Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Added w3c.json for WG/homepage #91

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Added w3c.json for WG/homepage #91

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
5 changes: 5 additions & 0 deletions w3c.json
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
{
"group": 109735
, "contacts": ["dontcallmedom", "himorin"]
, "repo-type": "homepage"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hmm... It's not clear to me that the "homepage" classification is a good fit; also, it fills more of a CG repo than WG repo

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

for WG->CG, I could agree. but I could not find better classification... (agree that this is not a kind of general "homepage", but not a "tool",,, so "others"??)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would "article" maybe be applicable (non-spec documents)?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it's actually provided as samples directory but not as documentation. We might be possible to call source codes of samples as documentation,,, for some cases, but...

}