Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(deps): update dependency org.jetbrains.kotlinx:kotlinx-datetime to v0.6.1 #140

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 21, 2024

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Aug 21, 2024

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
org.jetbrains.kotlinx:kotlinx-datetime 0.6.0 -> 0.6.1 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

Kotlin/kotlinx-datetime (org.jetbrains.kotlinx:kotlinx-datetime)

v0.6.1

  • Prohibit parsing non-ASCII digits as numbers in DateTimeFormat (#​405)
  • More accurately determine which files represent time zones and which don't on Linux and Darwin (#​395)
  • Fix a regression that occasionally considered the right boundary of a time overlap to be a part of it on Native (#​399)
  • Introduce various small improvements to the timezone handling on Windows (#​390)
  • On Linux, allow not having any /etc/localtime set, defaulting to TimeZone.UTC as the system time zone (#​426)

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot enabled auto-merge (rebase) August 21, 2024 17:30
@renovate renovate bot merged commit 66a785d into main Aug 21, 2024
2 checks passed
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/kotlinx.datetime branch August 21, 2024 17:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants