Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Sessions update #202

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 17, 2024
Merged

fix: Sessions update #202

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 17, 2024

Conversation

whiterabbit1983
Copy link
Contributor

@whiterabbit1983 whiterabbit1983 commented Apr 17, 2024

Ellipsis 🚀 This PR description was created by Ellipsis for commit 3114eb6.

Summary:

This PR expands classes in types.py, removes an unnecessary line in create_agent.py, modifies the logic for updating session data, handles metadata field separately during session updates, and replaces :update with :put in datalog queries.

Key points:

  • Expanded BaseTask and BaseTaskArgs classes in types.py files.
  • Removed unnecessary line in create_agent.py.
  • Modified logic for updating session data in patch_session.py and update_session.py.
  • Handled metadata field separately in session update.
  • Replaced :update keyword with :put in datalog query.

Generated with ❤️ by ellipsis.dev

@whiterabbit1983 whiterabbit1983 changed the title X/sessions update fix: Sessions update Apr 17, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks good to me!

  • Reviewed the entire pull request up to 3534f3d
  • Looked at 168 lines of code in 5 files
  • Took 1 minute and 32 seconds to review
More info
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 1 additional comments because they didn't meet confidence threshold of 50%.
1. /agents-api/agents_api/models/session/patch_session.py:11:
  • Assessed confidence : 100%
  • Grade: 0%
  • Comment:
    The 'metadata' field has been removed from the _fields list but it's still being used in the datalog query. This could potentially lead to an error if the 'metadata' field is not present in the update_data dictionary. Please ensure that the 'metadata' field is handled correctly.
  • Reasoning:
    The PR author has removed the 'metadata' field from the _fields list in the patch_session.py file. However, the 'metadata' field is still being used in the datalog query in the same file. This could potentially lead to an error if the 'metadata' field is not present in the update_data dictionary. The author should either add the 'metadata' field back to the _fields list or handle the case where 'metadata' is not present in the update_data dictionary.

Workflow ID: wflow_eWmFrIdHqAEGPAgS


Not what you expected? You can customize the content of the reviews using rules. Learn more here.

@whiterabbit1983 whiterabbit1983 merged commit 0dcfd17 into dev Apr 17, 2024
1 check passed
@whiterabbit1983 whiterabbit1983 deleted the x/sessions-update branch April 17, 2024 09:21
Copy link
Contributor

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks good to me!

  • Performed an incremental review on 3114eb6
  • Looked at 52 lines of code in 3 files
  • Took 1 minute and 40 seconds to review
More info
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 3 additional comments because they didn't meet confidence threshold of 50%.
1. agents-api/agents_api/activities/types.py:28:
  • Assessed confidence : 0%
  • Comment:
    The changes in this file are cosmetic and do not affect the functionality of the code. The ... is a valid way to define an empty class in Python.
  • Reasoning:
    The changes in the types.py files and create_agent.py file are cosmetic and do not affect the functionality of the code. The ... in the BaseTask and BaseTaskArgs classes is a valid way to define an empty class in Python. The removal of the empty line in create_agent.py is also a cosmetic change and does not affect the functionality of the code.
2. agents-api/agents_api/clients/worker/types.py:28:
  • Assessed confidence : 0%
  • Comment:
    The changes in this file are cosmetic and do not affect the functionality of the code. The ... is a valid way to define an empty class in Python.
  • Reasoning:
    The changes in the types.py files and create_agent.py file are cosmetic and do not affect the functionality of the code. The ... in the BaseTask and BaseTaskArgs classes is a valid way to define an empty class in Python. The removal of the empty line in create_agent.py is also a cosmetic change and does not affect the functionality of the code.
3. agents-api/agents_api/models/agent/create_agent.py:42:
  • Assessed confidence : 0%
  • Comment:
    The removal of the empty line in this file is a cosmetic change and does not affect the functionality of the code.
  • Reasoning:
    The changes in the types.py files and create_agent.py file are cosmetic and do not affect the functionality of the code. The ... in the BaseTask and BaseTaskArgs classes is a valid way to define an empty class in Python. The removal of the empty line in create_agent.py is also a cosmetic change and does not affect the functionality of the code.

Workflow ID: wflow_MORZGbaWwiSG1RgG


Not what you expected? You can customize the content of the reviews using rules. Learn more here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant