fix: 🗑️ Deprecation notice for js-ipfs

[whizzzkid]

Describe your changes

• Adds a deprecation notice for js-ipfs and provide a path forward.
• I am wondering if removing embedded node type as part of mv3 is a better option.
  • Remove/Replace Embedded Node Type ipfs-companion#1220

Files changed

• docs/how-to/companion-node-types.md

What issue(s) does this address?

• [Tracking Issue] js-ipfs deprecation - signposting over to Helia js-ipfs#4336

Checklist before requesting a review

• Passing the beta version of the Check Markdown links for modified files check. Action results can be viewed here.

Checklist before merging

• Passing all required checks (The beta Check Markdown links for modified files check is not required)

[welcome]

Thank you for submitting this PR!
A maintainer will be here shortly to review it.
We are super grateful, but we are also overloaded! Help us by making sure that:

• The context for this PR is clear, with relevant discussion, decisions and stakeholders linked/mentioned.
• Your contribution itself is clear (grammar and spelling checked, any code blocks checked and commented) and in its best form. Follow the docs contribution guidelines if they apply.

Getting other community members to do a review would be great help too on complex PRs (you can ask in the chats/forums). If you are unsure about something, just leave us a comment.
Next steps:

• A maintainer will triage and assign priority to this PR, commenting on any missing things and potentially assigning a reviewer for high priority items.
• The PR gets reviews, discussed and approvals as needed.
• The PR is merged by maintainers when it has been approved and comments addressed.

We currently aim to provide initial feedback/triaging within two business days. Please keep an eye on any labelling actions, as these will indicate priorities and status of your contribution.
We are very grateful for your contribution!

[BigLep]

Per ipfs/ipfs-companion#1220 (comment), I would encourage removing this all-together. I assume we aren't testing this functionality and it's not supported. As a result, I don't see value in advertising it.

[SgtPooki]

LGTM, but I would add a tracking issue on the companion side for users to follow so they will know when it's done.

Closing that issue would also be a good indicator that these docs need updating again.

Also, +1 to what Steve said.

[whizzzkid]

@SgtPooki the checks seem to be failing because of an error link in a file that didn't change. merge with errors? 🤔

[ElPaisano]

LGTM with a slight tweak

[ElPaisano]

@whizzzkid are there any other changes you'd like to make before I merge this into https://github.com/ipfs/ipfs-docs/tree/js-ipfs-cleanup for final cleanup and merging?

[BigLep]

I put a couple of comments but ultimately created a new PR here #1631 @whizzzkid

[BigLep]

@whizzzkid : I think this just adds noise. This can be in our backlogged but this was a non-functioning feature. I think we should just strip it out.

[BigLep]

Can we just remove the full Embedded section?