Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release-1.5] 🐛 Fix datastore selection based on StoragePolicy #2001

Conversation

k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot

This is an automated cherry-pick of #1937

/assign sbueringer

Fix datastore selection based on StoragePolicy

When storage policy is specified, CAPV will fetch compatible datastores
and randomly selects one, however the return set also contains
datastore cluster. This will leads to long-time retries and even clone
failures.

Signed-off-by: Gong Zhang <[email protected]>
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Jul 13, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jul 13, 2023
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

/lgtm
/retest

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 13, 2023
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

sbueringer commented Jul 13, 2023

@chrischdi Strange looks like we still get the categories flake even though we cherry-picked the PR into this branch: https://prow.k8s.io/view/gs/kubernetes-jenkins/pr-logs/pull/kubernetes-sigs_cluster-api-provider-vsphere/2001/pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-verify-gen/1679356407687680000

I'll go through all branches and ensure we have them everywhere

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

@chrischdi Strange looks like we still get the categories flake even though we cherry-picked the PR into this branch: https://prow.k8s.io/view/gs/kubernetes-jenkins/pr-logs/pull/kubernetes-sigs_cluster-api-provider-vsphere/2001/pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-verify-gen/1679356407687680000

I'll go through all branches and ensure we have them everywhere

Realized we have them everywhere (just not on my local branches 😂)

I don't understand how this issue can still occur as Prow should test this PR merged into release-1.5. But maybe that assumption is wrong?

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

Ah got it. The problem is that the checked-in CR YAML doesn't have the category :)

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

Fix PR: #2003

@randomvariable
Copy link
Member

/retest-required

@randomvariable
Copy link
Member

/retest

@randomvariable
Copy link
Member

/approve
/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: randomvariable

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 13, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 205dfd9 into kubernetes-sigs:release-1.5 Jul 13, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants