Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(service-portal): Delete and view delegation in service portal form me list #16400

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Oct 15, 2024

Conversation

magnearun
Copy link
Contributor

@magnearun magnearun commented Oct 15, 2024

What

Fix that delete button was not showing in from user list, and validTo date was endless even when set

Why

Be able to delete and see correct valid to date

Screenshots / Gifs

Attach Screenshots / Gifs to help reviewers understand the scope of the pull request

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • Formatting passes locally with my changes
  • I have rebased against main before asking for a review

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Improved validation accuracy for delegation expiry dates in the Delegation View Modal.
    • Simplified deletion process for outgoing delegations in the Delegations Outgoing component.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Enhanced handling of the validTo property to ensure correct date validation.

@magnearun magnearun marked this pull request as ready for review October 15, 2024 14:03
@magnearun magnearun requested a review from a team as a code owner October 15, 2024 14:03
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 15, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve updates to two components: DelegationViewModal and DelegationsOutgoing. The DelegationViewModal now processes the validTo property as a Date object for improved validation accuracy. In DelegationsOutgoing, the onDelete prop for the AccessCard component has been simplified by removing conditional logic, allowing for a more straightforward assignment of the delegation state. No alterations were made to exported or public entity declarations in either component.

Changes

File Change Summary
libs/portals/shared-modules/delegations/src/components/delegations/DelegationViewModal.tsx Updated validTo handling to convert it into a Date object for validation accuracy.
libs/portals/shared-modules/delegations/src/components/delegations/outgoing/DelegationsOutgoing.tsx Simplified onDelete prop for AccessCard by removing delegation type conditional logic.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

automerge, high priority

Suggested reviewers

  • GunnlaugurG
  • disaerna

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
libs/portals/shared-modules/delegations/src/components/delegations/outgoing/DelegationsOutgoing.tsx (1)

Line range hint 1-20: Consider optimizing imports for better tree-shaking

While the code adheres to the coding guidelines for libs/**/*, there's an opportunity to optimize imports. The file currently imports many dependencies, which could potentially impact tree-shaking.

Consider reviewing these imports and only import what's necessary. For example, if you're not using all components from @island.is/island-ui/core, you could import them individually:

import { SkeletonLoader } from '@island.is/island-ui/core/SkeletonLoader'
import { Stack } from '@island.is/island-ui/core/Stack'
import { Box } from '@island.is/island-ui/core/Box'

This approach can lead to more effective tree-shaking and potentially smaller bundle sizes.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1d5a051 and 290bab8.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • libs/portals/shared-modules/delegations/src/components/delegations/DelegationViewModal.tsx (1 hunks)
  • libs/portals/shared-modules/delegations/src/components/delegations/outgoing/DelegationsOutgoing.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
libs/portals/shared-modules/delegations/src/components/delegations/DelegationViewModal.tsx (1)

Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
  • TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
  • Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/portals/shared-modules/delegations/src/components/delegations/outgoing/DelegationsOutgoing.tsx (1)

Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
  • TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
  • Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
🔇 Additional comments (2)
libs/portals/shared-modules/delegations/src/components/delegations/DelegationViewModal.tsx (1)

157-157: Improved date validation for validTo

This change enhances the accuracy of date validation by converting delegation.validTo to a Date object before passing it to the isValid function. This approach is more robust and aligns with the isValid function's expected input type.

The modification addresses the PR objective of correctly displaying the validTo date, ensuring that the component handles date validation more reliably.

libs/portals/shared-modules/delegations/src/components/delegations/outgoing/DelegationsOutgoing.tsx (1)

124-128: Improved onDelete implementation

The simplification of the onDelete prop is a good improvement. It enhances code readability and maintainability by removing the conditional logic. This change aligns well with the PR objectives by enabling deletion for all delegation types, including general mandates.

The implementation maintains type safety with TypeScript and preserves the component's reusability across different NextJS apps. Good job on this refactoring!

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 15, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 36.73%. Comparing base (c21a58f) to head (b31ba5f).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #16400   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   36.73%   36.73%           
=======================================
  Files        6808     6808           
  Lines      141061   141061           
  Branches    40217    40217           
=======================================
  Hits        51817    51817           
  Misses      89244    89244           
Flag Coverage Δ
api 3.37% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c21a58f...b31ba5f. Read the comment docs.

@datadog-island-is
Copy link

datadog-island-is bot commented Oct 15, 2024

Datadog Report

Branch report: fix/delete-view-delegation-ac-sp
Commit report: afe2c53
Test service: api

✅ 0 Failed, 4 Passed, 0 Skipped, 2.69s Total Time
➡️ Test Sessions change in coverage: 1 no change

Copy link
Member

@GunnlaugurG GunnlaugurG left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM✍️

@GunnlaugurG GunnlaugurG added the automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass label Oct 15, 2024
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot merged commit 4a1d731 into main Oct 15, 2024
50 checks passed
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot deleted the fix/delete-view-delegation-ac-sp branch October 15, 2024 15:33
GunnlaugurG pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 16, 2024
…m me list (#16400)

* fixes wrong validTo date in DelegationViewModal and show delete button for outgoing delegation

* remove log

* chore: nx format:write update dirty files

---------

Co-authored-by: andes-it <[email protected]>
kodiakhq bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 16, 2024
)

* feat(auth-admin): Delegation-admin webhook auditlog (#16335)

* audit log delegation-admin webhook

* log the response in resource and request in meta

* remove audit in decorator

* make createdBy optional

* attempt to fix pipe

* attempt to fix pipe

* merge with main

* fix tests

---------

Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(service-portal): Delete and view delegation in service portal form me list (#16400)

* fixes wrong validTo date in DelegationViewModal and show delete button for outgoing delegation

* remove log

* chore: nx format:write update dirty files

---------

Co-authored-by: andes-it <[email protected]>

---------

Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Magnea Rún Vignisdóttir <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: andes-it <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants