any remote host), we compile to musl to avoid glibc conflicts.

@shadaj shadaj merged commit 87a6834 into main Sep 24, 2024
29 checks passed
@shadaj shadaj deleted the pr1464 branch September 24, 2024 20:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants