[WIP] Use bccsp instead of directly idemix #374
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Part I: Migration and tests in lib/server/idemix work. Signed-off-by: Alessandro Sorniotti <[email protected]>
Part II: Migration and tests in lib/client/credential/idemix/ work Signed-off-by: Alessandro Sorniotti <[email protected]>
ale-linux
force-pushed
the
no_direct_idemix
branch
from
e0dd8ed
to
2c14ec5
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Part I: Migration and tests in lib/server/idemix work.
fabric-ca's usage of the idemix package(s) is incorrect. Instead of relying on the bccsp abstraction, it makes direct use of the low-level API and so makes it hard to switch implementations.
Type of change
Improvement (improvement to code, performance, etc)
Description
This PR switches to using idemix's bccsp abstraction.