-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 295
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[release-1.7] 🌱 Add verify-govulncheck target and integrate to scan action #2215
[release-1.7] 🌱 Add verify-govulncheck target and integrate to scan action #2215
Conversation
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/retest-required |
1 similar comment
/retest-required |
fi | ||
|
||
.PHONY: verify-flavors | ||
verify-flavors: $(FLAVOR_DIR) generate-flavors ## Verify generated flavors |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks like this is not part of the original cherry-pick.
@chrischdi Maybe for simplicity. Can you open PRs for all branches (including 1.8) to resync .github/workflows + the Makefile changes? (including the changes to the generate-flavors tool)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would that sync include the failed cherry-picks from #2167 ? Don't want to hit those twice
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yup. Talked to Christian. He'll do a series of cherry-picks later today to bring GitHub actions, Makefile and related scripts in sync across 1.8-1.5 (also includes the IPClaim PR which will merge soon)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
SGTM - I'd just started looking at the failing cherry-picks, luckily I saw this too 😄
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yup sorry missed writing this somewhere while debugging our CI env :)
/retest |
/hold for syncing stuff.. |
/close In favor of #2226 |
@chrischdi: Closed this PR. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
PR needs rebase. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
This is a manual cherry-pick of #2174