Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

✨ test/e2e: use vSphere projects from Boskos #3034

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 11, 2024
Merged

✨ test/e2e: use vSphere projects from Boskos #3034

merged 2 commits into from
Jun 11, 2024

Conversation

sbueringer
Copy link
Member

@sbueringer sbueringer commented Jun 5, 2024 •
edited
Loading

What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR changes our e2e test setup to use Boskos to consume vsphere projects from VMC.

This is preparation for the upcoming migration to a community-owned vCenter environment

For more context, see: #3040

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jun 5, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested review from laozc and vrabbi June 5, 2024 16:00
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jun 5, 2024
@sbueringer sbueringer changed the title [WIP] [DON'T REVIEW] Implement Boskos [WIP] [DON'T REVIEW] ✨ Implement Boskos Jun 5, 2024
@chrischdi chrischdi mentioned this pull request Jun 5, 2024
Merged
@sbueringer sbueringer changed the title [WIP] [DON'T REVIEW] ✨ Implement Boskos [WIP] ✨ Implement Boskos Jun 5, 2024
@sbueringer sbueringer force-pushed the pr-boskos branch 4 times, most recently from 3898990 to 147942e Compare June 5, 2024 19:52
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

Just failing because the ipPools are not big enough yet. We'll try to increase these significantly tomorrow

@sbueringer sbueringer force-pushed the pr-boskos branch 2 times, most recently from f718c2e to bcaaec1 Compare June 6, 2024 04:49
@chrischdi
Copy link
Member

/retest

@chrischdi
Copy link
Member

/retest

Certificate change in VMC

chrischdi
chrischdi reviewed Jun 6, 2024
View reviewed changes
hack/e2e.sh Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

Maybe a flake
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-govmomi-main

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-janitor-main

@sbueringer sbueringer changed the title [WIP] ✨ Implement Boskos ✨ Implement Boskos Jun 6, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jun 6, 2024
sbueringer
sbueringer commented Jun 6, 2024
View reviewed changes
hack/e2e.sh Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jun 6, 2024
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

sbueringer commented Jun 6, 2024 •
edited
Loading

/assign @chrischdi @fabriziopandini
Ready for review

@sbueringer sbueringer changed the title ✨ Implement Boskos ✨ test/e2e: use vSphere projects from Boskos Jun 6, 2024
@sbueringer sbueringer added the tide/merge-method-squash Denotes a PR that should be squashed by tide when it merges. label Jun 10, 2024
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

Now only
/hold
for Fabrizio's PR

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-govmomi-conformance-ci-latest-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-govmomi-conformance-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-govmomi-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-govmomi-upgrade-1-30-1-31-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-supervisor-conformance-ci-latest-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-supervisor-conformance-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-supervisor-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-supervisor-upgrade-1-30-1-31-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-vcsim-govmomi-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-vcsim-supervisor-main

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

Rebased to resolve a conflict in go.mod

@chrischdi
Copy link
Member

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-govmomi-conformance-ci-latest-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-govmomi-conformance-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-govmomi-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-govmomi-upgrade-1-30-1-31-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-supervisor-conformance-ci-latest-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-supervisor-conformance-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-supervisor-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-supervisor-upgrade-1-30-1-31-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-vcsim-govmomi-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-vcsim-supervisor-main

@chrischdi
Copy link
Member

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-govmomi-blocking-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-supervisor-blocking-main

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-govmomi-conformance-ci-latest-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-govmomi-conformance-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-govmomi-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-govmomi-upgrade-1-30-1-31-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-supervisor-conformance-ci-latest-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-supervisor-conformance-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-supervisor-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-supervisor-upgrade-1-30-1-31-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-vcsim-govmomi-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-vcsim-supervisor-main

@chrischdi
Copy link
Member

/test help

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@chrischdi: The specified target(s) for /test were not found.
The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-govmomi-blocking-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-govmomi-conformance-ci-latest-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-govmomi-conformance-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-govmomi-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-govmomi-upgrade-1-30-1-31-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-supervisor-blocking-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-supervisor-conformance-ci-latest-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-supervisor-conformance-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-supervisor-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-supervisor-upgrade-1-30-1-31-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-vcsim-govmomi-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-vcsim-supervisor-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-test-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-verify-main

The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:

  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-apidiff-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-janitor-main

Use /test all to run the following jobs that were automatically triggered:

  • pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-apidiff-main
  • pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-govmomi-blocking-main
  • pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-supervisor-blocking-main
  • pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-test-main
  • pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-verify-main

In response to this:

/test help

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@fabriziopandini
Copy link
Member

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 11, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 3e67c795bf9ae3c4130c4ca13f22fb0af8bccb0d

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: fabriziopandini

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 11, 2024
@chrischdi
Copy link
Member

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-janitor-main

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-supervisor-conformance-ci-latest-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-supervisor-conformance-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-supervisor-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-supervisor-upgrade-1-30-1-31-main

@chrischdi
Copy link
Member

Periodic janitor did delete the cluster module 52399dfc-29aa-fa74-1cc6-374dfdb38132 (source)

/retest

https://prow.k8s.io/view/gs/kubernetes-jenkins/logs/periodic-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-janitor/1800525278573760512

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

/hold cancel

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jun 11, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 996d756 into kubernetes-sigs:main Jun 11, 2024
27 checks passed
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.11 milestone Jun 11, 2024
@sbueringer sbueringer deleted the pr-boskos branch June 11, 2024 15:34
This was referenced Jun 11, 2024
Merged
Merged
Merged
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@fabriziopandini fabriziopandini fabriziopandini left review comments

@chrischdi chrischdi chrischdi left review comments

@laozc laozc Awaiting requested review from laozc

@vrabbi vrabbi Awaiting requested review from vrabbi

Assignees

@chrischdi chrischdi

@fabriziopandini fabriziopandini

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. tide/merge-method-squash Denotes a PR that should be squashed by tide when it merges.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
v1.11
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@sbueringer @chrischdi @fabriziopandini @k8s-ci-robot