Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Documentation #407

Open
8 of 13 tasks
mgrover1 opened this issue Nov 24, 2021 · 9 comments · Fixed by #521
Open
8 of 13 tasks

Update Documentation #407

mgrover1 opened this issue Nov 24, 2021 · 9 comments · Fixed by #521
Assignees
Labels
documentation Documentation related

Comments

@mgrover1
Copy link
Collaborator

mgrover1 commented Nov 24, 2021

Based on conversations regarding the recent changes, and user feedback, it would be good to do a review of our current documentation, finding areas for improvement. Examples include:

Based on this documentation system, we should cover

  • Tutorials
  • How to Guides
  • Explanation
  • Reference
@mgrover1 mgrover1 added this to Xdev Nov 24, 2021
@mgrover1 mgrover1 moved this to 🌳 Todo in Xdev Nov 24, 2021
@mgrover1 mgrover1 self-assigned this Nov 24, 2021
@mgrover1 mgrover1 moved this from 🌳 Todo to ▶ In Progress in Xdev Nov 24, 2021
@mgrover1 mgrover1 added the documentation Documentation related label Nov 24, 2021
@andersy005 andersy005 added this to the Winter 2021 Release milestone Nov 24, 2021
@mnlevy1981
Copy link

I'm working on a branch to address the

Add a "how to build a catalog"

tickbox. There's already a a question about it in the FAQ, though the answer is more of a non-answer... so I was going to start by updating that page with step-by-step instructions. Is that sufficient, or should there be a new page elsewhere in the docs as well?

@andersy005
Copy link
Member

I think a notebook in docs/source/user-guide would suffice for the time being. We shall figure out where this belongs when we rearrange the docs...

This was referenced Dec 6, 2021
@jukent
Copy link
Collaborator

jukent commented Dec 20, 2021

I'm going to start working on "What is intake-esm doing with my data?"

@wachsylon
Copy link

Hi everyone,
fyi, I also provide some tutorials here for dkrz catalogs. I also cover how to merge two catalogs.

Can I contribute with one of those? Do you know about activities for defining name templates for catalogs and a registry for catalogs?

Best,
Fabi

@mgrover1
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Hi @wachsylon - sorry for the very delayed response. Those look like great tutorials!

Contributions are welcome - the repo we have been using for a registry of catalogs has been this repo https://github.com/NCAR/intake-esm-datastore .

We are taking a look at the PR you submitted there, hopefully getting feedback there + merging soon.

Repository owner moved this from ▶ In Progress to ✅ Done in Xdev Sep 16, 2022
@andersy005
Copy link
Member

Just realized @wachsylon's tutorials cover topics that are worth including in intake-esm's proper documentation. Therefore, i'm re-opening this issue

@andersy005 andersy005 reopened this Sep 16, 2022
Repository owner moved this from ✅ Done to ▶ In Progress in Xdev Sep 16, 2022
@andersy005
Copy link
Member

andersy005 commented Sep 16, 2022

@mgrover1, do you plan on covering the remaining tasks in this list? i'd be happy to help... just want make sure there's no duplication of efforts

Based on conversations regarding the recent changes, and user feedback, it would be good to do a review of our current documentation, finding areas for improvement. Examples include:

Based on this documentation system, we should cover

  • Tutorials
  • How to Guides
  • Explanation
  • Reference

@andersy005
Copy link
Member

@wachsylon, could i interest you in contribute a PR with some of the contents from your amazing tutorials? :) No pressure if you don't have time. i can help with this and would certainly credit you

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Documentation related
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

5 participants