You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
@lgeistlinger , thank-you for the update! (esp. import).
# I used apeglm for the res:
res <- lfcShrink(dds, coef="FM_1_vs_0", type="apeglm")
se <- import(dds, res, from = "DESeq2")
Error in .importFromDESeq2(obj, res) :
all(rnames %in% colnames(res)) is not TRUE
colnames(res)
[1] "baseMean" "log2FoldChange" "lfcSE"
[4] "pvalue" "padj"
# repeated without "apeglm"
res <- results(dds)
se <- import(dds, res, from = "DESeq2")
Error in .importFromDESeq2(obj, res) :
Supported experimental designs include binary group comparisons
with an optional blocking variable for paired samples / sample batches
design(dds)
~ age + batch + condition
I have 4 questions for you:
Is LFC shrinkage needed / recommended with EnrichmentBrowser?
I have to use age (scaled, continuous) and batch (binary) as covariates to analyze for my condition of interest (binary)? How can I use this information with EnrichmentBrowser to avoid any false positives?
To circumvent covariate problem, I was thinking of using ranked gene list with pi scores res$pi <- res$log2FoldChange*(-log(res$pvalue)), can I do this for downstream topology-based methods in EnrichmentBrowser, if yes, how?
Could you suggest a better way to rank / score genes? I am not sure how should the tie broken in case of non-unique scores.
@lgeistlinger , thank-you for the update! (esp. import).
I have 4 questions for you:
Is LFC shrinkage needed / recommended with EnrichmentBrowser?
I have to use age (scaled, continuous) and batch (binary) as covariates to analyze for my condition of interest (binary)? How can I use this information with EnrichmentBrowser to avoid any false positives?
To circumvent covariate problem, I was thinking of using ranked gene list with pi scores
res$pi <- res$log2FoldChange*(-log(res$pvalue))
, can I do this for downstream topology-based methods in EnrichmentBrowser, if yes, how?Could you suggest a better way to rank / score genes? I am not sure how should the tie broken in case of non-unique scores.
Originally posted by @vivek-verma202 in #23 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: