-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Train a baseline model from scratch on dcm-zurich-lesions
datasets using nnUNet
#2
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
…lti-channel training
…dataset_name_id_conversion.py': "raise RuntimeError("More than one dataset name found for dataset id %d. Please correct that."
…ilities/dataset_name_id_conversion.py':" This reverts commit 73b9614.
|
||
# Needed for finding the files correctly. IMPORTANT! File endings must match between images and segmentations! | ||
json_dict['file_ending'] = ".nii.gz" | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just to be consistent with latest findings about axes swaps -- maybe we should specify the IO reader ?
json_dict['overwrite_image_reader_writer'] = "NibabelIO"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good point! I've been thinking about that too! My only question is: will models with different IO readers (Nibabel/SimpleITK) be comparable?
This PR contains scripts for training baseline models from scratch on
dcm-zurich-lesions
datasets using nnUNetv2: