Upgrade protobuf to v3.25.5. #44
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Earlier versions are impacted by `CVE-2024-7254`. Even though we don't use groups or nested fields and mostly are not impacted directly. We upgrade nonetheless to ensure safe use in case on unknown fields.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Copilot reviewed 28 out of 29 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.
Files not reviewed (1)
- java/app/build.gradle: Language not supported
jkczyz
approved these changes
Dec 13, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Earlier versions are impacted by
CVE-2024-7254. Even though we don't use groups or nested fields and mostly are not impacted directly. We upgrade nonetheless to ensure safe use in case of unknown fields.Acc. to
3.25.5 is one of the recommended versions.
Prost in rust is not impacted as far as we know: rustsec/advisory-db#2169 (comment)