Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow integer enums to have correct integer serialization #104

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

clux
Copy link
Member

@clux clux commented Nov 12, 2022

  • Add discriminant to integer enums
  • Improve integration test for httproute so that it uses serde logic for the statusCode field
  • Add serde_repr
  • Drop #[serde(rename)] attrs on serde_repr enums

Last thing I want to fix before next release.

@clux
Copy link
Member Author

clux commented Nov 12, 2022

Well, the test actually works even without repr (surprisingly), but turns out the enum isn't actually used in the schema because kopium just infers i64 🙃

#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Clone, Debug)]
pub struct HTTPRouteRulesFiltersRequestRedirect {
    ...
    #[serde(default, skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none", rename = "statusCode")]
    pub status_code: Option<i64>,
}

#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Clone, Debug)]
pub enum HTTPRouteRulesFiltersRequestRedirectStatusCode {
    #[serde(rename = "301")]
    r#_301 = 301,
    #[serde(rename = "302")]
    r#_302 = 302,
}

@clux
Copy link
Member Author

clux commented Nov 12, 2022

I think we actually just look at the type in the schema:

statusCode:
    default: 302
    description: "StatusCode is the HTTP status
      code to be used in response. \n Support: Core
      \n Note that values may be added to this enum,
      implementations must ensure that unknown values
      will not cause a crash. \n Unknown values
      here must result in the implementation setting
      the Accepted Condition for the Route to `status:
      False`, with a Reason of `UnsupportedValue`."
    enum:
    - 301
    - 302
    type: integer

and see, "oh, yeah, integer" and then separately recurse down to find enum structs (which then generates the struct - which isn't used). I think this is a reflection of #101 that enums are not parsed at the right level. I'll try to have another look at this tomorrow.

@clux
Copy link
Member Author

clux commented Nov 18, 2022

Was hoping to have time to fix this properly, but don't want to block the release for it anymore. Doing this properly needs a bigger refactor of the analyzer for enums, and utimately there's a lot of great improvements in main already.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant