-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
🌱 Deprecate ClusterCacheTracker #11312
🌱 Deprecate ClusterCacheTracker #11312
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Stefan Büringer [email protected]
@@ -121,9 +121,6 @@ func (r *KubeadmControlPlaneReconciler) SetupWithManager(ctx context.Context, mg | |||
r.ssaCache = ssa.NewCache() | |||
|
|||
if r.managementCluster == nil { | |||
if r.ClusterCache == nil { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just a minor cleanup, this check is never used because we would already panic above now.
I have a follow-up to introduce proper input validation for all SetupWithManager funcs
@@ -32,6 +32,8 @@ import ( | |||
|
|||
// ClusterCacheReconciler is responsible for stopping remote cluster caches when | |||
// the cluster for the remote cache is being deleted. | |||
// | |||
// Deprecated: This will be removed in Cluster API v1.10, use clustercache.ClusterCache instead. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it makes sense to give folks one release time to migrate away (ClusterCacheTracker would be removed with the v1.10 (April 2025) release).
Folks can always just copy the old ClusterCacheTracker if they want to continue to use it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
works for me, should we change the PR type to make this surface in the release notes?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To what do you want to change it?
(Just adding the deprecation itself is not a breaking change)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Added a note here: #11092 (comment)
/assign @vincepri @fabriziopandini @chrischdi |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: 9a38d4c9d1a81b823d1833d87e35e43d21350f68
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/approve
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: chrischdi The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Signed-off-by: Stefan Büringer [email protected]
What this PR does / why we need it:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in
fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)
format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):Part of #11272