Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[9.101-x-prod] Update quarkus extensions to the right groupId: io.quarkus #75

Merged

Conversation

wmedvede
Copy link
Member

Description of the change:

Motivation for the change:

Checklist

  • Add or Modify a unit test for your change
  • Have you verified that tall the tests are passing?
How to backport a pull request to a different branch?

In order to automatically create a backporting pull request please add one or more labels having the following format backport-<branch-name>, where <branch-name> is the name of the branch where the pull request must be backported to (e.g., backport-7.67.x to backport the original PR to the 7.67.x branch).

NOTE: backporting is an action aiming to move a change (usually a commit) from a branch (usually the main one) to another one, which is generally referring to a still maintained release branch. Keeping it simple: it is about to move a specific change or a set of them from one branch to another.

Once the original pull request is successfully merged, the automated action will create one backporting pull request per each label (with the previous format) that has been added.

If something goes wrong, the author will be notified and at this point a manual backporting is needed.

NOTE: this automated backporting is triggered whenever a pull request on main branch is labeled or closed, but both conditions must be satisfied to get the new PR created.

@wmedvede wmedvede force-pushed the 9.101.x-prod-update-quarkus-deps branch from 37ab997 to ac17923 Compare September 16, 2024 10:57
@domhanak
Copy link

domhanak commented Sep 16, 2024

Here is the PR from last time for reference #53

Copy link
Member

@rgdoliveira rgdoliveira left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't we use com.redhat.quarkus.platform instead of io.quarkus as we are using RHBQ product?

@rgdoliveira
Copy link
Member

to answer myself, those Quarkus artifacts only exist on io.quarkus groupID, so I'm approving the PR

@rgdoliveira rgdoliveira merged commit d556021 into kiegroup:9.101.x-prod Sep 16, 2024
3 of 4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants