Suppress error: cast from pointer to integer of different size

[petervdonovan]

Closes #447.

Summary: I reviewed the pqueue_tag code that Edward and Byeong-gil worked on, and I determined that it was safe because I think that in practice, there are essentially no important platforms on which it will not work properly to cast a void pointer to an unsigned long long and back. This is because an unsigned long long is always at least 64 bits, and pointers in the real world are never larger than 64 bits.

Therefore, I decided to suppress the error using an intermediate cast to uintptr_t.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Bug Fixes
  • Resolved priority calculation issues in the queue by adjusting type casting for consistent handling of elements.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@petervdonovan has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 44 minutes and 51 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6c51f7d and 7640822.

Walkthrough

The changes in pqueue_tag.c involve modifying how elements and priorities are cast to uintptr_t before converting them to pqueue_pri_t or accessing their tag field. These adjustments aim to fix build errors on 32-bit systems.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
core/utils/pqueue_tag.c	Updated pqueue_tag_get_priority to cast element to uintptr_t first before pqueue_pri_t conversion. Adjusted pqueue_tag_compare to cast priorities to uintptr_t before accessing the tag field.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective (Issue #)	Addressed	Explanation
Fix build errors on 32-bit systems (#447)	✅

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 2

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 587a8f9 and 6c51f7d.

Files selected for processing (1)

• core/utils/pqueue_tag.c (3 hunks)

[petervdonovan]

Closing in favor of #450

[edwardalee]

I am reopening this because a Zephyr test failure #450 on a 32-bit platform indicates that this solution may be better.

[edwardalee]

I think this solution is better than #450, which fails on a 32-bit Zephyr test.