Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: refactor OSS-GPT #878

Draft
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

wangyantong2000
Copy link
Collaborator

@wangyantong2000 wangyantong2000 commented Sep 26, 2024

Brief Information

This pull request is in the type of (more info about types):

  • build
  • ci
  • docs
  • feat
  • fix
  • perf
  • refactor
  • test

Related issues (all available keywords):

Details

Firstly, provide basic open domain question and answer functions. The question and answer regarding the knowledge base will be implemented in the future. Provide two modes of brightness and darkness, Chinese and English. Users can provide model information themselves, and currently support both OpenAI and DeepSeek. More models will be supported in the future.
Anyway, with the basic infrastructure, we can start implementing various imaginative ideas.

Checklist

Others

@wangyantong2000
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@Xsy41 @YaoYao-Pig You can test this when you have time.

@Xsy41
Copy link
Collaborator

Xsy41 commented Sep 30, 2024

The page is beautifully done.
I found a small problem, when the code is presented, writing a line of code will be empty.

image

@wangyantong2000
Copy link
Collaborator Author

wangyantong2000 commented Sep 30, 2024

The page is beautifully done. I found a small problem, when the code is presented, writing a line of code will be empty.

image
image

Click to copy and you will find that essentially the blank line in the middle does not appear.
This is actually a distinction made when a single line of long code cannot be represented by a single line.
Like the example in the picture.

@wangyantong2000
Copy link
Collaborator Author

At present, let's mainly focus on the issues in the functional process and see if there are any major flaws in the functional process. Let's improve the style through continuous iterations in the future. Let's push things forward first.

@Xsy41
Copy link
Collaborator

Xsy41 commented Sep 30, 2024

At present, let's mainly focus on the issues in the functional process and see if there are any major flaws in the functional process. Let's improve the style through continuous iterations in the future. Let's push things forward first.

I don't think there's a problem with the function!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants