🌱 Adding to the test framework the equivalent to kubectl create -f. #9731

adilGhaffarDev · 2023-11-16T16:58:55Z

What this PR does / why we need it:
Adding runtime controller create for testing.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #

k8s-ci-robot · 2023-11-16T16:59:04Z

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign cecilerobertmichon for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

adilGhaffarDev · 2023-11-16T16:59:09Z

/test ?

k8s-ci-robot · 2023-11-16T16:59:12Z

@adilGhaffarDev: The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

/test pull-cluster-api-build-release-1-4
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-full-release-1-4
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-release-1-4
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-workload-upgrade-1-26-1-27-release-1-4
/test pull-cluster-api-test-mink8s-release-1-4
/test pull-cluster-api-test-release-1-4
/test pull-cluster-api-verify-release-1-4

The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:

/test pull-cluster-api-apidiff-release-1-4
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-informing-ipv6-release-1-4
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-informing-release-1-4

Use /test all to run the following jobs that were automatically triggered:

pull-cluster-api-apidiff-release-1-4
pull-cluster-api-build-release-1-4
pull-cluster-api-e2e-informing-ipv6-release-1-4
pull-cluster-api-e2e-informing-release-1-4
pull-cluster-api-e2e-release-1-4
pull-cluster-api-test-mink8s-release-1-4
pull-cluster-api-test-release-1-4
pull-cluster-api-verify-release-1-4

In response to this:

/test ?

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

adilGhaffarDev · 2023-11-16T16:59:52Z

/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-full-release-1-4

adilGhaffarDev · 2023-11-17T06:28:02Z

/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-full-release-1-4

adilGhaffarDev · 2023-11-17T08:05:30Z

/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-full-release-1-4

furkatgofurov7 · 2023-11-17T11:00:04Z

/pull-cluster-api-e2e-release-1-4

adilGhaffarDev · 2023-11-17T11:03:39Z

/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-full-release-1-4

adilGhaffarDev · 2023-11-17T11:04:13Z

/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-release-1-4

furkatgofurov7 · 2023-11-17T11:14:41Z

test/framework/cluster_proxy.go

+	for _, o := range objs {
+		if err := p.GetClient().Create(ctx, &o); err != nil {


Suggested change

for _, o := range objs {

if err := p.GetClient().Create(ctx, &o); err != nil {

for o := range objs {

if err := p.GetClient().Create(ctx, &objs[o]); err != nil {

or reassign the iteration var

for _, o := range objs { o := o if err := p.GetClient().Create(ctx, &o); err != nil {

Signed-off-by: muhammad adil ghaffar <[email protected]>

adilGhaffarDev · 2023-11-17T13:11:32Z

/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-full-release-1-4

adilGhaffarDev · 2023-11-17T16:50:11Z

4/4 pull-cluster-api-e2e-full-release-1-4 passed (last passed: https://prow.k8s.io/view/gs/kubernetes-jenkins/pr-logs/pull/kubernetes-sigs_cluster-api/9731/pull-cluster-api-e2e-full-release-1-4/1725501937413001216)
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-full-release-1-4

furkatgofurov7 · 2023-11-17T21:22:31Z

@adilGhaffarDev can you please remove WIP, if this is ready for review? Thanks!
The last run passed (5/5), re-running it again

/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-full-release-1-4
/area e2e-testing

adilGhaffarDev · 2023-11-19T14:15:38Z

5/6 passed, last failure was not at Applying the cluster template yaml to the cluster it failed at Running Post-upgrade steps against the management cluster, (https://prow.k8s.io/view/gs/kubernetes-jenkins/pr-logs/pull/kubernetes-sigs_cluster-api/9731/pull-cluster-api-e2e-full-release-1-4/1725625498903515136). This failure is not related to this PR. I will keep on investigating it.
running once more :
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-full-release-1-4

adilGhaffarDev · 2023-11-20T08:07:29Z

5/7 passed last failure was also related to ownerGraph issue which is in Running Post-upgrade steps against the management cluster Looking into it.
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-full-release-1-4

chrischdi · 2023-11-20T13:11:58Z

test/e2e/kcp_remediations.go

@@ -472,7 +472,7 @@ func createWorkloadClusterAndWait(ctx context.Context, input createWorkloadClust
 	Expect(workloadClusterTemplate).ToNot(BeNil(), "Failed to get the cluster template")

 	Eventually(func() error {
-		return input.Proxy.Apply(ctx, workloadClusterTemplate)
+		return input.Proxy.Create(ctx, workloadClusterTemplate)
 	}, 10*time.Second).Should(Succeed(), "Failed to apply the cluster template")


Suggested change

}, 10*time.Second).Should(Succeed(), "Failed to apply the cluster template")

}, 10*time.Second).Should(Succeed(), "Failed to create the cluster template")

fabriziopandini · 2023-11-20T13:44:49Z

Q: what is the reason to use create instead of apply?

adilGhaffarDev · 2023-11-20T14:00:56Z

Q: what is the reason to use create instead of apply?

As @killianmuldoon mentioned here #9696, it will help debug the flake we see in upgrade tests more specifically the one we are getting at INFO: Applying the cluster template yaml to the cluster. Here is a further explanation of 3 flakes that we are getting in clusterctl upgrade: #9688 (comment)

Why did we add this to 1.4 instead of the main first?
Because on 16th Nov, Thursday v1.4 was failing continuously on clusterctl upgrade. I added this to run some tests and get some logs to investigate, but after running several tests on this PR I don't see any failure at INFO: Applying the cluster template yaml to the cluster. I will run a few more tests just to confirm.

sbueringer · 2023-11-20T15:39:17Z

This is the same PR as https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api/pull/9736/files just for release-1.4, right?

If yes, let's please hold this PR and continue with the other one. If we merged 9736 we should then cherry-pick back from there.

To be clear, it's totally fine to have this PR to get data, but we should merge against main first and then backport instead of merging against release-1.4 first.

chrischdi · 2023-11-20T16:51:25Z

And please add [release-1.4] to the title of the PR :-)

adilGhaffarDev · 2023-11-27T09:19:22Z

/hold

adilGhaffarDev · 2024-01-15T16:57:19Z

/close because we merged #9737 which serves the same purpose.

sbueringer · 2024-01-15T17:15:14Z

/close

k8s-ci-robot · 2024-01-15T17:15:19Z

@sbueringer: Closed this PR.

In response to this:

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.4 milestone Nov 16, 2023

k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/needs-area PR is missing an area label labels Nov 16, 2023

k8s-ci-robot requested review from chrischdi and richardcase November 16, 2023 16:59

k8s-ci-robot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Nov 16, 2023

furkatgofurov7 reviewed Nov 17, 2023

View reviewed changes

Addin runtime controller create.

67b9656

Signed-off-by: muhammad adil ghaffar <[email protected]>

adilGhaffarDev force-pushed the add-client-create/adil branch from 054ae89 to 67b9656 Compare November 17, 2023 13:07

k8s-ci-robot added area/e2e-testing Issues or PRs related to e2e testing and removed do-not-merge/needs-area PR is missing an area label labels Nov 17, 2023

adilGhaffarDev changed the title ~~wip: 🌱 Adding runtime controller create.~~ 🌱 Adding runtime controller create. Nov 19, 2023

k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Nov 19, 2023

adilGhaffarDev mentioned this pull request Nov 20, 2023

clusterctl upgrade tests are flaky #9688

Closed

chrischdi reviewed Nov 20, 2023

View reviewed changes

fabriziopandini changed the title ~~🌱 Adding runtime controller create.~~ 🌱 Adding to the test framework the equivalent to kubectl create -f. Nov 20, 2023

k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Nov 27, 2023

fabriziopandini mentioned this pull request Jan 15, 2024

🌱 Adding controller runtime create #9736

Closed

k8s-ci-robot closed this Jan 15, 2024

cahillsf mentioned this pull request Mar 5, 2024

Replace kubectl apply in e2e test framework #9696

Closed

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

🌱 Adding to the test framework the equivalent to kubectl create -f. #9731

🌱 Adding to the test framework the equivalent to kubectl create -f. #9731

adilGhaffarDev commented Nov 16, 2023 •

edited

Loading

k8s-ci-robot commented Nov 16, 2023

adilGhaffarDev commented Nov 16, 2023

k8s-ci-robot commented Nov 16, 2023

adilGhaffarDev commented Nov 16, 2023

adilGhaffarDev commented Nov 17, 2023

adilGhaffarDev commented Nov 17, 2023

furkatgofurov7 commented Nov 17, 2023

adilGhaffarDev commented Nov 17, 2023

adilGhaffarDev commented Nov 17, 2023

furkatgofurov7 Nov 17, 2023 •

edited

Loading

adilGhaffarDev commented Nov 17, 2023

adilGhaffarDev commented Nov 17, 2023

furkatgofurov7 commented Nov 17, 2023

adilGhaffarDev commented Nov 19, 2023

adilGhaffarDev commented Nov 20, 2023

chrischdi Nov 20, 2023

fabriziopandini commented Nov 20, 2023

adilGhaffarDev commented Nov 20, 2023

sbueringer commented Nov 20, 2023 •

edited

Loading

chrischdi commented Nov 20, 2023

adilGhaffarDev commented Nov 27, 2023

adilGhaffarDev commented Jan 15, 2024

sbueringer commented Jan 15, 2024

k8s-ci-robot commented Jan 15, 2024

		for _, o := range objs {
		if err := p.GetClient().Create(ctx, &o); err != nil {

	}, 10*time.Second).Should(Succeed(), "Failed to apply the cluster template")
	}, 10*time.Second).Should(Succeed(), "Failed to create the cluster template")

🌱 Adding to the test framework the equivalent to kubectl create -f. #9731

🌱 Adding to the test framework the equivalent to kubectl create -f. #9731

Conversation

adilGhaffarDev commented Nov 16, 2023 • edited Loading

k8s-ci-robot commented Nov 16, 2023

adilGhaffarDev commented Nov 16, 2023

k8s-ci-robot commented Nov 16, 2023

adilGhaffarDev commented Nov 16, 2023

adilGhaffarDev commented Nov 17, 2023

adilGhaffarDev commented Nov 17, 2023

furkatgofurov7 commented Nov 17, 2023

adilGhaffarDev commented Nov 17, 2023

adilGhaffarDev commented Nov 17, 2023

furkatgofurov7 Nov 17, 2023 • edited Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

adilGhaffarDev commented Nov 17, 2023

adilGhaffarDev commented Nov 17, 2023

furkatgofurov7 commented Nov 17, 2023

adilGhaffarDev commented Nov 19, 2023

adilGhaffarDev commented Nov 20, 2023

chrischdi Nov 20, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

fabriziopandini commented Nov 20, 2023

adilGhaffarDev commented Nov 20, 2023

sbueringer commented Nov 20, 2023 • edited Loading

chrischdi commented Nov 20, 2023

adilGhaffarDev commented Nov 27, 2023

adilGhaffarDev commented Jan 15, 2024

sbueringer commented Jan 15, 2024

k8s-ci-robot commented Jan 15, 2024

adilGhaffarDev commented Nov 16, 2023 •

edited

Loading

furkatgofurov7 Nov 17, 2023 •

edited

Loading

sbueringer commented Nov 20, 2023 •

edited

Loading