[JENKINS-71021] Lint failures do not print proper error message in local builds (regression in 2.359)

[basil]

See JENKINS-71021.

Amending the Maven profile changes from #9718 which appear to have been completely untested prior to integration.

Testing done

Introduced stylelint and eslint failures in both CI and local builds.

Proposed changelog entries

N/A

Proposed upgrade guidelines

N/A

Submitter checklist

Beta Give feedback

1. The Jira issue, if it exists, is well-described.
2. The changelog entries and upgrade guidelines are appropriate for the audience affected by the change (users or developers, depending on the change) and are in the imperative mood (see examples). Fill in the Proposed upgrade guidelines section only if there are breaking changes or changes that may require extra steps from users during upgrade.
3. There is automated testing or an explanation as to why this change has no tests.
4. New public classes, fields, and methods are annotated with @Restricted or have @since TODO Javadocs, as appropriate.
5. New deprecations are annotated with @Deprecated(since = "TODO") or @Deprecated(forRemoval = true, since = "TODO"), if applicable.
6. New or substantially changed JavaScript is not defined inline and does not call eval to ease future introduction of Content Security Policy (CSP) directives (see documentation).
7. For dependency updates, there are links to external changelogs and, if possible, full differentials.
8. For new APIs and extension points, there is a link to at least one consumer.

Desired reviewers

@mention

Before the changes are marked as ready-for-merge:

Maintainer checklist

Beta Give feedback

1. There are at least two (2) approvals for the pull request and no outstanding requests for change.
2. Conversations in the pull request are over, or it is explicit that a reviewer is not blocking the change.
3. Changelog entries in the pull request title and/or Proposed changelog entries are accurate, human-readable, and in the imperative mood.
4. Proper changelog labels are set so that the changelog can be generated automatically.
5. If the change needs additional upgrade steps from users, the upgrade-guide-needed label is set and there is a Proposed upgrade guidelines section in the pull request title (see example).
6. If it would make sense to backport the change to LTS, a Jira issue must exist, be a Bug or Improvement, and be labeled as lts-candidate to be considered (see query).

[basil]

Unclear why there were three linting executions; there is only a need for two (one for CI, and one for local builds). Deleted the unnecessary execution and moved the two necessary executions to the correct place in the file (after the build executions, reflecting the order of operations at runtime).

[basil]

Needed in order to get CI builds to honor

jenkins/Jenkinsfile

Line 96 in 57d8fa0

'-Dmaven.test.failure.ignore',

to address https://issues.jenkins.io/browse/JENKINS-71021?focusedId=448486&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-448486 (cf. https://github.com/eirslett/frontend-maven-plugin/blob/f39b40c20971ecb810adce465d37f28d9dc4c0e6/frontend-maven-plugin/src/main/java/com/github/eirslett/maven/plugins/frontend/mojo/AbstractFrontendMojo.java and also jenkinsci/plugin-pom#874).

[github-actions]

Please take a moment and address the merge conflicts of your pull request. Thanks!