-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 187
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: release vm right after execution finished #274
Conversation
📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes involve a refactoring of the VM management logic within the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Dependency Review✅ No vulnerabilities or license issues or OpenSSF Scorecard issues found.OpenSSF Scorecard
Scanned Manifest Files |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
x/move/keeper/handler.go (1)
611-611
: Address the TODO regardingexecVM
removal after loader v2 installationThe comment indicates that
execVM
should be removed once loader v2 is installed. If loader v2 has been installed, consider removingexecVM
and updating the relevant code accordingly to prevent deprecated code from remaining in the codebase.Would you like me to assist in refactoring the code to remove
execVM
or open a GitHub issue to track this task?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- x/move/keeper/genesis.go (1 hunks)
- x/move/keeper/handler.go (4 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
x/move/keeper/handler.go (4)
201-210
: Refactor: UtilizeexecVM
for VM management inexecuteEntryFunction
The code correctly refactors
executeEntryFunction
to use theexecVM
helper function, which encapsulates VM acquisition and release. This improves code readability and maintainability by reducing duplication of VM management logic.
316-325
: Refactor: UtilizeexecVM
for VM management inexecuteScript
This change mirrors the refactoring in
executeEntryFunction
, applying the sameexecVM
pattern toexecuteScript
. It maintains consistency across the codebase.
588-596
: Refactor: UtilizeexecVM
for VM management inexecuteViewFunction
The use of
execVM
inexecuteViewFunction
aligns with the refactoring applied to other execution functions, ensuring consistent VM management.
613-617
: Confirm the safe release of VM resources inexecVM
The
execVM
function properly acquires and releases the VM usingdefer
, ensuring resource cleanup even if an error or panic occurs during execution. This is a good practice to prevent resource leaks and potential deadlocks.
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #274 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 40.67% 40.64% -0.03%
==========================================
Files 265 265
Lines 25258 25246 -12
==========================================
- Hits 10274 10262 -12
Misses 13396 13396
Partials 1588 1588
|
Description
Closes: #XXXX
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!
in the type prefix if API or client breaking changeReviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
I have...