Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

📖 Sync cluster-api-state-metrics proposal to match implementation state. #7183

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 15, 2022

Conversation

chrischdi
Copy link
Member

@chrischdi chrischdi commented Sep 7, 2022

What this PR does / why we need it:

Syncs the cluster-api-state-metrics proposal to match implementation state.
Implementation was mostly done in #7095

This also removes the _labels metric references. There are kube-state-metrics specific flags regarding these metric which won't affect custom resource configuration (allow/deny-list). Exposing all metrics would lead increase the cardinality without being worth it. Use-case specific configuration should be added by the user if required.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Part of #6458

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Sep 7, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Sep 7, 2022
Copy link
Member

@sbueringer sbueringer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

last nit from my side. otherwise lgtm pending squash

docs/proposals/20220411-cluster-api-state-metrics.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

lgtm pending squash

This also removes the `_labels` metric references. There are kube-state-metrics specific flags
regarding these metric which won't affect custom resource configuration (allow/deny-list).
Exposing all metrics would lead increase the cardinality without being worth it.
Use-case specific configuration should be added by the user if required.
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 13, 2022
@fabriziopandini
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

it would be great if @tobiasgiese (co-author on this proposal) could take a quick look, otherwise, I will approve in a couple of days

Copy link
Contributor

@killianmuldoon killianmuldoon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@tobiasgiese
Copy link
Member

it would be great if @tobiasgiese (co-author on this proposal) could take a quick look, otherwise, I will approve in a couple of days

/lgtm
Thanks for this great rework of the design proposal 🙌🏻

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: sbueringer

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 15, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 3f091f2 into kubernetes-sigs:main Sep 15, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.3 milestone Sep 15, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants