Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding a note on reviewer eligibility #170

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ElliotFriend
Copy link
Collaborator

Signed-off-by: Elliot J. Voris [email protected]

@@ -24,6 +24,11 @@ Can review bounties in exchange for rewards.

Reviewers claim reviewable tasks and complete a review on the task assigning it a state of pass, fail or retry. Upon review completion the reviewer is awarded their share of the award amount as detailed by the bounty spec.

#### Eligibility for Reviewers
In order to provide code reviews of the highest possible quality, anybody who wants to review bounties must be an established member within our [Discord server](https://discord.gg/jDjSQvTHTC).
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Discord links apparently expire after a week by default. Would there be reasons not to include a link in the readme?

#### Eligibility for Reviewers
In order to provide code reviews of the highest possible quality, anybody who wants to review bounties must be an established member within our [Discord server](https://discord.gg/jDjSQvTHTC).

We are also capping the number of reviewers per bounty at 2 (two). You can "claim" your spot as a reviewer with a comment on the relevant issue, but wait to do so until you've actually begun the review.
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this a decent way to politely say "Don't be squatting on bounty reviews if you're not actually gonna do them well"?

…-bounties into reviewer-eligibility"

Thought I was on `main` there...

This reverts commit 3001024, reversing
changes made to 7c531f9.
I'm using the words "substantial" and "actionable" here, although
they might not be quite the correct fit.

Signed-off-by: Elliot J. Voris <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant